Religion And Science In The Classroom Essay

Religion and Science in the Classroom Essay
Science, in Albert Einstein's words, "describes what is." "Such a description consists of certain laws of nature, which summarize observed patterns, and
theories" (Peshkin 46). Science and religion are the main components of the ongoing national debate about the teaching of evolution in our public
schools (Peshkin 46).Various religions reject or ignore the contributions of science, arguing that science displaces God, questions religious belief, and
degrades morality (Molloy 547). Others disagree, appreciating science and the important information that has broadened our knowledge by providing
explanations for natural phenomenon, and continuously enriching our lives. In some religions and traditions, science poses ethical questions. Does
...show more content...
If public school teachers want to inform students about creationism, they should do so in a religion class, not a science class.
"Intelligent design or Creationism, as typically viewed on by its American advocates, draws on a literal interpretation of the Judeo–Christian tradition
that the world is no more than 6,000 years old and that all species of life on the planet were created over a period of 6 days by a monotheistic deity"
(Overton 934). In contrast, evolutionary theory maintains that biological life originated by way of a natural selection process over billions of years
(Morris 78).The concept of evolution, since its inception as a scientific theory through publication of Charles Darwin's "Origin of Species" in 1859,
has faced religious opposition (Verma 206). Intelligent Design has been gaining acceptance in the United States. According to a series of polls,
conducted during the last 25 years, about 50% Americans believe in the original form of Creationism (Lewontin, 2005). Former President Bush agreed
to teaching evolution and intelligent design side by side in science classes (Dawkins & Coyne, 2005). A school board in Dover, Pennsylvania voted
against introduction of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in biology classes (Goodstein, 2005). In Kansas the school board accepted
intelligent design as part of the curriculum alongside evolution (Wilgoren,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Science And Religion
Are science and religion related? If so, how are they related? What is the importance of them in human lives? I believe, science and religion are
related to each other. The relationship between them has been debated for several years. Science is linked to the material, while religion is worried
about spirituality (Vikas, 2012). Humans depend on both religion and science not one or the other. In spite of being different from each other, science
and religion are related and linked to each other.
Science is based on observations, experiments, verifications, poofs, and facts while religion is based on the rituals and faith. Both use different ways to
explain and understand the world and what humans represent in the world. On one hand, there...show more content...
For example, most of us describe God as all–knowing and everywhere present. What if there was a finite probability that God could do these stuff and
it is not impossible. What if there is a possibility that God does not break boundaries of science but actually stays within in them. If science tells us
that there is a probability for the unusual activity happening and we are okay with that then we should not be as surprised about god that he can do
such things (Cruz, 2017). However, there is still a probability for that. This example shows that based on the probability, God's such act could be a
possibility. This shows how can these two things could be linked to together to explain phenomena like probability.
In Christian biblical texts, it talks about God created the world out of nothing, God is separate from the world, God created world freely, and many
other things. But, there is nowhere in their literature of Christian religion talks about the age of the earth or specifies a mode of creation. This allows
diverse views within science and religion. Therefore, in the Big Band theory proposed by Geroges LemaГ®tre, seems to give an answer. Based on the
theory, "universe originated from an extremely hot and dense state around 13.8 billion years ago" (Cruz, 2017). This shows that having known the
world was created, lead science to find out how long ago was earth created.
Science

