SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 52
Download to read offline
InvitationPrice
`50
NDIA EGALL STORIES THAT COUNT
June19, 2017 ` 100
I
IT Sector:
Future Shock?
PEDKI DEVI,
labelled a “witch” and
publicly humiliated in
1999, is a subject matter
in school books but still
fighting for justice 18
years later, as the culprits
roam free and continue
to threaten her. The
motive? Greed to grab
her 12 acres of land
Standing Counsels:
Relative Values
www.indialegallive.com
Witches BrewBranding women as dayans across tribal belts in India is on the rise as
greed for property, enmity and collusion by local officials overturns legal
and ethical norms, aided by illiteracy and superstition
India Legal 19 June 2017
IVEN the nature of the Indian polit-
ical system in which the doctrine of
separation of powers—the corner-
stone of accountable governance—
lies supine at the altar of executive
privilege, I doubt that we will ever see a tele-
vised session of parliament in which a top law
enforcement officer openly calls a prime minis-
ter a liar and points the finger at him for trying
to derail an investigation of collusion between
his closest advisors and a hostile foreign power
to influence the course of a general election.
In India’s Westminster-style democracy, the
legislature, for all intents and purposes, is a
slavish extension of the executive (members of
parliament are also ministers) and the execu-
tive can hardly be expected to conduct an im-
partial investigation into its own wrongdoings.
The accountability process is further stymied
by ministerial control of the bureaucracy, par-
ticularly law enforcement.
In these circumstances, obstruction of jus-
tice, or targeted prosecution of political oppo-
nents, is the everyday rule.
Small wonder then that Indians were flab-
bergasted by the spectacular real-time reality
TV show in which a sacked FBI director surgi-
cally rubbished the character and credibility
of his former boss, the most powerful man in
the world, no less than the President of Ame-
rica himself. And that too in testimony be-
fore the powerful 15-member US Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence,
comprising of Democrats and
Republicans (the President’s
own party).
Public investigations by bipar-
tisan Congressional committees
are de rigueur in the American sys-
tem. Senior administration officials are
regularly hauled up on Capitol Hill to testi-
fy under oath on the functioning of their
departments and to answer charges of mis-
feasance or malfeasance. Not all of them
attract a great deal of press. But former
FBI Director James Comey’s broadside
against President Trump was singular in that it
evoked memories of Nixon and Watergate in
which the issue of obstruction of justice caused
the late president to resign in disgrace.
There is nothing remarkable about an FBI
chief being fired by the president at whose
pleasure he serves. President Bill Clinton also
dismissed his FBI chief, William Sessions, in
1993 for proven misconduct.
A president can dump the FBI boss with or
without giving any reason. But there are sub-
tleties in the American system. The FBI chief
reports directly to the attorney general and not
to the president. And FBI directors keep presi-
dents at arm’s length, scrupulously guarding
their autonomy as the top federal law enforce-
ment and domestic counter-terrorism and
counter-espionage officers.
What is remarkable, however, is that Trump
fired the man heading a criminal investigation
into the president’s election campaign. “The
FBI has gone after presidents before,” Tim
Weiner, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and
historian told VOX, pointing to the Bureau’s
probes of Richard Nixon during Watergate and
Ronald Reagan during the Iran-Contra scan-
dal. “But never has a president dismissed an
FBI director when members of the president’s
administration and members of the president’s
campaign team were under investigation for
colluding with a foreign power (Russia).”
A
mericans treat law enforcement as a
religion. They also believe that public
officials owe their loyalty to the consti-
tution and not to their political bosses. And
obstruction of justice, when proven at any
level, receives zero tolerance, cutting across
party lines. Did Comey accuse Trump of this?
And did Trump obstruct justice? Did Trump
demand personal loyalty over loyalty to the
constitution? Those are the key questions
being debated across America.
In a lukewarm attempt to shield Trump
from this charge, Senator James Risch, a Rep-
ublican from Idaho, zeroed in on this point
BINDING THE MINOTAUR
Inderjit Badhwar
Letter from the Editor
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 3
G
4 June 19, 2017
during the Senate hearings at which Comey
testified. He wanted to know whether Trump
had “ordered” or “directed” Comey to drop the
probe of Michael Flynn, his national security
adviser, whom he was forced to fire barely
three weeks after being sworn in because he
had not revealed his secret contacts with the
Russians.
This is how the exchange went:
SENATOR RISCH: There’s 28 words (in your
written statement) there that are in quotes,
and it says, quote, “I hope”—this is the presi-
dent speaking—“I hope you can see your way
clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He
is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”
Now those are his (the president’s) exact
words, is that correct?
COMEY: Correct.
RISCH: And you wrote them here, and you put
them in quotes?
COMEY: Correct.
RISCH: Thank you for that. He did not direct
you to let it go.
COMEY: Not in his words, no.
RISCH: He did not order you to let it go.
COMEY: Again, those words are not an order.
RISCH: He said, “I hope.” Now, like me, you
probably did hundreds of cases, maybe thou-
sands of cases charging people with criminal
offenses. And, of course, you have knowledge
of the thousands of cases out there that—
where people have been charged. Do you know
of any case where a person has been charged
for obstruction of justice or, for that matter,
any other criminal offense, where this — they
said, or thought, they hoped for an outcome?
COMEY: I don’t know well enough to answer.
And the reason I keep saying “his words” is I
took it as a direction.
RISCH: Right.
COMEY: I mean, this is the president of the
United States, with me alone, saying, “I
hope” this. I took it as, this is what he wants
me to do.
(CROSSTALK)
COMEY: Now I — I didn’t obey that, but that’s
the way I took it.
RISCH: You—you may have taken it as a direc-
tion, but that’s not what he said.
(CROSSTALK)
COMEY: Correct. I—that’s why...
RISCH: He said—he said, “I hope.”
COMEY: Those are exact words, correct.
RISCH: OK, do you—you don’t know of any-
one that’s ever been charged for hoping some-
thing. Is that a fair statement?
COMEY: I don’t, as I sit here.
RISCH: Yeah. Thank you.
R
isch probably thought he had scored a
point. Did he? Here’s the definition of
Obstruction of Justice from the US
Federal Legal Code:
(a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or
by any threatening letter or communication,
endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede
any grand or petit juror,
or officer in or of any
court of the United Sta-
tes, or officer who may be
serving at any examina-
tion or other proceeding
before any United States
magistrate judge or other
committing magistrate,
in the discharge of his
duty, or injures any such
grand or petit juror in his
person or property on
account of any verdict or
indictment assented to by
him, or on account of his
being or having been such
juror, or injures any such
officer, magistrate judge,
or other committing mag-
Letter from the Editor
PLAIN TALK
Former FBI director James
Comey had the courage to
take on his former boss
Donald Trump in the US
Senate Select Committee
UNI
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 5
istrate in his person or property on account of
the performance of his official duties, or cor-
ruptly or by threats or force, or by any threat-
ening letter or communication, influences,
obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influ-
ence, obstruct, or impede, the due administra-
tion of justice, shall be punished as provided in
subsection (b).
That definition does not require that there
be a direct order that would quash or affect the
investigation. “The key question here is wheth-
er the president acted with corrupt intent,”
Renato Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor,
told CNN.
O
n a personal note, I covered the Water-
gate scandal as a reporter in Washing-
ton, and the present situation brings to
mind a great American hero Senator Sam
Ervin who chaired the Senate Select Commi-
ttee on Watergate and brought down Nixon. I
see analogies to the current Trump situation.
Ervin was an uncomplicated, strict consti-
tutionalist who believed the Social Contract
and Rule of Law to be living entities. He came
finally to the conclusion that Nixon and his top
aides resorted to dirty tricks to weaken the
Democratic Presidential campaign and incr-
ease Nixon’s chances for winning in 1972.
When information surfaced, Nixon and his
cronies lied to investigators, resorted to cover-
ups and got caught. Ervin opened his Commi-
ttee’s hearings with these famous words still
engraved in the minds of the reporters who
covered that event:
“If the many allegations made to date are
true, then the burglars who broke into the
Democratic National Committee at the Water-
gate (apartment) were in fact breaking into the
home of every American citizen…. And if these
allegations prove true, what they were seeking
to steal was not the jewels, money or other pre-
cious property, but something much more
valuable: the right to vote in a free election.”
As Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of
Lawfare and a Senior Fellow in Governance
Studies at the Brookings Institution, put it:
“This is the Trump presidency. There is no evi-
dence that any chains can bind this president:
not lawyers, not norms, not procedures, not
repeated screw-ups of the sort that educate
other leaders, and certainly not the mere
expectations of decent public servants. But
the problem is that the United States is res-
ponsible for his actions—and we are paying
daily the price for them, particularly in our
international relations but also in our domestic
governance. It simply will not do any more for
politicians to shield their eyes and say the
equivalent of “even if Trump did act inappro-
priately, and I’m not saying he did, it’s not my
problem because he’s a beastly minotaur and
no chains can bind him”.
Today there is no Sam Ervin or anybody of
his stature in the American Senate. Both hous-
es are controlled by Republicans, some of
whom blindly support Trump and some who
maintain a studied silence. But exceptional cir-
cumstances give birth to exceptional heroes.
Twitter: @indialegalmedia
Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
NO EXCEPTIONS
(Left) The Senate
Select Committee
pinned Richard Nixon
and his cronies for their
unethical practices in
the run-up to the 1972
elections
(Below) The sacked
FBI director surgically
rubbished the character
and credibility of the
most powerful man in
the world, US President
Donald Trump
UNI
Hunting for “Dayans”
The reprehensible custom of branding single women and widows as witches and grabbing
their property continues in various states. Are our laws strong enough to act as a deterrent?
14
LEAD
FOCUS
ContentsVOLUME. X ISSUE. 31
JUNE19,2017
OWNED BY E. N. COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD.
A -9, Sector-68, Gautam Buddh Nagar, NOIDA (U.P.) - 201309
Phone: +9 1-0120-2471400- 6127900 ; Fax: + 91- 0120-2471411
e-mail: editor@indialegalonline.com
website: www.indialegalonline.com
MUMBAI: Arshie Complex, B-3 & B4, Yari Road, Versova, Andheri,
Mumbai-400058
RANCHI: House No. 130/C, Vidyalaya Marg, Ashoknagar,
Ranchi-834002.
LUCKNOW: First floor, 21/32, A, West View, Tilak Marg, Hazratganj,
Lucknow-226001.
PATNA: Sukh Vihar Apartment, West Boring Canal Road, New Punaichak,
Opposite Lalita Hotel, Patna-800023.
ALLAHABAD: Leader Press, 9-A, Edmonston Road,
Civil Lines, Allahabad-211 001.
Editor Inderjit Badhwar
Senior Managing Editor Dilip Bobb
Deputy Managing Editor Shobha John
Executive Editor Ajith Pillai
Contributing Editor Ramesh Menon
Associate Editors Meha Mathur,
Sucheta Dasgupta
Deputy Editor Prabir Biswas
Staff Writer Usha Rani Das
Senior Sub-Editor Shailaja Paramathma
Art Director Anthony Lawrence
Deputy Art Editor Amitava Sen
Senior Visualizer Rajender Kumar
Graphic Designer Ram Lagan
Photographers Anil Shakya, Bhavana Gaur
Photo Researcher/ Kh Manglembi Devi
News Coordinator
Production Pawan Kumar
CFO
Anand Raj Singh
VP (HR & General Administration)
Lokesh C Sharma
Advertising
Valerie Patton
Mobile No: 9643106028, Landline No: 0120-612-7900
email: marketing@encommunication.org
Circulation Manager
RS Tiwari
Mobile No: 8377009652, Landline No: 0120-612-7900
email: indialegal.enc@gmail.com
PublishedbyProfBaldevRajGuptaonbehalfofENCommunicationsPvtLtd
andprintedatSuperCassettesIndustiesLtd.,C-85-86&94,Sector4,Noida,Distt.
GautamBudhNagar,UP-201301. Allrightsreserved.Reproductionortranslationinany
languageinwholeorinpartwithoutpermissionisprohibited.Requestsfor
permissionshouldbedirectedtoENCommunicationsPvtLtd.Opinionsof
writersinthemagazinearenotnecessarilyendorsedby
ENCommunicationsPvtLtd.ThePublisherassumesnoresponsibilityforthe
returnofunsolicitedmaterialorformateriallostordamagedintransit.
AllcorrespondenceshouldbeaddressedtoENCommunicationsPvtLtd.
Managing Editor (Web) Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr
Editor (Content & Planning) Sujit Bhar
Senior Content Writer Punit Mishra
(Web)
Technical Executive Anubhav Tyagi
6 June 19, 2017
All in the
Family
There is uneasiness about the
appointment of standing coun-
sels and advocates-general by
various states since clout and
lineage seem to be the decid-
ing factors
20
STATES
REGULARS
Followuson
Facebook.com/indialegalmedia
Twitter:@indialegalmedia
Website:www.indialegallive.com
Contact:editor@indialegallive.com
Ringside............................8
Delhi Durbar......................9
Courts.............................10
National Briefs................12
Media Watch ..................38
Satire ..............................50
Cover Design: ANTHONY LAWRENCE
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 7
Whose Tech Is It Anyway
The ministry might be playing favourites in a row between
Monsanto and Nuziveedu Seeds. But this isn’t the full picture
28
AGRICULTURE
Tango with India
As a new world order emerges, Modi will
try to be the right man in the right place
for Europe and the US. Will this give India
an edge on the world stage?
46
DIPLOMACY
“Govt Obliged to Share Information”
CIC Dr MS Acharyulu, who recently asked a post office to disclose data on demoneti-
sation, says policy decisions that impact the lives of people should be made public
36
INTERVIEW
How Democratic
Is My Country?
Public institutions are increasingly
found lacking in moral courage to
stand up to the Executive. This is
undermining the functioning of India’s
system of governance
44
BOOKS
Jaipur
Palace Wars
Though the Supreme Court has
settled this protracted feud over
five-star heritage hotels, secret
machinations by rival royals
may yet disinherit the true heirs
40
PROPERTY
Faith and Probity
The Kerala High Court has directed AIIMS to let Muslim women
wear the hijab while writing the MBBS entrance
26
24Murder Most Foul
The killing of a Congress lawmaker has again brought to light
the practice of political vendetta in MP
Survival of the Smartest
With the IT industry going through another churning, the only way
to sail through is to innovate and learn new skills or face the sack
32
TECH
8 June 19, 2017
“
RINGSIDE
These fireworks have no effect on Iran.
They will soon be eliminated .... They are
too small to affect the will of the Iranian
nation and its officials.
—Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,
reacting to the bomb and gun attacks in Tehran on
June 7, as quoted on Iran's state TV
I am convinced the Paris
Agreement and broad cli-
mate action is unstoppable.
President Trump’s decision
has given us a new sense of
urgency. It’s also created a
leadership vacuum, but like
all vacuums, it will be
filled.
—Executive Director of the
United Nations
Environment Programme
Erik Solheim, in
The Times of India
In terms of my political
writing, very often, I
actually feel even more
rage than I show
through the work.
When I write fiction,
I’m in my body [as] a
very different person.
There’s a great peace
in me when I write
fiction.
—Author Arundhati
Roy, in an interview to
www.slate.com
I am looking at women
coming in as jawans. I am
going to start it soon.
Firstly, we will start with
women as military police
jawans... We have already
started the process and
women will now have an
opportunity to show their
grit and strength in tak-
ing up challenges in com-
bat roles and shattering
the glass ceiling.
—Army chief General
Bipin Rawat, to PTI
NDTV isn’t an overnight
phenomenon, even they
know that. If you are so
eager to finish us, then Sir,
some day, let’s sit across
each other. We’ll be there,
you’ll be there and so will
be a Live Camera.
—NDTV journalist
Ravish Kumar, on his
Facebook page
Alleged that Roys owe
banks `48 crore. Adanis
owe banks 72,000 crore.
May we expect Gautam
bhai to be raided next?
—Historian Ramachandra
Guha, on Twitter
Triple talaq is an enormity;
it is a legacy of a pre-
Islamic Arabia…. This
obnoxious practice must be
put an end to, as has been
done in almost every
Muslim country. The
Indian Muslim man is no
special creature to continue
to have this special right.
—Former Union minister
Arif Mohammad Khan, in
The Indian Express
Any change in an
entrenched interest, who-
ever it be, is discomfort-
ing. But law of change
goes on. It’s universal.
—Puducherry governor
Kiran Bedi, on Twitter
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 9
The Congress Working
Committee meeting last
week gave a hint of where
the party is headed. The
long-awaited decision to
elevate Rahul Gandhi as
Congress party president
this October was not as
unexpected as Sonia’s
message. She appar-
ently took some select-
ed leaders
aside and
informed
them that
her ill-
health did not allow her to
carry on as president and
doctors have suggested
she move to the hills where
the air is cleaner. In fact,
the CWC meet was held in
her house, not the party
headquarters, an indication
of her restricted move-
ments. It is a measure of
their respect for her bind-
ing force and political acu-
men (or lack of it in the
case of the son) that the
leaders asked Sonia to
continue to oversee party
strategy and progress. She
is likely to move to the
house being built in
Chharabra, near Shimla by
daughter Priyanka, which is
almost complete. Her
favourite summer getaway
is Kausani in the
Uttarkhand hills where a
close family friend has a
house but for a lengthier
stay in cooler climes,
Shimla makes more sense.
It has already been sur-
veyed by the SPG.
Twitter: @indialegalmedia
Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley,
who also handles the defence
portfolio, is finding his hands are
too full. So, every now and then
he skips functions which a rak-
shamantri is expected to attend.
Last fortnight, at the last minute, he
pulled out from an Indian Navy-FICCI
conference on Warship Building
which is an annual event normally
presided over by the defence minis-
ter. Jaitley’s inability to make it to the
meet not only underlined how busy
he is, but also how important it is to
have a dedicated person handling the
defence portfolio. Perhaps the cabinet
reshuffle, predicted to follow the
Presidential polls may bring relief to
Jaitley and several others with multiple ministries
under their charge.
An inside track on
happenings in Lutyen’s Delhi
Delhi
Durbar
FINALLY, THE
CORONATION
SINGH IS
NOT KING
It now appears that the
controversial notification
regarding curbs on the
country’s cattle trade was
because of a procedural
goof-up and a premature
death. The notification was
issued five days after
Environment Minister Anil
Madhav Dave passed
away unexpectedly. It was
Dave’s brainchild and his
successor, Dr Harsh Vard-
han, was still finding his
feet when, two days later,
the notification, signed
by Dave, was issued.
Dave was a member of
the RSS and the decision
was in tune with his world
view. However, in a proce-
dural faux pas, the file was
never shown to his suc-
cessor with bureaucrats
assuming it had the
approval of higher-ups in
the government.
CATTLE
CONFUSION
DOUBLE SHIFT
One of those present at
the CWC meeting was in
for some good-natured
ribbing. Former Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh
is to be resurrected in that
role, albeit in celluloid. The
biopic on his tenure is
already being shot and is
loosely based on the
book, The Accidental
Prime Minister by Sanjaya
Baru, his former media
adviser. Dr Singh will not
be pleased with the
choice of the actor who
will play him—Anupam
Kher, who has been a
staunch supporter of the
Modi government. The
Congress is not happy
either; the film’s title is the
same as the book which
did not show Dr Singh in a
good light, or Sonia, for
that matter. Plus, it is due
for release in December
2018, shortly before the
next Lok Sabha elections.
The centre and Manipur submitted in the
Supreme Court that allegations levelled
against Manipur CM N Biren Singh by the
parents of a youth shot dead by Singh’s
son 2011 were false and made-up. They
alleged that there was a clear attempt to
sensationalise and extract publicity out of
the case.
Biren Singh’s son Ajay Meetai had in
March 2011 shot Irom Roger for over-
taking his car. Irom later died of bullet
wounds. An Imphal court had held Ajay
guilty of culpable homicide and senten-
ced him to a five-year jail term. Later,
Ajay had moved the Manipur High Court
for bail but the petition was challenged by
Roger’s mother.
The Supreme Court is hearing the
appeal of Irom’s mother Chitra Devi who
said that Singh was using his official clout
to threaten them and had even roped in
terror organisations to browbeat them
from pursuing the case. They had pleaded
for protection in Manipur and claimed that
they had to leave the state and come to
Delhi. They also alleged that no lawyer
was willing to take up their case in the
state. The apex court had asked the centre
to arrange for their security.
The Manipur government assured the
Court that security cover under Manipur
rifles had been provided to the parents and
the social activist who brought the case
into the limelight. The centre told the court
that the lawyer appearing for the parents,
Utsav Singh Bains (a Supreme Court
lawyer), would also be given security dur-
ing his appearances in the high court.
Bains had allegedly received threats from
the People’s Liberation Army.
However, the state government claimed
that the allegations were found to false
after scrutiny. According to it, the Manipur
Bar Association also refuted Chitra Devi’s
complaints that lawyers in Manipur were
not fighting her case.
The apex court will hear the matter
again in July.
Punish TN milk
adulterators
The Supreme Court refused to
respond to the plea of advo-
cate Mathews J Nedumpara, who
wanted a stay on a jail
term awarded by the
apex court to his client,
Justice CS Karnan of
the Calcutta High
Court. Karnan is
yet to be arrested
as per Supreme
Court’s order on
May 9 which had held him guilty
of contempt and awarded him a
six-month jail term.
The vacation bench said it cou-
ld not interfere in the order passed
by a seven-judge bench and asked
the counsel to seek relief from the
same bench. Earlier this month,
the Court had declined to list the
matter and to look into Karnan’s
plea for annulling the jail order on
maintainability grounds.
Karnan has remained untrace-
able to police teams from West
Bengal and Tamil Nadu till date.
Courts
10 June 19, 2017
Centre,
Manipur
flay Irom’s
mother
Pointing towards reports
about rampant adulter-
ation of milk by private milk
companies in the state, a
petitioner pleaded in the
Madras High Court that the
punishment mandated in the
IPC for adulteration be incr-
eased to life imprisonment.
Advocate AP Suryaprakasam
wanted the High Court to ask
the government to amend
Section 272.
Citing statements made by
the dairy development minis-
ter of the state—who had
admitted that private milk
suppliers were indeed adulter-
ating milk—the petitioner
blamed the state government
for its laxity in taking strong
action against adulterators
and for not stopping the
practice.
The High Court took str-
ict cognizance of the issue
and instructed the state gov-
ernment to update it on the
action taken so far. The
government was also asked
to file its response within
two weeks.
The government, on its
part, assured the Court that a
panel would be formed to
look into the matter. The case
is listed for June 19.
No relief for
Karnan
The Ministry of External Affairs must inform all
embassies, consulates or high commissions that
people coming to India must be well versed with
Indian laws, especially regarding possessing arms,
so that they do not get into unnecessary trouble,
the Delhi High Court observed. The Court was
referring to “frequency of registration of such cases
as at hand…”
The Court’s observation came while hearing sub-
missions for quashing FIRs against two foreigners
(one from the UK and another from Kenya) under
Section 25 of the Arms Act 1959. Although they had
come to India under legal visas, bullets were found
on them while they were leaving India.
The Court was convinced that there was nothing
to prove a “conscious possession” of bullets by the
foreigners. It also noted that the bullets could not be
used as the persons concerned were not carrying
any firearms. The government’s lawyer too informed
the Court that the petitioners did not know that they
were carrying bullets.
The FIRs were dismissed.
Foreignersmustknow
aboutIndianlaws
Senior BJP leaders LK Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi
and Union minister Uma Bharti were spared from
attending the Special CBI Court in Lucknow daily for
hearings in the Babri Masjid demolition case. The
Court is hearing the case on a day-to-day basis.
However, they would have to appear whenever the
court asks them.
All the three had pleaded against daily appear-
ances. While Advani and Joshi cited old age, Bharti
submitted that she had to travel extensively due to her
ministerial duties. The Supreme Court had earlier
revived conspiracy charges against all three and ins-
tructed the Court to complete hearings and give the
ruling within two years. Later, the special CBI Court
had framed charges against all three and nine others.
Empathising with prosecutors
dealing with cases under the
Prevention of Children from Sexual
Offences (POCSO) Act because of
the pathetic conditions they work
in, the Delhi High Court sought a
report from the AAP government in
July on work environment and
appointments.
The Court was at pains to high-
light the fact that these prosecu-
tors were not even
provided a private
space to enable
them to do “seri-
ous lawyering”.
They need to
draft applications,
replies, submis-
sions, refer to vari-
ous legal docu-
ments, talk to
clients, prepare
cases, get in
touch with probing officers and
scrutinise records.
For this, privacy is essential,
the Court pointed out. It lamented
that prosecutors could not be
allowed to function from open
spaces in court premises. How
could prosecutors take on top
lawyers from the other side during
hearings without proper home-
work, the Court asked.
Aclutch of petitions plea-
ding for a stay on the
centre’s recent notification
banning the sale of cattle
for slaughter in livestock
markets were struck down by the
Kerala High Court recently. The
matter will now be taken up by the
High Court on June 28 for quick
disposal.
Responding to a PIL from You-
th Congress State Secretary TS
Saji, the High Court observed that
the new rules were only related to
trading of cattle for slaughter and
there was no restrictions on slau-
ghtering cattle or eating beef.
The Court had earlier asked the
centre to file its response on ques-
tions raised on the after-effects of
the new rule, but the centre did not
get back at the time of hearing.
The Court said it would wait for
the centre’s reaction before taking
up the petitions. It asked the centre
to respond before the next hearing.
The Supreme Court too will
hear objections to the Prevention
of Cruelty to Animals (Regulation
of Livestock Markets) Rules, 2017
(Rules) on June 15.
A man from Hyderabad, Moha-
mmed Abdul Faheem Qureshi, had
approached the apex court and
claimed that the rule was uncon-
stitutional.
The Madras High Court had
earlier slapped a stay on the cen-
tre’s notification for four weeks.
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 11
— Compiled by Prabir Biswas
Advani,Joshi,Bhartigetrelief
Twitter: @indialegalmedia
Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
Batting for POCSO
prosecutors
No stay on
centre’s cattle
slaughter order
12 June 19, 2017
Briefs
Following Attorney
General Mukul Rohatgi’s
temporary extension, the ten-
ure of five other senior law
officers has also been exten-
ded. The extension is expec-
ted to be for two years, but
the interim order says it was
extended “till further orders”.
The terms of Solicitor Gen-
eral Ranjit Kumar and Add-
itional Solicitor Generals
Maninder Singh, Tushar
Mehta, PS Narasimha, PS
Patwalia and Pinky Anand
have been extended. Only
ASG Neeraj Kishan Kaul’s
term was not extended, keep-
ing in mind his letter to the
government which said he
wanted to be relieved from
the assignment.
As per the new order of
Uttar Pradesh DGP
Sulkhan Singh (below) any
individual or group suspected
of killing or transporting cattle
for slaughter, will make it nec-
essary to invoke National
Security Act (NSA). The Act
allows detention of any per-
son for three months or more.
The order was issued to all
police officials present in a
meeting in Lucknow on June
5. Singh said that the NSA,
1980, or Gangsters Act must
be invoked against criminals
indulging in cow slaughter or
transporting cows for the
same. The DGP has ordered
the officials to make sure that
the criminals do not get bail.
NSA against cow
slaughter in UP
The government will
appoint 44 judges to
different high courts
across the country. The
names had earlier been
returned by the govern-
ment to the collegium
for reconsideration.
However, the collegium
has been able to coax the
government in taking
them back. The appoin-
tees include 29 judges to
the Allahabad High
Court, two to the Karn-
ataka High Court, seven
to the Calcutta High
Court and six to the Ma-
dras High Court. This
was the second time the
list was resubmitted to
the government by the
collegiums headed by
Chief Justice JS Khehar
(left). So far 17 judges
have been appointed to
the Bombay and the
Jammu and Kashmir
High Courts.
Lawofficersgetextension
The NGT has barred
nine state pollution
control board heads for
failing to submit compli-
ance reports of appoint-
ments of chairpersons
and member secretaries
in the boards.
The vacation bench,
headed by Justice RS
Rathore ordered board
chiefs of Himachal Prad-
esh, Haryana, Uttara-
khand, Rajasthan, Kera-
la, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu,
Telangana and Maha-
rashtra to stop function-
ing, effective immediately.
The judge said: “The
judgement was delivered
in August last year and
you had to file compli-
ance report in three mon-
ths...We had given you
ample time for complying
with our directions.”
A three-month grace
period was granted to
Delhi and two months to
Punjab and UP. The mat-
ter is listed for July 4.
Govt to appoint 44
HC judges
Punjab judge objects
to “your ladyship”
NGT bars 9 state
pollution heads
The practice of doing away
with the use of “Your Lord-
ship” while addressing judges
has been a subject of discus-
sion; it is seen as a relic of col-
onial rule. An interesting ex-
change between Justice Daya
Chaudhary (below) and Advo-
cate General Atul Nanda in the
Punjab and Haryana High
Court brought up the issue to
the fore again. Nanda addre-
ssed Justice Chaudhary as
“Your Ladyship”. Justice
Chaudhary objected to this,
saying that it is “Delhi culture”
and it won’t work in the
Punjab and Haryana High
Court. She also said that judges
and advocates have no gender
and they are not to be addre-
ssed as lady judges or lady
advocates.
Solicitor General
Ranjit Kumar
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 13
—Compiled by Lilly Paul
Twitter: @indialegalmedia/ Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
Recently, the Madras High Court
issued notice to the Tamil Nadu
animal husbandry department over a
petition filed by M Ravikumar, a
part-time sweeper at the Vellodu
sub-centre for the past 17 years.
Ravikumar is working in the sub-
centre since July 20, 2000, on a
meagre salary of `2 per day without
his services been regularised. The
department had issued notification
for vacancies to the post of assistants
