Miami (CNN) — Former President Donald Trump has pleaded not guilty to 37 charges related to alleged mishandling of classified documents. 'Dejected': Grisham describes Trump's demeanor as he headed to court 00:38 - Source: CNN See More Videos 'Dejected': Grisham describes Trump's demeanor as he headed to court 00:38 Haberman reveals what in the indictment made Trump 'especially rattled' By Tierney Sneed, Hannah Rabinowitz, Jeremy Herb, Holmes Lybrand and Katelyn Polantz, CNN Trump faces 37 felony counts, alleging he illegally retained national defense information and that he concealed documents in violation of witness-tampering laws in the Justice Department’s probe into the materials.

1. AudioLive TV
Donald Trump pleads not guilty to classified documents
charges
Updated 9:51 PM EDT, Tue June 13, 2023
Miami (CNN) — Former President Donald Trump has pleaded not guilty to 37 charges
related to alleged mishandling of classified documents.
'Dejected': Grisham describes Trump's demeanor as he headed to court
00:38 - Source: CNN
See More Videos
'Dejected': Grisham describes Trump's demeanor as he headed to court
00:38
Haberman reveals what in the indictment made Trump 'especially rattled'
By Tierney Sneed, Hannah Rabinowitz, Jeremy Herb, Holmes Lybrand and Katelyn Polantz, CNN

2. Trump faces 37 felony counts, alleging he illegally retained national defense information
and that he concealed documents in violation of witness-tampering laws in the Justice
Department’s probe into the materials.
Former President Donald Trump as he appeared in Miami federal courthouse on Tuesday facing 37 federal charges involving
the handling of classified documents.
Stop at Cuban restaurant
After the court hearing, Trump made an unannounced stop at Versailles, a well-known
Cuban restaurant in Miami. Trump was surrounded by dozens of his supporters inside
the restaurant, shaking hands and snapping photos with them.
“Food for everyone,” Trump told those gathered as they cheered.
At one point, Trump’s supporters sang him “happy birthday.” Trump’s birthday is on
Wednesday.
“Some birthday, we got a government that is out of control,” Trump could be heard
saying.
Following the restaurant stop, Trump flew back to New Jersey Tuesday evening where
he spoke publicly at his Bedminster resort about what he called the “fake and
fabricated charges.” The former president claimed he had “every right to have these

3. documents” and said prosecutors “ought to drop this case immediately because they’re
destroying our country.”
“They should never have done this,” he told the gathered crowd. “This was an unwritten
rule, you just don’t unless it’s really bad. But you just don’t. But the seal is now broken.”
Earlier in the day, Trump posted on his social media before heading to court that it was
“ONE OF THE SADDEST DAYS IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY. WE ARE A NATION IN
DECLINE!!!”
Tuesday’s hearing will kickstart what will likely be a winding, dramatic judicial process,
with criminal and appeal proceedings that may play out for years. US District Judge
Aileen Cannon – a Trump nominee whose decision last year to order a third-party review
appeals court – has been assigned the case.
Attorneys Todd Blanche and Chris Kise represented Trump in court for the arraignment.
However, the role Kise will play going forward is unclear, and he was sidelined during
last year’s litigation over the Mar-a-Lago search amid Trump team infighting.
RELATED ARTICLE
Trump shakes up legal team in wake of classified documents indictment
Another Trump attorney, Alina Habba, spoke outside the courthouse ahead of Trump’s
arraignment, saying that the former president was “defiant.”
Habba ridiculed what she called a “two-tiered system of justice” and called the
indictment an “unapologetic weaponization of the criminal justice system.”
The Justice Department’s counterintelligence chief Jay Bratt, who has been a key
player in the documents probe so far, also attended Tuesday’s hearing, along with
prosecutors Harbach and Julie Edelstein.
Seriousness of the charges
Before last week’s federal indictment, Trump also faced criminal charges brought by
New York City’s local prosecutors for an alleged hush money scheme in the 2016
campaign in which Trump is accused of falsifying business records.
The new charges in the DOJ documents case are drastically more serious and present
the possibility of several years in prison if Trump is ultimately convicted.
of an FBI search of Mar-a-Lago was widely criticized and overturned by a conservative

4. Thirty-one counts that Trump faces are for willful retention of national defense
information, a charge that does not turn on whether the documents are classified. In
addition to the obstruction conspiracy, he also faces four counts related to the
concealment of the documents, as well as a false statements charge.
“In a case like this, obstruction and tampering help prove the main charge, that the
defendant willfully engaged in the charged conduct,” said David Aaron, a former federal
prosecutor in espionage section of the DOJ’s national security division and a current
senior counsel at Perkins Coie. “Those facts could also a몭ect how a judge, the jury, or
the public views the case and could substantially a몭ect sentencing.”
What happens next
Now that Tuesday’s hearing is in the rearview mirror, the case will enter a legal grind of
pretrial proceedings, including likely disputes over what evidence is put before a jury
and whether the case should be thrown out altogether before going to trial. The Trump
team will have plenty of opportunity to drag things out – potentially until after the 2024
election.
One major x-factor in the prosecution of the case is its assignment to Cannon, who sits
in Ft. Pierce, Florida, but who is part of the pool of judges who are randomly cases filed
in West Palm Beach, where the new indictment was brought.
“There are few things more powerful than a district judge in a federal case,” said Alan
Rozenshtein, a former attorney in the DOJ National Security Division who is now a
University of Minnesota law school professor. “She could – if she wanted to – cause
huge problems for the prosecution. Would they be existential problems? Probably not.”
Cannon’s approach to last year’s Trump lawsuit challenging the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago
search raised eyebrows among legal experts across the ideological spectrum for how
she appeared to bend over backward to create special legal rules in favor of the former
president. Her rationale for why such a review was necessary was torn apart by a panel
of right-leaning appellate judges, including two Trump appointees, on the 11th US
Circuit Court of Appeals last December.
“She got so banged up by the 11th Circuit that she might be ultra-cautious,” Kel
McClanahan, a national security lawyer and an adjunct professor at the George
Washington University Law School, told CNN. “We just don’t know.”
This story has been updated with additional developments.