Throughout history, religion and science have been in constant conflict with each other. The arrest and excommunication of astronomer Galileo1 for
teaching that the earth is flat and revolves around the sun is just one example of this conflict. Many religious leaders2 and scientists3 today believe
that science and religion are fundamentally different and will always contradict each other. But with what reason? Religion has always tried to answer
our questions in an instinctual way, based on emotions, morality and scripture. Science, meanwhile, removes all emotion and focuses on facts and
evidence. On the surface they seem to be polar opposites. Angels and Demons by Dan Brown4 is novel about a modern day conflict between the
Catholic Church...show more content...
"Since the beginning of time, spirituality and religion have been called on to fill in the gaps that science did not understand. The rising and
setting of the sun was once attributed to Helios and a flaming chariot. Earthquakes and tidal waves were the wrath of Poseidon" (Brown 25). The
fact that we attempt to explain what we cannot comprehend is absolute evidence that we yearn for knowledge of our creation. But the inherent
problem is that these creation stories are thousands of years old. We will never know who wrote them, or if they have any legitimacy. Despite
these issues, religion has and always will seek the answer to how man was created. The second question that religion seeks to answer is why we
exist. This question actually has an answer, and it is found in scripture. In Mark 16:15, Jesus says, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to
all creation." Many other religions share the same general commission. We are to love others and convert them to our religion, have faith in and love
our deity, and in exchange we receive some sort of afterlife. This is religion's strength. There are clear guidelines and rules for how we should live our
lives and what our ultimate purpose is. What religion lacks in explaining creation, it makes up for in explaining our commission. In Angels and
Demons, Vittoria Vetra explains this well. "Faith is universal. Our specific methods for

Essay on Science and Religion
Humans do not engage the world in a neutral way. Instead, we see world through the reality that our culture creates. Without culture, humanity would
have to continuously reinvent the wheel, perhaps even literally. It casts a web of reality over us that is inescapable. We are constantly in the grip of our
culture. Therefore, it isn't surprising to find societies with cultures which differ greatly from ours who come to very different conclusions about what
reality is. When we are confronted with these differences in world views, we are often quick and confident to assert that our way of life is superior to
others. This is behavior isn't unique to tribes indigenous to foreign lands who believe in so–called "primitive" religions. It...show more content...
Every part of it depends upon the existence of witchcraft, just as their absolute belief in witchcraft depends upon the rest of their cultural framework.
There is a system of self–reinforcement, which causes the belief to go unquestioned, even when the effects are inconsistent with an objective reality.
Evans–Pritchard explains, "Azande do not perceive the contradiction as we perceive it because they have no theoretical interest in the subject, and those
situations in which they express their beliefs in witchcraft do not force the problem upon them."(Evans–Pritchard, 25) Even if one is able to point out
the inconsistent effects of witchcraft, the Azande will not believe it, but in fact will find a way to incorporate inconsistencies into his worldview,
Evans–Pritchard tells us. However, he also points out that, "they did not attempt to account for the existence of phenomena, or even the action of
phenomena, by mystical causation alone"(Evans–Pritchard, 67) and that "They reason excellently within the idiom of their
beliefs"(Evans–Pritchard,XX), and thus are not mentally inferior or irrational. They merely engage the world through a different idiom than the
Westerner. However, if the Azande are blinded by their beliefs in witchcraft, we cannot be sure that we are free from the same sort of cultural blinders.
Just as the Azande are at the mercy of witches, oracles, and sorcerers,

Relationship Between Science And Religion
Science is the study of the natural and physical world through experiments and observations.
Religion, however, makes analytical arguments and shares transcendental beliefs that have been passed on from believers to converts. Religion
acknowledges philosophical explanations; it includes faith and revelation, whereas, science acknowledges reason, empiricism, and evidence, whereas.
The relationship offers a continued debate in both philosophy and theology. This paper will explore the different religious perspectives on science,
and scientific perspectives on topics of a variety of religious groups. This paper will provide general exploration of the relationship between science, and
religion. This paper, along with their oppositions, will include an explanation on how science and religion can strengthen each other to allow a more
nuanced experience of our world and our place in it.
Science and religion and their differences Science and religion are the two most important worldviews. They are global phenomena present throughout
the history of mankind. Science and religion are extremely complex enterprises. Both are in a state of constant change. The birth of modern science
itself cannot be understood without previous scientific developments. Going back to the dawn of science in antiquity, we can already find interactions
with religion. Science is the study of the natural and physical world through experiments and observations; it's about explanation. Religion is about