without considering his case. The
Court, in its notice, mentioned that
it was “inhuman” on the part of the
government to keep poor employees
like him unregularised for decades.
Sweeper moves Madras HC
The Supreme Court on June 9
directed that the government can-
not force anybody to link his Aadhaar
to his PAN for the purpose of filing his
or her Income Tax Return. This also
means that PAN remains valid even
without Aadhaar. Despite this being
an interim order—with the larger con-
stitution bench to take it up later—it
is a big defeat for the government
which introduced this rule through
the back door, in the form of Section
139AA, inserted into the Income Tax
Act by the Finance Act, 2017.
The Court also requested the legis-
lature to “tone down” the provisions of
the section. It also rejected argume-
nts by petitioner Binoy Visman that
this is violative of one’s Fundamental
Rights. The Court did not touch all
arguments associated with Article 21
as they are still pending with the lar-
ger bench.
No need to attach
Aadhaar to PAN: SC
Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal of the
Punjab and Haryana High Court is
set to be the next Chief Justice of the
Delhi High Court. The post is current-
ly handled by Acting Chief Justice Gita
Mittal. However, this decision of the
Supreme Court collegium, as reported
in the media, cannot be put in practice
before September. The sitting judge of
the Delhi High Court, Justice SS
Saron, is senior to Justice Ajay Kumar
Mittal and technically the person due
for the post. However, Justice Saron
is retiring on September 3, which is
why the new incumbent will take over
after that.
Justice Mittal to be
Delhi HC Chief Justice
Former chief ministers of Bihar, Lalu
Prasad Yadav and Jagannath Mishra,
appeared before a special CBI court in Patna
in the fodder scam case. The case is related to
the fraudulent withdrawal of `47 lakh from
Bhagalpur treasury during the financial years
1993-94 and 1994-95. The CBI had regis-
tered a case and filed a PIL against Lalu and
Mishra, along with 42 others. The Supreme
Court ruled last month that Lalu will have to
stand trial in all the four fodder scam cases.
Ahead of introducing an amendment bill
in the parliament, the government is
working towards fixing flaws of the Lokpal
and Lokayuktas Act, including capping of
the jurist member’s tenure. Currently, the
tenure of the jurist member, who would be
appointed by the prime minister-led selec-
tion committee, is not certain. The ministe-
rial panel is reportedly considering fixing
the tenure to three years. The panel has
noticed that the law has not specified basic
details, such as the location of the Lokpal
office and secretariat.
Govt to fix flaws of Lokpal Act
Ex-Bihar CMs appear
before CBI
Lead/ Witch-hunting
14 June 19, 2017
Y name is
Pedki Devi. I
live in a village
in Jharkhand.
When I was 15,
I was married
off. My eldest daughter was born three
years later and subsequently, I gave
birth to three more children. When I
was 35, life came to a standstill when
my husband died after an illness.
Following that, my husband’s brothers
tried to seize our land. They beat me up
brutally and labelled me a witch. I filed
a case against them. At the age of 40, I
saw a police station for the first time. I
learnt how to read and write at the age
of 45. Now I am 50 years old.”
This testimony is not recorded in a
police report but is part of a math text-
M“
Singlewomenandwidows
areoftenbrandedaswitches
tohumiliateandostracise
themandseizetheirproperty.
Whydoesthisreprehensible
practicecontinueunchecked
andareourlawsstringent
enoughtoproviderelief?
By Shankar Sinha
and Meha Mathur
18-YEAR-OLD STRUGGLE
Pedki Devi (right) labelled
as a “witch”;
(below right) a textbook
chapter on maths in
Jharkhand sketches
her tragedy
Diabolic
Persecution
licly humiliated.
Neighbours are either unwilling to
talk about the incident or are petrified
to express their support. One aged
woman who saw Pedki Devi distraught
on the ground, covered with excreta
over her face and had offered her water,
now categorically denies she saw any
crime being committed. She says she
had merely offered water to a woman in
distress. And one of the accused, Srikant
Mahato, denies being present in the vil-
lage on that fateful day in 1999. He also
denies that he or his family members
were after Pedki Devi’s property.
But the truth lies elsewhere and it
came into the public domain because
Pedki Devi filed a case and decided
book, Ganit ka Jaadu (The Magic of
Maths), of the Jharkhand Education
Project for Class III students. And the
unfortunate story is followed by an exer-
cise in which students have to mark,
next to an illustration of a woman, the
milestones of Pedki Devi’s life.
The cruelty of it is that it is not fic-
tional. The real life Pedki Devi is still
running from pillar to post to get justice
against the atrocity perpetrated against
her in 1999. Like so many other cases of
crimes against women being relegated
to mere statistics, this case too has been
reduced to an exercise in a textbook for
school students.
But the humiliation and cruelty that
Pedki Devi of Kherabera village endured
in March 1999 has not been captured in
the bland account in the textbook. She
can, however, still recall the day when
her husband’s brothers pounced on her
as she was returning from the fields.
They dragged her and stripped her,
forced her to ingest excreta and urine
and beat her mercilessly. They conve-
niently branded her a witch—the evil
force that killed her husband.
When her daughters saw their moth-
er being assaulted, they rushed to her
rescue, but they too were beaten up.
One of them, Purni, suffered a miscar-
riage as a result. Pedki Devi spoke to
India Legal’s sister channel APN, about
the pain and humiliation meted out to
her some 18 years ago. And as she faced
the camera in front of her ramshackle
mud home, one could see the 12 acres of
land which had become the bone
of contention. Pedki Devi vividly
remembers the spot where she was pub-
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 15
Brandingwomenaswitchesismoreofatoolusedbylandgrabbersto
deprivefamiliesoftheirproperty.Itisalsousedasaweaponof
revengeagainstwomenwhorefusetoyieldtosexualadvances.
she would not take the humiliation lying
down. In 2004, a trial court sentenced
the culprits to one to four years in
prison. But they went in appeal to the
Jharkhand High Court which granted
them bail.
CASE DITHERS
Unfortunately, Pedki’s lawyer dithered,
for reasons best known to him, in pursu-
ing the matter in court. He did not
inform his client about the hearings and
as a result, she failed to turn up in court
twice on appointed dates. The case soon
lost direction. Meanwhile, the embold-
ened in-laws began to openly threaten
Pedki and her family with dire conse-
quences. There are allegations that they
may have had a hand in ensuring that
the case languished in the courts.
It is clear that seizing property was
what motivated the in-laws to label
Pedki Devi a witch. While rural soci-
eties, where superstition reigns
supreme, do resort to occult practices to
“neutralise” evil forces or for healing
purposes, the branding of old and wid-
owed women as witches is a matter of
convenience. Often, the real motive is to
throw them out of their property or to
abandon them if they are becoming a
financial burden for the family.
Arun Kumar Naik of Jeet, an NGO
that is working in Jharkhand, explains
the modus operandi: a scare is deliber-
ately created around a person, usually
an old destitute woman. At times, young
women are also targeted as witches, and
in such cases, the motive is more often
than not sexual exploitation.
Once branded, the woman
becomes an outcast in her own village
16 June 19, 2017
T
here are several laws that deal
specifically with witchcraft and
“witch” related offences. The first
was the Prevention of Witch (Dayan)
Practices Act 1999 enacted by Bihar.
Later, when Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand
were created in 2001, they too enacted
laws to address the witches issue. Both
adapted the 1999 Act.
Jharkhand introduced the Prevention of
Witch-hunting (Dayan Pratha Act) in 2001
and Chhattisgarh passed the Tonahi
Pratadna Nivaran Act in 2005. Later,
some other states followed suit.
It was a high court directive to Odisha
that led to the enactment of the Odisha
Prevention of Witch-hunting Act 2013.
The Odisha initiative was followed two
years later by Rajasthan passing the
Rajasthan Prevention of Witch-hunting
Act 2015. In the same year, the Assam
Witch-hunting (Prohibition, Prevention
and Protection) Bill was passed and
awaits enactment since it was sent back
to the state by the Union home ministry
for review.
Two bills—the Maharashtra
Prevention and Eradication of Human
Sacrifice and Other inhuman, Evil and
Aghori Practices and Black Magic Bill
and the Karnataka Prevention of
Superstitious Practices Bill—have been
passed but not yet enacted. Both
address the problem of witch-hunting.
So far so good. But the big question
is how effective are the enacted laws on
the ground? Partners in Law, a Delhi-
based legal resource group working in
the fields of social justice and women’s
rights, conducted an 18-month study in
Jharkhand, Bihar and Chhattisgarh. Their
2015 report—Contemporary Practices in
Witch-Hunting: Social Trends and
Interface with Law—spells out the prob-
lem areas in laws dealing specifically
with witch-hunting.
The study reveals what is wrong with
the criminal justice system. For example,
in one-third of cases, the victims never
approached the police or were prevented
from doing so by vested interest or rela-
tives. Many of the cases registered were
closed because of shoddy investigation,
lack of evidence and witnesses or a
compromise being worked out between
the victims and the perpetrators.
It is only when publicly orchestrated
violence occurred that the police took it
seriously. To quote the report: “Based on
our data, we can infer that the law inter-
acts with victims only when physical vio-
lence involving public humiliation is
involved, but such cases do not proceed
to the appellate courts unless they per-
tain to or result in murder.” In short, the
state does not normally appeal against
acquittal in cases of witch-hunting.
According to the report, the special
laws on witch-hunting on paper focus on
preventive action and addressing
harassment where the motive is clearly
linked to “witch” accusation. These laws
criminalise the acts of “identifying” and
“exhibiting” any person as a witch along
with the mental and physical torture
which accompanies it. All the offences
under the special laws are cognisable
and non-bailable. They seek to prevent
escalation of victimisation through early
intervention by the police.
H
owever, very few reported cases
are registered under the new
laws. The study examined 85 FIRs
and found that only six were registered
solely on the basis of special laws. Notes
the report: “The data categorically shows
that the mischief that the special law was
enacted to correct remains unaddressed,
with no action or prosecution against
preliminary forms of harassment. In fact,
the data establishes that special laws are
rarely, if ever, used alone, and almost
never at the preliminary stages to pre-
vent escalation of violence. Our data
from police records show that almost all
cases are registered under provisions of
the Indian Penal Code (IPC), with one or
more provisions of the special law, to
establish if it (witch-hunting) were the
motive of the crime. The majority of the
provisions of the IPC invoked in the
records are related to beating, hurt, tres-
pass, theft, murder, conspiracy, etc—with
more bailable rather than non-bailable
offences being invoked.”
According to police officials, the IPC
is invoked since the special laws are not
comprehensive enough to deal with
LawsandLimitations
Lead/ Witch-hunting
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 17
defamation, trespass, intimidation, van-
dalism, destruction of property or mur-
der. So, even when the new laws are
invoked, it is in conjunction with the IPC.
The police find it easier to frame their
cases under the existing laws.
S
ashiprava Bindhani, Odisha’s infor-
mation commissioner, who filed a
PIL in the High Court which led to
the enactment of the special law in the
state in 2013, speaks of how women
who break from conventions are usually
the targets of witch-hunts. “Having
grown up in the Mayurbhanj district of
Odisha, I observed the exploitation per-
petrated through witch-hunting against
women who threatened social struc-
tures.” She is of the view that since the
legislation has come there is some
change--cases are being registered and
people are sympathetic to the victims.
However, legal experts do not see any
dramatic change.
So, have the special laws helped?
Madhu Mehra, executive director of
Partners in Law, and Anuja Agarwal,
associate professor, department of soci-
ology at Delhi University in a joint paper
published in The Economic and Political
Weekly have this pertinent observation
to make: “The parading of women, ton-
suring the hair and blackening the face
are forms of violation that involve more
than physical injury, as they intend and
result in humiliating the victim, destroying
her social standing and dignity in the
community. These need to be part of the
penal code, given their social reso-
nance—although largely associated with
caste atrocities perpetrated against
Dalits, there is increasing evidence that
such victimisation is also used to
punish social and sexual transgressions,
which may or may not take the form of
witch-hunting.”
Thus, the new laws may have filled a
legal vacuum but do not look at the
socio-economic situation that encour-
ages witch-hunting. It is known that it
thrives in areas where there is lack of
education, economic depravity, health
facilities and access to justice. But the
criminal justice system continues to see
the malaise as one rooted in irrational,
barbaric practices and superstition. This
is even reinforced in several judgments,
one of which calls it a tribal custom of
the “Middle Ages” which is perpetuated
till today.
Any law or amendments made to an
existing Act has to factor the socio-eco-
nomic context rather than see witch-
hunting as merely an irrational act
guided by superstitious beliefs.
Also, the motives for witch-hunting
have changed over the years. Laws
have to take into account the present-
day reality.
Illustration: Anthony Lawrence
and is ostracised.
The problem is not endemic to
Jharkhand alone. One hears similar
stories from across the country—of
women being branded as witches and
blamed for the death of a family mem-
ber, the failure of a crop or any other
untoward incident.
SOME EXAMPLES
Here are a few illustrative instances:
Badar village, Balrampur district,
Chhattisgarh, 2016: A 35-year-old
woman is beaten to death by her broth-
er-in-law and his son on suspicion that
she is responsible for a child’s death
Mayangi village, Odisha, 2015: A 35-
year-old woman is accused of being a
witch and forced to eat excreta
Anglong district, Assam, 2014: A
gold medalist in javelin who represented
the state in several national meets, is
tied up in a fishing net and brutally
beaten up by villagers on suspicion that
she indulged in witchcraft
Smit village, Shillong, Meghalaya,
2013: Twelve persons arrested for the
lynching of three in a case of witch
hunting. The accused were reportedly
related to the victims
The statistics from various states on
witchcraft-related murders is, to say the
least, shocking (see box). However, the
situation in Jharkhand is the worst.
Social activist Ajay Kumar Jaiswal, who
has been working at the grassroots level
in the state for the last 26 years says
that his team surveyed 332 villages last
year and found 300 cases of women
being harassed as witches. He says:
“Jharkhand has 32,000 villages and
every village has such cases. So, thou-
sands of women are suffering. We need
a very big awareness campaign to eradi-
cate this problem.”
Dr Louis Marandi, Jharkhand’s min-
ister for social welfare, women and child
development and minority affairs says
the government is doing its bit through
campaigns using street theatre and
workshops. But, she admits it will be a
long haul: “We can’t eradicate the prob-
lem completely. We can’t be watching
over people 24 hours a day,” she says
adding that she has no knowledge of the
Pedki Devi case. “If you give us all the
papers and her story, we will try to pro-
vide her protection through the local
administration.”
Jharkhand is among the few states to
have enacted a specific law—the
Prevention of Witch Practices Act, 2001.
Other states also have laws in place to
counter the malaise (Accompanying
story). But these have not had the
desired impact.
This is perhaps why activists like
Jaiswal point out that the new law is not
an effective deterrent in Jharkhand.
“One year of punishment and `2,000 as
18 June 19, 2017
Lead/ Witch-hunting
Tribalsocietiesalwaysbelievedin
goodandevilspirits.Thegood
spiritsauguredwellnessandheal
people.Theevilforcescould
wreakhavocandcausedisasters.
“Medicalfacilitieshavenotreached
manypartsofthecountry.Andin
Jharkhandthereisadeep-seatedbelief
thatsomepeoplehavethesupernatural
powerofhealingaswellasdestroying
things.So,ifsomethinggoeswrong
youendupblamingthatperson.”
—SubhashMendupurkar,directorof
theSocietyforUpliftmentthrough
RuralAction
“Wecan’teradicatetheproblem
completely.Wecan’tbewatching
overpeople24hoursaday...Ifyou
giveusallthepapersandPedkiDevi’s
story,wewilltrytoprovideherprotec-
tionthroughthelocaladministration.”
—DrLouisMarandi,Jharkhand’s
ministerforsocialwelfare,women
andchilddevelopmentand
minorityaffairs
“Jharkhandhas32,000villages
andeveryvillagehassuchcases.
So,thousandsofwomenare
suffering.Weneedaverybig
awarenesscampaigntoeradicate
thisproblem.”
—AjayKumarJaiswal,socialactivist
whohasbeenworkingatthegrass-
rootslevelinthestateforthelast
26years
fine is hardly a punishment.” According
to him, a more stringent punishment is
required like the Rajasthan Prevention
of Witch-Hunting Act, 2015 which pro-
vides for seven years rigorous imprison-
ment extending up to a life term, and/or
`1 lakh fine. This, he said, is more in
keeping with the nature of the crime.
THE ORIGINS
Tribal societies always believed in the
tradition of good and evil spirits. The
good spirits, it was believed, could bring
about wellness in the community and
heal people. The evil forces, on the other
hand, could wreak havoc and cause nat-
ural disasters like floods, famine, disease
or drive away the rain. In tribal commu-
nities, it was a woman who was
endowed with the power of healing.
However, the line between good and
evil was always a thin one. Traditionally,
it was the all-knowing “Mahan” or seer
of the village who identified the woman
with the evil force residing inside her.
She would be branded as a witch, parad-
ed naked and killed and her family
members ostracised. Anthropologists
like KS Singh, former director of the
Anthropological Society of India, have
been quoted as saying that the concept
of black magic and white magic got fur-
ther underlined after India became
colonised by the European powers.
Subhash Mendupurkar, director of
the Society for Upliftment through
Rural Action (SUTRA), has worked
extensively in Jharkhand. He traces the
problem to lack of medical care.
“Medical facilities have not reached
many parts of the country. And in
Jharkhand there is a deep-seated belief
that some people have the supernatural
power of healing as well as destroying
things. So, if something goes wrong you
end up blaming that person. Once mod-
ern medical facilities are made accessi-
ble such beliefs will fade away,” he says.
But today, branding women as witch-
es is more of a tool used by land grab-
bers to deprive families of their proper-
ty. It is also used as a weapon of revenge
against women who refuse to yield to
sexual exploitation. Also, the campaign
of a political party is sometimes
derailed, particularly within tribal areas,
by branding one of its activists as a
witch. Such exploitative behaviour is
sought to be explained as part of local
customs and therefore, acceptable.
While stringent laws will help,
changing societal attitudes and mindsets
is the real challenge. Forget a tribal state
like Jharkhand, we have a situation
where even in a cosmopolitan city like
Mumbai, a leading Bollywood actor was
recently accused of practicing witchcraft
by her embittered ex-boyfriend.
Superstition, as they say, runs deep.
And there are enough people waiting to
exploit the vulnerable.
—With inputs from
Rafi Sami and Irfan Amayur
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 19
2015 NCRB figures on registered
witchcraft-related murder cases:
States
No. of
Cases
Jharkhand 32
Odisha 26
Madhya Pradesh 20
Telangana 14
Gujarat 13
Chhattisgarh 13
Maharashtra 5
Karnataka 5
UP 3
Bihar 2
Tripura 1
Andhra Pradesh 1
TOTAL 135
ListofShame
WASHING HIS HANDS OFF
One of the accused in the Pedki Devi case, Srikant Mahato, has denied his involvement
Twitter: @indialegalmedia
Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
20 June 19, 2017
F you are a VIP’s son or daughter,
chances are that largesse will be
showered on you by the state even
without you seeking it. Ask Raktim
Gogoi, Supreme Court judge Ran-
jan Gogoi’s son, who was chosen
as one of the lawyers to represent the
Punjab government in the apex court
and other courts outside Chandigarh.
The selection came as surprise for him.
However, after the lawyers list was
released in March 2017, he wrote to
the Punjab government to withdraw
his name as it was included without
his consent.
Similar was the experience of Saket
Sikri, son of Justice AK Sikri of the
Supreme Court. He wrote a letter to the
Punjab government requesting that his
name be removed from the list. Sikri
told India Legal: “I wrote to have my
name withdrawn as my consent was
Cloutand
Lineage
Theappointmentofgovernmentlawyersandadvocate
generalshasoftenbeenquestionedbecausetheyaremostly
connectedtoministersandjudges.Thisleavesethical
lawyersfeelingshortchanged
By Usha Rani Das
I
APPOINTMENT
LETTER
Illustration: Anthony Lawrence
Focus/ Standing Counsels
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 21
not taken. I did not even apply for the
post.” But he refused to comment on
why his name was included in the list in
the first place.
Were these cases of misdirected
favouritism? There is no way of conclu-
sively determining that. But one can say
that some lawyers are favoured over oth-
ers and the reason may not always be
professional competence.
Remember, there was a controversy
over an appointment in Madhya Pra-
desh in November 2014 when Aditya
Shankar, son of Union Minister of Law
and Justice and Information Technology
Ravi Shankar Prasad, was appointed as
the standing counsel of the state govern-
ment in the apex court. Immediately
after the appointment, BS Banthia, who
was the standing counsel of Madhya
Pradesh for 12 years, raised objections,
alleging it to be a case of “favouritism”.
He said that Shankar was appointed
to represent the state in the apex court
though he had not passed the man-
datory Advocate-On-Record (AOR)
examination.
Banthia was quoted by a newspaper
as saying that “his only qualification is
that he is Ravi Shankar Prasad’s son”.
The Congress party had also raised
objections, with its then leader of the
Opposition in the Madhya Pradesh ass-
embly, the late Satyadev Katare, point-
ing out that the post should have gone
to someone from the state, and not an
outsider like Shankar.
When Aditya Shankar was contacted,
he told India Legal he had suspected he
was being favoured and had hence rej-
ected the MP government’s offer twice.
He said: “I knew I was being appointed
because I was Ravi Shankar Prasad’s
son. It had nothing to do with my cre-
dentials…. But when they offered me the
position a third time, I took it as a chal-
lenge and accepted it. As soon as the
allegations came in February 2015, I
quit the office the following month and
joined Kaden Boriss (a law firm). It is
also true that I did not pass the exami-
nation but we all know that the Advo-
cate-On-Record examination is just a
formality.”
LINEAGE COUNTS
Instances of such appointments are apl-
enty in the Supreme Court and High
Courts of different states. While Aditya
Shankar resigned and Gogoi and Sikri
refused the offer, there are many gov-
ernment lawyers who, though they
were appointed thanks to their political
affiliations, enjoy the benefits with im-
punity. Legal experts note that over the
years, the post of state counsels and
advocate generals have become political
appointments.
The list of advocate generals selected
by the Madhya Pradesh government
over the years is telling. Pushpendra
Kaurav, who became the additional ad-
vocate general for Madhya Pradesh gov-
ernment on June 6, 2017, is alleged to
have got the post thanks to his affilia-
tions with the RSS. He was earlier asso-
ciated with the ABVP, the student wing
of the RSS, during his student years. He
started his career as a lawyer in 2001
un-der the tutelage of his maternal
uncle and BJP leader Virendra Singh
Choudhary. Kaurav had barely complet-
ed seven years as a lawyer when the
Shivraj Singh Chouhan government
appointed him deputy advocate general.
He was later promoted as additional
advocate general.
Kaurav succeeded Ravish Chandra
Agrawal, who landed the post allegedly
on the recommendation of former advo-
cate general and senior BJP leader, Ravi
Nandan Singh. Before Agrawal, senior
lawyer from Gwalior and BJP leader RD
Jain was the Madhya Pradesh advocate
general. He had succeeded another BJP
leader Ravi Nandan Singh, the first
advocate general, after the BJP came to
power in the state in 2003.
In the Congress government prior to
that, then chief minister Digvijaya Singh
had appointed Vivek Tankha as advo-
cate general. Tankha, who is now a
Congress Rajya Sabha MP and senior
Supreme Court lawyer, was just 43 then.
His father-in-law late Colonel Jay
Narayan Mushran was the finance
"IknewIwasbeing
appointedbecauseIwas
RaviShankarPrasad’s
son.Ithadnothingtodo
withmycredentials.…As
soonastheallegations
came,Iquittheoffice.”
—AdityaShankar,sonof
UnionMinisterRavi
ShankarPrasad
“Iwrotetohavemy
namewithdrawnas
myconsentwasnot
taken.Ididnoteven
applyforthepost
(ofgovernment
counsel).”
—SaketSikri,sonof
JusticeAKSikriof
theSupremeCourt
A2012CAGreportforHaryana
foundthatthesystemofappoint-
mentoflawofficersfollowedin
thestatedoesnotevenassess
themanpowerrequirement.
22 June 19, 2017
minister in the Digvijaya Singh cabinet.
Political appointments of law officers
are rampant in Haryana and Punjab
too. An RTI query by advocate Pradeep
Kumar Raparia reveals that none of the
applications received for the post of ad-
vocate general of the Punjab and Harya-
na government were invited or received
from those appointed. His RTI even
found that resumes of the applicants
were asked after they were appointed by
the state government. He alleges that a
majority of those appointed as standing
counsels and advocate generals were
kith and kin of ministers, political lead-
ers, senior bureaucrats, high court
judges, police officers and MLAs of the
ruling parties in the two states.
COURT OBSERVATIONS
Such appointments take place despite
the 2016 Supreme Court ruling in State
of Punjab & Anr vs Brijeshwar Singh
Chahal & Anr. The apex court had ruled
then that “appointment of Government
Counsel must, like the discharge of any
other function by the Government and
public bodies, be only in public interest
unaffected by any political or other
extraneous considerations. The govern-
ment and public bodies are under an
obligation to engage the most compe-
tent of the lawyers to represent them in
the Courts for it is only when those
appointed are professionally competent
that public interest can be protected in
the Courts”.
The bench headed by then CJI, TS
Thakur, had regretted that “the states
continue to harp on the theory that in
the matter of engagement of state coun-
sels, they are not accountable and that
engagement is only professional and/or
contractual, hence, unquestionable. It is
too late in the day for any public func-
tionary or the government to advance
such a contention, leave alone expect
this court to accept the same”.
Punjab, Haryana and Madhya Prade-
sh are not the only states that are exp-
loiting the system. Tamil Nadu too is
filling the post of standing counsels in
the High Court with lawyers who enjoy
a cordial relationship with the party in
power. The minute there is a change of
government, the standing counsels will
either be immediately replaced or will
themselves relinquish their posts. This
is an age-old practice prevailing in the
state for the past 50 years.
The appointment of kith and kin that
have attracted notice could well be just
the tip of the iceberg. India Legal found
in its investigation that since the AOR
exam is not mandatory to be appointed
as a standing counsel, this is being wide-
ly exploited. According to a former stan-
ding counsel, the irony is that those who
have not passed the exam have to hire
an AOR lawyer to file a case in Supreme
Court, which in turn increases the exp-
enses the state has to bear—which is an
unfair practice since it comes from the
public exchequer. “For a standing coun-
sel to be an AOR lawyer is in public
interest,” he says.
According to a source, there are even
instances where an individual is the
standing counsel of three states. For
example, advocate CD Singh is the
standing counsel of Madhya Pradesh,
Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh.
Though there is no rule that prohibits
this, it is quite impossible for an individ-
ual to handle the responsibilities of
three states, said the source. If we look
at the history of standing counsels, he
added, it is ripe with examples of rela-
tives of VIPs getting the post though
they may be “unfit” for the job.
ARBITRARY APPOINTMENTS
A 2012 Comptroller and Auditor
General (CAG) report for Haryana fou-
nd that the system of appointment of
law officers followed in the state does
not assess the manpower requirement,
leave alone any worthwhile process of
selection. The result is that more than
half of those appointed were without
any work, resulting in payment of idle
salaries. The report stated: “The engage-
ment of excess Law Officers without
assessing the quantum of work and
without resorting to fair and transpar-
ent selection method, resulted in allow-
“Acertaindegreeofcom-
petencewasrequired....
Havesomemercyonthe
courtstoo.Mereconnec-
tionwithpoliticians
shouldneverbethecrite-
riatoappointanadvocate
asgovernmentlawyer.”
—SupremeCourt
benchheadedbyCJI
JSKhehar
“Thestatescontinueto
harponthetheorythatin
thematterofengagement
ofstatecounsels,theyare
notaccountable….Itis
toolateinthedayforany
publicfunctionaryorthe
governmenttoadvance
suchacontention.”
—SCbenchheadedby
formerCJITSThakur
Thestatesclaimthattheyare
undernoobligationtofollowany
definitemethodwhileappointing
lawofficersasit’saprofessional
engagement.
Focus/ Standing Counsels
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 23
ABOVE APPEASEMENT:
The Supreme Court has on numerous
instances emphasised probity in legal posts
ing more than 50 percent Law Officers
without work and payment of idle salary
of `2.22 crore.”
In fact, in State of Punjab & Anr vs
Brijeshwar Singh Chahal & Anr in the
Supreme Court it was argued that with-
out a proper system, the appointments
may be made not because they are
required but because “they come handy
for political aggrandisement, appease-
ment or personal benevolence of those
in power towards those appointed”.
Not just that. Dismissing a plea by
the Bihar government to grant it a free
hand in appointing government lawyers,
the Supreme Court had observed in
March, 2017, that a government lawyer
should be appointed on the basis of an
advocate’s performance in courts and
not his political connections. The bench
headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar,
Justices DY Chandrachud and Sanjay
Kishan Kaul stated: “The cases involv-
ing the governments were crucial in
many aspects touching key areas of gov-
ernance. A certain degree of competence
was required from the advocates to rep-
resent the government and render mea-
ningful assistance to the courts. Have
some mercy on the courts too. Mere
connection with politicians should never
be the criteria to appoint an advocate as
government lawyer.”
In yet another petition that broke the
cycle of political appointments in Tamil
Nadu, advocate Vengadessane Vasantha-
kumar had asked the Madras High
Court to issue directions to the govern-
ment to follow prescribed rules and reg-
ulations in the appointment of standing
counsels for various state departments.
The first bench of the Court headed by
the then Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan
Kaul in August, 2016 directed the Tamil
Nadu government to devise rules and
regulations for the appointment of gov-
ernment counsels. The procedure laid
down by the Madras High Court was:
The Advocate General of the state of
