Gay Marriage Definition Essay

Gay Marriage Definition Essay
some time during elementary school i first heard the word "gay." i had no idea what it meant but people said i would figure it out someday. i quickly
learned to hate the word "gay" before even knowing what it meant because people were always using it as an insult. the night someone finally told me,
i laid in bed wondering why it mattered so much that a boy had a crush on another boy– and why it was so abominable.
but to me now the word gay is synonymous with an apprehensive little boy hiding a gnawing in his heart behind his big round eyes.
"gay" is the ache in your chest as you remember your parents explaining "boys cannot like other boys." it is watching your best friend, and first crush,
slow dancing with his date at the eighth grade formal, fearing...show more content...
the beauty and strength of not only loving another guy for the first time, but also of breaking the surface of drowning words and finally being able to
breathe again.
"gay" is being the person you were meant to be. it is flawless, and it is unapologetic.
but others haven't been so lucky in instances where rumors of "gays" and "fa**ots" were met by acid words and clenched up fists. bigots beat them
every color of the rainbow. homophobes turned the color blue into black and orange into red, painting the skin of their victims and staining their own
hands. nothing could ever make these colors go away. victims took matters into their own hands and the news titled them as yet another rainbow suicide.
so i have this dream where none of the love poems that gay people write have to say, "i'm so glad we're
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Gay Marriage Equality
Of the many societal customs engrained in humanity, marriage may be one of the most prevalent. For most of history, man and woman have displayed
their capacity for affection through this formality; and, for most of history, marriage has been limited to only man and woman. Like marriage, however,
homosexuality too has existed for thousands of years. One could even argue that it is simply a part of human nature. Nonetheless, those who identify as
anything but heterosexual have been persecuted for hundreds of years. In the United States of America, gay marriage has been legal since 2015 –– and
although legal, the opposition persists to this day through politicians and religious groups. For example, while the Constitution of the United States
...show more content...
Much of the argument lies in the Holy Bible, which is a book written nearly 3500 years ago. While the book does state that man shall not lay with
man, it also provides the reader with a plethora of other suggestions. It even discusses the logistics of buying and selling slaves. With that in mind, a
large portion of the Bible cannot be taken literally, but instead read for the overall message of the book–– which undoubtedly revolves more so around
the themes love and acceptance, rather than discrimination on a basis of sexual identity. This is a concept humanity has failed to grasp for
thousands of years, and thus the fight against gay rights continues to this day. When arguing for the sake of equality, however, one must raise the
question: if Jesus Christ were alive today, what would he say about gay marriage? Would he use words like "faggot," or "dike,"? Or would he walk
with them, as he did with the outcasts and lepers of his time? Religious scholars have yet to debate questions such as these, and for good reason. Jesus
was more concerned with love than discrimination; to deny that would raise questions of literacy and comprehension. To examine love as a concept,
however, is a crucial step in understanding marriage

Gay Marriage Thesis
Gay marriage is a very controversial issue that has emerged in our society. Depending on your upbringing and your mentality, individuals have formed
their own personal opinions and have taken sides, either to support or to oppose the issue. Gay marriage throughout the years has sparked so much
controversy that it was brought to the United States Supreme Court, which is known to be the highest court of all the land. It is up to the justices of the
court to determine how states and society view and treat gay marriage. Whether it being legalized throughout the country or only in certain states, it is,
now legalized and recognized as a legitimate marriage in certain state. However, although it is recognized and states legalized gay marriage, the...show
more content...
After hearing the case three issues that were needed to be addressed was if same–sex marriage a right for individuals to marry in each state, does the
states have to grant marriage licenses to same–sex couples, and lastly must states recognize same–sex marriage licenses in other jurisdictions? The
courts concluded and favored the plaintiffs, the ruling of the case was 5–4 and the majority opinion was written by Justice Kennedy. Basically the
judges in the majority believe that the fourteenth amendment is responsible and is required to allow same–sex marriages have the right to marry in all
states that states must issue marriage licenses to those of same–sex, and lastly the license must be recognized throughout all states. As you see an
example of the some of the justices siding with the plaintiffs, however there is another side that opposes the legalization of gay marriage. In the
Supreme Court justices of the courts are allowed to issue and write opinions on cases whether to favoring or arguing against a case's ruling. In the
case of Obergefell vs.Hodges, Scalia wrote a dissenting opinion that can be considered

