From 2014-2016, the National Networks of Libraries of Medicine, MidContinental Region ran the Mobile App Experience Project. This program provided funds for health science librarians to purchase apps via iTunes or Google Play. In exchange, participants were asked to thoroughly evaluate each app and share their experience in using them with the library community. Evaluators were equipped with an App Evaluation Report Form (AERF) to help develop a systematic and critical evaluation of mobile apps. The AERF guided the users to report on an app's: authority of information sources; accuracy and objectivity; currency of information; organization and usability; and purpose. After completing the project, participants were asked to respond to a brief questionnaire about their experience.
This presentation will provide an overview of the project, its challenges and successes, and suggestions for how you can establish a similar program in your college or university.
Reviewing Apps: Taking Evaluation Skills Outside of the Library
1. REVIEWING APPS:
TAKING EVALUATION
SKILLS BEYOND THE
LIBRARY
Alicia Lillich
Kansas Outreach and Technology Coordinator
A.R. Dykes Library
University of Kansas Medical Center
3. NATIONAL NETWORK OF
LIBRARIES OF MEDICINE (NNLM)
NNLM, formerly Regional Medical Library Program
Established in the Medical Library Assistance Act (1965)
Mission
Provide health professionals and the general public with equal access to
biomedical information
Coordinated by the National Library of Medicine
8 Regional Offices
Support Network members to achieve NNLM mission
5-year grants
4. NNLM MIDCONTINENTAL REGION
(MCR)
6 State Region
Based out of the University of Utah
Free Membership
Mostly Academic Health Sciences and Hospital Libraries
Provide support in: education, community engagement,
advocacy, technology, and evaluation
6. PURPOSE
Provide funds for librarians to purchase apps
Evaluate and share with the community
Librarians benefit from the experience
Improve Confidence
10. PARTICIPANTS
Year One 13
Library Type
Hospital 6
Academic 7
Card Type
iTunes 10
Google Play 3
State
Colorado 3
Kansas 3
Missouri 2
Nebraska 3
Utah 1
Wyoming 1
Year Two 19
Library Type
Hospital 5
Academic 14
Card Type
iTunes 15
Google Play 4
State
Colorado 3
Kansas 2
Missouri 7
Nebraska 4
Utah 2
Wyoming 1
11. COST AND CARDS DISTRIBUTED
Year 1
Distributed $650 = 13 x $50
10 iTunes
3 Google Play
Year 2
Year 2: $950 = 19 x $50
15 iTunes
4 Google Play
19. APPS EVALUATED
Excellent
1Password
AnkiMobile
BioStat Decision Tool
CalenMob Pro for Google Calendar
Clear
Clinical Pattern Recognition: Knee Pain
Concussion Assessment & Response: Sport Version
Dexteria - Fine Motor Skills Development
Duet Display
Explain Everything
Family Medicine Study Guide
Family Practice Notebook
FRAX:WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool
GoodReader
IFTTT
iMoodJournal
Infectious Disease Compendium: A Persiflager's
Guide
iThoughts
Kidometer
Kidometer
KidsDoc
Medrills: Pediatric considerations
Micromedex Drug Reference Essentials
MindNode
Muscle Trigger Points by Real Bodywork
NCLEX-RN Alt-format
Patient Education Bundle
Patient Education Bundle-Spine
patient education bundle; Heart
Patient Education Bundle: Heart, Ortho and Spine
PDF Expert 5
Pocket Anatomy
Pocket Heart, version 2.3
Prognosis: Your Diagnosis
Research Methods for Library and Information
Science Professionals - Book by Martin Frické
Spine Pro III
SplashID
Stop Breathe & Think
The Mindfulness App
Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE): Colour
Doppler
Visible Body Atlas
Very Good
ABCs of Medical Management of Stones
ArchieMD 3D Health Essentials
Buddhify
Byword
CBT Keeper
Diagnosaurus DDX
Differential diagnosis pocket. Also referred to as
DDX Pocket
Drawboard PDF
Encyclopedia of Alternative Medicine
English<>Spanish Medical
Evernote
Feed Baby
Flashcards Deluxe
GoScholar
ICU Rounds
iGeriatrics
igeriatrics
Infectious Disease Compendium: A Persiflager's
Guide
Interfaith Care for the Ill
JKZ Series2 and JKZ Series3 (Mindfulness Apps by Jon
Kabat-Zinn)
Journal Club for Android
Lab Values Pro
Lab Values Pro 3 in 1 Medical Reference
LastPass Password Mgr Premium
MD on Call
MedCalc - The Professional Medical Calculator
Medical Microbiology Pronunciations
Medical Spanish: Healthcare Phrasebook with Audio
Mediquations
Mediquations Medical Calculator
Memeo Connect Reader for ipad
MRSA eGuideline
My Wonderful Days: Daily Journal/Diary
NCLEX-RN Exam Prep 2015
Noteshelf
Nurse Tabs Complete
OnExam
Pediatric Quiz Game
Physical Exam Essentials
Pill Monitor – Medication Reminders and Logs
Prioritize Me
Prizmo Scanning & OCR app
Psych On Demand
PubMed on Tap
RH Medical Labs
SoundNote
The Mindfulness App
Todo
Fairly/Mildly Good
AHIMA Pocket Glossary