Tamil Nadu should send a list of the
names to the government.
The Advocate General will then send
the list to the government.
A team of senior government officials
will scrutinize the list and then appoint
the standing counsels.
Two senior advocates of the Court to
be appointed as amicus curie
But Vasanthakumar has refused to
accept the proposals. He says: “There is
no transparency in these proposals. For
example, on what basis will the AG sel-
ect an advocate and send his name to
the government for his or her appoint-
ment as standing counsel? As soon as
the court opens after the vacations, we
will take up the issue before the first
bench which originally gave directions
to the government.”
There is also a controversy relating to
the AOR exam. Clearing it is only man-
datory for a standing counsel if he has to
file cases in the Supreme Court. But why
is it often referred to as a mere formali-
ty? A Supreme Court advocate had this
explanation: “The questions for the
AOR exam are prepared by lawyers and
whoever is well-connected can get hold
of them well in advance. It hardly takes
a month to prepare and pass the exami-
nation. Hence, practically speaking, it is
just a formality.”
The states claim that the engage-
ment of state counsels is a professional
engagement and hence they are under
no obligation either to prescribe a pro-
cedure or follow any definite method
while making such appointments. This
is indeed a convenient position to take.
India Legal was given to understand
that a standing counsel cannot be dis-
missed till the government of the day
decides to change him/her. This and
other arbitrary policies give political
parties in power the leverage to bestow
largesse on those they wish to favour.
(With inputs from Vipin Pubby in
Chandigarh, Ramasubramanian in
Chennai, Rakesh Dixit in Bhopal and
Neeraj Mishra in Raipur)
Twitter: @indialegalmedia
Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
TheSChasruledthatthe
appointmentofgovernment
counselmustbe inpublicinter-
est,unaffectedbyanypoliticalor
otherextraneousconsiderations.
Anil Shakya
States/ MP/MLA Murder
24 June 19, 2017
N eight-year-old murder
case has come to haunt
Madhya Pradesh General
Administration
Department minister Lal
Singh Arya. He was
accused of killing Congress MLA
Makhan Lal Jatav on April 13, 2009,
when the latter was campaigning for the
Lok Sabha candidate for Bhind seat,
Bhagirath Prasad.
Although the Gwalior bench of the
Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed a
non-bailable warrant against Arya on
May 31, he is still not out of the woods
as yet as the Court pointed out two legal
flaws in the Bhind trial court’s order,
which was passed on May 19. The Bhind
court had made Arya an accused after
booking him under Sections 302 and
120 (b) (conspiracy). However, the court
stayed an arrest warrant to give the
minister an opportunity to argue.
HC RULING
The High Court’s single-bench of Justice
Sheel Nagu ruled that Bhind’s trial
court judge had no power under the
Criminal Procedure Code to stay his
own order passed on the same day.
Arya’s counsel Surendra Singh argued
that the petitioner was made an accused
on weak evidence and without his side
being heard.
Arya was named the main accused by
Jatav’s family members and three eye-
witnesses. But the police ignored these
charges and instead, relied on Arya’s
security guard who did not name any-
one. The CBI, which later took over the
high-profile investigation, spared the
minister for “lack of evidence” against
him. This is not surprising, as from the
beginning, this case was characterised
by political opportunism and shoddy
investigation.
However, the most stunning volte-
face was seen in the case of Bhagirath
Prasad, Bhind’s Lok Sabha candidate for
whom Jatav was campaigning when he
was shot dead in 2009. Prasad had cate-
gorically stated then that Arya had got
Jatav murdered. However, following the
Bhind court’s May 19 order, he said:
“Despite my statement, the CBI and the
police had found no evidence against
Arya. Even I did not have concrete evi-
dence that Arya had ordered the killing.
My statement at best was noncommit-
tal.” He said attempts to target him were
“politically motivated”.
Incidentally, Prasad was principal
secretary (home) till he took voluntary
retirement in 2007. He contested the
2009 Lok Sabha elections as a Congress
candidate but lost. However, he got a
ticket again in 2014, but defected to the
BJP and won from Bhind.
POLITICAL RIVALRY
It all began in the November 2008
assembly elections when Makhan Lal
ThekillingofaCongressleaderhasexposedthisstate’s
penchantforpoliticalvendettaandwiththegovernment
backingtheaccusedminister,hecouldwellgoscot-free
By Rakesh Dixit in Bhopal
Open and
Shut Case?
THE PAST COMES TO HAUNT
Congress MLA Makhan Lal Jatav (above)
was killed on April 13, 2009 and MP
minister Lal Singh Arya was accused in
the caseA
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 25
Jatav, a little-known Congress worker,
clashed with two-time BJP MLA Lal
Singh Arya for the Gohad seat and won,
taking everyone by surprise. As a
shocked Arya licked his wounds, Jatav’s
supporters further infuriated the BJP
leader by hurling stones at him in a
function. Arya had filed an FIR against
Jatav and his supporters. On April 13,
2009, during campaigning for the Lok
Sabha election, both Jatav and Arya
came face to face at Chharenta village in
Gohad around 8.15 pm. According to
three eyewitnesses, Jatav was sitting in
the front seat of his Bolero with his son,
Arvind, while his two armed guards sat
behind. He had halted the car and was
speaking to villagers when two persons
walked up and shot him twice. Arvind
told the police he heard Arya shout:
“Makhan ko maro, bachna nahi paye
(Kill Makhan, he should not escape).”
Eyewitnesses said Arya was present at
the scene.
ACCUSED MURDERED
As the Congress mounted pressure for
Arya’s arrest, the BJP government of
Shivraj Singh Chouhan handed over the
probe to the CBI. After investigation,
the CBI identified six persons as accused
and chargesheeted them in the special
court in Bhind. Arya was excluded.
Of these six, Tej Narayan Shukla was
found murdered under mysterious cir-
cumstances at his farmhouse in 2014
when he was out on bail.
Senior Congress
leader Dr Govind Singh
claims that Shukla was
in his party but later
aligned with Arya.
Shukla was reported to
be angry with Jatav for
raising some land dis-
pute related to him in
the state assembly.
Singh claimed the
deceased had expressed
apprehensions that
Arya could get him
murdered. The murder
case dragged on till
April this year when
the CBI finally filed an
affidavit saying Arya was innocent as his
name figured neither in the FIR nor in
the chargesheet filed by it.
EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS
Jadav’s son Arvind countered the CBI
affidavit, and filed an application to
include Arya as one of the accused
under Section 319 of the IPC. Arvind’s
lawyer, Ram Pratap Kushwaha, told the
Court that his client had submitted a
similar application soon after the mur-
der also but the police chose to rely on
the gunman’s FIR which did not name
Arya. Arvind’s elder brother, Ranveer,
said that his father’s guard, a govern-
ment employee, had deliberately avoid-
ed naming Arya, but there were other
eyewitnesses too whose accounts
eventually prevailed, leading to the
arrest warrant.
The Court order spurred the
Congress and a delegation of the party
led by the leader of opposition, Ajay
Singh, called on Governor OP Kohli
on May 27 to seek the dismissal of the
minister on moral grounds. However,
Arya told journalists that the CBI had
given him a clean chit. “My counsel
applied for quashing the warrant execu-
tion, which the high court has permit-
ted,” said Arya.
However, the BJP has backed the
minister, with state party president
Nandkumar Chouhan saying there was
no need for him to resign. After the
High Court ruling, Chief Minister
Shivraj Singh Chouhan too said the
question of the minister’s resignation
does not arise.
Probity in high places seems to be in
short supply.
Twitter: @indialegalmedia
Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
AftertheHighCourt
ruling,Chief
MinisterShivraj
SinghChouhansaid
thatthequestionof
Arya’sresignation
doesnotarise.
Themost
stunning
volte-facewas
ofBhagirath
Prasad(right),
Bhind’sLScan-
didateforwhom
Jatavwascam-
paigning,when
hewasshot
dead.
UNI
26 June 19, 2017
OR 19-year-old Fida Fathima
from Kozhikode, the legal bat-
tle she won in the Kerala
High Court to protect her reli-
gious rights under Article 25
(1) of the Indian Constitution
was a significant one—both as a citizen
and as a Muslim. The young girl was
forced to take legal recourse after she
received her admit card for the MBBS
entrance examination conducted by the
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
(AIIMS) on May 28.
What upset Fathima was that the
admit card listed items which candi-
dates were prohibited from bringing/
wearing into the examination hall and
this included “headgear and scarf”. This
was not acceptable for Fathima who had
covered her head with a hijab since
childhood in accordance with the prac-
tice prescribed by her religion. She
decided to go to court.
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
On May, 24, the Kerala High Court
upheld the plea filed by Fathima and
three others and ruled that the direc-
tions issued by AIIMS are a direct
infringement of Article 25 (1) of the
Constitution of Indian which says “…all
persons are equally entitled to freedom
of conscience and the right to freely
profess, practice and propagate any reli-
gion of one’s choice”. The Court, while
passing the judgment, directed AIIMS
to ensure that “the restrictions as
regards to use of headgear/head scarf
should not be enforced against candi-
dates who by virtue of Article 25 (1) of
the Constitution have the protection to
wear such dress as part of their faith.’’
An elated Fathima says that she was
immensely pleased that she could take
the examination on May 28 without
F
A Matter of Faith
TheKeralaHighCourt’sdirectiontoAIIMStorespectreligiousrightsguaranteedunder
theconstitutionandallowMuslimwomentowearahijabwhileappearingforan
entranceexam,overturneda2015rulingbytheSupremeCourt
By Naveen Nair in Thiruvananthapuram
States/ Kerala/ Religious Attire
Photos: Anil Shakya
the Board to frame proper rules
that do not infringe on the reli-
gious rights of candidates.
The CBSE was in for further
embarrassment when girl stu-
dents cutting across religious
barriers raised a hue and cry
about the totally unethical way
in which they were frisked and
checked at exam centres. One in
Kannur, North Kerala was in the
eye of storm when students
alleged that even their under-
garments were checked. “It was
so humiliating. The invigilator
asked me to unhook my top
innerwear to check. I was so dis-
turbed that I could not write the exami-
nation,’’ a student told the media.
After the huge outcry, an investiga-
tion was initiated by the State Human
Rights Commission which also visited
the school in which the incident
occurred and suspended four invigila-
tors. Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi
Vijayan also directed the district admin-
istration to initiate criminal proceeding
against the school.
Advocate Fathima Thahaliya, who
was one of the petitioners along with
Fida Fathima and others at the High
Court in the latest case, says it is com-
mendable that the High Court ruled in
their favour despite the Supreme Court
taking a different stand in 2015. “These
are times when everything is being
questioned—from what we wear to what
we eat. So it is absolutely important to
question such rules at the moment.
When it is known that a highly sensitive
issue is involved, why frame such rules?
If it’s for preventing malpractice then
there are many other mechanisms that
can be used,’’ she says.
The Kerala High Court’s recent
ruling only reinforces that the funda-
mental rights enshrined in Article 25 (1)
are indisputable and no new rule can
bend it.
feeling guilty of having
shown disrespect to her reli-
gion.“I felt immensely proud
when I got this judgment
from the court because it
upholds my right to practice
my religion and yet at the
same time pursue my dream
in life. I hope this judgment
will give strength to candi-
dates like me in the future
who are in a dilemma as to
whether they should respect
their religion or blindly fol-
low such rules. Just because
someone is practicing her
religion doesn’t mean she
should be denied opportunities in life,’’
Fida Fathima told India Legal.
This is not the first time that the
issues of headgear and scarf have come
up before the Kerala High Court. In
2016, a similar case was heard by the
court ahead of the pre-medical entrance
examination conducted by the Central
Board for Secondary Education (CBSE).
The ruling went in favour of Amnah
Bint Basheer of Thrissur who was
allowed to sit for the examination wear-
ing a hijab. The Court had observed that
“the right of women to have the choice
of dress based on religious injunctions is
a fundamental right protected when
such prescription of dress is an essential
part of religion”.
Hence on May 24, the Kerala High
Court was only reiterating one of its ear-
lier judgments. However, the advocate
who appeared for Fathima, PE Sajal,
claimed it was a landmark verdict.
“What the court said in 2016 was for
that particular case and that is why the
issue has come up again. Even the
AIIMS admit card was not fully clear
about the rules. This judgment brings
clarity on the issue and will set a prece-
dent,’’ Sajal told India Legal.
The Court directed Fathima and oth-
ers who wear the head dress to reach the
venue of the examination at least one
hour in advance so that they could be
thoroughly frisked by a lady invigilator.
The Court has also added that such
checks should be carried out “respecting
religious sentiments”.
DIFFERING VERDICTS
It has never been smooth sailing for
those who insist on wearing a hijab. In
2015, the CBSE had come out with a set
of guidelines banning use of headgears
and scarf in the pre-medical entrance
examinations. This was done after ram-
pant malpractices were reported from
certain centres. Three girls had then
approached the Supreme Court with a
plea similar to the one filed by Fathima.
The apex court turned it down and
asked the students to appear in the
examination without wearing any head-
gear or scarf.
However, in 2016 following wide-
spread criticism, the CBSE relaxed the
rules allowing veils and certain kind of
burqas inside exams but again kept out
the head scarf. Here again, Justice A
Muhamed Mustaq of the Kerala High
Court directed the CBSE to admit a
Thrissur-based student and also asked
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 27
“Thesearetimeswhenevery-
thingisbeingquestioned—from
whatweweartowhatweeat.
Whenahighlysensitiveissueis
involved,whyframesuchrules?”
—FathimaThahaliya,advocate
Twitter: @indialegalmedia
Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
Agriculture/ GM Technology
28 June 19, 2017
N May 16, when Additional
Solicitor-General Tushar
Mehta sought to intervene
in a private dispute between
Monsanto and its biggest
erstwhile sub-licencee,
Hyderabad-based Nuziveedu Seeds, it
seemed like the agriculture ministry was
not done with “fixing” Monsanto.
Monsanto, an American company, is
the leader in genetically-modified crop
technology. In December 2015, its local
joint venture had terminated
Nuziveedu’s licence over refusal to pay
trait fee dues as per their contract.
Mehta wanted to make submissions on
behalf of the government on the
patentability of genetically-engineered
traits like insect resistance and herbi-
cide tolerance in plants, a week after
hearings on the matter had ended. But
the Delhi High Court did not take them
on record. It told him to move an appli-
cation to do so and said the principal
parties would be entitled to reply.
Incidentally, the views of the ASG
and M Prabhakara Rao, the founder and
managing director of Nuziveedu Seeds,
Sowing Seeds
of Doubt
TheAdditionalSolicitor-GeneralintervenedbetweenMonsanto
andNuziveeduSeeds,givingtheimpressionthattheministry
isplayingfavourites.Butthismaynotbethefullpicture
By Vivian Fernandes
THE DEBATE IS ON
The Bt Cotton plant (right), seeds (above) and
the toxic bollworm (facing page). As per the
PPVFR Act, if a proprietary GM trait is used
by any breeder, the trait developer can
make a claim for “benefit sharing”
O
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 29
are quite similar. In 2015, Rao had
made a case for widely-used GM traits
to be considered as SEPs (Standard
Essential Patents) which should be
available on FRAND (fair, reasonable
and non-discriminatory) terms. He was
quoting from an article in the August
2014 edition of the Colorado Law
Review. Rao has also been pushing for
the traits to be patented under the
Protection of Plant Varieties and
Farmers’ Rights (PPVFR) Act.
STANDARD ESSENTIAL PATENTS
India has protected these genetically-
engineered traits under the Indian
Patent Act, as amended in 2002 and
2005. But the ASG believes that is not
good for the country’s food security. He
asserts that Monsanto and its licencees
want to cling on to protections under
that Act because they are addicted to
profiteering. He wants widely used pro-
prietary GM traits to be regarded as
SEPs like the technologies used in smart
phones, available freely on payment of a
fee fixed by the regulator. Monsanto’s
bollworm-resistance trait, for instance,
is found in almost all the Bt cottonseed
planted in the country.
Though the ASG agrees the traits by
themselves and the method of putting
them in plants can be patent-protected,
once inside, they become part of the
plant. Except for microorganisms, the
patent act does not allow animals and
plants, including seeds, and species to
be patented. Nor can biological process-
es be patented. The ASG was referring
to a list of “exclusions” in the act.
The ASG says GM traits once incor-
porated in plants, become part of it and
are indistinguishable from them. Rao,
like the ASG, believes they lose their dis-
tinct character once grafted into plant
DNA. And the plants pass on the genet-
ic traits to subsequent generations
through a biological process, which
again puts them in the excluded catego-
ry. Hence, the correct law, according to
the ASG, for protection of GM traits is
the PPVFR Act of 2001. If a proprietary
GM trait is used by any breeder (that is
say, a seed company like Nuziveedu) in
any of the seeds it registers with the
PPVFR Authority, the trait developer
can make a claim for “benefit sharing”
on the authority. The PPVFR Authority
will make payments from a National
Gene Fund, made up of contributions by
seed companies registered with it.
WITHOUT PERMISSION
The ASG believes the PPVFR Act allows
seed companies as breeders to use the
proprietary traits in their own varieties
and hybrids without permission. But
this is only for limited or one-time use.
Once the traits are introgressed (trans-
fer of genetic information from one
species to another), the seed company
will not need to use the genetic material
of the trait developer. In other words, he
seems to be making a case for legalised
grab of IPRs.
But Justice RK Gauba of the Delhi
High Court, against whose order the
two litigants had gone in appeal to the
division bench, was not impressed by
similar arguments advanced by
Nuziveedu Seeds. In his order of March
28, he upheld Monsanto’s patent on
insect-resistance traits in Bt cottonseed.
He said the patent act has a section on
“invention” by which it meant “a new
product or process involving an inven-
tive step and capable of industrial pro-
duction”. The provision was inserted in
2002 so that patentees were not
deprived of the reward for innovations
based on skill and ingenuity and “above
what occurs in nature”. The GM traits
involve “laboratory processes and are
not naturally occurring substances,”
Justice Gauba averred. They are man-
made and therefore, do not fall within
the ambit of exclusions in the patent act.
The gene which produces the boll-
worm-killing toxic protein in Bt cotton
plants is obtained from a soil bacterium.
But the natural isolate cannot be
TheASGbelievesthatoncethe
traitsareintrogressed,theseed
companywillnotneedtouse
thegeneticmaterialofthe
traitdeveloper.
Agriculture/ GM Technology
30 June 19, 2017
straightaway inserted into the cotton
genome. It has to be modified for the
plant to accept it. It also has compo-
nents attached so that the production of
the toxic protein is switched on and off
at particular points in the life cycle of
the cotton plant. This gene construct
when inserted can locate anywhere in
the plant genome. There are hundreds
or thousands of possibilities. The pro-
duction of the toxin, its potency, the
crop yield, its quality, and other proper-
ties of the plant can be affected by the
location of the insertions. Each of these
insertions is called an “event”. The event
chosen after screening, for patenting,
would be the one that gives the best set
of desired results.
Justice Gauba said the PPVFR Act is
for plant varieties. A plant variety, he
said, is the lowest rank grouping of
plants, distinguished from others by one
or more characteristics. Relying on the
1991 international convention on pro-
tection of plant varieties, he said, a sin-
gle plant, a trait (like disease resistance
or flower colour), a chemical or other
substance (like oil or DNA), or a plant
breeding technology (like tissue culture)
do not meet the definition of a variety.
Justice Gauba also termed benefit
sharing as a “pot of gold at the end of
the rainbow” because it depended on the
breeders (seed companies) registering
their varieties with the PPVFR
Authority, which is not mandatory. Most
seed companies, in fact, do not.
Agribiotech companies say benefit
sharing is for farmers and conservers of
biodiversity. It is not for developers of
GM traits which are manmade and cre-
ated in laboratories. They say the law
makes a distinction between the subject
matter of an invention and use of an
invention. If the subject matter is a
plant or variety, it cannot be patented
under IPA, but inventions whose use lies
in plants and varieties can be patented.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST?
Incidentally, Rao was made a member of
the PPVFR Authority in October 2016.
He has been saying that seed companies
should not have to obtain a non-objec-
tion certificate (NOC) from the trait
developer, as it gives the developer a
handle to impose onerous terms. Once
the Genetic Engineering Appraisal
Committee recommends commercial
release of a GM trait and the govern-
ment accepts the recommendation, seed
companies should be free to use the trait
on terms fixed by the government and
not the trait developer. Otherwise, it will
result in a monopoly, he said.
On a reference by the PPVFR
Authority, the ASG has opined that such
an NOC is indeed not necessary. It is
not prescribed by the Act. An NOC goes
against the grain of the PPVFR Act, he
says, which is to promote the develop-
ment of new varieties and hybrids. He
says a mere declaration is enough. This
should not be construed as an NOC. A
self-declaration that genetic material
used in transgenic varieties has been
lawfully obtained is enough.
Rao is said to enjoy considerable
clout in the agriculture ministry, though
this correspondent cannot vouch for it.
His company was a big beneficiary (but
not the only one) from the ministry’s 70
percent reduction in Bt cottonseed trait
fees (payable to a joint venture of
Monsanto). Bt cottonseed prices to
farmers were cut by just four percent.
Seed companies kept the savings.
Given the agriculture minister’s pub-
licly stated dislike of Monsanto’s “profi-
teering”, it would be reasonable to
assume that the ASG’s views have his
consent. But a senior agriculture min-
istry official said on a non-attributable
basis, that the minister has not given his
approval to the ASG’s legal opinion and
the ministry has not vetted it. “It is a
private matter between two companies
and the government has no locus standi
in the dispute.” Since the agriculture
ministry had issued a notification in
May last year waiving patents on GM
traits and then withdrawing the notifi-
cation hastily, one cannot say for sure
that the issue has been laid to rest.
The author is editor of
www.smartindianagricutlure.in
In2015,MPrabhakara
Rao,founderofNuziveedu
Seeds,hadmadeacase
forGMtraitstobeconsid-
eredasStandardEssential
Patents,whichshouldbe
availableonfairterms.
Twitter: @indialegalmedia
Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
AdditionalSolicitor-
GeneralTusharMehta
saysthattheGMtraits,
onceincorporatedin
plants,becomepartofit
andareindistinguishable
fromthem.
JusticeRKGaubaofthe
DelhiHighCourtwasnot
impressedwitharguments
ofNuziveeduSeeds.He
upheldMonsanto’spatent
oninsectresistancetraits
inBtcottonseed.
India Legal 19 June 2017
32 June 19, 2017
Survival of the Fittest
ThesearecriticaltimesforthissectorinIndiaandtheonlywaytosailthroughistoinnovate
inbusinessmodelsandlearnnewskillssuchasartificialintelligenceandcloudcomputing
By Imran Qureshi in Bengaluru
STILL THE SUNRISE
INDUSTRY?
(Above) Employees at the
Infosys campus in Bengaluru;
(Facing page) The IT sector
boom had created many work
opportunities
HE IT industry in India is ag-
ain facing challenging times.
Whether it is due to new tech-
nologies or US visa policies,
there is a churning that is tak-
ing place. The focus is clearly to ride the
curve of new job-threatening technolo-
gies or face the sack.
The insecurity has led to the renewed
formation of a forum for IT employees
which says that at least 56,000 employ-
T
ees are expected to lose their jobs over
the next year. Though industry experts
dismiss this insecurity as part of normal
attrition and say it is standard practice
to get rid of two percent of employees
from the bottom of the pyramid every
year, the fact remains that annual norms
of appraisal have been made tougher.
Ashok Soota, executive chairman,
Happiest Minds Technologies and a for-
mer chairman, Confederation of Indian
Tech/ IT Industry/Job Losses
UNI
sition, which many in the industry see
as yet another phase that could help it
grow further.
Fundamentally, the older form of
doing business is changing. No more are
clients coming up with large projects
that last for a minimum of a couple of
years. These have been reduced from 18-
24 months to just three months now.
“New businesses are very project-orient-
ed. It is platform-based and you need
people to get it up and running. This
requires fewer people and work is short-
er in duration and cyclical,’’ said an HR
manager on condition of anonymity.
SENIOR POSITIONS
Unlike previous years, what has added
to the hue and cry this year is the purg-
ing of people in senior positions such as
vice-presidents or senior V-Ps. Mohan-
das Pai, former CFO and HR head of
Infosys, calls it a “clutter concentrated at
a certain level’’. His counterparts, how-
ever, call it “people stuck with legacy
technology, little learnability and less
adaptability’’. In short, it means that
these managers don’t bring value to the
work that the team is doing.
A business head of a major company
said: “There are a dime-a-dozen man-
agers in this industry and they are not
needed. Technology has also moved to a
point where the industry can afford not
to have them. The result is pink slips.
The industry needs to have every res-
ource that is billable. This is the reason
for the purge in the middle.’’
But surely these people can be re-
skilled? An HR consultant who previ-
ously worked for an IT company said:
“It is not easy. It depends entirely on the
mindset of the individual and the tech-
nology background. Today, the customer
is no longer saying I want this to be
done like earlier. He simply asks what
can you do to improve things?”
In the old days, said Soota, it was
easier for people who couldn’t get re-
skilled to move on because industry was
growing at a phenomenal pace. Today, it
simply cannot afford it. But it is not a
bad thing as such people have another
| INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 33
started this, people trust us to take up
their issues.”
The reality is that automation is
slowly taking over this industry and, as
Soota says, will replace a “large number
of low-value jobs by higher-value but
smaller number of jobs”.
This will also decrease the number of
jobs in this sector. The nature of engage-
ment in this sector will undergo a tran-
Industry, said: “In an industry that is
still a huge net hirer, employing upwar-
ds of a million-and-a-half annually, you
are bound to get rid of some people. But
there have not been mass layoffs.’’
INSECURE LOT
But there is genuine fear over job losses
and it has led to the Forum for Infor-
mation Technology Employees trying to
get itself registered formally. It will be
the first independent association of its
kind in the country and is a bid to
organise the estimated 2.8 million emp-
loyees in India’s IT sector. The insecuri-
ty runs high and the forum claims that
at least 56,000 employees of top soft-
ware companies such as Infosys, Wipro
and Cognizant are expected to lose their
jobs over the next year. J Jayaprakash, a
member of the forum, said: “Since we
ourselves are IT employees who have
”Indiancompaniesmayevengo
touniversitiesintheUStohire
localtalent,groomthemandput
themonthejob.Wewillalsoget
toknowwhatskillsetsthelocal
peoplehave.”
–AformerHRdirectorofanITfirm
Rajeev Tyagi
chance to become entrepreneurs. “After
all, every other industry has an IT arm.
The demand for IT skills will remain
high because there is a huge amount of
requirement everywhere,’’ he said.
NEW CHALLENGES
The change is happening at a phenome-
nal pace. A business head of an IT com-
pany said: “When the internet came,
you could not find Java-trained individ-
uals. Now, we are talking about data sci-
ence and machine learning which makes
artificial intelligence adaptable. These
are the newer challenges. In fact, today,
architects are still in demand, hands-on
programmers are still in demand….”
This is an industry that is quick to
adapt and has done so every time it has
faced a crisis. Whether it is the Y2K one,
the Lehman Brothers crash or the US
slowdown, the Indian IT industry sim-
ply went on an overdrive and re-skilled
and adapted to meet the demands of the
market and grow. It is the same appro-
ach it is adapting this time too, despite
the new curbs on H1B visas proposed by
the US government.
In fact, even before Donald Trump
came to occupy the White House, for-
mer president Barack Obama’s rhetoric
had forced the Indian IT industry to
reduce its share of H1B visas in fiscal
2016. According to a report by National
Foundation for American Policy, a US-
based non-profit think-tank, seven top
Indian IT companies saw a drop of 37
percent in H1B visas in 2016 as com-
pared to 2015. These included TCS,
Wipro and Infosys. It said, the 9,356
new H1B petitions for the top seven
Indian-based companies approved in
fiscal 2016 represent only 0.006 percent
of the US labour force. So, it is hardly
surprising that companies have reduced
the number of applications for the cov-
eted visas this year.
Not just that, the sector is changing
its business model of onsite deployment.
From the days when almost 50 percent
of a company’s work was outside India,
it has been reduced to 30 percent. This
means that the number of Indians who
used to be sent abroad by IT companies
will come down and could be reduced to
as little as 10 percent.
Kris Laxmikanth, CEO, Headhun-
ters, said that with the new norms,
Indian companies will be hiring Ameri-
cans locally. One former HR director
said: “Indian companies may even go to
universities there to hire local talent,
groom them and put them on the job.
We will also know what skill sets the
local people have.” Soota added that by
sending higher skilled people abroad,
Indian companies will evolve and move
up the value chain.
Some insiders were surprised at the
proposal of Infosys’ founder, NR Nara-
yan Murthy that top managements of IT
companies take a cut in salary so that
the younger lot does not lose jobs. “It is
a cut-and-dried world today. If you are
paid handsomely, professionals perform.
Otherwise, they find better jobs and go
away,” said an HR consultant.
The only way then to survive this
dog-eat-dog world is to move towards
new opportunity areas like machine
learning, artificial intelligence, IoT
(Internet of Things) and robotic process
automation. Doing a niche job is the
security one needs.
Twitter: @indialegalmedia
Website: www.indialegallive.com
Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
Automationwillreplacealarge
numberoflow-valuejobs
byhigher-valuebutsmaller
numberofjobs.
—AshokSoota,executivechairman,
HappiestMindsTechnologies
Tech/ IT Industry/Job Losses
34 June 19, 2017
BRACING FOR LAYOFFS: Protests against
mass terminations in TCS at the Town Hall
in Bengaluru in January 2017
UNI
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017
India Legal 19 June 2017