Gay Marriage
They are no longer a small population, but a booming revolution. These groups do not hide themselves in burrows, but flamboyantly celebrate their
identities. The gays are now a people willing and ready to be heard. It has come to all of our attentions that in the light of marriage they have been
depraved and deceived. Homosexuals cannot allow this persecution to continue, as they are constantly forfeited equal rights. The arguments are of
lifestyle differences and the legalized discrimination of these people. It encompasses same–sex marriage as a cause worth fighting and defending so
that we all may be, "one Nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all."
Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays. Almost everyone...show more content...
The distinctions between these two forms of partnerships are unlawful to the loving and legitimate gay relationships. They as a group are cheated
out of such as filing joint taxes and joint ownership of property. These allowances in reality, help foster and maintain steady relationships.
Homosexual partnerships are even at times denied to make decisive medical decisions. He, or she, in their partner's time of need, may not be
permitted to visit on account that they are neither a spouse nor close family member, access to a spouse's medical records, disability insurance, or
benefits under a pension plan. They are outwardly excluded these rights that are essential in difficult times. The New Jersey Law Journal certifies these
claims as curbed privileges for heterosexual marriages. All this in collaboration have an extremely negative effect on gay couples whose only wish is
to be equal with their heterosexual counterparts.
Another argument towards anti–gay marriages is that homosexual relationships are not biologically natural. Same–sex couples cannot naturally produce
children through their union. If procreation is the problem of gay marriages, and a necessary purpose of marriage, then to be consistent, States would
also have to prohibit marriages in which one or both partners are sterile or impotent. This would mean postmenopausal women as well, would not be
allowed to marry. This would definitely be unacceptable to many

Gay Marriage Thesis
Gay Marriage
In the years prior to the nineteenth century society and the church has shunned sexual depravity between two people of the same sex. Homosexuals
were condemned for their sexual preferences and were found in violation of the law. Severe punishment for these crimes was banishment from society
by exiling or loss of life by hanging. The judicial system, church, and society firmly considered sexual activity was limited only to those in a union of
marriage between a man and a woman. In the twentieth century, society has become more open minded with the understanding of the identities of
homosexuals. Today's society has labeled a homosexual as "gay". The public has become more aware of gays living with their life...show more content...
The debate over whether homosexual couples should be allowed legally "marry" isn't about rights , equality or discrimination.It imposes it's acceptance
on all society , it's the cutting edge of the of the sexual revolution.The problem bedeviling society over the last forty years is more than having been
asked to tolerate and accept modes of conduct heretofore outside the respectable pale. It is that those engaged in those activities demand that society
redefine its institutions and overturn cherished and wise traditions in order not only to accommodate but also affirm as equally legitimate and desirable
such activities."Marriage is a contract, as with all contracts there are elements that define them.Super impose on those committing to the
marriage.(pastebin.com)Certainly prejudice against homosexuals isn't at the root of others who is wishing to preserve the integrity of marriage.One of
the inherent, fundamental interests of government is to perpetuate the society it governs, and try to provide the next generation with stable homes,
preferably with a mother and father. We officially sanction marriage for the sake of society, more so than for the sake of married couples. Same
–sex
and opposite–sex couples simply do not fulfill the same role in our society. We are under no obligation, through our laws, to pretend otherwise. That
would be

