Thank you for sharing this presentation! I often use wikipedia, now I know exactly how it works. I’m sure it is useful for everyone, I don’t understand why would anyone think that it is totally unreliable.
Great presentation, Su-Laine. I would (and will) recommend this to anyone who wants to know more about Wikipedia and how it works. The list of most-visited pages was a hoot!
Thanks for the kind comments. I prepared this presentation for the Vancouver User Experience Group, a community of design and usability professionals. I also gave a variation of it to a chapter of the Society for Technical Communication. The slides are designed for a 90-minute talk with a lot of switching out to demonstrate how to edit and how to monitor for vandalism.
excellent presentation :-) thank´s for sharing ! For which audience have you prepared it ?
I have started to present the wikipedia -principles as a pedagogical model for changing the mind-set. This is within teachers trainings.
Would you be interested in discussing this for 20 min in our live online room ? (audio and shared presentation) See the test room http://testlion-web2.0campus.ivocalize.net/ - enter name, no pw for login
Su-Laine Yeo Vancouver User Experience Group November, 2007 Dynamics of Wikipedia This presentation is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Overview
How does it all work?
Who writes for Wikipedia, and why?
How does the site keep vandalism and spam away?
What happens when contributors disagree?
How does the site keep articles consistent and organized?
Agenda
What is Wikipedia?
Contributing: Part I
Vandalism and spam
Conflict and culture
Contributing: Part II
Please ask questions along the way!
What is Wikipedia?
Vision
A free, neutral encyclopedia that anyone can edit
“ Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing.” – Wikipedia founder Jimbo Wales
The global project
253 languages
2 million+ articles in English
5 million articles in languages other than English, accounting for half of all traffic
Freely -licensed image, video, and sound files on Wikimedia Commons are used across languages
Semi-protect pages (lock pages from being edited by unregistered and new users)
Protect pages (lock pages from being edited)
Edit protected pages
Delete and undelete page histories
Addressing spam
“ No-follow” on external links
Spam blacklist
As with vandalism: revert, warn user, block persistent offenders
Other obviously-bad edits
Blatant advertising
Copyright violation
Libel
Hoax
Complete bullocks
Conflict and Culture
“ When someone just writes 'f**k, f**k, f**k', we just fix it, laugh and move on. But the difficult social issues are the borderline cases — people who do some good work, but who are also a pain in the neck.”
– Jimbo Wales
Conflict
When contributors disagree in good faith, there are procedures for working through disputes.
The Wikipedia community has final say on most things
… The community is: people who have a history of good contributions and who show up for the debate
What not to do
Dispute resolution
After being bold:
Discuss on the article Talk page and/or the other person’s Talk page
Third Opinion
Mediation
Request for Comment
Arbitration
Intervention by Jimbo
Content policies and guidelines
What are reliable sources?
What is an acceptable External Link?
Is company XYZ notable enough for an article?
Should the article title be “Giraffe” or “Giraffes”?
Is it “program” or “programme”?
Conduct policies and guidelines
Be civil
Assume good faith
Don’t edit war
Write for the enemy
Ignore all rules
Don’t use Wikipedia for self-promotion
Corporate advocacy and self-promotion
Includes adding excessive links to your own company’s website
If in doubt about possible conflict of interest, suggest changes on the article’s Talk page or on one of the noticeboards
Talk pages
Dispute resolution principles
Focus on how to improve the articles
Widen the conflict; ask for third-party viewpoints
Don’t wikilawyer
Discuss rather than vote
See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deleted_articles_with_freaky_titles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pooky_the_Teddy_Bear
Controversy is often good
Motivates people to improve articles
Raises awareness of the need for quality sourcing
Leads to inclusion of multiple viewpoints and nuances in articles
Builds community
Problem behaviour
Point-of-view pushing; political and nationalist block voting
Edit warring
Persistent corporate advocacy
Fraudulent use of multiple accounts (sockpuppetry)
Problem behaviour (cont’d)
Problem users can be banned from a topic or from all of Wikipedia
Bans are difficult to enforce
Short supply of neutral people who are patient enough to deal with problematic behaviour
“ The takeaway message I'm getting here is ‘only an admin with a hole in his head willingly gets involved in Israel-Palestine articles.’ ” - a Wikipedia administrator
Controversial Issues
Wikipedia’s list of controversial issues
Articles involving “biographies of living persons”
Children in the news
Victims of crime
People notable for having medical conditions
Overwhelmingly negative biographies
Biographies of Living Persons rules
Consider privacy
Negative material has more rigorous inclusion requirements
Immediately remove unsourced or poorly sourced negative or controversial material
Avoid discussion
IA for two million articles
Few information types : encyclopedia articles, lists, disambiguation pages
No essays or how-to articles
No point-of-view forking of articles
Extensive guidelines on:
naming conventions
refactoring long articles, merging similar articles
use of categories
IA for two million articles (cont’d)
Relatively simple markup
Extensive use of templates
Constant refactoring
Templates
Categories
There are guidelines for creating categories
Be bold in creating categories
Categories are subject to refactoring
Adding and using categories
Summary: Conflict and culture
Policies and guidelines
Culture is oriented towards trust, discussion, and generating consensus
Conflict can build community and often leads to better articles
Most articles are not controversial. Usually, good-faith edits stick
Decentralized management of information architecture
Contributing: Part II
“ I have found working with a bunch of like minded folks on an article or wikiproject when it kicks into top gear one of the most inspiring things, the rapid-fire editing of an article gunning toward FA status as writer's blocks are sequentially blasted out of the way is just amazing to witness via the diffs/hists.”
– Wikipedia editor “Casliber”
Contribute by…
Writing about what you’re interested in
Improving the writing of others
Citing sources
Categorizing and organizing articles
Translating articles
Contributing photographs and artwork
Reviewing and commenting on articles
Maintenance: removing vandalism, spam, and trivia
Helping to resolve disputes
"We can no longer feel satisfied and happy when we see these (article) numbers going up.... We should continue to turn our attention away from growth and towards quality.“ - Jimbo Wales
Why contribute?
Improve your skills in:
Writing
Editing
Having your work edited
Conflict resolution and group dynamics
Understanding copyright
Wiki technology
Summary
Free encyclopedia written by volunteers
Be bold
Get an account with a fake name; don’t promote commercial interests
Revert, warn, and block vandals and spammers
Policies, guidelines, and dispute resolution systems exist for controversial issues
Distributed decision-making scales well for information architecture
The radical project
Almost no co-ordination of effort
2% of users (1400 people) make 73.4% of edits
0.7% of users (524 people) make 50% of edits
But… people who make very, very few edits write most of Wikipedia’s content
… Your earliest edits will probably be your most valuable ones
Wikipedia, the encylopedia that anyone can edit, more
Wikipedia, the encylopedia that anyone can edit, “can never work in theory, only in practice.” Accounting for one in every 200 page views on the Internet, it has become a part of our everyday lives. Wikipedia is changing the way we think about the economics of the web, the potential and the pitfalls of engaging the masses, and the role of professional information architects in a world in which content arrives from literally every direction.
In this session, we’ll explore the nuts-and-bolts of how the Wikipedia project works. Who writes Wikipedia, and why? How does the English Wikipedia maintain quality, consistent tagging, and coherent organization across over two million articles? What happens when contributors disagree? We will take a tour behind the scenes at Wikipedia to learn what happens when users are encouraged to - as they say on Wikipedia… “be bold.” less
6 comments
Comments 1 - 6 of 6 previous next Post a comment