SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Gay Marriage: Perseverance May Pay Off In the End.
Earlier this year, a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel ruled 2–1 in Perry v. Brown, declaring
Proposition 8, California’s ballot initiative banning same-sex marriage, unconstitutional. The
case was a calculated move by LGBT rights advocates to force a Supreme Court decision; one
they presumably believe will result in same-sex marriage rights granted nationwide. Not all
LGBT advocates were happy with the initiation of the lawsuit, which features veteran Supreme
Court lawyers, David Boies and Ted Olson, opposing counsel in Bush v. Gore, as plaintiffs’
attorneys. The largest LGBT advocacy organizations, including the Human Rights Campaign
and Lambda Legal, opposed forcing a Supreme Court case at this time, fearing an adverse
decision will undermine decades of legal work.
The chief dilemma for marriage equality advocates is the desire to win at the ballot box, a
sign of political strength as a cause, and the seeming inability to do so. Gaining allies in the
political branches and prevailing in courts is helpful, but winning elections is necessary for true
social equality. Proposition 8 was an all too familiar tale for gay rights proponents and some
LGBT advocates have grown restless with the pace of progress, particularly in the wake of yet
another defeat at the ballot box. At present, only eight states plus the District of Columbia
recognize marriages between people of the same sex. In none of these states was the right to
marriage granted by the voters. In fact, two states, California and Maine, had marriage equality
only to have it subsequently banned by voters. In contrast, 39 states ban same sex marriage, 29 of
which are constitutional bans. In 2012, constitutional measures banning same sex marriage are
on the ballot in Minnesota and North Carolina, both of which are polling well.
Research points to deep seeded social hierarchal reasons why pro-gay issues may have a
hard time winning elections. Researchers documented high levels of resistance to civil rights
legislation based on gender, race, and religion. Research demonstrates that individuals are often
motivated to political action by the prevention of a perceived threat rather than by the support of
an opportunity for something good especially when a key political issue is involved. Election
results often reflect deep seeded prejudice toward gays and lesbians.
A mere twenty year ago, the people of Colorado approved Amendment 2, earning the ire
of gay advocates and the nickname, “the hate state”. This week, the Colorado Senate approved,
with bipartisan support, legislation that would allow same-sex couples to register as domestic
partners. This year alone, the New Jersey, Washington, and Maryland legislatures approved gay
marriage, indicating there is a popular movement toward marriage recognition.
While these victories show signs of progress, these victories are piecemeal, taking a great
deal of resources and time to pass legislation in each state. With Americans split on the issue of
marriage equality and given the current make up Congress, a national legislative solution is
nearly impossible. Legislative solutions are relatively easy to reverse, arduous, and costly. Civil
rights laws that are easy to reverse create instability in the law and are not in the best interest of
marriage equality advocates, especially when faced with the prospect of continually having to
protect the right at the legislature, once granted.
Winning at the ballot box limits cries of counter majoritarian action by the judiciary and
limits the amount of time and money spent defending legislation from potential repeal.
Proponents of LGBT rights must engage in direct democratic lawmaking. Direct democracy
mechanisms are here for the foreseeable future and the LGBT community must learn to be
successful in it. LGBT leaders must focus on strategies for winning at the ballot box if there is
any hope for marriage equality. Regardless of how marriage equality is achieved, gaining
favorable public opinion will ultimately allow gay and lesbians to live complete and full lives as
they so choose. The win in Perry v. Brown is exciting and advances the cause of LGBT
Americans, but the real social change will occur when majorities of Americans are willing to go
to the ballot box, challenge the religious and cultural norms, and vote to expand rights for their
fellow citizens.

More Related Content

What's hot

Global perspectives homophobia qr
Global perspectives homophobia qrGlobal perspectives homophobia qr
Global perspectives homophobia qrmayorgam
 
Political science homework
Political science homeworkPolitical science homework
Political science homeworkWriters Per Hour
 
Research paper Felon Voting
Research paper Felon VotingResearch paper Felon Voting
Research paper Felon VotingWriters Per Hour
 
Parties in the california state government (chapter 4)
Parties in the california state government (chapter 4)Parties in the california state government (chapter 4)
Parties in the california state government (chapter 4)Melissa Michelson
 
FelonyDisenfranchisementEllis
FelonyDisenfranchisementEllisFelonyDisenfranchisementEllis
FelonyDisenfranchisementEllisDennis Ellis
 
Florida Activists Frustrated On Gay Rights
Florida  Activists  Frustrated  On  Gay  RightsFlorida  Activists  Frustrated  On  Gay  Rights
Florida Activists Frustrated On Gay Rightsmelisrob
 
Government Presentaion
Government PresentaionGovernment Presentaion
Government Presentaionjbartalam
 
Tampa Tribune Lobbyist Series
Tampa Tribune Lobbyist SeriesTampa Tribune Lobbyist Series
Tampa Tribune Lobbyist SeriesJohn T. Wark
 
Research paper gay marrige
Research paper gay marrigeResearch paper gay marrige
Research paper gay marrigeadamtweek
 