Why Gay Marriage Should Be Legal
There are more than eight million people in the United States that are in the LGBT, which stands for (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender)
community. All of those people want to marry who they want and have the same rights as anyone else. Gay marriage rights should be legal because it
will make LGBT families more stable, create a non–discriminated society, and more children could be adopted.
The first reason it should be legal is that it will make LGBT families more stable. Children raised by same–sex parents had fewer social problems than
heterosexual raised children. This proves that same–sex parents are just as capable as heterosexual parents. Same–sex families are usually made by
either adoption or surrogacy. It ends up costing tons of money, but to them it is worth it. For them to take a child who has no one to care for them is
amazing....show more content...
Eventually it will bring down the high rate of hatred in the world. Gay marriage rights could change how people look and treat one another. We hope
that one–day no one will judge one another based on their religion, race, or even life choices. The LGBT community is discriminated against every
day for just being themselves. All people should be able to express themselves however they want without judgment. The last reason gay marriage
rights will change is letting more kids be adopted into loving homes. Many children do not get adopted for, there are not enough people in the world
to care for them. A while ago, states kept gay men and women from adopting and fostering children. Even now many states still keep children away
from same–sex couples, and continue to say they must be married to adopt or foster children. It is unfair to withhold children from loving families
who can take care of them. The United States has 115,000 children that are waiting to be adopted and

Equality for All: Gay Marriage Essay
Throughout time, many have fought for the rights they believed they deserved and those guaranteed by the constitution. With each of these battles,
those seen as "below the majority" were usually victorious. With that said, there is an inevitable future for the homosexual community to be eventually
equal to everyone else. The question remains, what justifies the right for a gay couple to have the same benefits as a heterosexual couple? Gay marriage
has been a wide spread issue for quite a bit of time and multiple arguments have been made as to why it should not occur, but none of them stand valid
against rights provided by the constitution. Many individuals are quite passionate about the issue whether it is in hopes to get a law passed...show more
content...
Gay rights have been in discussion since the beginning of time, but have recently become more popularized in the mid twentieth century (Garnett,
Richard W., Michael J Pery, and Marc O. DeGirolami). At first, the topic of how it is a sin for two people of the same gender to interact in a sexual
and/or romantic manner was only within religion. As time progressed, organizations for gay rights began to appear and with that, both sides
started to make their arguments more public. The two groups involved would be those who engage in any sort of romantic or sexual relationship
with another person of the same gender is regarded as homosexual (gay is typically used for guys and lesbian for girls) and those who have
romantic or sexual relationships with someone of the opposite gender which are referred to as being heterosexual. The fight is not necessarily
between those who are homosexual and those who are heterosexual, but between those who are homosexual and their supporters against those who
are against it. The debate mainly surrounds whether or not gay couples should get the privilege to marry and if they should have the same marital
benefits given to heterosexual couples. Typically, religious Catholics view homosexual relations as a sin and therefore oppose the legalization of gay
marriage. Although it goes against their beliefs, if gay couples are able to wed it would not crucially influence their lives. If gay marriage were not
legal, it would

Pro Gay Marriage Essay
Imagine if you couldn't marry the person who you were in love and wanted to spend the rest of your life with because it was seen morally, socially
and religiously wrong. For millions of people all around the world that's the harsh reality. Times are changing in the world that we live in today
however discrimination against gay and lesbian couples is still a frequent issue with only 13 countries that fully legalise and recognise gay marriage
with full equality. The most common argument for people being against gay marriage is that it's "not natural" for two people of the same sex to have
a marriage. Opponents of gay marriage make out that the natural world that we live in created marriage however this is wrong as us the humans did.
How...show more content...
Everybody has the right to live the life they want to and by restricting the freedom of people who want to be married to someone who's the same sex
is out of order. A topic that opponents of gay marriage find very controversial and seen as morally wrong is gay or lesbians wanting to have children.
Opponents are said to think that gay married couples who want to have children will "harm the children". They argue that that children need both a
mum and dad to succeed in life. Despite this, several studies have shown that there's no difference between a child's well–being from being raised by an
opposite sex couple compared to a child whose been raised by a same sex couple. I find opponents that argue that same sex couples shouldn't be
allowed to have children extremely frustrating. When people get married the next step for most couples is to start a family however this is seen as
a controversial concept for same sex couples to do. Why shouldn't everybody be giving the right to have children and raise them into the world being
the best parent they can be protecting and nurturing them? I also find it very baffling when opponents against same sex couples having children think
that same sex couples aren't as good of people to be a parent to a child compared to a same sex couple. Just because you're not straight doesn't not
mean that you're a bad person in anyway and that