Argument Between Science and Religion Essay
Why would educated, reasonable people believe in one side of an argument when the majority of the evidence points to the other? The argument
between science and religion began with Charles Darwin publishing Origin of the Species, and since then, is still a conflict, because every individual
questions: Where do people come from? Where does the earth come from? The universe? Not only Charles Darwin, but many scientist who followed
Charles Darwin as a paragon of evolution, found evidence and answers to argue that evolution is the more reasonable theory in the question of: Where
did everything come from? This paper focuses on a traditional Creationist theory as described in the Genesis story of creation in the Hebrew Bible.
Evolution is the...show more content...
But then the next question is: Where did god come from? If that gets considered as an unanswerable question, then save a step and say the origins of
the universe are an unanswered question. Creationist also argue, that god always existed, why not save a step again and consider that the universe
always existed, but then there wouldn't be a need for a creation, it was always there. These are not easy questions. In an evolutionist eyes though, the
universe did not always existed, but was the consequence of an unusual event. The Big Bang.
How could life begin without intelligent interference?
It is possible that through a chemical process life can begin without intelligent interference.
To answer this question requires looking at the primordial earth as it was over 1.7 billion years ago: warm, mostly wet, and with an atmosphere of
different gases like hydrogen, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide. DNA is a chain of just four different types of nuclear tights. Under the condition of
the primordial earth those nuclear tights can form on they own. After they formed the next step is to join together. Researches found that the clay
in the primordial earth was in perfect condition for them to join and so they did. The result was RNA. RNA is able to make copies of itself. The
copies are not always perfect there are mistakes. The ones that are copied better are stronger and survive. And so over 1.000 years RNA grew more
complex to DNA. DNA needs

How Does Religion And Science Relate Together
Research Note:
Inquiry focus: How does religion and science relate together
The relationship between religion and science has been a subject of study since classical antiquity, addressed by philosophers, theologians, scientists,
and others. Different concept come from different geographical regions, cultures and history.– most scientific and technical innovations prior to the
scientific revolution were achieved by societies organized by religious traditions. The scientific method were beginning by ancient pagan, Islamic, and
Christian. – In the ancient and medieval world, the etymological Latin roots of both science and religion were understood as inner qualities of the
individual or virtues.
– The central difference between science and religion is science rely on experimental verification, while the religions rely on faith...show more content...
The explanation of science must base on checking evidence in natural world. In religion, it not rely on the experience evidence, is not necessarily
modified in evidence, it involves supernatural forces or entities.
– The reason of debate are both science and religion represent different ways to explain answer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_between_religion_and_science
Religion and Science: Competitors or Companions. Can Religion and Science coexist each other or not? This is a good topic for philosophy.– A lot of
scientists also have religious conviction, such as Galileo, Alister McGrath. – Science studies how the heavens go, religion how to get to heaven.
Science is investigates objective empirical facts, religion subjective questions of true meaning. – Science and Religion must exist an overlapping field.
Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.
– Religion not only talking about empirical truths, but also includes experiential, emotional, moral, and metaphysical

Science and Religion Essay
Science and religion have always collided. Science is based on observation and what we can prove. Religion on the other hand makes arguments
analytical in nature and requires faith. The basis though may not seem similar. A scientist might call this as the order in the universe or the Energy,
which is transmitted in the world we live in. Religions like to look this ultimate reality as God. This entity is capable of setting an order in the universe
and is nothing but what religion defines as God. Science and Religion then appear to be tied up like two versions of the same subject.
What major affects does science have on religion in the past two centuries? From Isaac Newton, who discovered gravity, Thomas Edison who invented
to light...show more content...
All these affect religion and who believes it and to what extent we as people actually believe. In today's society people want to be able to grasp, to
hold it, and even just feel it. So how do some people believe in God, we are not able to see him, hold him, let alone hear him? So how can we
actually believe in something that is not there? Now you see this is how science draws us away from our beliefs. Science says that, "seeing is
believing." Meaning that if u can see something then you can believe in it. We are not able to see him. But his existence could be debated using
knowledge based on what we see around us. For instance when we throw coins on a table, these coins will stop and arrange themselves on the table.
What made the coins be in the order we see them after they have been thrown? Maybe it was the cause of Newton's Laws. But then again this order as
proposed by Science implies an order setter. Is this God, a human like, yet unseen being? Are his features well defined? How do we describe the
qualities of such a being? If He is perfect, his features are the highest level of moral standards, then we can say that him and is followers are beyond
our understanding. We might say that he is wise, he knows all, and he is merciful and powerful. But these just limits how we express things not
described by our won language. It is possible we might not have