More Related Content

What's hot

Ethics in Policing, Corrections, and Criminal Justice
Ethics in Policing, Corrections, and Criminal JusticeEthics in Policing, Corrections, and Criminal Justice
Ethics in Policing, Corrections, and Criminal JusticeNicholas Tancredi
 
Article:The Zimmerman Verdict A Victory of the Rule of Law over Politics by R...
Article:The Zimmerman Verdict A Victory of the Rule of Law over Politics by R...Article:The Zimmerman Verdict A Victory of the Rule of Law over Politics by R...
Article:The Zimmerman Verdict A Victory of the Rule of Law over Politics by R...Ron Martinelli
 
#TeamClinton vs. #TeamTrump #Election2016
#TeamClinton vs. #TeamTrump #Election2016#TeamClinton vs. #TeamTrump #Election2016
#TeamClinton vs. #TeamTrump #Election2016Empowered Presentations
 
To serve and protect
To serve and protectTo serve and protect
To serve and protectAshley Farr
 
L&J #1 Intro Fall2008
L&J #1 Intro Fall2008L&J #1 Intro Fall2008
L&J #1 Intro Fall2008gsagan
 
Internet and the Law: Protecting Yourself Against Online Abuse - Dr. Emily La...
Internet and the Law: Protecting Yourself Against Online Abuse - Dr. Emily La...Internet and the Law: Protecting Yourself Against Online Abuse - Dr. Emily La...
Internet and the Law: Protecting Yourself Against Online Abuse - Dr. Emily La...University of Calgary
 
Serena Essapour | Criminal Law III Week 3 Summer 2010
Serena Essapour | Criminal Law III Week 3 Summer 2010Serena Essapour | Criminal Law III Week 3 Summer 2010
Serena Essapour | Criminal Law III Week 3 Summer 2010Serena Essapour
 
Powerpoint
PowerpointPowerpoint
Powerpointyoun9485
 
The russia hoax the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donald ...
The russia hoax the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donald ...The russia hoax the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donald ...
The russia hoax the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donald ...Theotis Davis
 
ATJ Conf RHEIR 6 1 2011
ATJ Conf RHEIR  6 1 2011ATJ Conf RHEIR  6 1 2011
ATJ Conf RHEIR 6 1 2011EGDunn
 
2016 Presidential Election: Marketing Lessons
2016 Presidential Election: Marketing Lessons2016 Presidential Election: Marketing Lessons
2016 Presidential Election: Marketing LessonsInternet Marketing Muscle
 
Liberty Cjus 350 discussions
Liberty Cjus 350 discussionsLiberty Cjus 350 discussions
Liberty Cjus 350 discussionsHomework Simple
 
Prophet Muhammad will never honor Bomb-Robot nor ISIS
Prophet Muhammad will never honor Bomb-Robot nor ISISProphet Muhammad will never honor Bomb-Robot nor ISIS
Prophet Muhammad will never honor Bomb-Robot nor ISISallahcom
 
Letter to the Nebraska Congressional Delegation
Letter to the Nebraska Congressional DelegationLetter to the Nebraska Congressional Delegation
Letter to the Nebraska Congressional DelegationJames Harrold
 
Takes onequery(1)
Takes onequery(1)Takes onequery(1)
Takes onequery(1)Joel Brooks
 

What's hot (17)

News Stories
News StoriesNews Stories
News Stories
 
Ethics in Policing, Corrections, and Criminal Justice
Ethics in Policing, Corrections, and Criminal JusticeEthics in Policing, Corrections, and Criminal Justice
Ethics in Policing, Corrections, and Criminal Justice
 
Article:The Zimmerman Verdict A Victory of the Rule of Law over Politics by R...
Article:The Zimmerman Verdict A Victory of the Rule of Law over Politics by R...Article:The Zimmerman Verdict A Victory of the Rule of Law over Politics by R...
Article:The Zimmerman Verdict A Victory of the Rule of Law over Politics by R...
 
#TeamClinton vs. #TeamTrump #Election2016
#TeamClinton vs. #TeamTrump #Election2016#TeamClinton vs. #TeamTrump #Election2016
#TeamClinton vs. #TeamTrump #Election2016
 
To serve and protect
To serve and protectTo serve and protect
To serve and protect
 
L&J #1 Intro Fall2008
L&J #1 Intro Fall2008L&J #1 Intro Fall2008
L&J #1 Intro Fall2008
 
Internet and the Law: Protecting Yourself Against Online Abuse - Dr. Emily La...
Internet and the Law: Protecting Yourself Against Online Abuse - Dr. Emily La...Internet and the Law: Protecting Yourself Against Online Abuse - Dr. Emily La...
Internet and the Law: Protecting Yourself Against Online Abuse - Dr. Emily La...
 
Serena Essapour | Criminal Law III Week 3 Summer 2010
Serena Essapour | Criminal Law III Week 3 Summer 2010Serena Essapour | Criminal Law III Week 3 Summer 2010
Serena Essapour | Criminal Law III Week 3 Summer 2010
 
Powerpoint
PowerpointPowerpoint
Powerpoint
 
The russia hoax the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donald ...
The russia hoax the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donald ...The russia hoax the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donald ...
The russia hoax the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donald ...
 