Same Sex Marriage
Gay Couples Should Have the Same Rights As Married Couples
Professor
PHI 210
June 6, 2013
Same–sex marriage is a topic that has become increasingly more debatable throughout time. America has been said to be the "land of the free," but
when it comes to homosexual couples, it is far from that. If same–sex marriage was legalized, many positive outcomes could emerge from it; the
society would be closer to equality, adoption would increase, gained social support for families would develop, and it would positively affect the
economy and tax revenues. In 1993, the first national debate was made in regards to same–sex marriage, which occurred in Hawaii. According to the
National Conference of State Legislature (2013), Hawaii...show more content...
The second statement implies that individuals become who they are exposed to, which is a hasty generalization and there is no evidence to back that
statement. Janice Langbehn was able to bring the importance of same sex couple benefits to the public eye. Janice Langbehn was denied access to visit
her dying partner in the hospital. Thereafter, President Obama apologized to Janice and informed her of the Presidential Memorandum that was
previously signed, which is the extension of benefits to same–sex domestic partners. With that being said, same sex couples should be issued the same
benefits as heterosexual couples.
Same sex couples can also produce financial gain for both local and state governments because of the generation of tax revenue. This allows the
economy to benefit from the legalization of same–sex marriage. According to Jerome Nathaniel (2012), since same–sex marriages were legalized in
New York, anywhere from 7,200 to 8,200 gay couples have gotten married in the city; the marriages have brokered in 200,000 out–of–towners, $259
million in economic activity and $16 million in taxes. Even though same–sex marriage should be an equal right, the impact same–sex marriage will
make on the economy is significant, which is more than enough reason to legalize it.
I was able to conduct a survey in attempt to get into the

Essay on Gay marriage
Critical Review – Gay Marriage "Unnatural" Sheldon L, 1996, Gay Marriage "Unnatural", USA Today, USA. Homosexual marriage is one of the
old but controversial issues around the world. Compared to the past, it seems to become a more open debate among people. At the same time, people
seem to be more swayable than before, but towards the gay marriage, different voices have still been hovering in the air. Gay people and their
supporters have been striving for their rights to get married legally, while others who against gay marriage have never stopped deterring it. Strongly
against gay marriage is the central theme of Louis P. Sheldon's article Gay Marriage "Unnatural". According to the author's views, gay marriage is
'unnatural', and...show more content...
The numbers he presented seem attractive and persuasive, but it is worth noting that no source has been provided for them, so readers do not know
how trustworthy they are. In my view, it would be more convincing for example to try referencing the data in his claims like the quoted above as well
as the gay people's average income is twice higher than that of non–gay people in America, and his figures will not be questioned. The author of this
article can therefore be criticised here for a lack of citation of sources to back up his views. Another questionable aspect of this article is its hidden
premises. Although the author does not openly state that the marriage should be generational, otherwise they should get divorce, this could be
understood from the authors's statement that gay marriage is "not generational". While marriage is not only about generating offspring but also
means love. It is an insulting claim for the couples who in love but unfortunately could not have children might because fertility problems, health
issues, over age, their chosen life style of Dink family, so do they have to separate with each other just because of that? Is it really the essence of
marriage? I do not think so. In my view, whether to have kids or not in couples' marriage lives, it is a matter that couples, including gay couples need
to consider and judge not by other irrelevant people, and it should not be an excuse to despoil