Research Paper On Science Vs Religion
Science versus Religion: How the universe came to be
Humanity has always struggled with the controversy of how the universe was created, since it is a question without a definite answer. People tend to
look to science and religion to solve this problem. Christianity is the most followed religion, and evolution is the most popular scientific belief.
Christians claim there is a greater being (God), who created the universe.
Evolutionists, on the other hand, claim the earth and humanity came to be through the big bang. The creation debate tends to focus on evolution and
Christianity. Through gapcreationism, evolutionary creationism, and old earth creationism, theologians and scientists are in the process of fusing
scientific creation and religion. Theologians are using old earth creationism, evolutionary creationism, and gap...show more content...
Public schools are only allowed to teach evolution, while private schools tend to only teach Christianity. Studies show when both views, Intelligent
design theory and Evolution, are taught there tends to be more people who accept both sides. The reason why the public schooling system came to
not being able to speak about Christianity is because parents and students claimed it dissuaded and offended their religion. I think this is not fair to
the majority of children, who are not offended by hearing more views on creation. People who are only taught Evolution actually tend to be less
likely to believe in evolution then if they are taught multiple religions. A reason why this is also not taught in school is because science is always
changing with new technology, and obtaining new information about the world. This is a problem because religion is never changing, or at least the
basic principles of religion do not change. The basic principles of science can change, and do change. There does not seem to be a place where both,
Christianity and Evolution, can be taught without

Religion and Science: Can They Coexist in the Modern World
Since the dawn of man, humans have struggled to explain the many mysteries of the universe, and to justify their existence in it. Throughout this
journey of self–understanding, numerous standpoints about human existence have evolved and merged into a complex, abstract manifestation called
religion. Advances in science and technology have yielded a new breed of human thought that has disturbed and shaken the foundations of religious
ideology. The new, scientifically–grounded understanding of the universe has unfolded a plethora of answers to age–old questions, which are
antithetical to the explanations offered by some religious beliefs. The Bible has answered the questions: how...show more content...
Many religious thinkers have responded to this evidence, by claiming that the methods used to ascertain the Earth's age are inaccurate. They argue that
radioactive dating; a widely accepted method of determining the age of rocks, is inaccurate because there is no available rock sample of a known
age, to which the method can be calibrated. However, this argument is obsolete because the only calibration required to find the age of a rock is the
measurement of decay rates, which can be found in the laboratory in a controlled experiment (Badash, 1995, 90). Because of the evidence provided by
scientific research, many religious thinkers have been forced to compromise their position, and have attempted to blend scientific fact with biblical
accounts of the age of the earth.
Many theists contend that the words of the Bible are metaphorical, and can be interpreted in a way that reconciles the biblical account of the Earth's
age with scientific fact. According to Genesis, the first book of the Old Testament, the earth was created in six days: "And God saw every thing that
he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day" (Genesis 1:31). They argue that other passages in
the book of Genesis can be interpreted to mean that a day to God can be thousands of years, and because of this, the Earth could have been created
over a much longer timeframe than six days, and can thus be as

Relation Between Science and Religion Essay
on What is the Relation between Science and Religion
William Lane Craig
Examines several ways in which science and theology relate to each other.
Back in 1896 the president of Cornell University Andrew Dickson White published a book entitled A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology
in Christendom. Under White's influence, the metaphor of "warfare" to describe the relations between science and the Christian faith became very
widespread during the first half of the 20th century. The culturally dominant view in the West–even among Christians–came to be that science and
Christianity are not allies in the search for truth, but adversaries.
To illustrate, several years ago I had a debate with a philosopher of science at Simon Fraser...show more content...
They were remarkably successful in pushing through their agenda. But philosophers of science during the second half of the 20th century have come
to realize that the idea of a warfare between science and theology is a gross oversimplification. White's book is now regarded as something of a bad
joke, a one–sided and distorted piece of propaganda.
Now some people acknowledge that science and religion should not be regarded as foes, but nonetheless they do not think that they should be
considered friends either. They say that science and religion are mutually irrelevant, that they represent two non–over–lapping domains. Sometimes you
hear slogans like "Science deals with facts and religion deals with faith." But this is a gross caricature of both science and religion. As science probes the
universe, she encounters problems and questions which are philosophical in character and therefore cannot be resolved scientifically, but which can
be illuminated by a theological perspective. By the same token, it is simply false that religion makes no factual claims about the world. The world
religions make various and conflicting claims about the origin and nature of the universe and humanity, and they cannot all be true. Science and
religion are thus like two circles which intersect or partially overlap. It is in the area of