ATJ Conf RHEIR 6 1 2011
ATJ Conf RHEIR  6 1 2011ATJ Conf RHEIR  6 1 2011
ATJ Conf RHEIR 6 1 2011
 
2016 Presidential Election: Marketing Lessons
2016 Presidential Election: Marketing Lessons2016 Presidential Election: Marketing Lessons
2016 Presidential Election: Marketing Lessons
 
Liberty Cjus 350 discussions
Liberty Cjus 350 discussionsLiberty Cjus 350 discussions
Liberty Cjus 350 discussions
 
Prophet Muhammad will never honor Bomb-Robot nor ISIS
Prophet Muhammad will never honor Bomb-Robot nor ISISProphet Muhammad will never honor Bomb-Robot nor ISIS
Prophet Muhammad will never honor Bomb-Robot nor ISIS
 
Riots research paper
Riots research paperRiots research paper
Riots research paper
 
Letter to the Nebraska Congressional Delegation
Letter to the Nebraska Congressional DelegationLetter to the Nebraska Congressional Delegation
Letter to the Nebraska Congressional Delegation
 
Takes onequery(1)
Takes onequery(1)Takes onequery(1)
Takes onequery(1)
 

Similar to India Legal 19 June 2017

Obstruction Of Justice In Huckleberry Finn
Obstruction Of Justice In Huckleberry FinnObstruction Of Justice In Huckleberry Finn
Obstruction Of Justice In Huckleberry FinnBeth Hall
 
India Legal - 2 December 2019
India Legal -  2 December 2019India Legal -  2 December 2019
India Legal - 2 December 2019ENC
 
Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State Community
Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State CommunityWatergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State Community
Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State CommunityMelissa Williams
 
Marvin Anderson Case
Marvin Anderson CaseMarvin Anderson Case
Marvin Anderson CaseVictoria Soto
 
The Pros And Cons Of President Nixon And The Watergate 7
The Pros And Cons Of President Nixon And The Watergate 7The Pros And Cons Of President Nixon And The Watergate 7
The Pros And Cons Of President Nixon And The Watergate 7Julie Jones
 
Presidential Impeachment Trials
Presidential Impeachment TrialsPresidential Impeachment Trials
Presidential Impeachment TrialsLisa Jones
 
India Legal 28 May 2018
India Legal 28 May 2018India Legal 28 May 2018
India Legal 28 May 2018ENC
 
A Synopsis Of The Movie Fletch Essay
A Synopsis Of The Movie Fletch EssayA Synopsis Of The Movie Fletch Essay
A Synopsis Of The Movie Fletch EssayJessica Hill
 
Racial Discrimination In The 19Th Century Essay
Racial Discrimination In The 19Th Century EssayRacial Discrimination In The 19Th Century Essay
Racial Discrimination In The 19Th Century EssayJennifer Letterman
 
Gay Politician No 5 Research Paper
Gay Politician No 5 Research PaperGay Politician No 5 Research Paper
Gay Politician No 5 Research PaperVeronica Hall
 
Executive Privilege In The United States Vs. Richard Nixon
Executive Privilege In The United States Vs. Richard NixonExecutive Privilege In The United States Vs. Richard Nixon
Executive Privilege In The United States Vs. Richard NixonAmber Rodriguez
 
Comparing The Functions And Power Of Judical, Legislative,...
Comparing The Functions And Power Of Judical, Legislative,...Comparing The Functions And Power Of Judical, Legislative,...
Comparing The Functions And Power Of Judical, Legislative,...Rebecca Diamond
 
Bill Clinton Impeach Essay
Bill Clinton Impeach EssayBill Clinton Impeach Essay
Bill Clinton Impeach EssayLinda Torres
 
INDIA LEGAL: Stories that count Edition: 20 February 2017
INDIA LEGAL: Stories that count Edition: 20 February 2017INDIA LEGAL: Stories that count Edition: 20 February 2017
INDIA LEGAL: Stories that count Edition: 20 February 2017ENC
 
Similarities Between The Red Scare And The Crucible
Similarities Between The Red Scare And The CrucibleSimilarities Between The Red Scare And The Crucible
Similarities Between The Red Scare And The CrucibleKimberly Brooks
 
President Ronald Reagan And President Reagan
President Ronald Reagan And President ReaganPresident Ronald Reagan And President Reagan
President Ronald Reagan And President ReaganJessica Reyes
 
Impeachments To Become President Essay
Impeachments To Become President EssayImpeachments To Become President Essay
Impeachments To Become President EssayJennifer Lopez
 

Similar to India Legal 19 June 2017 (20)

Obstruction Of Justice In Huckleberry Finn
Obstruction Of Justice In Huckleberry FinnObstruction Of Justice In Huckleberry Finn
Obstruction Of Justice In Huckleberry Finn
 
India Legal - 2 December 2019
India Legal -  2 December 2019India Legal -  2 December 2019
India Legal - 2 December 2019
 
Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State Community
Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State CommunityWatergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State Community
Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State Community
 
Marvin Anderson Case
Marvin Anderson CaseMarvin Anderson Case
Marvin Anderson Case
 
DECLARATION OF CONSCIENCE
DECLARATION OF CONSCIENCEDECLARATION OF CONSCIENCE
DECLARATION OF CONSCIENCE
 
The Pros And Cons Of President Nixon And The Watergate 7
The Pros And Cons Of President Nixon And The Watergate 7The Pros And Cons Of President Nixon And The Watergate 7
The Pros And Cons Of President Nixon And The Watergate 7
 
Presidential Impeachment Trials
Presidential Impeachment TrialsPresidential Impeachment Trials
Presidential Impeachment Trials
 
India Legal 28 May 2018
India Legal 28 May 2018India Legal 28 May 2018
India Legal 28 May 2018
 
A Synopsis Of The Movie Fletch Essay
A Synopsis Of The Movie Fletch EssayA Synopsis Of The Movie Fletch Essay
A Synopsis Of The Movie Fletch Essay
 
Racial Discrimination In The 19Th Century Essay
Racial Discrimination In The 19Th Century EssayRacial Discrimination In The 19Th Century Essay
Racial Discrimination In The 19Th Century Essay
 
Gay Politician No 5 Research Paper
Gay Politician No 5 Research PaperGay Politician No 5 Research Paper
Gay Politician No 5 Research Paper
 
Executive Privilege In The United States Vs. Richard Nixon
Executive Privilege In The United States Vs. Richard NixonExecutive Privilege In The United States Vs. Richard Nixon
Executive Privilege In The United States Vs. Richard Nixon
 
Comparing The Functions And Power Of Judical, Legislative,...
Comparing The Functions And Power Of Judical, Legislative,...Comparing The Functions And Power Of Judical, Legislative,...
Comparing The Functions And Power Of Judical, Legislative,...
 
Bill Clinton Impeach Essay
Bill Clinton Impeach EssayBill Clinton Impeach Essay
Bill Clinton Impeach Essay
 
INDIA LEGAL: Stories that count Edition: 20 February 2017
INDIA LEGAL: Stories that count Edition: 20 February 2017INDIA LEGAL: Stories that count Edition: 20 February 2017
INDIA LEGAL: Stories that count Edition: 20 February 2017
 
Similarities Between The Red Scare And The Crucible
Similarities Between The Red Scare And The CrucibleSimilarities Between The Red Scare And The Crucible
Similarities Between The Red Scare And The Crucible
 
Trump Letter
Trump LetterTrump Letter
Trump Letter
 
President Ronald Reagan And President Reagan
President Ronald Reagan And President ReaganPresident Ronald Reagan And President Reagan
President Ronald Reagan And President Reagan
 
Letter to ec 2
Letter to ec 2Letter to ec 2
Letter to ec 2
 
Impeachments To Become President Essay
Impeachments To Become President EssayImpeachments To Become President Essay
Impeachments To Become President Essay
 

More from ENC

India legal 20 April 2020
India legal 20 April 2020India legal 20 April 2020
India legal 20 April 2020ENC
 
India legal 13 april 2020
India legal 13 april 2020India legal 13 april 2020
India legal 13 april 2020ENC
 
India legal 06 april 2020
India legal 06 april 2020India legal 06 april 2020
India legal 06 april 2020ENC
 
India legal 30 march 2020
India legal 30 march 2020India legal 30 march 2020
India legal 30 march 2020ENC
 
India legal 23 march 2020
India legal 23 march 2020India legal 23 march 2020
India legal 23 march 2020ENC
 
India legal 16 march 2020
India legal 16 march 2020India legal 16 march 2020
India legal 16 march 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 9 March 2020
India Legal - 9 March 2020India Legal - 9 March 2020
India Legal - 9 March 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 2 March 2020
India Legal - 2 March 2020India Legal - 2 March 2020
India Legal - 2 March 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 24 February 2020
India Legal - 24 February 2020India Legal - 24 February 2020
India Legal - 24 February 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 17 February 2020
India Legal - 17 February 2020India Legal - 17 February 2020
India Legal - 17 February 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 10 February, 2020
India Legal - 10 February, 2020India Legal - 10 February, 2020
India Legal - 10 February, 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 3 February 2020
India Legal - 3 February 2020India Legal - 3 February 2020
India Legal - 3 February 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 27 January 2020
India Legal - 27 January 2020India Legal - 27 January 2020
India Legal - 27 January 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 20 January 2020
India Legal - 20 January 2020India Legal - 20 January 2020
India Legal - 20 January 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 13 January 2020
India Legal - 13 January 2020India Legal - 13 January 2020
India Legal - 13 January 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 6 January 2020
India Legal - 6 January 2020India Legal - 6 January 2020
India Legal - 6 January 2020ENC
 
India Legal - 30 December 2019
India Legal - 30 December 2019India Legal - 30 December 2019
India Legal - 30 December 2019ENC
 
India Legal - 23 December 2019
India Legal - 23 December 2019India Legal - 23 December 2019
India Legal - 23 December 2019ENC
 
India Legal - 16 December 2019
India Legal - 16 December 2019India Legal - 16 December 2019
India Legal - 16 December 2019ENC
 
India Legal - 9 December 2019
India Legal - 9 December 2019India Legal - 9 December 2019
India Legal - 9 December 2019ENC
 

More from ENC (20)

India legal 20 April 2020
India legal 20 April 2020India legal 20 April 2020
India legal 20 April 2020
 
India legal 13 april 2020
India legal 13 april 2020India legal 13 april 2020
India legal 13 april 2020
 
India legal 06 april 2020
India legal 06 april 2020India legal 06 april 2020
India legal 06 april 2020
 
India legal 30 march 2020
India legal 30 march 2020India legal 30 march 2020
India legal 30 march 2020
 
India legal 23 march 2020
India legal 23 march 2020India legal 23 march 2020
India legal 23 march 2020
 
India legal 16 march 2020
India legal 16 march 2020India legal 16 march 2020
India legal 16 march 2020
 
India Legal - 9 March 2020
India Legal - 9 March 2020India Legal - 9 March 2020
India Legal - 9 March 2020
 
India Legal - 2 March 2020
India Legal - 2 March 2020India Legal - 2 March 2020
India Legal - 2 March 2020
 
India Legal - 24 February 2020
India Legal - 24 February 2020India Legal - 24 February 2020
India Legal - 24 February 2020
 
India Legal - 17 February 2020
India Legal - 17 February 2020India Legal - 17 February 2020
India Legal - 17 February 2020
 
India Legal - 10 February, 2020
India Legal - 10 February, 2020India Legal - 10 February, 2020
India Legal - 10 February, 2020
 
India Legal - 3 February 2020
India Legal - 3 February 2020India Legal - 3 February 2020
India Legal - 3 February 2020
 
India Legal - 27 January 2020
India Legal - 27 January 2020India Legal - 27 January 2020
India Legal - 27 January 2020
 
India Legal - 20 January 2020
India Legal - 20 January 2020India Legal - 20 January 2020
India Legal - 20 January 2020
 
India Legal - 13 January 2020
India Legal - 13 January 2020India Legal - 13 January 2020
India Legal - 13 January 2020
 
India Legal - 6 January 2020
India Legal - 6 January 2020India Legal - 6 January 2020
India Legal - 6 January 2020
 
India Legal - 30 December 2019
India Legal - 30 December 2019India Legal - 30 December 2019
India Legal - 30 December 2019
 
India Legal - 23 December 2019
India Legal - 23 December 2019India Legal - 23 December 2019
India Legal - 23 December 2019
 
India Legal - 16 December 2019
India Legal - 16 December 2019India Legal - 16 December 2019
India Legal - 16 December 2019
 
India Legal - 9 December 2019
India Legal - 9 December 2019India Legal - 9 December 2019
India Legal - 9 December 2019
 

Recently uploaded

Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfSABC News
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinIpsos France
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 

Recently uploaded (9)

Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 

India Legal 19 June 2017

  • 1. InvitationPrice `50 NDIA EGALL STORIES THAT COUNT June19, 2017 ` 100 I IT Sector: Future Shock? PEDKI DEVI, labelled a “witch” and publicly humiliated in 1999, is a subject matter in school books but still fighting for justice 18 years later, as the culprits roam free and continue to threaten her. The motive? Greed to grab her 12 acres of land Standing Counsels: Relative Values www.indialegallive.com Witches BrewBranding women as dayans across tribal belts in India is on the rise as greed for property, enmity and collusion by local officials overturns legal and ethical norms, aided by illiteracy and superstition
  • 3. IVEN the nature of the Indian polit- ical system in which the doctrine of separation of powers—the corner- stone of accountable governance— lies supine at the altar of executive privilege, I doubt that we will ever see a tele- vised session of parliament in which a top law enforcement officer openly calls a prime minis- ter a liar and points the finger at him for trying to derail an investigation of collusion between his closest advisors and a hostile foreign power to influence the course of a general election. In India’s Westminster-style democracy, the legislature, for all intents and purposes, is a slavish extension of the executive (members of parliament are also ministers) and the execu- tive can hardly be expected to conduct an im- partial investigation into its own wrongdoings. The accountability process is further stymied by ministerial control of the bureaucracy, par- ticularly law enforcement. In these circumstances, obstruction of jus- tice, or targeted prosecution of political oppo- nents, is the everyday rule. Small wonder then that Indians were flab- bergasted by the spectacular real-time reality TV show in which a sacked FBI director surgi- cally rubbished the character and credibility of his former boss, the most powerful man in the world, no less than the President of Ame- rica himself. And that too in testimony be- fore the powerful 15-member US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, comprising of Democrats and Republicans (the President’s own party). Public investigations by bipar- tisan Congressional committees are de rigueur in the American sys- tem. Senior administration officials are regularly hauled up on Capitol Hill to testi- fy under oath on the functioning of their departments and to answer charges of mis- feasance or malfeasance. Not all of them attract a great deal of press. But former FBI Director James Comey’s broadside against President Trump was singular in that it evoked memories of Nixon and Watergate in which the issue of obstruction of justice caused the late president to resign in disgrace. There is nothing remarkable about an FBI chief being fired by the president at whose pleasure he serves. President Bill Clinton also dismissed his FBI chief, William Sessions, in 1993 for proven misconduct. A president can dump the FBI boss with or without giving any reason. But there are sub- tleties in the American system. The FBI chief reports directly to the attorney general and not to the president. And FBI directors keep presi- dents at arm’s length, scrupulously guarding their autonomy as the top federal law enforce- ment and domestic counter-terrorism and counter-espionage officers. What is remarkable, however, is that Trump fired the man heading a criminal investigation into the president’s election campaign. “The FBI has gone after presidents before,” Tim Weiner, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and historian told VOX, pointing to the Bureau’s probes of Richard Nixon during Watergate and Ronald Reagan during the Iran-Contra scan- dal. “But never has a president dismissed an FBI director when members of the president’s administration and members of the president’s campaign team were under investigation for colluding with a foreign power (Russia).” A mericans treat law enforcement as a religion. They also believe that public officials owe their loyalty to the consti- tution and not to their political bosses. And obstruction of justice, when proven at any level, receives zero tolerance, cutting across party lines. Did Comey accuse Trump of this? And did Trump obstruct justice? Did Trump demand personal loyalty over loyalty to the constitution? Those are the key questions being debated across America. In a lukewarm attempt to shield Trump from this charge, Senator James Risch, a Rep- ublican from Idaho, zeroed in on this point BINDING THE MINOTAUR Inderjit Badhwar Letter from the Editor | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 3 G
  • 4. 4 June 19, 2017 during the Senate hearings at which Comey testified. He wanted to know whether Trump had “ordered” or “directed” Comey to drop the probe of Michael Flynn, his national security adviser, whom he was forced to fire barely three weeks after being sworn in because he had not revealed his secret contacts with the Russians. This is how the exchange went: SENATOR RISCH: There’s 28 words (in your written statement) there that are in quotes, and it says, quote, “I hope”—this is the presi- dent speaking—“I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.” Now those are his (the president’s) exact words, is that correct? COMEY: Correct. RISCH: And you wrote them here, and you put them in quotes? COMEY: Correct. RISCH: Thank you for that. He did not direct you to let it go. COMEY: Not in his words, no. RISCH: He did not order you to let it go. COMEY: Again, those words are not an order. RISCH: He said, “I hope.” Now, like me, you probably did hundreds of cases, maybe thou- sands of cases charging people with criminal offenses. And, of course, you have knowledge of the thousands of cases out there that— where people have been charged. Do you know of any case where a person has been charged for obstruction of justice or, for that matter, any other criminal offense, where this — they said, or thought, they hoped for an outcome? COMEY: I don’t know well enough to answer. And the reason I keep saying “his words” is I took it as a direction. RISCH: Right. COMEY: I mean, this is the president of the United States, with me alone, saying, “I hope” this. I took it as, this is what he wants me to do. (CROSSTALK) COMEY: Now I — I didn’t obey that, but that’s the way I took it. RISCH: You—you may have taken it as a direc- tion, but that’s not what he said. (CROSSTALK) COMEY: Correct. I—that’s why... RISCH: He said—he said, “I hope.” COMEY: Those are exact words, correct. RISCH: OK, do you—you don’t know of any- one that’s ever been charged for hoping some- thing. Is that a fair statement? COMEY: I don’t, as I sit here. RISCH: Yeah. Thank you. R isch probably thought he had scored a point. Did he? Here’s the definition of Obstruction of Justice from the US Federal Legal Code: (a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United Sta- tes, or officer who may be serving at any examina- tion or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing mag- Letter from the Editor PLAIN TALK Former FBI director James Comey had the courage to take on his former boss Donald Trump in the US Senate Select Committee UNI
  • 5. | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 5 istrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or cor- ruptly or by threats or force, or by any threat- ening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influ- ence, obstruct, or impede, the due administra- tion of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). That definition does not require that there be a direct order that would quash or affect the investigation. “The key question here is wheth- er the president acted with corrupt intent,” Renato Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor, told CNN. O n a personal note, I covered the Water- gate scandal as a reporter in Washing- ton, and the present situation brings to mind a great American hero Senator Sam Ervin who chaired the Senate Select Commi- ttee on Watergate and brought down Nixon. I see analogies to the current Trump situation. Ervin was an uncomplicated, strict consti- tutionalist who believed the Social Contract and Rule of Law to be living entities. He came finally to the conclusion that Nixon and his top aides resorted to dirty tricks to weaken the Democratic Presidential campaign and incr- ease Nixon’s chances for winning in 1972. When information surfaced, Nixon and his cronies lied to investigators, resorted to cover- ups and got caught. Ervin opened his Commi- ttee’s hearings with these famous words still engraved in the minds of the reporters who covered that event: “If the many allegations made to date are true, then the burglars who broke into the Democratic National Committee at the Water- gate (apartment) were in fact breaking into the home of every American citizen…. And if these allegations prove true, what they were seeking to steal was not the jewels, money or other pre- cious property, but something much more valuable: the right to vote in a free election.” As Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of Lawfare and a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution, put it: “This is the Trump presidency. There is no evi- dence that any chains can bind this president: not lawyers, not norms, not procedures, not repeated screw-ups of the sort that educate other leaders, and certainly not the mere expectations of decent public servants. But the problem is that the United States is res- ponsible for his actions—and we are paying daily the price for them, particularly in our international relations but also in our domestic governance. It simply will not do any more for politicians to shield their eyes and say the equivalent of “even if Trump did act inappro- priately, and I’m not saying he did, it’s not my problem because he’s a beastly minotaur and no chains can bind him”. Today there is no Sam Ervin or anybody of his stature in the American Senate. Both hous- es are controlled by Republicans, some of whom blindly support Trump and some who maintain a studied silence. But exceptional cir- cumstances give birth to exceptional heroes. Twitter: @indialegalmedia Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com NO EXCEPTIONS (Left) The Senate Select Committee pinned Richard Nixon and his cronies for their unethical practices in the run-up to the 1972 elections (Below) The sacked FBI director surgically rubbished the character and credibility of the most powerful man in the world, US President Donald Trump UNI
  • 6. Hunting for “Dayans” The reprehensible custom of branding single women and widows as witches and grabbing their property continues in various states. Are our laws strong enough to act as a deterrent? 14 LEAD FOCUS ContentsVOLUME. X ISSUE. 31 JUNE19,2017 OWNED BY E. N. COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD. A -9, Sector-68, Gautam Buddh Nagar, NOIDA (U.P.) - 201309 Phone: +9 1-0120-2471400- 6127900 ; Fax: + 91- 0120-2471411 e-mail: editor@indialegalonline.com website: www.indialegalonline.com MUMBAI: Arshie Complex, B-3 & B4, Yari Road, Versova, Andheri, Mumbai-400058 RANCHI: House No. 130/C, Vidyalaya Marg, Ashoknagar, Ranchi-834002. LUCKNOW: First floor, 21/32, A, West View, Tilak Marg, Hazratganj, Lucknow-226001. PATNA: Sukh Vihar Apartment, West Boring Canal Road, New Punaichak, Opposite Lalita Hotel, Patna-800023. ALLAHABAD: Leader Press, 9-A, Edmonston Road, Civil Lines, Allahabad-211 001. Editor Inderjit Badhwar Senior Managing Editor Dilip Bobb Deputy Managing Editor Shobha John Executive Editor Ajith Pillai Contributing Editor Ramesh Menon Associate Editors Meha Mathur, Sucheta Dasgupta Deputy Editor Prabir Biswas Staff Writer Usha Rani Das Senior Sub-Editor Shailaja Paramathma Art Director Anthony Lawrence Deputy Art Editor Amitava Sen Senior Visualizer Rajender Kumar Graphic Designer Ram Lagan Photographers Anil Shakya, Bhavana Gaur Photo Researcher/ Kh Manglembi Devi News Coordinator Production Pawan Kumar CFO Anand Raj Singh VP (HR & General Administration) Lokesh C Sharma Advertising Valerie Patton Mobile No: 9643106028, Landline No: 0120-612-7900 email: marketing@encommunication.org Circulation Manager RS Tiwari Mobile No: 8377009652, Landline No: 0120-612-7900 email: indialegal.enc@gmail.com PublishedbyProfBaldevRajGuptaonbehalfofENCommunicationsPvtLtd andprintedatSuperCassettesIndustiesLtd.,C-85-86&94,Sector4,Noida,Distt. GautamBudhNagar,UP-201301. Allrightsreserved.Reproductionortranslationinany languageinwholeorinpartwithoutpermissionisprohibited.Requestsfor permissionshouldbedirectedtoENCommunicationsPvtLtd.Opinionsof writersinthemagazinearenotnecessarilyendorsedby ENCommunicationsPvtLtd.ThePublisherassumesnoresponsibilityforthe returnofunsolicitedmaterialorformateriallostordamagedintransit. AllcorrespondenceshouldbeaddressedtoENCommunicationsPvtLtd. Managing Editor (Web) Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr Editor (Content & Planning) Sujit Bhar Senior Content Writer Punit Mishra (Web) Technical Executive Anubhav Tyagi 6 June 19, 2017 All in the Family There is uneasiness about the appointment of standing coun- sels and advocates-general by various states since clout and lineage seem to be the decid- ing factors 20
  • 7. STATES REGULARS Followuson Facebook.com/indialegalmedia Twitter:@indialegalmedia Website:www.indialegallive.com Contact:editor@indialegallive.com Ringside............................8 Delhi Durbar......................9 Courts.............................10 National Briefs................12 Media Watch ..................38 Satire ..............................50 Cover Design: ANTHONY LAWRENCE | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 7 Whose Tech Is It Anyway The ministry might be playing favourites in a row between Monsanto and Nuziveedu Seeds. But this isn’t the full picture 28 AGRICULTURE Tango with India As a new world order emerges, Modi will try to be the right man in the right place for Europe and the US. Will this give India an edge on the world stage? 46 DIPLOMACY “Govt Obliged to Share Information” CIC Dr MS Acharyulu, who recently asked a post office to disclose data on demoneti- sation, says policy decisions that impact the lives of people should be made public 36 INTERVIEW How Democratic Is My Country? Public institutions are increasingly found lacking in moral courage to stand up to the Executive. This is undermining the functioning of India’s system of governance 44 BOOKS Jaipur Palace Wars Though the Supreme Court has settled this protracted feud over five-star heritage hotels, secret machinations by rival royals may yet disinherit the true heirs 40 PROPERTY Faith and Probity The Kerala High Court has directed AIIMS to let Muslim women wear the hijab while writing the MBBS entrance 26 24Murder Most Foul The killing of a Congress lawmaker has again brought to light the practice of political vendetta in MP Survival of the Smartest With the IT industry going through another churning, the only way to sail through is to innovate and learn new skills or face the sack 32 TECH
  • 8. 8 June 19, 2017 “ RINGSIDE These fireworks have no effect on Iran. They will soon be eliminated .... They are too small to affect the will of the Iranian nation and its officials. —Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, reacting to the bomb and gun attacks in Tehran on June 7, as quoted on Iran's state TV I am convinced the Paris Agreement and broad cli- mate action is unstoppable. President Trump’s decision has given us a new sense of urgency. It’s also created a leadership vacuum, but like all vacuums, it will be filled. —Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme Erik Solheim, in The Times of India In terms of my political writing, very often, I actually feel even more rage than I show through the work. When I write fiction, I’m in my body [as] a very different person. There’s a great peace in me when I write fiction. —Author Arundhati Roy, in an interview to www.slate.com I am looking at women coming in as jawans. I am going to start it soon. Firstly, we will start with women as military police jawans... We have already started the process and women will now have an opportunity to show their grit and strength in tak- ing up challenges in com- bat roles and shattering the glass ceiling. —Army chief General Bipin Rawat, to PTI NDTV isn’t an overnight phenomenon, even they know that. If you are so eager to finish us, then Sir, some day, let’s sit across each other. We’ll be there, you’ll be there and so will be a Live Camera. —NDTV journalist Ravish Kumar, on his Facebook page Alleged that Roys owe banks `48 crore. Adanis owe banks 72,000 crore. May we expect Gautam bhai to be raided next? —Historian Ramachandra Guha, on Twitter Triple talaq is an enormity; it is a legacy of a pre- Islamic Arabia…. This obnoxious practice must be put an end to, as has been done in almost every Muslim country. The Indian Muslim man is no special creature to continue to have this special right. —Former Union minister Arif Mohammad Khan, in The Indian Express Any change in an entrenched interest, who- ever it be, is discomfort- ing. But law of change goes on. It’s universal. —Puducherry governor Kiran Bedi, on Twitter
  • 9. | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 9 The Congress Working Committee meeting last week gave a hint of where the party is headed. The long-awaited decision to elevate Rahul Gandhi as Congress party president this October was not as unexpected as Sonia’s message. She appar- ently took some select- ed leaders aside and informed them that her ill- health did not allow her to carry on as president and doctors have suggested she move to the hills where the air is cleaner. In fact, the CWC meet was held in her house, not the party headquarters, an indication of her restricted move- ments. It is a measure of their respect for her bind- ing force and political acu- men (or lack of it in the case of the son) that the leaders asked Sonia to continue to oversee party strategy and progress. She is likely to move to the house being built in Chharabra, near Shimla by daughter Priyanka, which is almost complete. Her favourite summer getaway is Kausani in the Uttarkhand hills where a close family friend has a house but for a lengthier stay in cooler climes, Shimla makes more sense. It has already been sur- veyed by the SPG. Twitter: @indialegalmedia Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, who also handles the defence portfolio, is finding his hands are too full. So, every now and then he skips functions which a rak- shamantri is expected to attend. Last fortnight, at the last minute, he pulled out from an Indian Navy-FICCI conference on Warship Building which is an annual event normally presided over by the defence minis- ter. Jaitley’s inability to make it to the meet not only underlined how busy he is, but also how important it is to have a dedicated person handling the defence portfolio. Perhaps the cabinet reshuffle, predicted to follow the Presidential polls may bring relief to Jaitley and several others with multiple ministries under their charge. An inside track on happenings in Lutyen’s Delhi Delhi Durbar FINALLY, THE CORONATION SINGH IS NOT KING It now appears that the controversial notification regarding curbs on the country’s cattle trade was because of a procedural goof-up and a premature death. The notification was issued five days after Environment Minister Anil Madhav Dave passed away unexpectedly. It was Dave’s brainchild and his successor, Dr Harsh Vard- han, was still finding his feet when, two days later, the notification, signed by Dave, was issued. Dave was a member of the RSS and the decision was in tune with his world view. However, in a proce- dural faux pas, the file was never shown to his suc- cessor with bureaucrats assuming it had the approval of higher-ups in the government. CATTLE CONFUSION DOUBLE SHIFT One of those present at the CWC meeting was in for some good-natured ribbing. Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is to be resurrected in that role, albeit in celluloid. The biopic on his tenure is already being shot and is loosely based on the book, The Accidental Prime Minister by Sanjaya Baru, his former media adviser. Dr Singh will not be pleased with the choice of the actor who will play him—Anupam Kher, who has been a staunch supporter of the Modi government. The Congress is not happy either; the film’s title is the same as the book which did not show Dr Singh in a good light, or Sonia, for that matter. Plus, it is due for release in December 2018, shortly before the next Lok Sabha elections.
  • 10. The centre and Manipur submitted in the Supreme Court that allegations levelled against Manipur CM N Biren Singh by the parents of a youth shot dead by Singh’s son 2011 were false and made-up. They alleged that there was a clear attempt to sensationalise and extract publicity out of the case. Biren Singh’s son Ajay Meetai had in March 2011 shot Irom Roger for over- taking his car. Irom later died of bullet wounds. An Imphal court had held Ajay guilty of culpable homicide and senten- ced him to a five-year jail term. Later, Ajay had moved the Manipur High Court for bail but the petition was challenged by Roger’s mother. The Supreme Court is hearing the appeal of Irom’s mother Chitra Devi who said that Singh was using his official clout to threaten them and had even roped in terror organisations to browbeat them from pursuing the case. They had pleaded for protection in Manipur and claimed that they had to leave the state and come to Delhi. They also alleged that no lawyer was willing to take up their case in the state. The apex court had asked the centre to arrange for their security. The Manipur government assured the Court that security cover under Manipur rifles had been provided to the parents and the social activist who brought the case into the limelight. The centre told the court that the lawyer appearing for the parents, Utsav Singh Bains (a Supreme Court lawyer), would also be given security dur- ing his appearances in the high court. Bains had allegedly received threats from the People’s Liberation Army. However, the state government claimed that the allegations were found to false after scrutiny. According to it, the Manipur Bar Association also refuted Chitra Devi’s complaints that lawyers in Manipur were not fighting her case. The apex court will hear the matter again in July. Punish TN milk adulterators The Supreme Court refused to respond to the plea of advo- cate Mathews J Nedumpara, who wanted a stay on a jail term awarded by the apex court to his client, Justice CS Karnan of the Calcutta High Court. Karnan is yet to be arrested as per Supreme Court’s order on May 9 which had held him guilty of contempt and awarded him a six-month jail term. The vacation bench said it cou- ld not interfere in the order passed by a seven-judge bench and asked the counsel to seek relief from the same bench. Earlier this month, the Court had declined to list the matter and to look into Karnan’s plea for annulling the jail order on maintainability grounds. Karnan has remained untrace- able to police teams from West Bengal and Tamil Nadu till date. Courts 10 June 19, 2017 Centre, Manipur flay Irom’s mother Pointing towards reports about rampant adulter- ation of milk by private milk companies in the state, a petitioner pleaded in the Madras High Court that the punishment mandated in the IPC for adulteration be incr- eased to life imprisonment. Advocate AP Suryaprakasam wanted the High Court to ask the government to amend Section 272. Citing statements made by the dairy development minis- ter of the state—who had admitted that private milk suppliers were indeed adulter- ating milk—the petitioner blamed the state government for its laxity in taking strong action against adulterators and for not stopping the practice. The High Court took str- ict cognizance of the issue and instructed the state gov- ernment to update it on the action taken so far. The government was also asked to file its response within two weeks. The government, on its part, assured the Court that a panel would be formed to look into the matter. The case is listed for June 19. No relief for Karnan
  • 11. The Ministry of External Affairs must inform all embassies, consulates or high commissions that people coming to India must be well versed with Indian laws, especially regarding possessing arms, so that they do not get into unnecessary trouble, the Delhi High Court observed. The Court was referring to “frequency of registration of such cases as at hand…” The Court’s observation came while hearing sub- missions for quashing FIRs against two foreigners (one from the UK and another from Kenya) under Section 25 of the Arms Act 1959. Although they had come to India under legal visas, bullets were found on them while they were leaving India. The Court was convinced that there was nothing to prove a “conscious possession” of bullets by the foreigners. It also noted that the bullets could not be used as the persons concerned were not carrying any firearms. The government’s lawyer too informed the Court that the petitioners did not know that they were carrying bullets. The FIRs were dismissed. Foreignersmustknow aboutIndianlaws Senior BJP leaders LK Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi and Union minister Uma Bharti were spared from attending the Special CBI Court in Lucknow daily for hearings in the Babri Masjid demolition case. The Court is hearing the case on a day-to-day basis. However, they would have to appear whenever the court asks them. All the three had pleaded against daily appear- ances. While Advani and Joshi cited old age, Bharti submitted that she had to travel extensively due to her ministerial duties. The Supreme Court had earlier revived conspiracy charges against all three and ins- tructed the Court to complete hearings and give the ruling within two years. Later, the special CBI Court had framed charges against all three and nine others. Empathising with prosecutors dealing with cases under the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act because of the pathetic conditions they work in, the Delhi High Court sought a report from the AAP government in July on work environment and appointments. The Court was at pains to high- light the fact that these prosecu- tors were not even provided a private space to enable them to do “seri- ous lawyering”. They need to draft applications, replies, submis- sions, refer to vari- ous legal docu- ments, talk to clients, prepare cases, get in touch with probing officers and scrutinise records. For this, privacy is essential, the Court pointed out. It lamented that prosecutors could not be allowed to function from open spaces in court premises. How could prosecutors take on top lawyers from the other side during hearings without proper home- work, the Court asked. Aclutch of petitions plea- ding for a stay on the centre’s recent notification banning the sale of cattle for slaughter in livestock markets were struck down by the Kerala High Court recently. The matter will now be taken up by the High Court on June 28 for quick disposal. Responding to a PIL from You- th Congress State Secretary TS Saji, the High Court observed that the new rules were only related to trading of cattle for slaughter and there was no restrictions on slau- ghtering cattle or eating beef. The Court had earlier asked the centre to file its response on ques- tions raised on the after-effects of the new rule, but the centre did not get back at the time of hearing. The Court said it would wait for the centre’s reaction before taking up the petitions. It asked the centre to respond before the next hearing. The Supreme Court too will hear objections to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Regulation of Livestock Markets) Rules, 2017 (Rules) on June 15. A man from Hyderabad, Moha- mmed Abdul Faheem Qureshi, had approached the apex court and claimed that the rule was uncon- stitutional. The Madras High Court had earlier slapped a stay on the cen- tre’s notification for four weeks. | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 11 — Compiled by Prabir Biswas Advani,Joshi,Bhartigetrelief Twitter: @indialegalmedia Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com Batting for POCSO prosecutors No stay on centre’s cattle slaughter order
  • 12. 12 June 19, 2017 Briefs Following Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi’s temporary extension, the ten- ure of five other senior law officers has also been exten- ded. The extension is expec- ted to be for two years, but the interim order says it was extended “till further orders”. The terms of Solicitor Gen- eral Ranjit Kumar and Add- itional Solicitor Generals Maninder Singh, Tushar Mehta, PS Narasimha, PS Patwalia and Pinky Anand have been extended. Only ASG Neeraj Kishan Kaul’s term was not extended, keep- ing in mind his letter to the government which said he wanted to be relieved from the assignment. As per the new order of Uttar Pradesh DGP Sulkhan Singh (below) any individual or group suspected of killing or transporting cattle for slaughter, will make it nec- essary to invoke National Security Act (NSA). The Act allows detention of any per- son for three months or more. The order was issued to all police officials present in a meeting in Lucknow on June 5. Singh said that the NSA, 1980, or Gangsters Act must be invoked against criminals indulging in cow slaughter or transporting cows for the same. The DGP has ordered the officials to make sure that the criminals do not get bail. NSA against cow slaughter in UP The government will appoint 44 judges to different high courts across the country. The names had earlier been returned by the govern- ment to the collegium for reconsideration. However, the collegium has been able to coax the government in taking them back. The appoin- tees include 29 judges to the Allahabad High Court, two to the Karn- ataka High Court, seven to the Calcutta High Court and six to the Ma- dras High Court. This was the second time the list was resubmitted to the government by the collegiums headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar (left). So far 17 judges have been appointed to the Bombay and the Jammu and Kashmir High Courts. Lawofficersgetextension The NGT has barred nine state pollution control board heads for failing to submit compli- ance reports of appoint- ments of chairpersons and member secretaries in the boards. The vacation bench, headed by Justice RS Rathore ordered board chiefs of Himachal Prad- esh, Haryana, Uttara- khand, Rajasthan, Kera- la, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Maha- rashtra to stop function- ing, effective immediately. The judge said: “The judgement was delivered in August last year and you had to file compli- ance report in three mon- ths...We had given you ample time for complying with our directions.” A three-month grace period was granted to Delhi and two months to Punjab and UP. The mat- ter is listed for July 4. Govt to appoint 44 HC judges Punjab judge objects to “your ladyship” NGT bars 9 state pollution heads The practice of doing away with the use of “Your Lord- ship” while addressing judges has been a subject of discus- sion; it is seen as a relic of col- onial rule. An interesting ex- change between Justice Daya Chaudhary (below) and Advo- cate General Atul Nanda in the Punjab and Haryana High Court brought up the issue to the fore again. Nanda addre- ssed Justice Chaudhary as “Your Ladyship”. Justice Chaudhary objected to this, saying that it is “Delhi culture” and it won’t work in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. She also said that judges and advocates have no gender and they are not to be addre- ssed as lady judges or lady advocates. Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar
