Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Design in Elections
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Design in Elections

1,097

Published on

This is a presentation I did almost a year ago as part of the Election Assistance Commission event in August 2011 - Design Counts in Elections - EAC Roundtable …

This is a presentation I did almost a year ago as part of the Election Assistance Commission event in August 2011 - Design Counts in Elections - EAC Roundtable Discussion
(http://www.eac.gov/design_counts_in_elections_-_eac_roundtable_discussion/)

Published in: Technology, News & Politics
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,097
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Evolution of Design in ElectionsGood design and clear language makesa better election experienceEAC Roundtable discussionAugust 11, 2011Whitney QuesenberyUsability in Civic Lifehttp://usabilityinciviclife.org Twitter @whitneyq #BReady2012
  • 2. 2 Design, plain language, and usability all start with people A good voting experience takes  Good design  Clear information  Easy to understand interaction All working together!photo from Susan King Roth “Disenfranchised byDesign” ID Journal, 1998
  • 3. 3How far havewe come?
  • 4. 4Chicago judicial retention ballot Redesign by Design for Democracy 2002
  • 5. 5Voting instructions Redesign by Design for Democracy
  • 6. 6Minnesota absentee ballot instructions Redesign by Usability in Civic Life for the Minnesota Secretary of State, 2009
  • 7. 7Redesign concept for New York ballots Redesign by Oxide Design, 2011
  • 8. 8Best Practices:Design ballots tobe easy to read
  • 9. 9Make the text large enough One of the most frequent complaints from voters in usability tests is the size of the text on paper ballots
  • 10. 10Use lowercase letters, notALL CAPITAL LETTERS The shapes of the letters are not as distinct. Lines of text look more crowded In social media, capital letters are like shouting
  • 11. 11Align text on the left,instead of centering itStrong alignment makes the balloteasier to scan  Ballot identification header  Contests and candidates  Ballot questions  Instructions
  • 12. 12Pick one fontThe best practices suggest  Use a single font family  Pick a sans-serif font  Use size and weight (bold or light fonts) for emphasis
  • 13. 13Best Practices:Use design fororganization andmeaning
  • 14. 14Use color and contrast inmeaningful waysShading and color create hierarchyof importance  Separate instructions and contests  Highlight selections  Emphasize important information
  • 15. 15Place instructions to guidevoters through the ballotPut instructions where they areneeded  In the upper-left or first column  Before the first contest.  When instructions change  At the end of a form
  • 16. 16 Use layout to reinforce organization and meaning Don’t split contests  Sample ballots in Ohio in 2008 also split the first contest across two columnsKewaunee County, Wisconsin, 2002
  • 17. 17 Use layout to reinforce organization and meaning Don’t hide contests below instructionsKing County, 2009
  • 18. 18 What holds us back?Photo from the Trace Center
  • 19. 19We negotiate design inlegal markup, not as itwill be seen by voters How can anyone understand what this will look like? How can we know whether it will be usable?
  • 20. 20Election departmentsdon’t have (enough)design resources We need more programs like the AIGA Election Design Fellowships in Oregon and Washington
  • 21. 21 We don’t spend (enough) time learning from voters  Usability testing does not have to be formal or expensive.  Observing usability tests is not the same as demos, meetings, hearings or consultations.Poster from Washington State, Jenny Greeve
  • 22. 23Everything gets usability tested…will it be before or during the election?
  • 23. 24The Usability in Civic Life project promotes usability in elections, plain languageand accessibility.We…. mobilize usability professionals to participate in projects supporting better election design. teach workshops and give presentations for election officials on usability testing, design and plain language created the LEO usability testing kit for election officialshttp://usabilityinciviclife.orghttp://civicdesigning.org

×