Relationship Between Science And Religion
Science and religion have always been in conflict with one another because they each represent complete opposite ideals, science is about how nature
controls how the universe works and religion is about how God controls how the universe works. In the five models on science and religion I believe
that Conflict best describes the relationship between the two. Conflict tells how either science is completely right and religion is wrong or the other way
around and that religion and science are completely different. It also tells on how many scientists are religious and may be inspired be many religious
ideals but on the other side is that if God created the universe he also created the rules that go with it.
I choose the model of conflict because I believe in some of the points it talks about such as how they are at odds because science tells how nature
controls life and religion tells how God does. The point that really sticks out with me is how it's says that if God created the universe then he created
the rules that go with it and I strongly believe in that point. I thinks that this model can show a little about what it means to be faithful in God because
faith is believing in God and the teachings of God, so in having faith in God you believe that he created the universe and its rules.
Most scientists believe in the theory of evolution because it answers the question on how humans came to be and how life as we know it came to be.
In my opinion it does answer the question

Relationship Between Science And Religion Essay
An Essay on Science and Religion
There can be hardly any compromise between science and religion. Science deals with the material world that we know religion is concerned with a
divine order that we imagine. Science believes in things that can be proved; religion deals with ideas that cannot be proved. Science depends on reason;
religion on intuition. The scientist bases himself on material facts; religion takes its stand on spiritual ideas. The scientist works in the laboratory of
the material world; the religious teacher probes into the recesses of the inward mind. The goal of science is achievement; that of religion is
realization. The truths of science can be proved to all; the so–called truths of religion have to be taken on trust. Hence there is bound to be hostility
between the man of science and the man of religion.
Whether God exists is a proposition that is beyond proof. Writing in an age when science was already beginning to work havoc with man's traditional
ideas, Tennyson plaintively said of God–
Whom we that cannot see Thy faces,
By faith and faith and faith alone embrace,
Believing where we cannot prove.
And again–
We have but faith, we cannot know,
Fol. knowledge is of things we see;
And yet we trust it comes from Thee
A beam in darkness.
Here we have in poetic language the essence of the perplexity with which we in the modern age are confronted, when dealing with the ideas of
God and religion. We have to accept these ideas on trust because they are incapable of proof. Beyond the known world of life that is before us,
there is the illimitable unknown world beyond death which we neither know nor can know, and yet which looms before us as something so
portentous that we cannot ignore Religion therefore, is the refuge of man where science has failed to solve his doubts. And as long as this limitation
on our powers of knowing will remain, there is bound to be a place for religion in human life.
But a claim is being made on behalf of religion chiefly in India–that it has its own science; that it does know that which is unknown to our senses by a
sort of sixth sense. That is the claim made by the mystic and the yogi. According to them just as the scientist knows reality with the help of

Essay Faith In Religion And Science
Since the dawn of mankind religion has been one of the most significant elements of a society's social and cultural beliefs and actions. However, this
trend has declined due to the general increase in knowledge regarding our the natural sciences. Where we had previously attributed something that we
didn't understand to the working of a higher power, is now replaced by a simple explanation offered by natural sciences. While advocates of Religion
may question Natural Sciences by stating that they are based on assumptions, it is important to note the Natural Sciences are based on theories and
principles which can be proven using mathematical equations and formulas. Faith however contrasts from the easily visible feasibility of data...show
more content...
This example vividly displays how faith can cause an accretion to human development and innovation, if the findings of Galileo were ubiquitously
accepted, then in the 21st Century, we would have been further down the line in the field of astrology.
One great benefit that faith in religion has had to mankind is that religion answers all of the "big questions". No matter how farfetched the
answers may seem, followers of a religion feel assuaged and even motivated by the answers. The concept of "live after death" and "bad luck for
bad actions and good luck for good actions" assuage many individuals who are uneasy about the mysteries of life. For example in the religion of
Hinduism there exists a concept of Karma, which basically states that what goes around comes around. This simple concept motivates millions of
Hindus to perform good deeds and also discourages them from committing sins as the concept of Karma stands to offer great rewards as well as
great punishments. Likewise in Christianity there exists a concept of "Heaven" and "Hell", Heaven being the luxurious destination for afterlife and
Hell being the horrible and abject one. The Christian concept of "A record of good and bad deeds", also motivates millions of Christians to make the
right choices and decisions. Although beliefs in afterlife are completely due to faith and lack no scientific proof, there are great benefits as it is proven