  • 13. | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 13 —Compiled by Lilly Paul Twitter: @indialegalmedia/ Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com Recently, the Madras High Court issued notice to the Tamil Nadu animal husbandry department over a petition filed by M Ravikumar, a part-time sweeper at the Vellodu sub-centre for the past 17 years. Ravikumar is working in the sub- centre since July 20, 2000, on a meagre salary of `2 per day without his services been regularised. The department had issued notification for vacancies to the post of assistants without considering his case. The Court, in its notice, mentioned that it was “inhuman” on the part of the government to keep poor employees like him unregularised for decades. Sweeper moves Madras HC The Supreme Court on June 9 directed that the government can- not force anybody to link his Aadhaar to his PAN for the purpose of filing his or her Income Tax Return. This also means that PAN remains valid even without Aadhaar. Despite this being an interim order—with the larger con- stitution bench to take it up later—it is a big defeat for the government which introduced this rule through the back door, in the form of Section 139AA, inserted into the Income Tax Act by the Finance Act, 2017. The Court also requested the legis- lature to “tone down” the provisions of the section. It also rejected argume- nts by petitioner Binoy Visman that this is violative of one’s Fundamental Rights. The Court did not touch all arguments associated with Article 21 as they are still pending with the lar- ger bench. No need to attach Aadhaar to PAN: SC Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal of the Punjab and Haryana High Court is set to be the next Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court. The post is current- ly handled by Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal. However, this decision of the Supreme Court collegium, as reported in the media, cannot be put in practice before September. The sitting judge of the Delhi High Court, Justice SS Saron, is senior to Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal and technically the person due for the post. However, Justice Saron is retiring on September 3, which is why the new incumbent will take over after that. Justice Mittal to be Delhi HC Chief Justice Former chief ministers of Bihar, Lalu Prasad Yadav and Jagannath Mishra, appeared before a special CBI court in Patna in the fodder scam case. The case is related to the fraudulent withdrawal of `47 lakh from Bhagalpur treasury during the financial years 1993-94 and 1994-95. The CBI had regis- tered a case and filed a PIL against Lalu and Mishra, along with 42 others. The Supreme Court ruled last month that Lalu will have to stand trial in all the four fodder scam cases. Ahead of introducing an amendment bill in the parliament, the government is working towards fixing flaws of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, including capping of the jurist member’s tenure. Currently, the tenure of the jurist member, who would be appointed by the prime minister-led selec- tion committee, is not certain. The ministe- rial panel is reportedly considering fixing the tenure to three years. The panel has noticed that the law has not specified basic details, such as the location of the Lokpal office and secretariat. Govt to fix flaws of Lokpal Act Ex-Bihar CMs appear before CBI
  • 14. Lead/ Witch-hunting 14 June 19, 2017 Y name is Pedki Devi. I live in a village in Jharkhand. When I was 15, I was married off. My eldest daughter was born three years later and subsequently, I gave birth to three more children. When I was 35, life came to a standstill when my husband died after an illness. Following that, my husband’s brothers tried to seize our land. They beat me up brutally and labelled me a witch. I filed a case against them. At the age of 40, I saw a police station for the first time. I learnt how to read and write at the age of 45. Now I am 50 years old.” This testimony is not recorded in a police report but is part of a math text- M“ Singlewomenandwidows areoftenbrandedaswitches tohumiliateandostracise themandseizetheirproperty. Whydoesthisreprehensible practicecontinueunchecked andareourlawsstringent enoughtoproviderelief? By Shankar Sinha and Meha Mathur 18-YEAR-OLD STRUGGLE Pedki Devi (right) labelled as a “witch”; (below right) a textbook chapter on maths in Jharkhand sketches her tragedy Diabolic Persecution
  • 15. licly humiliated. Neighbours are either unwilling to talk about the incident or are petrified to express their support. One aged woman who saw Pedki Devi distraught on the ground, covered with excreta over her face and had offered her water, now categorically denies she saw any crime being committed. She says she had merely offered water to a woman in distress. And one of the accused, Srikant Mahato, denies being present in the vil- lage on that fateful day in 1999. He also denies that he or his family members were after Pedki Devi’s property. But the truth lies elsewhere and it came into the public domain because Pedki Devi filed a case and decided book, Ganit ka Jaadu (The Magic of Maths), of the Jharkhand Education Project for Class III students. And the unfortunate story is followed by an exer- cise in which students have to mark, next to an illustration of a woman, the milestones of Pedki Devi’s life. The cruelty of it is that it is not fic- tional. The real life Pedki Devi is still running from pillar to post to get justice against the atrocity perpetrated against her in 1999. Like so many other cases of crimes against women being relegated to mere statistics, this case too has been reduced to an exercise in a textbook for school students. But the humiliation and cruelty that Pedki Devi of Kherabera village endured in March 1999 has not been captured in the bland account in the textbook. She can, however, still recall the day when her husband’s brothers pounced on her as she was returning from the fields. They dragged her and stripped her, forced her to ingest excreta and urine and beat her mercilessly. They conve- niently branded her a witch—the evil force that killed her husband. When her daughters saw their moth- er being assaulted, they rushed to her rescue, but they too were beaten up. One of them, Purni, suffered a miscar- riage as a result. Pedki Devi spoke to India Legal’s sister channel APN, about the pain and humiliation meted out to her some 18 years ago. And as she faced the camera in front of her ramshackle mud home, one could see the 12 acres of land which had become the bone of contention. Pedki Devi vividly remembers the spot where she was pub- | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 15 Brandingwomenaswitchesismoreofatoolusedbylandgrabbersto deprivefamiliesoftheirproperty.Itisalsousedasaweaponof revengeagainstwomenwhorefusetoyieldtosexualadvances.
  • 16. she would not take the humiliation lying down. In 2004, a trial court sentenced the culprits to one to four years in prison. But they went in appeal to the Jharkhand High Court which granted them bail. CASE DITHERS Unfortunately, Pedki’s lawyer dithered, for reasons best known to him, in pursu- ing the matter in court. He did not inform his client about the hearings and as a result, she failed to turn up in court twice on appointed dates. The case soon lost direction. Meanwhile, the embold- ened in-laws began to openly threaten Pedki and her family with dire conse- quences. There are allegations that they may have had a hand in ensuring that the case languished in the courts. It is clear that seizing property was what motivated the in-laws to label Pedki Devi a witch. While rural soci- eties, where superstition reigns supreme, do resort to occult practices to “neutralise” evil forces or for healing purposes, the branding of old and wid- owed women as witches is a matter of convenience. Often, the real motive is to throw them out of their property or to abandon them if they are becoming a financial burden for the family. Arun Kumar Naik of Jeet, an NGO that is working in Jharkhand, explains the modus operandi: a scare is deliber- ately created around a person, usually an old destitute woman. At times, young women are also targeted as witches, and in such cases, the motive is more often than not sexual exploitation. Once branded, the woman becomes an outcast in her own village 16 June 19, 2017 T here are several laws that deal specifically with witchcraft and “witch” related offences. The first was the Prevention of Witch (Dayan) Practices Act 1999 enacted by Bihar. Later, when Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand were created in 2001, they too enacted laws to address the witches issue. Both adapted the 1999 Act. Jharkhand introduced the Prevention of Witch-hunting (Dayan Pratha Act) in 2001 and Chhattisgarh passed the Tonahi Pratadna Nivaran Act in 2005. Later, some other states followed suit. It was a high court directive to Odisha that led to the enactment of the Odisha Prevention of Witch-hunting Act 2013. The Odisha initiative was followed two years later by Rajasthan passing the Rajasthan Prevention of Witch-hunting Act 2015. In the same year, the Assam Witch-hunting (Prohibition, Prevention and Protection) Bill was passed and awaits enactment since it was sent back to the state by the Union home ministry for review. Two bills—the Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice and Other inhuman, Evil and Aghori Practices and Black Magic Bill and the Karnataka Prevention of Superstitious Practices Bill—have been passed but not yet enacted. Both address the problem of witch-hunting. So far so good. But the big question is how effective are the enacted laws on the ground? Partners in Law, a Delhi- based legal resource group working in the fields of social justice and women’s rights, conducted an 18-month study in Jharkhand, Bihar and Chhattisgarh. Their 2015 report—Contemporary Practices in Witch-Hunting: Social Trends and Interface with Law—spells out the prob- lem areas in laws dealing specifically with witch-hunting. The study reveals what is wrong with the criminal justice system. For example, in one-third of cases, the victims never approached the police or were prevented from doing so by vested interest or rela- tives. Many of the cases registered were closed because of shoddy investigation, lack of evidence and witnesses or a compromise being worked out between the victims and the perpetrators. It is only when publicly orchestrated violence occurred that the police took it seriously. To quote the report: “Based on our data, we can infer that the law inter- acts with victims only when physical vio- lence involving public humiliation is involved, but such cases do not proceed to the appellate courts unless they per- tain to or result in murder.” In short, the state does not normally appeal against acquittal in cases of witch-hunting. According to the report, the special laws on witch-hunting on paper focus on preventive action and addressing harassment where the motive is clearly linked to “witch” accusation. These laws criminalise the acts of “identifying” and “exhibiting” any person as a witch along with the mental and physical torture which accompanies it. All the offences under the special laws are cognisable and non-bailable. They seek to prevent escalation of victimisation through early intervention by the police. H owever, very few reported cases are registered under the new laws. The study examined 85 FIRs and found that only six were registered solely on the basis of special laws. Notes the report: “The data categorically shows that the mischief that the special law was enacted to correct remains unaddressed, with no action or prosecution against preliminary forms of harassment. In fact, the data establishes that special laws are rarely, if ever, used alone, and almost never at the preliminary stages to pre- vent escalation of violence. Our data from police records show that almost all cases are registered under provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), with one or more provisions of the special law, to establish if it (witch-hunting) were the motive of the crime. The majority of the provisions of the IPC invoked in the records are related to beating, hurt, tres- pass, theft, murder, conspiracy, etc—with more bailable rather than non-bailable offences being invoked.” According to police officials, the IPC is invoked since the special laws are not comprehensive enough to deal with LawsandLimitations Lead/ Witch-hunting
  • 17. | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 17 defamation, trespass, intimidation, van- dalism, destruction of property or mur- der. So, even when the new laws are invoked, it is in conjunction with the IPC. The police find it easier to frame their cases under the existing laws. S ashiprava Bindhani, Odisha’s infor- mation commissioner, who filed a PIL in the High Court which led to the enactment of the special law in the state in 2013, speaks of how women who break from conventions are usually the targets of witch-hunts. “Having grown up in the Mayurbhanj district of Odisha, I observed the exploitation per- petrated through witch-hunting against women who threatened social struc- tures.” She is of the view that since the legislation has come there is some change--cases are being registered and people are sympathetic to the victims. However, legal experts do not see any dramatic change. So, have the special laws helped? Madhu Mehra, executive director of Partners in Law, and Anuja Agarwal, associate professor, department of soci- ology at Delhi University in a joint paper published in The Economic and Political Weekly have this pertinent observation to make: “The parading of women, ton- suring the hair and blackening the face are forms of violation that involve more than physical injury, as they intend and result in humiliating the victim, destroying her social standing and dignity in the community. These need to be part of the penal code, given their social reso- nance—although largely associated with caste atrocities perpetrated against Dalits, there is increasing evidence that such victimisation is also used to punish social and sexual transgressions, which may or may not take the form of witch-hunting.” Thus, the new laws may have filled a legal vacuum but do not look at the socio-economic situation that encour- ages witch-hunting. It is known that it thrives in areas where there is lack of education, economic depravity, health facilities and access to justice. But the criminal justice system continues to see the malaise as one rooted in irrational, barbaric practices and superstition. This is even reinforced in several judgments, one of which calls it a tribal custom of the “Middle Ages” which is perpetuated till today. Any law or amendments made to an existing Act has to factor the socio-eco- nomic context rather than see witch- hunting as merely an irrational act guided by superstitious beliefs. Also, the motives for witch-hunting have changed over the years. Laws have to take into account the present- day reality. Illustration: Anthony Lawrence
  • 18. and is ostracised. The problem is not endemic to Jharkhand alone. One hears similar stories from across the country—of women being branded as witches and blamed for the death of a family mem- ber, the failure of a crop or any other untoward incident. SOME EXAMPLES Here are a few illustrative instances: Badar village, Balrampur district, Chhattisgarh, 2016: A 35-year-old woman is beaten to death by her broth- er-in-law and his son on suspicion that she is responsible for a child’s death Mayangi village, Odisha, 2015: A 35- year-old woman is accused of being a witch and forced to eat excreta Anglong district, Assam, 2014: A gold medalist in javelin who represented the state in several national meets, is tied up in a fishing net and brutally beaten up by villagers on suspicion that she indulged in witchcraft Smit village, Shillong, Meghalaya, 2013: Twelve persons arrested for the lynching of three in a case of witch hunting. The accused were reportedly related to the victims The statistics from various states on witchcraft-related murders is, to say the least, shocking (see box). However, the situation in Jharkhand is the worst. Social activist Ajay Kumar Jaiswal, who has been working at the grassroots level in the state for the last 26 years says that his team surveyed 332 villages last year and found 300 cases of women being harassed as witches. He says: “Jharkhand has 32,000 villages and every village has such cases. So, thou- sands of women are suffering. We need a very big awareness campaign to eradi- cate this problem.” Dr Louis Marandi, Jharkhand’s min- ister for social welfare, women and child development and minority affairs says the government is doing its bit through campaigns using street theatre and workshops. But, she admits it will be a long haul: “We can’t eradicate the prob- lem completely. We can’t be watching over people 24 hours a day,” she says adding that she has no knowledge of the Pedki Devi case. “If you give us all the papers and her story, we will try to pro- vide her protection through the local administration.” Jharkhand is among the few states to have enacted a specific law—the Prevention of Witch Practices Act, 2001. Other states also have laws in place to counter the malaise (Accompanying story). But these have not had the desired impact. This is perhaps why activists like Jaiswal point out that the new law is not an effective deterrent in Jharkhand. “One year of punishment and `2,000 as 18 June 19, 2017 Lead/ Witch-hunting Tribalsocietiesalwaysbelievedin goodandevilspirits.Thegood spiritsauguredwellnessandheal people.Theevilforcescould wreakhavocandcausedisasters. “Medicalfacilitieshavenotreached manypartsofthecountry.Andin Jharkhandthereisadeep-seatedbelief thatsomepeoplehavethesupernatural powerofhealingaswellasdestroying things.So,ifsomethinggoeswrong youendupblamingthatperson.” —SubhashMendupurkar,directorof theSocietyforUpliftmentthrough RuralAction “Wecan’teradicatetheproblem completely.Wecan’tbewatching overpeople24hoursaday...Ifyou giveusallthepapersandPedkiDevi’s story,wewilltrytoprovideherprotec- tionthroughthelocaladministration.” —DrLouisMarandi,Jharkhand’s ministerforsocialwelfare,women andchilddevelopmentand minorityaffairs “Jharkhandhas32,000villages andeveryvillagehassuchcases. So,thousandsofwomenare suffering.Weneedaverybig awarenesscampaigntoeradicate thisproblem.” —AjayKumarJaiswal,socialactivist whohasbeenworkingatthegrass- rootslevelinthestateforthelast 26years
  • 19. fine is hardly a punishment.” According to him, a more stringent punishment is required like the Rajasthan Prevention of Witch-Hunting Act, 2015 which pro- vides for seven years rigorous imprison- ment extending up to a life term, and/or `1 lakh fine. This, he said, is more in keeping with the nature of the crime. THE ORIGINS Tribal societies always believed in the tradition of good and evil spirits. The good spirits, it was believed, could bring about wellness in the community and heal people. The evil forces, on the other hand, could wreak havoc and cause nat- ural disasters like floods, famine, disease or drive away the rain. In tribal commu- nities, it was a woman who was endowed with the power of healing. However, the line between good and evil was always a thin one. Traditionally, it was the all-knowing “Mahan” or seer of the village who identified the woman with the evil force residing inside her. She would be branded as a witch, parad- ed naked and killed and her family members ostracised. Anthropologists like KS Singh, former director of the Anthropological Society of India, have been quoted as saying that the concept of black magic and white magic got fur- ther underlined after India became colonised by the European powers. Subhash Mendupurkar, director of the Society for Upliftment through Rural Action (SUTRA), has worked extensively in Jharkhand. He traces the problem to lack of medical care. “Medical facilities have not reached many parts of the country. And in Jharkhand there is a deep-seated belief that some people have the supernatural power of healing as well as destroying things. So, if something goes wrong you end up blaming that person. Once mod- ern medical facilities are made accessi- ble such beliefs will fade away,” he says. But today, branding women as witch- es is more of a tool used by land grab- bers to deprive families of their proper- ty. It is also used as a weapon of revenge against women who refuse to yield to sexual exploitation. Also, the campaign of a political party is sometimes derailed, particularly within tribal areas, by branding one of its activists as a witch. Such exploitative behaviour is sought to be explained as part of local customs and therefore, acceptable. While stringent laws will help, changing societal attitudes and mindsets is the real challenge. Forget a tribal state like Jharkhand, we have a situation where even in a cosmopolitan city like Mumbai, a leading Bollywood actor was recently accused of practicing witchcraft by her embittered ex-boyfriend. Superstition, as they say, runs deep. And there are enough people waiting to exploit the vulnerable. —With inputs from Rafi Sami and Irfan Amayur | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 19 2015 NCRB figures on registered witchcraft-related murder cases: States No. of Cases Jharkhand 32 Odisha 26 Madhya Pradesh 20 Telangana 14 Gujarat 13 Chhattisgarh 13 Maharashtra 5 Karnataka 5 UP 3 Bihar 2 Tripura 1 Andhra Pradesh 1 TOTAL 135 ListofShame WASHING HIS HANDS OFF One of the accused in the Pedki Devi case, Srikant Mahato, has denied his involvement Twitter: @indialegalmedia Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
  • 20. 20 June 19, 2017 F you are a VIP’s son or daughter, chances are that largesse will be showered on you by the state even without you seeking it. Ask Raktim Gogoi, Supreme Court judge Ran- jan Gogoi’s son, who was chosen as one of the lawyers to represent the Punjab government in the apex court and other courts outside Chandigarh. The selection came as surprise for him. However, after the lawyers list was released in March 2017, he wrote to the Punjab government to withdraw his name as it was included without his consent. Similar was the experience of Saket Sikri, son of Justice AK Sikri of the Supreme Court. He wrote a letter to the Punjab government requesting that his name be removed from the list. Sikri told India Legal: “I wrote to have my name withdrawn as my consent was Cloutand Lineage Theappointmentofgovernmentlawyersandadvocate generalshasoftenbeenquestionedbecausetheyaremostly connectedtoministersandjudges.Thisleavesethical lawyersfeelingshortchanged By Usha Rani Das I APPOINTMENT LETTER Illustration: Anthony Lawrence Focus/ Standing Counsels
  • 21. | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 21 not taken. I did not even apply for the post.” But he refused to comment on why his name was included in the list in the first place. Were these cases of misdirected favouritism? There is no way of conclu- sively determining that. But one can say that some lawyers are favoured over oth- ers and the reason may not always be professional competence. Remember, there was a controversy over an appointment in Madhya Pra- desh in November 2014 when Aditya Shankar, son of Union Minister of Law and Justice and Information Technology Ravi Shankar Prasad, was appointed as the standing counsel of the state govern- ment in the apex court. Immediately after the appointment, BS Banthia, who was the standing counsel of Madhya Pradesh for 12 years, raised objections, alleging it to be a case of “favouritism”. He said that Shankar was appointed to represent the state in the apex court though he had not passed the man- datory Advocate-On-Record (AOR) examination. Banthia was quoted by a newspaper as saying that “his only qualification is that he is Ravi Shankar Prasad’s son”. The Congress party had also raised objections, with its then leader of the Opposition in the Madhya Pradesh ass- embly, the late Satyadev Katare, point- ing out that the post should have gone to someone from the state, and not an outsider like Shankar. When Aditya Shankar was contacted, he told India Legal he had suspected he was being favoured and had hence rej- ected the MP government’s offer twice. He said: “I knew I was being appointed because I was Ravi Shankar Prasad’s son. It had nothing to do with my cre- dentials…. But when they offered me the position a third time, I took it as a chal- lenge and accepted it. As soon as the allegations came in February 2015, I quit the office the following month and joined Kaden Boriss (a law firm). It is also true that I did not pass the exami- nation but we all know that the Advo- cate-On-Record examination is just a formality.” LINEAGE COUNTS Instances of such appointments are apl- enty in the Supreme Court and High Courts of different states. While Aditya Shankar resigned and Gogoi and Sikri refused the offer, there are many gov- ernment lawyers who, though they were appointed thanks to their political affiliations, enjoy the benefits with im- punity. Legal experts note that over the years, the post of state counsels and advocate generals have become political appointments. The list of advocate generals selected by the Madhya Pradesh government over the years is telling. Pushpendra Kaurav, who became the additional ad- vocate general for Madhya Pradesh gov- ernment on June 6, 2017, is alleged to have got the post thanks to his affilia- tions with the RSS. He was earlier asso- ciated with the ABVP, the student wing of the RSS, during his student years. He started his career as a lawyer in 2001 un-der the tutelage of his maternal uncle and BJP leader Virendra Singh Choudhary. Kaurav had barely complet- ed seven years as a lawyer when the Shivraj Singh Chouhan government appointed him deputy advocate general. He was later promoted as additional advocate general. Kaurav succeeded Ravish Chandra Agrawal, who landed the post allegedly on the recommendation of former advo- cate general and senior BJP leader, Ravi Nandan Singh. Before Agrawal, senior lawyer from Gwalior and BJP leader RD Jain was the Madhya Pradesh advocate general. He had succeeded another BJP leader Ravi Nandan Singh, the first advocate general, after the BJP came to power in the state in 2003. In the Congress government prior to that, then chief minister Digvijaya Singh had appointed Vivek Tankha as advo- cate general. Tankha, who is now a Congress Rajya Sabha MP and senior Supreme Court lawyer, was just 43 then. His father-in-law late Colonel Jay Narayan Mushran was the finance "IknewIwasbeing appointedbecauseIwas RaviShankarPrasad’s son.Ithadnothingtodo withmycredentials.…As soonastheallegations came,Iquittheoffice.” —AdityaShankar,sonof UnionMinisterRavi ShankarPrasad “Iwrotetohavemy namewithdrawnas myconsentwasnot taken.Ididnoteven applyforthepost (ofgovernment counsel).” —SaketSikri,sonof JusticeAKSikriof theSupremeCourt A2012CAGreportforHaryana foundthatthesystemofappoint- mentoflawofficersfollowedin thestatedoesnotevenassess themanpowerrequirement.
  • 22. 22 June 19, 2017 minister in the Digvijaya Singh cabinet. Political appointments of law officers are rampant in Haryana and Punjab too. An RTI query by advocate Pradeep Kumar Raparia reveals that none of the applications received for the post of ad- vocate general of the Punjab and Harya- na government were invited or received from those appointed. His RTI even found that resumes of the applicants were asked after they were appointed by the state government. He alleges that a majority of those appointed as standing counsels and advocate generals were kith and kin of ministers, political lead- ers, senior bureaucrats, high court judges, police officers and MLAs of the ruling parties in the two states. COURT OBSERVATIONS Such appointments take place despite the 2016 Supreme Court ruling in State of Punjab & Anr vs Brijeshwar Singh Chahal & Anr. The apex court had ruled then that “appointment of Government Counsel must, like the discharge of any other function by the Government and public bodies, be only in public interest unaffected by any political or other extraneous considerations. The govern- ment and public bodies are under an obligation to engage the most compe- tent of the lawyers to represent them in the Courts for it is only when those appointed are professionally competent that public interest can be protected in the Courts”. The bench headed by then CJI, TS Thakur, had regretted that “the states continue to harp on the theory that in the matter of engagement of state coun- sels, they are not accountable and that engagement is only professional and/or contractual, hence, unquestionable. It is too late in the day for any public func- tionary or the government to advance such a contention, leave alone expect this court to accept the same”. Punjab, Haryana and Madhya Prade- sh are not the only states that are exp- loiting the system. Tamil Nadu too is filling the post of standing counsels in the High Court with lawyers who enjoy a cordial relationship with the party in power. The minute there is a change of government, the standing counsels will either be immediately replaced or will themselves relinquish their posts. This is an age-old practice prevailing in the state for the past 50 years. The appointment of kith and kin that have attracted notice could well be just the tip of the iceberg. India Legal found in its investigation that since the AOR exam is not mandatory to be appointed as a standing counsel, this is being wide- ly exploited. According to a former stan- ding counsel, the irony is that those who have not passed the exam have to hire an AOR lawyer to file a case in Supreme Court, which in turn increases the exp- enses the state has to bear—which is an unfair practice since it comes from the public exchequer. “For a standing coun- sel to be an AOR lawyer is in public interest,” he says. According to a source, there are even instances where an individual is the standing counsel of three states. For example, advocate CD Singh is the standing counsel of Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Though there is no rule that prohibits this, it is quite impossible for an individ- ual to handle the responsibilities of three states, said the source. If we look at the history of standing counsels, he added, it is ripe with examples of rela- tives of VIPs getting the post though they may be “unfit” for the job. ARBITRARY APPOINTMENTS A 2012 Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report for Haryana fou- nd that the system of appointment of law officers followed in the state does not assess the manpower requirement, leave alone any worthwhile process of selection. The result is that more than half of those appointed were without any work, resulting in payment of idle salaries. The report stated: “The engage- ment of excess Law Officers without assessing the quantum of work and without resorting to fair and transpar- ent selection method, resulted in allow- “Acertaindegreeofcom- petencewasrequired.... Havesomemercyonthe courtstoo.Mereconnec- tionwithpoliticians shouldneverbethecrite- riatoappointanadvocate asgovernmentlawyer.” —SupremeCourt benchheadedbyCJI JSKhehar “Thestatescontinueto harponthetheorythatin thematterofengagement ofstatecounsels,theyare notaccountable….Itis toolateinthedayforany publicfunctionaryorthe governmenttoadvance suchacontention.” —SCbenchheadedby formerCJITSThakur Thestatesclaimthattheyare undernoobligationtofollowany definitemethodwhileappointing lawofficersasit’saprofessional engagement. Focus/ Standing Counsels