PRESS RELEASE—KRISIN BECK—April 2
PRESS RELEASE—KRISIN BECK—April 2PRESS RELEASE—KRISIN BECK—April 2
PRESS RELEASE—KRISIN BECK—April 2James Roth
 
Controversies and interpretations of civil rights
Controversies and interpretations of civil rightsControversies and interpretations of civil rights
Controversies and interpretations of civil rightsAngel Magana
 
FINAL Congress
FINAL CongressFINAL Congress
FINAL Congressh2oo
 
Congressional Redistricting
Congressional RedistrictingCongressional Redistricting
Congressional Redistrictinggovaae
 

What's hot (19)

Global perspectives homophobia qr
Global perspectives homophobia qrGlobal perspectives homophobia qr
Global perspectives homophobia qr
 
Political science homework
Political science homeworkPolitical science homework
Political science homework
 
Doma faq
Doma faqDoma faq
Doma faq
 
Research paper Felon Voting
Research paper Felon VotingResearch paper Felon Voting
Research paper Felon Voting
 
Parties in the california state government (chapter 4)
Parties in the california state government (chapter 4)Parties in the california state government (chapter 4)
Parties in the california state government (chapter 4)
 
FelonyDisenfranchisementEllis
FelonyDisenfranchisementEllisFelonyDisenfranchisementEllis
FelonyDisenfranchisementEllis
 
Florida Activists Frustrated On Gay Rights
Florida  Activists  Frustrated  On  Gay  RightsFlorida  Activists  Frustrated  On  Gay  Rights
Florida Activists Frustrated On Gay Rights
 
ap gov chap 7
ap gov chap 7ap gov chap 7
ap gov chap 7
 
QU presentation
QU presentation QU presentation
QU presentation
 
Government Presentaion
Government PresentaionGovernment Presentaion
Government Presentaion
 
Tampa Tribune Lobbyist Series
Tampa Tribune Lobbyist SeriesTampa Tribune Lobbyist Series
Tampa Tribune Lobbyist Series
 
Tarea 7
Tarea 7Tarea 7
Tarea 7
 
Research paper gay marrige
Research paper gay marrigeResearch paper gay marrige
Research paper gay marrige
 
honestymarkherring
honestymarkherringhonestymarkherring
honestymarkherring
 
PRESS RELEASE—KRISIN BECK—April 2
PRESS RELEASE—KRISIN BECK—April 2PRESS RELEASE—KRISIN BECK—April 2
PRESS RELEASE—KRISIN BECK—April 2
 
Controversies and interpretations of civil rights
Controversies and interpretations of civil rightsControversies and interpretations of civil rights
Controversies and interpretations of civil rights
 
Chapter 10b
Chapter 10bChapter 10b
Chapter 10b
 
FINAL Congress
FINAL CongressFINAL Congress
FINAL Congress
 
Congressional Redistricting
Congressional RedistrictingCongressional Redistricting
Congressional Redistricting
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (16)

Environmental Law
Environmental LawEnvironmental Law
Environmental Law
 
Leadership and Political Compromise
Leadership and Political CompromiseLeadership and Political Compromise
Leadership and Political Compromise
 
Lobato Brief
Lobato BriefLobato Brief
Lobato Brief
 
IPV Analysis
IPV AnalysisIPV Analysis
IPV Analysis
 
Return on Investment Analysis City of Denver
Return on Investment Analysis City of DenverReturn on Investment Analysis City of Denver
Return on Investment Analysis City of Denver
 
Gender is refers to as a social aspects and opportunities associated with bei...
Gender is refers to as a social aspects and opportunities associated with bei...Gender is refers to as a social aspects and opportunities associated with bei...
Gender is refers to as a social aspects and opportunities associated with bei...
 
The pursuit of gender equity
The pursuit of gender equityThe pursuit of gender equity
The pursuit of gender equity
 
Gender Differences
Gender DifferencesGender Differences
Gender Differences
 
The influence of gender-role socialization, media use and sports participatio...
The influence of gender-role socialization, media use and sports participatio...The influence of gender-role socialization, media use and sports participatio...
The influence of gender-role socialization, media use and sports participatio...
 
Sample essay on women
Sample essay on womenSample essay on women
Sample essay on women
 
Gay marriage research paper
Gay marriage research paperGay marriage research paper
Gay marriage research paper
 
marriage
marriagemarriage
marriage
 
Gender and diversity
Gender and diversityGender and diversity
Gender and diversity
 
Same sex marriage. My oponion
Same sex marriage. My oponionSame sex marriage. My oponion
Same sex marriage. My oponion
 
LoganSalyersRoanScholarshipEssayResponses
LoganSalyersRoanScholarshipEssayResponsesLoganSalyersRoanScholarshipEssayResponses
LoganSalyersRoanScholarshipEssayResponses
 
Gender discrimination vs Equity
Gender discrimination vs EquityGender discrimination vs Equity
Gender discrimination vs Equity
 

