This document provides a competitive analysis of the observability market by:
1) Defining observability and outlining the fragmented landscape across applications, infrastructure, and network monitoring vendors.
2) Categorizing competitors as tier 1, 2, or 3 priorities and analyzing data points and Cisco's field perspective.
3) Assessing that while the term "observability" is marketed broadly, competitors differ in their ability to provide full-stack observability and insights beyond siloed monitoring. Legacy vendors are transforming to cloud offerings, and acquisitions are expanding solutions.
1. For internal use only. Not for external use or consumption.
Gavin Lloyd
Hybrid Cloud and Observability Analyst CI
Aug 2021
DC & Hybrid Cloud, Observability
Competitive Analysis
* https://thenewstack.io/monitoring-vs-observability-whats-the-difference/ - this article give a very good but simple view of the difference between monitoring and observability
Compete on observability “not the same problem statement as visibility” “old school monitoring” <- frame competitors as legacy
“seeing isn’t the same thing as understanding” using AI/ML to bring the value of cross-platform integrations together
“need infused AI across agile platforms” joke soundbyte notorious X.X.X “more tools more problems”
“not a tools conversation, because visibility/monitoring does not = observability and understanding in “real time”
“observe the E2E digital experience whereas a patchwork of monitored events from a disparate patchwork of tools do not
we are the best within siloes, but better together “innovative integrations get to insights”