Animated Pocket Dictionary of Allergy
Dara Torres Health & Fitness
Fooducate
GoodReader
Instant Anatomy Flash Cards
Journal Club for Android
LabGear 3.0
Large Print Message Composer
Lippincott's NCLEX-RN
Marvin
Medical Abbreviations
Medical Doctor: Reference Tool
Medical Microbiology
Medical Term Pronunciation
Medical Terms Abbreviation
MobileDDx
mySymptoms
NCLEX-RN Practice Test & Questions
Osteopathic Medicine pocketcards By Börm
Bruckmeier Publishing LLC
Outliner
Pain Therapy
palmEM
Pediatric Blue Book
Polaris Office5
PSA (Psychological Symptoms Analyzer)
RN Cheat Sheet
Shelby's Quest
Shelved
SportsMed
TalkBoard
Ultimeyes
Not Good
Everyday First Aid
Instant Blood Pressure
Nursing History
T'ai Chi for Life
20. APP COSTS
Year 1
Total Spent: $305
Average Cost: $6.63
Highest App Cost: $24
Lowest App Cost: Free
Leftover Funds: $345
Year 2
Total Spent: $625
Average Cost: $8.22
Highest App Cost: $45
Lowest App Cost: Free
Leftover Funds: $325
24. 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
A B C D E F G
Quality Grading of Evaluations Evaluations were down-
graded for:
Blank Responses
Using “Information Not Available”
response
Range A (0 deductions) to G
(6 deductions)
QUALITY OF EVALUATIONS
25. SELF-EVALUATION
11%
22%
31%
5%
5%58%
47%
54%
26%
26%
15%
Y2: My involvement in
this project benefited
or enhanced
my professional
development.
Y2: I now feel more
confident in
my ability to
evaluate mobile
apps.
Y1: Participating in this
project benefited my
program. Strongl
y
Agree
Agree Neither
Disagr
ee
No
Response
Positiv
ely
Very
Positiv
ely
30. CHALLENGES
Conservative on spending
Managing participants
Meeting deadlines
Quality of evaluations
Evaluation form problems
Too comprehensive
Confusion between fairly/mildly good rating
31. PARTICIPANT COMMENTS
“I found the evaluation form for this project hard to fill out”
“Sometimes it was difficult to decide which app to test drive.
Lots of information on free apps, but how do you find apps with
a fee that are appropriate?”
34. ANY QUESTIONS?
This project has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the Department of Health and Human Services, National
Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, under cooperative agreement number UG4LM012344 with the University of Utah
Editor's Notes
The National Network of Libraries of Medicine, MidContinental Region (NN/LM MCR) which serves MO, KS, NE, CO, UT, and WY is based out of the University of Utah, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library in Salt Lake City. Each state has a dedicated outreach coordinator. I work out of the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City. Together, we are the arms and legs of NLM within our 6 state region and are charged with providing training on the resources available from NLM to health professionals, researchers, educators and the general public. Our task is to provide training on the various resources from the National Library of Medicine to professionals who work in organizations that provide health outreach. Membership is free to anyone who provides health information – but the majority of members are academic health science and hospital libraries.
I split my time between outreach for the state and technology coordination. As technology coordinator, we run projects and provide support for ways to use technology to improve access to health information.
The idea came from a previous project where librarians and community health providers were given iPads. We discovered that they were not purchasing apps, only using free ones and also having a hard time evaluating whether an app was useful. The cost of apps and difficulty in evaluating them appeared to be a barrier for providing health info.
This project took place over 2 years (with 2 cohorts). Y1 was run by my colleague, John Bramble and I took over in Y2 and handled the evaluation.
We know online reviews are not the best, so it’s hard to make that call whether to download an app.
The app evaluation criteria we are using for this project is a modified version of the app evaluation worksheet developed by faculty at the Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library for a Topics in Pediatrics course. This worksheet was used by medical students to evaluate health apps used during pediatrics rotations and demonstrate their usefulness. My predecessor, Rachel Vukas, modified this form to make it more appropriate for librarians.
122 total apps were reviewed
Based on self-reported data
Info not available on questions like when was the app updated and are there ads.
Several participants added mobile app reviews to their websites or LibGuides and started app review clubs with other librarians, faculty, and providers.