Similar to Perry Op Ed

The Good Samaritan Immigration Essay.docx
The Good Samaritan Immigration Essay.docxThe Good Samaritan Immigration Essay.docx
The Good Samaritan Immigration Essay.docxwrite4
 
Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
 Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docxMARRY7
 
US Politics - Propositions in 2012
US Politics - Propositions in 2012US Politics - Propositions in 2012
US Politics - Propositions in 2012tutor2u
 
KeethaFinalPaper_Fall2014
KeethaFinalPaper_Fall2014KeethaFinalPaper_Fall2014
KeethaFinalPaper_Fall2014Amanda Gilmore
 

Similar to Perry Op Ed (8)

The Good Samaritan Immigration Essay.docx
The Good Samaritan Immigration Essay.docxThe Good Samaritan Immigration Essay.docx
The Good Samaritan Immigration Essay.docx
 
Gay Marriage (Final)
Gay Marriage (Final)Gay Marriage (Final)
Gay Marriage (Final)
 
We the people
We the peopleWe the people
We the people
 
We the people
We the peopleWe the people
We the people
 
We the people
We the peopleWe the people
We the people
 
Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
 Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
 
US Politics - Propositions in 2012
US Politics - Propositions in 2012US Politics - Propositions in 2012
US Politics - Propositions in 2012
 
KeethaFinalPaper_Fall2014
KeethaFinalPaper_Fall2014KeethaFinalPaper_Fall2014
KeethaFinalPaper_Fall2014
 

Perry Op Ed

  • 1. Gay Marriage: Perseverance May Pay Off In the End. Earlier this year, a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel ruled 2–1 in Perry v. Brown, declaring Proposition 8, California’s ballot initiative banning same-sex marriage, unconstitutional. The case was a calculated move by LGBT rights advocates to force a Supreme Court decision; one they presumably believe will result in same-sex marriage rights granted nationwide. Not all LGBT advocates were happy with the initiation of the lawsuit, which features veteran Supreme Court lawyers, David Boies and Ted Olson, opposing counsel in Bush v. Gore, as plaintiffs’ attorneys. The largest LGBT advocacy organizations, including the Human Rights Campaign and Lambda Legal, opposed forcing a Supreme Court case at this time, fearing an adverse decision will undermine decades of legal work. The chief dilemma for marriage equality advocates is the desire to win at the ballot box, a sign of political strength as a cause, and the seeming inability to do so. Gaining allies in the political branches and prevailing in courts is helpful, but winning elections is necessary for true social equality. Proposition 8 was an all too familiar tale for gay rights proponents and some LGBT advocates have grown restless with the pace of progress, particularly in the wake of yet another defeat at the ballot box. At present, only eight states plus the District of Columbia recognize marriages between people of the same sex. In none of these states was the right to marriage granted by the voters. In fact, two states, California and Maine, had marriage equality only to have it subsequently banned by voters. In contrast, 39 states ban same sex marriage, 29 of which are constitutional bans. In 2012, constitutional measures banning same sex marriage are on the ballot in Minnesota and North Carolina, both of which are polling well.
  • 2. Research points to deep seeded social hierarchal reasons why pro-gay issues may have a hard time winning elections. Researchers documented high levels of resistance to civil rights legislation based on gender, race, and religion. Research demonstrates that individuals are often motivated to political action by the prevention of a perceived threat rather than by the support of an opportunity for something good especially when a key political issue is involved. Election results often reflect deep seeded prejudice toward gays and lesbians. A mere twenty year ago, the people of Colorado approved Amendment 2, earning the ire of gay advocates and the nickname, “the hate state”. This week, the Colorado Senate approved, with bipartisan support, legislation that would allow same-sex couples to register as domestic partners. This year alone, the New Jersey, Washington, and Maryland legislatures approved gay marriage, indicating there is a popular movement toward marriage recognition. While these victories show signs of progress, these victories are piecemeal, taking a great deal of resources and time to pass legislation in each state. With Americans split on the issue of marriage equality and given the current make up Congress, a national legislative solution is nearly impossible. Legislative solutions are relatively easy to reverse, arduous, and costly. Civil rights laws that are easy to reverse create instability in the law and are not in the best interest of marriage equality advocates, especially when faced with the prospect of continually having to protect the right at the legislature, once granted. Winning at the ballot box limits cries of counter majoritarian action by the judiciary and limits the amount of time and money spent defending legislation from potential repeal. Proponents of LGBT rights must engage in direct democratic lawmaking. Direct democracy mechanisms are here for the foreseeable future and the LGBT community must learn to be
  • 3. successful in it. LGBT leaders must focus on strategies for winning at the ballot box if there is any hope for marriage equality. Regardless of how marriage equality is achieved, gaining favorable public opinion will ultimately allow gay and lesbians to live complete and full lives as they so choose. The win in Perry v. Brown is exciting and advances the cause of LGBT Americans, but the real social change will occur when majorities of Americans are willing to go to the ballot box, challenge the religious and cultural norms, and vote to expand rights for their fellow citizens.