  • 23. | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 23 ABOVE APPEASEMENT: The Supreme Court has on numerous instances emphasised probity in legal posts ing more than 50 percent Law Officers without work and payment of idle salary of `2.22 crore.” In fact, in State of Punjab & Anr vs Brijeshwar Singh Chahal & Anr in the Supreme Court it was argued that with- out a proper system, the appointments may be made not because they are required but because “they come handy for political aggrandisement, appease- ment or personal benevolence of those in power towards those appointed”. Not just that. Dismissing a plea by the Bihar government to grant it a free hand in appointing government lawyers, the Supreme Court had observed in March, 2017, that a government lawyer should be appointed on the basis of an advocate’s performance in courts and not his political connections. The bench headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar, Justices DY Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul stated: “The cases involv- ing the governments were crucial in many aspects touching key areas of gov- ernance. A certain degree of competence was required from the advocates to rep- resent the government and render mea- ningful assistance to the courts. Have some mercy on the courts too. Mere connection with politicians should never be the criteria to appoint an advocate as government lawyer.” In yet another petition that broke the cycle of political appointments in Tamil Nadu, advocate Vengadessane Vasantha- kumar had asked the Madras High Court to issue directions to the govern- ment to follow prescribed rules and reg- ulations in the appointment of standing counsels for various state departments. The first bench of the Court headed by the then Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul in August, 2016 directed the Tamil Nadu government to devise rules and regulations for the appointment of gov- ernment counsels. The procedure laid down by the Madras High Court was: The Advocate General of the state of Tamil Nadu should send a list of the names to the government. The Advocate General will then send the list to the government. A team of senior government officials will scrutinize the list and then appoint the standing counsels. Two senior advocates of the Court to be appointed as amicus curie But Vasanthakumar has refused to accept the proposals. He says: “There is no transparency in these proposals. For example, on what basis will the AG sel- ect an advocate and send his name to the government for his or her appoint- ment as standing counsel? As soon as the court opens after the vacations, we will take up the issue before the first bench which originally gave directions to the government.” There is also a controversy relating to the AOR exam. Clearing it is only man- datory for a standing counsel if he has to file cases in the Supreme Court. But why is it often referred to as a mere formali- ty? A Supreme Court advocate had this explanation: “The questions for the AOR exam are prepared by lawyers and whoever is well-connected can get hold of them well in advance. It hardly takes a month to prepare and pass the exami- nation. Hence, practically speaking, it is just a formality.” The states claim that the engage- ment of state counsels is a professional engagement and hence they are under no obligation either to prescribe a pro- cedure or follow any definite method while making such appointments. This is indeed a convenient position to take. India Legal was given to understand that a standing counsel cannot be dis- missed till the government of the day decides to change him/her. This and other arbitrary policies give political parties in power the leverage to bestow largesse on those they wish to favour. (With inputs from Vipin Pubby in Chandigarh, Ramasubramanian in Chennai, Rakesh Dixit in Bhopal and Neeraj Mishra in Raipur) Twitter: @indialegalmedia Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com TheSChasruledthatthe appointmentofgovernment counselmustbe inpublicinter- est,unaffectedbyanypoliticalor otherextraneousconsiderations. Anil Shakya
  • 24. States/ MP/MLA Murder 24 June 19, 2017 N eight-year-old murder case has come to haunt Madhya Pradesh General Administration Department minister Lal Singh Arya. He was accused of killing Congress MLA Makhan Lal Jatav on April 13, 2009, when the latter was campaigning for the Lok Sabha candidate for Bhind seat, Bhagirath Prasad. Although the Gwalior bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed a non-bailable warrant against Arya on May 31, he is still not out of the woods as yet as the Court pointed out two legal flaws in the Bhind trial court’s order, which was passed on May 19. The Bhind court had made Arya an accused after booking him under Sections 302 and 120 (b) (conspiracy). However, the court stayed an arrest warrant to give the minister an opportunity to argue. HC RULING The High Court’s single-bench of Justice Sheel Nagu ruled that Bhind’s trial court judge had no power under the Criminal Procedure Code to stay his own order passed on the same day. Arya’s counsel Surendra Singh argued that the petitioner was made an accused on weak evidence and without his side being heard. Arya was named the main accused by Jatav’s family members and three eye- witnesses. But the police ignored these charges and instead, relied on Arya’s security guard who did not name any- one. The CBI, which later took over the high-profile investigation, spared the minister for “lack of evidence” against him. This is not surprising, as from the beginning, this case was characterised by political opportunism and shoddy investigation. However, the most stunning volte- face was seen in the case of Bhagirath Prasad, Bhind’s Lok Sabha candidate for whom Jatav was campaigning when he was shot dead in 2009. Prasad had cate- gorically stated then that Arya had got Jatav murdered. However, following the Bhind court’s May 19 order, he said: “Despite my statement, the CBI and the police had found no evidence against Arya. Even I did not have concrete evi- dence that Arya had ordered the killing. My statement at best was noncommit- tal.” He said attempts to target him were “politically motivated”. Incidentally, Prasad was principal secretary (home) till he took voluntary retirement in 2007. He contested the 2009 Lok Sabha elections as a Congress candidate but lost. However, he got a ticket again in 2014, but defected to the BJP and won from Bhind. POLITICAL RIVALRY It all began in the November 2008 assembly elections when Makhan Lal ThekillingofaCongressleaderhasexposedthisstate’s penchantforpoliticalvendettaandwiththegovernment backingtheaccusedminister,hecouldwellgoscot-free By Rakesh Dixit in Bhopal Open and Shut Case? THE PAST COMES TO HAUNT Congress MLA Makhan Lal Jatav (above) was killed on April 13, 2009 and MP minister Lal Singh Arya was accused in the caseA
  • 25. | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 25 Jatav, a little-known Congress worker, clashed with two-time BJP MLA Lal Singh Arya for the Gohad seat and won, taking everyone by surprise. As a shocked Arya licked his wounds, Jatav’s supporters further infuriated the BJP leader by hurling stones at him in a function. Arya had filed an FIR against Jatav and his supporters. On April 13, 2009, during campaigning for the Lok Sabha election, both Jatav and Arya came face to face at Chharenta village in Gohad around 8.15 pm. According to three eyewitnesses, Jatav was sitting in the front seat of his Bolero with his son, Arvind, while his two armed guards sat behind. He had halted the car and was speaking to villagers when two persons walked up and shot him twice. Arvind told the police he heard Arya shout: “Makhan ko maro, bachna nahi paye (Kill Makhan, he should not escape).” Eyewitnesses said Arya was present at the scene. ACCUSED MURDERED As the Congress mounted pressure for Arya’s arrest, the BJP government of Shivraj Singh Chouhan handed over the probe to the CBI. After investigation, the CBI identified six persons as accused and chargesheeted them in the special court in Bhind. Arya was excluded. Of these six, Tej Narayan Shukla was found murdered under mysterious cir- cumstances at his farmhouse in 2014 when he was out on bail. Senior Congress leader Dr Govind Singh claims that Shukla was in his party but later aligned with Arya. Shukla was reported to be angry with Jatav for raising some land dis- pute related to him in the state assembly. Singh claimed the deceased had expressed apprehensions that Arya could get him murdered. The murder case dragged on till April this year when the CBI finally filed an affidavit saying Arya was innocent as his name figured neither in the FIR nor in the chargesheet filed by it. EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS Jadav’s son Arvind countered the CBI affidavit, and filed an application to include Arya as one of the accused under Section 319 of the IPC. Arvind’s lawyer, Ram Pratap Kushwaha, told the Court that his client had submitted a similar application soon after the mur- der also but the police chose to rely on the gunman’s FIR which did not name Arya. Arvind’s elder brother, Ranveer, said that his father’s guard, a govern- ment employee, had deliberately avoid- ed naming Arya, but there were other eyewitnesses too whose accounts eventually prevailed, leading to the arrest warrant. The Court order spurred the Congress and a delegation of the party led by the leader of opposition, Ajay Singh, called on Governor OP Kohli on May 27 to seek the dismissal of the minister on moral grounds. However, Arya told journalists that the CBI had given him a clean chit. “My counsel applied for quashing the warrant execu- tion, which the high court has permit- ted,” said Arya. However, the BJP has backed the minister, with state party president Nandkumar Chouhan saying there was no need for him to resign. After the High Court ruling, Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan too said the question of the minister’s resignation does not arise. Probity in high places seems to be in short supply. Twitter: @indialegalmedia Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com AftertheHighCourt ruling,Chief MinisterShivraj SinghChouhansaid thatthequestionof Arya’sresignation doesnotarise. Themost stunning volte-facewas ofBhagirath Prasad(right), Bhind’sLScan- didateforwhom Jatavwascam- paigning,when hewasshot dead. UNI
  • 26. 26 June 19, 2017 OR 19-year-old Fida Fathima from Kozhikode, the legal bat- tle she won in the Kerala High Court to protect her reli- gious rights under Article 25 (1) of the Indian Constitution was a significant one—both as a citizen and as a Muslim. The young girl was forced to take legal recourse after she received her admit card for the MBBS entrance examination conducted by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) on May 28. What upset Fathima was that the admit card listed items which candi- dates were prohibited from bringing/ wearing into the examination hall and this included “headgear and scarf”. This was not acceptable for Fathima who had covered her head with a hijab since childhood in accordance with the prac- tice prescribed by her religion. She decided to go to court. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT On May, 24, the Kerala High Court upheld the plea filed by Fathima and three others and ruled that the direc- tions issued by AIIMS are a direct infringement of Article 25 (1) of the Constitution of Indian which says “…all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice and propagate any reli- gion of one’s choice”. The Court, while passing the judgment, directed AIIMS to ensure that “the restrictions as regards to use of headgear/head scarf should not be enforced against candi- dates who by virtue of Article 25 (1) of the Constitution have the protection to wear such dress as part of their faith.’’ An elated Fathima says that she was immensely pleased that she could take the examination on May 28 without F A Matter of Faith TheKeralaHighCourt’sdirectiontoAIIMStorespectreligiousrightsguaranteedunder theconstitutionandallowMuslimwomentowearahijabwhileappearingforan entranceexam,overturneda2015rulingbytheSupremeCourt By Naveen Nair in Thiruvananthapuram States/ Kerala/ Religious Attire Photos: Anil Shakya
  • 27. the Board to frame proper rules that do not infringe on the reli- gious rights of candidates. The CBSE was in for further embarrassment when girl stu- dents cutting across religious barriers raised a hue and cry about the totally unethical way in which they were frisked and checked at exam centres. One in Kannur, North Kerala was in the eye of storm when students alleged that even their under- garments were checked. “It was so humiliating. The invigilator asked me to unhook my top innerwear to check. I was so dis- turbed that I could not write the exami- nation,’’ a student told the media. After the huge outcry, an investiga- tion was initiated by the State Human Rights Commission which also visited the school in which the incident occurred and suspended four invigila- tors. Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan also directed the district admin- istration to initiate criminal proceeding against the school. Advocate Fathima Thahaliya, who was one of the petitioners along with Fida Fathima and others at the High Court in the latest case, says it is com- mendable that the High Court ruled in their favour despite the Supreme Court taking a different stand in 2015. “These are times when everything is being questioned—from what we wear to what we eat. So it is absolutely important to question such rules at the moment. When it is known that a highly sensitive issue is involved, why frame such rules? If it’s for preventing malpractice then there are many other mechanisms that can be used,’’ she says. The Kerala High Court’s recent ruling only reinforces that the funda- mental rights enshrined in Article 25 (1) are indisputable and no new rule can bend it. feeling guilty of having shown disrespect to her reli- gion.“I felt immensely proud when I got this judgment from the court because it upholds my right to practice my religion and yet at the same time pursue my dream in life. I hope this judgment will give strength to candi- dates like me in the future who are in a dilemma as to whether they should respect their religion or blindly fol- low such rules. Just because someone is practicing her religion doesn’t mean she should be denied opportunities in life,’’ Fida Fathima told India Legal. This is not the first time that the issues of headgear and scarf have come up before the Kerala High Court. In 2016, a similar case was heard by the court ahead of the pre-medical entrance examination conducted by the Central Board for Secondary Education (CBSE). The ruling went in favour of Amnah Bint Basheer of Thrissur who was allowed to sit for the examination wear- ing a hijab. The Court had observed that “the right of women to have the choice of dress based on religious injunctions is a fundamental right protected when such prescription of dress is an essential part of religion”. Hence on May 24, the Kerala High Court was only reiterating one of its ear- lier judgments. However, the advocate who appeared for Fathima, PE Sajal, claimed it was a landmark verdict. “What the court said in 2016 was for that particular case and that is why the issue has come up again. Even the AIIMS admit card was not fully clear about the rules. This judgment brings clarity on the issue and will set a prece- dent,’’ Sajal told India Legal. The Court directed Fathima and oth- ers who wear the head dress to reach the venue of the examination at least one hour in advance so that they could be thoroughly frisked by a lady invigilator. The Court has also added that such checks should be carried out “respecting religious sentiments”. DIFFERING VERDICTS It has never been smooth sailing for those who insist on wearing a hijab. In 2015, the CBSE had come out with a set of guidelines banning use of headgears and scarf in the pre-medical entrance examinations. This was done after ram- pant malpractices were reported from certain centres. Three girls had then approached the Supreme Court with a plea similar to the one filed by Fathima. The apex court turned it down and asked the students to appear in the examination without wearing any head- gear or scarf. However, in 2016 following wide- spread criticism, the CBSE relaxed the rules allowing veils and certain kind of burqas inside exams but again kept out the head scarf. Here again, Justice A Muhamed Mustaq of the Kerala High Court directed the CBSE to admit a Thrissur-based student and also asked | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 27 “Thesearetimeswhenevery- thingisbeingquestioned—from whatweweartowhatweeat. Whenahighlysensitiveissueis involved,whyframesuchrules?” —FathimaThahaliya,advocate Twitter: @indialegalmedia Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com
  • 28. Agriculture/ GM Technology 28 June 19, 2017 N May 16, when Additional Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta sought to intervene in a private dispute between Monsanto and its biggest erstwhile sub-licencee, Hyderabad-based Nuziveedu Seeds, it seemed like the agriculture ministry was not done with “fixing” Monsanto. Monsanto, an American company, is the leader in genetically-modified crop technology. In December 2015, its local joint venture had terminated Nuziveedu’s licence over refusal to pay trait fee dues as per their contract. Mehta wanted to make submissions on behalf of the government on the patentability of genetically-engineered traits like insect resistance and herbi- cide tolerance in plants, a week after hearings on the matter had ended. But the Delhi High Court did not take them on record. It told him to move an appli- cation to do so and said the principal parties would be entitled to reply. Incidentally, the views of the ASG and M Prabhakara Rao, the founder and managing director of Nuziveedu Seeds, Sowing Seeds of Doubt TheAdditionalSolicitor-GeneralintervenedbetweenMonsanto andNuziveeduSeeds,givingtheimpressionthattheministry isplayingfavourites.Butthismaynotbethefullpicture By Vivian Fernandes THE DEBATE IS ON The Bt Cotton plant (right), seeds (above) and the toxic bollworm (facing page). As per the PPVFR Act, if a proprietary GM trait is used by any breeder, the trait developer can make a claim for “benefit sharing” O
  • 29. | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 29 are quite similar. In 2015, Rao had made a case for widely-used GM traits to be considered as SEPs (Standard Essential Patents) which should be available on FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) terms. He was quoting from an article in the August 2014 edition of the Colorado Law Review. Rao has also been pushing for the traits to be patented under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPVFR) Act. STANDARD ESSENTIAL PATENTS India has protected these genetically- engineered traits under the Indian Patent Act, as amended in 2002 and 2005. But the ASG believes that is not good for the country’s food security. He asserts that Monsanto and its licencees want to cling on to protections under that Act because they are addicted to profiteering. He wants widely used pro- prietary GM traits to be regarded as SEPs like the technologies used in smart phones, available freely on payment of a fee fixed by the regulator. Monsanto’s bollworm-resistance trait, for instance, is found in almost all the Bt cottonseed planted in the country. Though the ASG agrees the traits by themselves and the method of putting them in plants can be patent-protected, once inside, they become part of the plant. Except for microorganisms, the patent act does not allow animals and plants, including seeds, and species to be patented. Nor can biological process- es be patented. The ASG was referring to a list of “exclusions” in the act. The ASG says GM traits once incor- porated in plants, become part of it and are indistinguishable from them. Rao, like the ASG, believes they lose their dis- tinct character once grafted into plant DNA. And the plants pass on the genet- ic traits to subsequent generations through a biological process, which again puts them in the excluded catego- ry. Hence, the correct law, according to the ASG, for protection of GM traits is the PPVFR Act of 2001. If a proprietary GM trait is used by any breeder (that is say, a seed company like Nuziveedu) in any of the seeds it registers with the PPVFR Authority, the trait developer can make a claim for “benefit sharing” on the authority. The PPVFR Authority will make payments from a National Gene Fund, made up of contributions by seed companies registered with it. WITHOUT PERMISSION The ASG believes the PPVFR Act allows seed companies as breeders to use the proprietary traits in their own varieties and hybrids without permission. But this is only for limited or one-time use. Once the traits are introgressed (trans- fer of genetic information from one species to another), the seed company will not need to use the genetic material of the trait developer. In other words, he seems to be making a case for legalised grab of IPRs. But Justice RK Gauba of the Delhi High Court, against whose order the two litigants had gone in appeal to the division bench, was not impressed by similar arguments advanced by Nuziveedu Seeds. In his order of March 28, he upheld Monsanto’s patent on insect-resistance traits in Bt cottonseed. He said the patent act has a section on “invention” by which it meant “a new product or process involving an inven- tive step and capable of industrial pro- duction”. The provision was inserted in 2002 so that patentees were not deprived of the reward for innovations based on skill and ingenuity and “above what occurs in nature”. The GM traits involve “laboratory processes and are not naturally occurring substances,” Justice Gauba averred. They are man- made and therefore, do not fall within the ambit of exclusions in the patent act. The gene which produces the boll- worm-killing toxic protein in Bt cotton plants is obtained from a soil bacterium. But the natural isolate cannot be TheASGbelievesthatoncethe traitsareintrogressed,theseed companywillnotneedtouse thegeneticmaterialofthe traitdeveloper.
  • 30. Agriculture/ GM Technology 30 June 19, 2017 straightaway inserted into the cotton genome. It has to be modified for the plant to accept it. It also has compo- nents attached so that the production of the toxic protein is switched on and off at particular points in the life cycle of the cotton plant. This gene construct when inserted can locate anywhere in the plant genome. There are hundreds or thousands of possibilities. The pro- duction of the toxin, its potency, the crop yield, its quality, and other proper- ties of the plant can be affected by the location of the insertions. Each of these insertions is called an “event”. The event chosen after screening, for patenting, would be the one that gives the best set of desired results. Justice Gauba said the PPVFR Act is for plant varieties. A plant variety, he said, is the lowest rank grouping of plants, distinguished from others by one or more characteristics. Relying on the 1991 international convention on pro- tection of plant varieties, he said, a sin- gle plant, a trait (like disease resistance or flower colour), a chemical or other substance (like oil or DNA), or a plant breeding technology (like tissue culture) do not meet the definition of a variety. Justice Gauba also termed benefit sharing as a “pot of gold at the end of the rainbow” because it depended on the breeders (seed companies) registering their varieties with the PPVFR Authority, which is not mandatory. Most seed companies, in fact, do not. Agribiotech companies say benefit sharing is for farmers and conservers of biodiversity. It is not for developers of GM traits which are manmade and cre- ated in laboratories. They say the law makes a distinction between the subject matter of an invention and use of an invention. If the subject matter is a plant or variety, it cannot be patented under IPA, but inventions whose use lies in plants and varieties can be patented. CONFLICT OF INTEREST? Incidentally, Rao was made a member of the PPVFR Authority in October 2016. He has been saying that seed companies should not have to obtain a non-objec- tion certificate (NOC) from the trait developer, as it gives the developer a handle to impose onerous terms. Once the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee recommends commercial release of a GM trait and the govern- ment accepts the recommendation, seed companies should be free to use the trait on terms fixed by the government and not the trait developer. Otherwise, it will result in a monopoly, he said. On a reference by the PPVFR Authority, the ASG has opined that such an NOC is indeed not necessary. It is not prescribed by the Act. An NOC goes against the grain of the PPVFR Act, he says, which is to promote the develop- ment of new varieties and hybrids. He says a mere declaration is enough. This should not be construed as an NOC. A self-declaration that genetic material used in transgenic varieties has been lawfully obtained is enough. Rao is said to enjoy considerable clout in the agriculture ministry, though this correspondent cannot vouch for it. His company was a big beneficiary (but not the only one) from the ministry’s 70 percent reduction in Bt cottonseed trait fees (payable to a joint venture of Monsanto). Bt cottonseed prices to farmers were cut by just four percent. Seed companies kept the savings. Given the agriculture minister’s pub- licly stated dislike of Monsanto’s “profi- teering”, it would be reasonable to assume that the ASG’s views have his consent. But a senior agriculture min- istry official said on a non-attributable basis, that the minister has not given his approval to the ASG’s legal opinion and the ministry has not vetted it. “It is a private matter between two companies and the government has no locus standi in the dispute.” Since the agriculture ministry had issued a notification in May last year waiving patents on GM traits and then withdrawing the notifi- cation hastily, one cannot say for sure that the issue has been laid to rest. The author is editor of www.smartindianagricutlure.in In2015,MPrabhakara Rao,founderofNuziveedu Seeds,hadmadeacase forGMtraitstobeconsid- eredasStandardEssential Patents,whichshouldbe availableonfairterms. Twitter: @indialegalmedia Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com AdditionalSolicitor- GeneralTusharMehta saysthattheGMtraits, onceincorporatedin plants,becomepartofit andareindistinguishable fromthem. JusticeRKGaubaofthe DelhiHighCourtwasnot impressedwitharguments ofNuziveeduSeeds.He upheldMonsanto’spatent oninsectresistancetraits inBtcottonseed.
  • 32. 32 June 19, 2017 Survival of the Fittest ThesearecriticaltimesforthissectorinIndiaandtheonlywaytosailthroughistoinnovate inbusinessmodelsandlearnnewskillssuchasartificialintelligenceandcloudcomputing By Imran Qureshi in Bengaluru STILL THE SUNRISE INDUSTRY? (Above) Employees at the Infosys campus in Bengaluru; (Facing page) The IT sector boom had created many work opportunities HE IT industry in India is ag- ain facing challenging times. Whether it is due to new tech- nologies or US visa policies, there is a churning that is tak- ing place. The focus is clearly to ride the curve of new job-threatening technolo- gies or face the sack. The insecurity has led to the renewed formation of a forum for IT employees which says that at least 56,000 employ- T ees are expected to lose their jobs over the next year. Though industry experts dismiss this insecurity as part of normal attrition and say it is standard practice to get rid of two percent of employees from the bottom of the pyramid every year, the fact remains that annual norms of appraisal have been made tougher. Ashok Soota, executive chairman, Happiest Minds Technologies and a for- mer chairman, Confederation of Indian Tech/ IT Industry/Job Losses UNI
  • 33. sition, which many in the industry see as yet another phase that could help it grow further. Fundamentally, the older form of doing business is changing. No more are clients coming up with large projects that last for a minimum of a couple of years. These have been reduced from 18- 24 months to just three months now. “New businesses are very project-orient- ed. It is platform-based and you need people to get it up and running. This requires fewer people and work is short- er in duration and cyclical,’’ said an HR manager on condition of anonymity. SENIOR POSITIONS Unlike previous years, what has added to the hue and cry this year is the purg- ing of people in senior positions such as vice-presidents or senior V-Ps. Mohan- das Pai, former CFO and HR head of Infosys, calls it a “clutter concentrated at a certain level’’. His counterparts, how- ever, call it “people stuck with legacy technology, little learnability and less adaptability’’. In short, it means that these managers don’t bring value to the work that the team is doing. A business head of a major company said: “There are a dime-a-dozen man- agers in this industry and they are not needed. Technology has also moved to a point where the industry can afford not to have them. The result is pink slips. The industry needs to have every res- ource that is billable. This is the reason for the purge in the middle.’’ But surely these people can be re- skilled? An HR consultant who previ- ously worked for an IT company said: “It is not easy. It depends entirely on the mindset of the individual and the tech- nology background. Today, the customer is no longer saying I want this to be done like earlier. He simply asks what can you do to improve things?” In the old days, said Soota, it was easier for people who couldn’t get re- skilled to move on because industry was growing at a phenomenal pace. Today, it simply cannot afford it. But it is not a bad thing as such people have another | INDIA LEGAL | June 19, 2017 33 started this, people trust us to take up their issues.” The reality is that automation is slowly taking over this industry and, as Soota says, will replace a “large number of low-value jobs by higher-value but smaller number of jobs”. This will also decrease the number of jobs in this sector. The nature of engage- ment in this sector will undergo a tran- Industry, said: “In an industry that is still a huge net hirer, employing upwar- ds of a million-and-a-half annually, you are bound to get rid of some people. But there have not been mass layoffs.’’ INSECURE LOT But there is genuine fear over job losses and it has led to the Forum for Infor- mation Technology Employees trying to get itself registered formally. It will be the first independent association of its kind in the country and is a bid to organise the estimated 2.8 million emp- loyees in India’s IT sector. The insecuri- ty runs high and the forum claims that at least 56,000 employees of top soft- ware companies such as Infosys, Wipro and Cognizant are expected to lose their jobs over the next year. J Jayaprakash, a member of the forum, said: “Since we ourselves are IT employees who have ”Indiancompaniesmayevengo touniversitiesintheUStohire localtalent,groomthemandput themonthejob.Wewillalsoget toknowwhatskillsetsthelocal peoplehave.” –AformerHRdirectorofanITfirm Rajeev Tyagi
  • 34. chance to become entrepreneurs. “After all, every other industry has an IT arm. The demand for IT skills will remain high because there is a huge amount of requirement everywhere,’’ he said. NEW CHALLENGES The change is happening at a phenome- nal pace. A business head of an IT com- pany said: “When the internet came, you could not find Java-trained individ- uals. Now, we are talking about data sci- ence and machine learning which makes artificial intelligence adaptable. These are the newer challenges. In fact, today, architects are still in demand, hands-on programmers are still in demand….” This is an industry that is quick to adapt and has done so every time it has faced a crisis. Whether it is the Y2K one, the Lehman Brothers crash or the US slowdown, the Indian IT industry sim- ply went on an overdrive and re-skilled and adapted to meet the demands of the market and grow. It is the same appro- ach it is adapting this time too, despite the new curbs on H1B visas proposed by the US government. In fact, even before Donald Trump came to occupy the White House, for- mer president Barack Obama’s rhetoric had forced the Indian IT industry to reduce its share of H1B visas in fiscal 2016. According to a report by National Foundation for American Policy, a US- based non-profit think-tank, seven top Indian IT companies saw a drop of 37 percent in H1B visas in 2016 as com- pared to 2015. These included TCS, Wipro and Infosys. It said, the 9,356 new H1B petitions for the top seven Indian-based companies approved in fiscal 2016 represent only 0.006 percent of the US labour force. So, it is hardly surprising that companies have reduced the number of applications for the cov- eted visas this year. Not just that, the sector is changing its business model of onsite deployment. From the days when almost 50 percent of a company’s work was outside India, it has been reduced to 30 percent. This means that the number of Indians who used to be sent abroad by IT companies will come down and could be reduced to as little as 10 percent. Kris Laxmikanth, CEO, Headhun- ters, said that with the new norms, Indian companies will be hiring Ameri- cans locally. One former HR director said: “Indian companies may even go to universities there to hire local talent, groom them and put them on the job. We will also know what skill sets the local people have.” Soota added that by sending higher skilled people abroad, Indian companies will evolve and move up the value chain. Some insiders were surprised at the proposal of Infosys’ founder, NR Nara- yan Murthy that top managements of IT companies take a cut in salary so that the younger lot does not lose jobs. “It is a cut-and-dried world today. If you are paid handsomely, professionals perform. Otherwise, they find better jobs and go away,” said an HR consultant. The only way then to survive this dog-eat-dog world is to move towards new opportunity areas like machine learning, artificial intelligence, IoT (Internet of Things) and robotic process automation. Doing a niche job is the security one needs. Twitter: @indialegalmedia Website: www.indialegallive.com Contact: editor@indialegallive.com Automationwillreplacealarge numberoflow-valuejobs byhigher-valuebutsmaller numberofjobs. —AshokSoota,executivechairman, HappiestMindsTechnologies Tech/ IT Industry/Job Losses 34 June 19, 2017 BRACING FOR LAYOFFS: Protests against mass terminations in TCS at the Town Hall in Bengaluru in January 2017 UNI