www.celcis.org
CELCIS Education
Forum
08 Dec 2016
www.celcis.org
Information sharing
in education
www.celcis.org
Two questions for you to consider:
1)In what circumstances do you think
teachers should be informed of a child’s
‘looked after’ status?
2)If a colleague asked you for guidance
on ‘sharing information about looked
after children’, what would you say to
them.
15 minutes of discussion at your tables, with
10 minutes’ group discussion
www.celcis.org
• Data protection and information
sharing are not exclusively technical
issues; getting your practice right
involves professional judgement,
clarity of purpose and
communication skills.
• While these issues aren’t simple,
they certainly aren’t as complicated
as many areas choose to make it.
Some CELCIS reflections on information sharing in education
www.celcis.org
Some CELCIS reflections on information sharing in education
• In the context of child who has become
‘looked after’, their right to privacy and
participation in decisions being taken about
them should be front and centre in your
consideration. But you must also attend to
your (legal) obligations to secure
improvement in their wellbeing.
• This is not carte blanche to share information
about looked after children; however, these
children’s status in the care system is a
strong indicator that their wellbeing is at risk,
and that creates the space for appropriate
and proportionate information sharing.
www.celcis.org
What should we take-away from this?
In considering whether to share information,
consider whether:
a) sharing is necessary to secure some better
outcome for the child (e.g. their protection,
an additional service or support at school,
etc.)
b) that the level of information being shared is
proportionate (no more than necessary)
c) that it’s only shared with the individuals who
need to know (there should never be
speculative information sharing, on the basis
that the person might need to know
something in the future)
www.celcis.org
What should we do?
d) that the sharing of information is recorded
properly in the Child’s Plan,
e) that the consent of the child or young person
is sought – and if that is not possible, or if it
is withheld, the approval of the child’s Lead
Professional, making a judgement about
whether it is in the child’s best interest.
In every case (unless there is a child protection
concern) the child and their carers should be
informed of the decision to share the
information.
www.celcis.org
What should we do?
• Any ‘absolute’ position on information
sharing, at any level, will invariably be wrong.
• Information / data sharing about looked after
children is a highly contextualised aspect of
professional practice, organised within a
legislative framework of principles and
processes. To get it right, organisations will
have to invest in both the physical systems
and infrastructure to make it work, and their
people, ensuring they understand their
obligations and responsibilities.
www.celcis.org
Guidance from SG & ICO
• Adhere to the principles of the Data Protection Act 1998
(these are largely about processing and safe storage)
• Only share information that is necessary, relevant and
proportionate
• Record why information has been requested or shared
• Make the child, young person or family aware of why
information is being shared*
• *Unless there are child protection concerns which mean
this can’t (due to time) or shouldn’t (due to risk) be
sought.

Celcis education forum dec 2016

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
    www.celcis.org Two questions foryou to consider: 1)In what circumstances do you think teachers should be informed of a child’s ‘looked after’ status? 2)If a colleague asked you for guidance on ‘sharing information about looked after children’, what would you say to them. 15 minutes of discussion at your tables, with 10 minutes’ group discussion
  • 4.
    www.celcis.org • Data protectionand information sharing are not exclusively technical issues; getting your practice right involves professional judgement, clarity of purpose and communication skills. • While these issues aren’t simple, they certainly aren’t as complicated as many areas choose to make it. Some CELCIS reflections on information sharing in education
  • 5.
    www.celcis.org Some CELCIS reflectionson information sharing in education • In the context of child who has become ‘looked after’, their right to privacy and participation in decisions being taken about them should be front and centre in your consideration. But you must also attend to your (legal) obligations to secure improvement in their wellbeing. • This is not carte blanche to share information about looked after children; however, these children’s status in the care system is a strong indicator that their wellbeing is at risk, and that creates the space for appropriate and proportionate information sharing.
  • 6.
    www.celcis.org What should wetake-away from this? In considering whether to share information, consider whether: a) sharing is necessary to secure some better outcome for the child (e.g. their protection, an additional service or support at school, etc.) b) that the level of information being shared is proportionate (no more than necessary) c) that it’s only shared with the individuals who need to know (there should never be speculative information sharing, on the basis that the person might need to know something in the future)
  • 7.
    www.celcis.org What should wedo? d) that the sharing of information is recorded properly in the Child’s Plan, e) that the consent of the child or young person is sought – and if that is not possible, or if it is withheld, the approval of the child’s Lead Professional, making a judgement about whether it is in the child’s best interest. In every case (unless there is a child protection concern) the child and their carers should be informed of the decision to share the information.
  • 8.
    www.celcis.org What should wedo? • Any ‘absolute’ position on information sharing, at any level, will invariably be wrong. • Information / data sharing about looked after children is a highly contextualised aspect of professional practice, organised within a legislative framework of principles and processes. To get it right, organisations will have to invest in both the physical systems and infrastructure to make it work, and their people, ensuring they understand their obligations and responsibilities.
  • 9.
    www.celcis.org Guidance from SG& ICO • Adhere to the principles of the Data Protection Act 1998 (these are largely about processing and safe storage) • Only share information that is necessary, relevant and proportionate • Record why information has been requested or shared • Make the child, young person or family aware of why information is being shared* • *Unless there are child protection concerns which mean this can’t (due to time) or shouldn’t (due to risk) be sought.