Gay Marriage Essay
Gay Marriage
There seem to be Specific time in history where certain issues define the culture tension in a society. They become representative of large worldview
and clearly emphasize the battle between divergent moral and spiritual perspectives. Homosexual marriage in the United States is one of these issues.
In the past five years, there have been various threats and debates about the possibility of legalizing homosexual union. The issue took centre stage in
February largely. The U.S Senate quashes a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gays from marrying.President Bush and other same–sex
marriage opponents say they will try again. Most of Americans are against same–sex marriage because how the nation would change if gay were...show
more content...
The budget study for the possible impact of same sex marriage that the office crunched numbers from census figures and other reports to estimate
income taxes, Social Security, health care benefits and other federal programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, and food stamps. The government would
pay more benefits in areas such as social security.
Third, gay marriage is against "Religious Speech". Some religious leaders think it could become more difficult legally to lecture against homosexuality
if the nation were to support same sex marriage as a fundamental right. The argument has spread, reaching Christian television shows and church
pulpits. Major religious organizations have issued warnings, including concerned women for America, focus on the family and the liberty counsel, and
Orlando based group that has become a national leader in the fight against same– sex marriage. "A woman who married her lesbian partner in
Massachusetts was banned from teaching in the church of Christ, Scientist after she refused to "repent" for her actions." A church letter sent to
Kathleen Clement son said she had abused her role as a teacher and could teach spiritual healing again only if she repented and served a three– years
probation. "I don't feel I have anything to repent for more than

Should Gay Marriage Be Legalized Essay
Legalization of gay marriage has been a major controversial topic for a long time. Although, many people do not know what it means to be
homosexual, most people do not know the actual definition of homosexuality and they do not know how difficult it is to be gay in this society.
There are many reasons why people are against gay marriage and homosexuals all together. Most of the reasons are based on religious bias another
big reason is being afraid of the unknown. Some smaller reasons are that being heterosexual is such a social norm now a day's people are not used to
the change. Also parents often time tell kids that homosexuality is not a good thing because of there own views. Gay marriage should be legalized
because most of the people...show more content...
Back in 1985 gay rights were very strict they could not serve openly in the military, have sex without having the risk of being arrested, be protected
under hate crime legislation, get married, be protected as a transgendered child, visit the same sex spouse in the hospital, come out as a celebrity
and not have backlash, and identify as a transgender without being classified as having a mental disorder. These laws were in place 28 years ago
and some of them have not changed; such as, be safe from being fired, get married, be parents in many states, serve the military as transgendered,
and be served by every business. These are many of the hardships of being a part of the LGBT society. There are many reasons for things being the
way they are still today.
Some of the reasons why people have such a hard time in accepting gay marriage have to do with, religion, accepting change, having parents tell
you that it's not right. Most people know that religion has a lot to do with why people do not like gay marriage or gays in general. Each religion has
there own opinion on the matter, Christianity can go both ways; it was traditionally considered a sin but other denominations have reconsidered or are
in the process of changing. In the bible it does not specifically say anything about gay marriage. Judaism has three types of people who practice their
religion and they

One of the most controversial issues around today is gay marriages. Many believe that the media is primly responsible for the idea of same–sex
marriages, but when it all comes down to it there are really only two sides; those who support gay marriages, and those who oppose them. Two authors
write their opinions on their opposite views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports same–sex marriages and believes marriage to be a universal right, not
just restricted to heterosexuals. Contrary to Sullivan, Bennett (2002) believes that marriage is a sacred traditional family value that should be set aside
for heterosexual couples. (2002)Throughout this essay, I will summarize both authors' ideas and evaluate them through their evidence and...show more
content...
Bennett's article is a response to Sullivan's and states that gay marriages should not be allowed. Bennett (2002) believes that marriage is done in the
sight of God and thus should be treated with high regards and also believes gay marriages to be corrupting today's society. He believes that,
"...marriage is not an arbitrary construct which can be redefined simply by those who and human realities. It is an honorable estate, instituted of God
and built on moral, religious, sexual and human realities."(2002:30) He goes on to explain how America's most important institutions such as
neighborhoods and schools are fine just the way they are without gay marriages. (2002:30)
Though Sullivan and Bennett both make strong points for their cases against each other, they have many similar aspects to their articles. Both articles
make similar evidentiary assertions by adding religion in to their discussions. Sullivan fights that in America there is a separation between church and
state and therefore, church should not be added in to a discussion about same–sex marriages. (Sullivan 2002:26) Bennett (2002) makes different
comments about this issue. Bennett (2002) believes that gay marriages are an insult to religion and thus should not be allowed in to America's proper
institutions like church. (Bennett 2002:30)
Sullivan (2002) and Bennett (2002) both use religious assertions to explain their views on same–sex marriages. Sullivan (2002) says that