The book talks about a different way to look at religion and science using Einstein. Religion has been and probably will continue to influence the
scientific institution. This notion can extend to all types of institutions that are indeed separate from one another. It seems as if every school of thought
influences one another. As advanced as America is discrimination is still prominent however it does not show in the scientific world like it did with
Einstein. Also, Interesting questions were posed, a concept was looked at in a different way and science was explained in the wrong way during
Einstein's time, while reading students essays.
In the twenty–first century it seems that America is advancing rapidly due to science. Despite the differences in religion or culture that people have,
if anyone contributes to science it will not be labeled as "Gay science" or "Jewish science" or "Muslim science" it is purely an advancement to the
understanding of the world. Having said this, Americans are still affected by discrimination. If Einstein were able to come back and live for a few
months he would probably find himself feeling empathy towards people who are being discriminated against and be outspoken about it. Einstein's
theories were once viewed as rubbish due to being a Jewish man, now students are studying his theories without knowledge of the fact that the exact
concepts they are studying, now deemed extravagant, were once regarded as nonsense and given the name, Jewish

Science and Religion Essays
Science and religion have always been in conflict with one another because they each represent complete opposite ideals, science is about how nature
controls how the universe works and religion is about how God controls how the universe works. In the five models on science and religion I believe
that Conflict best describes the relationship between the two. Conflict tells how either science is completely right and religion is wrong or the other way
around and that religion and science are completely different. It also tells on how many scientists are religious and may be inspired be many religious
ideals but on the other side is that if God created the universe he also created the rules that go with it....show more content...
I'm my opinion since God is the creator of the universe and all life then he is the creator of science as well. There are four other models that
explain the relationship between science and religion but in my opinion they do not explain the relationship between the two. Independence tells
how the two are complete opposites which is true but it also says that religion seeks to explain experiences of inner life which I don't believe to be
true. Religion does try to explain experiences of inner life but it's much more than just that, religion tries to explain how and why were created, how
God created the world, and what purpose do serve on this earth. Complimentary tells how science and religion benefit each other and that information
from one enriches the other. I don't think this model fits at all because I believe that the two are completely different and do not enrich or fulfill one
another. I believe that in the world there opposites to everything, good and evil, white and black and science and religion. The only way science and
religion compliment the other is to be the opposite of the other.
Integration is the model that tells how science

Science And Religion Research Paper
Today, it seems like science and religion are in a constant, bloody war with one another, similarly to the on–going war between the Palestinians and the
Jews, but what are science and religion? Science is the intellectual study of the structure and behavior of the world through observation and experiment.
Religion is the belief in a superior being or many superior beings. Although science and religion seem like two diverse topics, the two methods of
explanation are more alike than one would think, and both of these things together complement each other to give us our modern technology and how
we as a society should use it. First, to explain how science and religion are similar, we have to look back in time. Throughout our history and deep in
Without the contribution our religion institution provided us, we could still be stuck in a dark time with a lack of advances in technological. The
catholic church was the first place to allowed the common folk (peasants) the luxury of books and education. Before the Catholic Church opened the
opportunity of education and books to the masses, education and books were strictly for the wealthy. With the education provided by the catholic
church, the people started to question things in their environment. They also started pursuing answers to their questions away from text. People held
experiments and would document it carefully. An example of a person who did document his findings is Roger Bacon. It was the curiosity of the
common folk and the opportunity the Catholic Church gave the common folk that helped to re–birth science in Europe. This action made by the
catholic church changed the course of history, which gave European empires an opportunity to compete among the hegemonic powers at the time
(the Abbasid Empire), and brought Europe out of the gloomy Medieval Era and into the beautiful Renaissance Era. To this day, the Catholic Church
remains one of the main contributors to educating the youth of the world and as a result, has a huge emphasis on science and technology. The
second clue to how these three big topics are closely related is in the nature of science. Science is our explanation of the world backed up with
experimentation and hard fact. Us taking the knowledge of the world and creating a new method or device to make life easier is how we obtain

