Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Hypervisor quick comparison
Hypervisor quick comparison
Hypervisor quick comparison
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Hypervisor quick comparison

200

Published on

VMware vs Citrix vs Hyper-V

VMware vs Citrix vs Hyper-V

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
200
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. VMWARE - Easier to setup, established product, works with most OSs - Is owned by EMC (1 storage vendor) and has plenty of development resources - Constantly improves, has an established upgrade process - Just works, seems to be very flexible and is ready for production environment - Has relationships with many organizations where they continue to improve (features and benefits) especially when it comes to networking (virtual networking - able to control the packets ability to traverse the network using an application) - Storage virtualization has improved along with giving vendors the ability to develop API's to work with their solution - Has integrated with Powershell to allow for automated VM management - Does not work with Nvidia GPUs, but they are in the works - Faster ESXi server setup, integrated LDAP (AD) tools, VC management interface, very easy to install
  • 2. CITRIX - Easy to setup, continues to establish capabilities, works with most OSs - Found that it is easy to setup an ISO file from a CIFS share, no need to upload into datastore (like that of Vmware) - Has an established upgrade policy - Complex powershell automation configuration - Faster VDI implementation, but for large organizations, costs seem to be the an issue because of the much needed hardware - Works with Nvidia GPUs - Easier Network bonding and implementation - Status view of the XenServer gives real-time stats, none really found on Vmware ESXi server (they have the capability found on VMware Operations Manager but not on the ESXi server itself)
  • 3. HYPER-V - Easy to install and configure - Not really an established technology, found some glitches with Windows 2008 but they have worked out a lot of the problems with 2012 - Does not work with all OS, had problems with Linux and Unix (Mint, Solaris, Xubuntu, etc) - Cluster configuration, complex - Network configuration needs more development work, they need to work at bonding the NICs - Cluster configuration only works with ISCSI protocols

×