Gay Marriage And The Constitution Essay
Gay Marriage and the Constitution
Amberlee Ozment
Axia College of University of Phoenix
Gay Marriage and the Constitution Is it okay to not believe in gay marriage, yet at the same time support the constitutional rights of life, liberty and
pursuit of happiness for homosexual couples? Even though most churches' beliefs conflict with marrying same–sex partners, government should not
deny a person's right to their happiness; because any person, no matter race, color, sex, religion or sexual orientation, should be allowed to exercise
their constitutional rights as Americans to pursue their happiness; and married gay couples should be able to have a spectrum of rights and benefits if
their gay partnership is legalized.
Equal...show more content...
How long must gays fight for equal rights that they were given at birth as a legal citizen of America? If gay marriage is legalized, this would mean a
restructuring for employers.
Benefits and Rights
If gay marriage is legalized, employers would therefore be affected. Affected in the way that benefits available to married heterosexuals will then be
the same for married gay couples. In the event of legalizing gay marriage, same–sex married couples will be given a range of benefits that include
employee benefits, inheritance and real estate rights, child custody, emergency health care procedures and tax laws. (Kuiow, Spring 2001) There are
some employers that currently give domestic partners benefits, at their discretion. However, because there is not a final document of proof that a gay
couple is indeed domestic partners, it makes it difficult for employers and others to determine what constitutes as a gay partnership. How does one go
about in proving that they do in fact have a spousal equivalent in a same–sex relationship, rather than just a roommate? Granting gays the right to
marriage or the equivalent of being married without the Church being involved would open up numerous solutions and put the gray areas of gay
relationships to rest.
Resolution

As the numbers of gay couples have risen exuberantly in the last two decades, they no doubt

The Legal Issues Of Gay Marriage
Gay marriage is marriage involving two persons of the same sex is a man and a man or a woman and a woman. It can be seen as a phrase that is
used by the Government, social and religious groups to have the recognition of marriage between two persons of the same sex. There is a social
movement, so that people can get their rights and responsibilities in countries like the United States of America. Legal issues involved in this type of
marriage have been made to the procedures of the federal Government in the traditional system, the federal Government had no attempt to have the
meaning of marriage and, therefore, he had the idea that any marriage that was appreciated by the State, has also been known by the federal
Government, even if there was a problem of recognition of such marriages from other States. This means that the State was responsible for the
enforcement of rights that people need so that people can have their partner through the Act. The defense of marriage act and then people quickly find
how issues that had to be met, and that might work and it did only definition that a marriage could be a Union between a man and a woman.
Therefore, there is no company that has the recognition for this same sex as those who had pushed for legalization of sex type. (Justin, 1990)
Those who argue that if people have a relationship then it is not the job of the Government to know about their association and, therefore, should have
their own rights, they, therefore, need to define

Gay Marriage Argumentative Essay
Many people in the United States have been refused the right to marry for many years, especially homosexuals. Gay marriage is important because,
everyone has the right to pursuit of happiness; according to the Decleration of Independence. Homosexuals have been shunned for their lifestyle
choices because of others religious beliefs and morals. After several years of riots and debates, Gay marriage was finally legalized on June 26, 2015.
Same–Sex marriage should remain legal because, it offers many advantages to same–sex marriage such as legal benefits, stability for children, and the
right to equality. To begin, Gay Marriage has many legal benefits like traditional marriage does. There are many perks to being married such as
Taxes, Estate planning, medical benefits and much more. For example, A spouse gets very sick and cannot make decisions for themselves; this means
that their spouse or next of kin makes the desicion for them; but the spouse has no say if unmarried. Financial state can also become a problem if
partners are not...show more content...
In the fourteenth amendment it reads, "...No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States." According to the article written by Kellard, Homosexuals are law obeying, tax–paying citizenz and deserve the same rights and legal
protections as well as all other people of the United States. Some may argue that it is against their religious beliefs, and although that may be true our
country is not founded on religion; and congress must make decisions that better the economy and obey the constitution. Some may put religion first,
but it is only fair to everyone if all citizens have equal