Essay on Science vs. Religion
Religion versus science, the debates and conflicts have been on for centuries. For both religious and scientific ideals, the faith people have drives
them. In this paper, I will examine the story of "The Eye of Apollo" by G.K. Chesterton, and the episode "House vs. God" of House, M.D., in order to
question this conflict. The main character–Father Brown–in "The Eye of Apollo" combines his reasoning with his religious ideals and beliefs, or we
can say his faith in God leads him to the truth of the crime. However, if we try to have a deeper look at the both the rational and religious sides of
Father Brown, his perspectives on the immortality and justice are similar to Dr House, who interprets his rationality based on science. Thus both the
Father Brown finally points out the truth that Kalon kills Pauline with his setup based on Miss Stacey being blind in order to get her money. Miss
Pauline's sister, Joan Pauline, is also part of the crime according to Father Brown, who has also taken advantage of her sister's blindness and played
trick on the will. We can easily find Father Brown's interpretation about "truths". People apparently will recognize him as a rational and religious
person who is a skeptic of pure "sciences", however, not necessarily the scientific methodology. Upon learning the newreligion mentioned by
Flambeau, Father Brown holds his doubts about the religion of Apollo: he doubts seriously on whether "it can cure the one spiritual disease".
Father Brown actually has found Kalon is the murderer before he learns what is the tragedy. As he says: "there came a crash and a scream down
the street, and the priest of Apollo did not start or look around... I know that he was expecting it" (The Eye of Apollo). This kind of distrust as
presented by him conveys his skeptical approach to things. Father Brown's skepticism for and tendency to reject the Apollo religion reflect his belief:
the pure science and the new religion are both considered as superstitions. On the other side, the reasons lying behind the crimes, according to Father
brown, are driven by the inner desires of human, or we can say, it is the "devil" that made

Religion vs. Science Essay
Religion vs. Science
This paper will examine the scientific view verse religion. I feel their support for the big picture is shallow and untenable. I believe in science but I
also have faith. Scientific research has lead to dramatic and more humane treatments of persons suffering from mental disease, depression, and physical
injury. The reputation of scientists has reached an all–time high. Majority of Americans have said they trust the scientific community more than almost
anyone, including the Supreme Court, organized religion, Congress, teachers and the U.S. military. Many of these Americans believe that these
scientific advances are leading them to a better world. The questions: What is man? What am I to do?...show more content...
Raymo viewed humans as the universe becoming conscious of itself through evolution, while prayer consists of miracles, and giving praise and
thanksgiving to nature. (National Review p32) Scientists begin to worship their own concepts, proclaiming limitless philosophical systems rather than
concentrating on what the data is really showing. Scientists cannot prove that known natural forces can produce complex biological organisms. No one
has demonstrated that chemical evolution cannot even begin to account for the information content of the simplest organisms. There is no actual
evidence of natural selection having substantial creative power. The only examples available are those of variations in fundamentally stable
populations. In scientific perspective, molecular revolution has revealed an unforeseen domain of complexity and interaction more consistent with
technology than with the mechanical viewpoint. Scientist have come to realize that cells thoroughly protect themselves against the kinds of accidental
genetic change that, according to conventional theory, are the sources of evolutionary variability. The current knowledge of genetic change is
fundamentally at variance with hypothesis held by neo–Darwinists. Everyone is in search of the their truth. Understanding, the very rich and varied
world, in which we live, the need for these insights of

Religion And Science In The Classroom Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Religion And Science In The Classroom Essay