12. The Problem of Social Value Social impacts V. Social accounts/audit Interventions v Core business activity Some distinction but overlapping and blurred lines Desire for: Quantification Financial Valuation But also: Progress/Change Capture of ‘feelings’ Community effect of core business
15. Supporters Direct: Research Outline Secondary Literature and methods review, good practice 6 Working Papers Primary 1. Survey of CEOs – 10 clubs, all levels 2. Comparative Case Studies – 4 clubs (2 fan-owned, 2 non fan-owned) i) Internal stakeholder perceptions Qualitative interviews ii) External stakeholder perceptions Qualitative interviews – fans, residents, business, local councils Surveys - fans iii) Community department monitoring and evaluation iv) Social Audit ‘Bundle’ of Indicators Local Spending; Investment in Local Community; Staffing; Environmental Impact; Supporters; Governance
16. Key Findings All activities = community impacts Core business affects range of stakeholders Few clubs acknowledge, evidence or report Fan Ownership: more holistic relationships Good and bad practice evident
18. Recommendations Football – change culture and practice Clubs – adopt Community Company Objectives Authorities make reporting requirements Recognise the added social value of broader based ownership Football’s opportunity and benefit Government All public authorities: preferential treatment conditional Local Govt: Encourage wider involvement through powers National Govt: Recognise added social value of broader ownership European Govt: To generate Europe-wide evidence of positive social value
19. Developing a Social Audit Tool 7 Internal Measures Governance Financial performance Member/staff economic participation Member/staff democratic participation Training and education Staff absenteeism Staff profiling / survey 7 External Measures Customer and stakeholder satisfaction Impact on social change Ethical procurement and investment Local economic impact Investment in community initiatives Environmental impact Finance and capital