Gay Marriage Should Be Legal Essay
In every time period throughout history and every region of the world there has always been a stigma as to what it means to be a gay man – even if
that is not the language that always would be used to describe homosexual behavior in a given place and time. In the United States, gay marriage has
been legalized in all 50 states by a federal court ruling, but many Americans do not realize that there is still a long way to go in terms of embracing gay
citizens (and the rest of the LGBT community) into the " societal norm." Despite the strides that have been taken to legalize marriage for same sex
couples, there are many states where discrimination is still legal. LGBT people can be denied housing, work, and even service and are also not legally
protected from discrimination in the education system in many states today.
LGBT issues came into the spotlight in San Francisco in the 1970s, as Richard Rodriguez puts it in his essay "Late Victorians," when the private
lives of gays and lesbians where starting to enter to the public sphere (Rodriguez 57). LGBT people, especially gay men, from all over the country
were migrating to blossoming gay neighborhoods in San Francisco like the Castro. This growing phenomenon led to the birth of gay culture and how
we define it today, and assisted in creating an identity for the gay community.
This identity that the gay community was formulating during this time period was largely based on a superficial faГ§ade. Gay men in San Francisco
began

Gay Marriage Argument Paper
"On June the 26, 2015 after many years of debating, gay marriage was made legal according to the US Constitution. This meant that all 50 states
must allow gay marriage, and any previous bans were null and void."(Gay Marriage in the US Supreme Court, 2015. par 1) After this bill passed,
clergy and business owners were expected to perform certain duties that compromised their religious beliefs. Because of this, the First and Fourteenth
Amendment were looked at more closely to determine exactly what rights citizens have. "The First Amendment states that" Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." (About the First Amendment. par 1) In other words, it is illegal to
make people

Legalizing Gay Marriage Essays
Legalizing Gay Marriage
The battle over Gay marriage in the United States reached a fever pitch during the presidential election of 2004. The issue vaulted into prominence
when the Democratic mayor of San Francisco flouted state law and performed marriage ceremonies for Gay couples. Conservatives claim that the issue
catapulted them into power by motivating fundamentalist Christian voters to turnout in order to defeat anti–gay–marriage amendments in eleven states,
including the crucial swing state Ohio. Liberals retort that fundamentalist Christian turnout in 2004 was statistically even to 2000. Regardless of the
truth of that statement, what cannot be denied is the attention the issue of Gay...show more content...
Indeed, "In the modern administrative state, civil marriage condenses within a single document a vast array of legal, financial, and medical rights and
benefits" (Haslett). Proponents of Gay marriage argue that denying these rights based solely on sexuality is akin to the segregation of blacks in the
South. Opponents of Gay marriage also acknowledge the uniqueness and importance of marriage as an institution. It is precisely for this reason that
they oppose allowing homosexuals to join in matrimony. Gay marriage would redefine the institution, leading people to no longer believe that "the
central purpose of marriage is to bind men and women exclusively to each other and to the children that their sexual behavior is apt to produce. It will
communicate instead that marriage was created to gratify grown–ups by reinforcing their committed romantic relationships" (Jacoby). This change in
definition will erode the traditional roles held by men and women in a marriage, according to opponents, and lead society down a slippery slope
towards a point in time where even polygamy could be condoned as a reinforcement of a committed relationship.
The real issue at hand seems to me to be the notion of civil union versus full fledged marriage. If the main reason that Gay couples wish to wed is so
that they can enjoy the legal privileges associated with

Gay Marriage Definition Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Gay Marriage Definition Essay