3. Challenge
Looking to expand the business beyond cell phones and
electronics, uSell surveyed customers asking what other
types of products they would be interested in selling on
the site. Through qualitative surveys and measuring click-
through rates in marketing emails, our team observed that
customers were interested in selling items such as
textbooks, clothing, and video games on uSell.com, but we
wanted data to prove it.
Homepage Re-Design Version 7.8
Hypothesis
Our product team hypothesized that we could add
additional verticals to the site without affecting our
core conversion rate. Before taking a risk.
4. Original
the original version of the site allows
customers to sell eight different types of
electronics by clicking on the icons.
The variation features the new sellable items as
icons and in the header links menu.
v.s.
Design & Testing
Variation
11. Results
We focused on customers placing orders to sell their electronics as the barometer of success in the test. As long as the variation showed no
significant negative impact to the core conversion, we would make the expanded products the default. Orders from other verticals would add
incremental revenue worth pursuing for the business.
After running the test twice, we found that adding additional verticals to the site had somewhere between a break even and -3% impact on
conversions on our electronic business. Instead of being focused only on selling electronics, we can commit to offering consumers the
opportunity to sell a wider variety of products in our marketplace.
Original v.s. Variation 1 (–3%)
12. Selling Volume
Traffic
Challenge
After about one quarter we added new additional verticals
the Conversion Rate became fragile; because the traffic
looks to be not stable enough, even it keeps gradually
increase.
Our team determined implementing another experiment
so that make our Conversion Rate going steady again.
Homepage Re-Design Version 8.0 - 8.63
13. Hypothesis
The uSell product team hypothesized that we
could focus on the most popular products to
drive a more stable and higher conversion rate.
90% Revenue from
iPhone + other brands Cellphone
17. Click Test 1
Variation BVariation A
Even Variation A doesn’t win from preference test, we still need to validate its usability
aspect via click test. As above result, this pattern could concentrate users’ consistent
behaviors which potentially is ideal pattern to support hypothesis validation.
On the other side, Variation B’s distribution is a kind of chaos. As a homepage design, this
pattern is not good for the entrance of traffic which could lead some risks.
20. Variation CVariation A
Based this round test, we learnt Variation C could work as good as Variation A. It
could bring user focus on main CTA enough.
Click Test 2
22. Results
After running live A/B testing two weeks, we are glad to see that the new design to the site had somewhere
between 12% - 15% improve on conversions on our core business.
Original v.s. Variation 3 (+15%)
23. Results
After released the v8.63, our conversion rate became
strong, and then the traffic also met a peak in follow
quarters. Based on these scientific experiments, our
product team continue to validate the right directions of
product. as the right side charts showed, we made a
better and better conversion rate, and NPS via a series
of new features.
30. Results:
Conversion Rate keep -1 to +1 % as original design, but Order
Send-In Rate increased from 30% to 55%
The new mobile error states UI design
The new mobile checkout flow pages