The document discusses different methods for settling disputes, including conciliation, adjudication, and arbitration. It notes that a conciliator tries to get parties to settle on their own without making a decision, while an arbitrator can make a final ruling. Arbitration is described as a popular dispute resolution process in several countries because it is flexible, less expensive than other options, and helps build cooperation between parties. The key conditions for referring an industrial dispute to arbitration under the relevant Act are that a dispute exists, the employer and workers agree in writing, the agreement is officially signed, and it is referred before going to labor court.

1. Presented by-
Ayisha Kowsar A
MBA

3. Conciliation
AdjudicationArbitration

7. Discussion
leader
An
innovator
A protectorAn adviser
A
communicati
on link

10. Is the impartial person who represented by the
court to settle the dispute.
the only difference between conciliator and
arbitrator is….
conciliator does not give a decision,he make the
parties themselves to come to settle. Where as an
arbitrator having the right to take the final decision.

11. Arbitration has been popular in countries, the
USA,Canada,New Zealand etc.,
 It is more flexible and can be adjusted to the
views,desires and experience of the parties.
Less expensive
 It helps build a healthy industrial relations,mutual
understanding and co-operation.
It is popular because it is suitable and compelling.

12. Under this Act,a dispute may be referred to arbitration
based on the following conditions
An industrial dispute exists in an establishment
The employer and the workers agree,in writing,to refer
the dispute to arbitration.
The agreement is in official form and signed by the
parties.
The dispute must be referred to arbitration at any time
before it has been referred by the labour court.
A copy of the agreement is forwarded to the government
and the conciliation officer.