Why Could Google Die...

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

23 comments

Comments 1 - 10 of 23 previous next Post a comment

  • + guestd2959c2 guestd2959c2 10 months ago
    I agree with your points, but I believe you missed three more powerful reasons Google will crater. Google’s search engine and its pay per click activities are based upon fraud. And Google is trying to control the Internet, like no other.

    The first fraud is that the search engine lists the most relevant web sites for the key search phrases. This is not true. I have proof that my web pages were deleted from the entire search engine for no reason. Yet Google had previously listed these web pages for the specified search phrases at placement 12 through 8 for the previous 5 YEARS. And I had performed not changes to the web pages. This is true for several different search phrases and web pages. Also note that the very same web pages continued to be ranked at placement 1-4 by Google for other search phrases. They deleted (totally not listed whatsoever) the site for one search phrase but not for another.

    Google’s listings are incomplete, inaccurate and in many cases meaningless, caused sole by Google’s breakdowns in their own algorithm. All of this is conducted in total secrecy. Remember Bernie Madhof, and his secret formulas he protected and misdirected the SEC for over 25 years. It was a SHAM from the beginning. I tried to discover what the problems were to make corrections myself, but was stonewalled countless times. Even sent two certified letters to EUric Schmidt.

    The second fraud is that Google charges their pay per click customers for charges not due. These charges are also performed in total secrecy. In essence Google can and DOES deduct funds from customers accounts, at will, and never have to prove or provide documentation for where the money was used. Sounds like Bernie Madhof again!

    The third reason is Google is attempting and Eric Schmidt in particular through insider contacts with Obama to take control of the Internet by eliminating the NET FREE conditions that allowed Google to rise up from nowhere to its too lofty place today. Google wants to create and control faster Internet pipes to allow Google to pop up faster than less wealthy sites. Thus Google would control throughout the Internet which sites load the fastest. This would be like Lehman Brothers, another scam artist, remember the Credit Default Swaps, getting control of the stock or commodity trading floor to have their transactions handled faster than anyone else.

    Google is a house of cards that will be uncovered and toppled. Google has to diversify as soon as possible to spread their risks.
  • + guest902969 guest902969 10 months ago
    hehe.china
  • + richm711 richm711 10 months ago
    Very interesting research. Thanks for sharing
  • + laserstone laserstone 10 months ago
    哈哈,来自中国的留言很集中呀。肯定是哪个帖子引过来的。
  • + laserstone laserstone 10 months ago
    哈哈,来自中国的留言很集中呀。肯定是哪个帖子引过来的。
  • + laserstone laserstone 10 months ago
    哈哈,来自中国的留言很集中呀。肯定是哪个帖子引过来的。
  • + guestd3a06b guestd3a06b 10 months ago
    ~
  • + guest88413ef guest88413ef 10 months ago
    test
  • + rinco1983 rinco1983 10 months ago
    留名!
  • + guest0a706a2 guest0a706a2 10 months ago
    chinese from Tinghsin Group,shit!

Comments 1 - 10 of 23 previous next

Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

77 Favorites

Why Could Google Die... - Presentation Transcript

  1. Why could Google die … maybe not now, but tomorrow Paris, March 2009
  2. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons to allow further contributions by other specialists and web users in the coming months. To view a copy of this Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike3.0 Unported license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 1712nd Street, Suite300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. ..……. 2 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  3. This presentation is an answer to the comments related to the previous faberNovel study In December 2008, faberNovel published a white paper about Google’s key success factors : http://www.slideshare.net/misteroo/all-about-google-presentation Many comments dealt with Google’s weaknesses and the possible threats to Google’s market dominance. We are now trying to identify these threats and weaknesses. The title of the presentation refers to Jeff Jarvis’ book What would Google do? which will be published in France in June 2009 (faberNovel/Télémaque publishing) ..……. 3 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  4. Methodology •  4 types of threats and weaknesses have been identified: Legal threat Internal weakness Strategic threat Other threat •  For each threat or weakness, probability, forecast and impact have been evaluated on scales : •  Probability: evaluation of the possibility that a threat or a weakness could impact Google’s business Low Mild High •  Timing: evaluation of the time limit for the threat or a weakness to impact Google’s business Long Short term term •  Impact: evaluation of the negative impact on Google’s revenues and profits High Low impact impact ..……. 4 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  5. 12 main weaknesses or threats Threats / Weaknesses Probability Timing Impact Low > High Short > Long Low > High Antitrust suits against Google Legal threats Copyright infringement suits Inability to hire or retain key people Internal Inability to scale operational processes weaknesses Top management issues Acquisition difficulties Competition with incumbents Strategic threats Disruptive innovations Inability to control points of entry Interruption or failure of Google’s services Privacy concerns Other threats Opensource’s ecosystem threats ..……. 5 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  6. Antitrust suits against Google Legal threat Google is increasingly subject to antitrust suits vs / vs In 2007, Microsoft called for In November 2008, Google and In February 2009, Sourcetool, a B2B regulator action to stop Google Yahoo ended their negotiations, search engine, filed an antitrust suit and DoubleClick merging abandoning attempts to overcome against Google, accusing it of upping the objections of antitrust regulators its ad rates unfairly Google might constantly be subject to antitrust claims for (amongst others) : Excluding companies Over favoring in-house Issuing unclear ad from Google results services rates Probability Timing Impact High Middle term High ..……. 6 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  7. Legal threat Copyright infringement suits Google has been subject to copyright infringement claims all over the World (Australia, Austria, France, Israel, Italy,…) vs vs vs May 2007: Viacom sued Google, May 2008: a group of Belgian October 2008: Google agreed to accusing YouTube of \"massive newspapers filed a lawsuit against pay $125 million to settle two intentional copyright Google claiming that Google News copyright lawsuits by publishers infringement\" and asking for more made the papers' articles available and authors than $1 billion in damages for free. They asked Google for €49 million in damages Since most of Google’s services link or host copyrighted material, The risk of monetary damages is substantial Probability Timing Impact High Short term Moderate ..……. 7 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  8. Internal Inability to hire or retain key weakness people Google set up processes to attract and motivate employees Since its performance depends on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals 600 Examples : 400 Google stock 200 price [$] 05 06 07 08 Cool work Transferable stock Very selective environment options program hiring process In a more mature company, incentives became less efficient: Google’s work environment is becoming comparable to big corporations At current stock price, 85% of its employees have underwater stock options Google’s hiring process is currently viewed as interminable (up to 5 months) and inefficient Probability Timing Impact High Middle term Moderate ..……. 8 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  9. Internal Inability to scale operational weakness processes Operational infrastructure and processes are key to Google favoring the growth of the company through innovation and quality Google's 80/20 rule allowed to Organization based on a startup model: develop many products : •  Project teams are small and autonomous •  Peer-reviewing: engineers work is subjected to the scrutiny of other engineers who are experts in the same field Google will face issues adapting its infrastructure to quick growth Implementation of heavy Inability to maintain a corporate Inability to maintain processes which could culture that fosters creativity and good quality level for slow down innovations teamwork Google products Probability Timing Impact Low Short term Mild ..……. 9 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  10. Internal Top management issues weakness Top management is key to Google’s strategy Larry Page, President in Eric Schmidt, CEO Sergei Brin, President in charge of products charge of technology Moreover, the triumvirate’s stocks account for 67% of the voting power of Google capital stock Top management issues could affect Google’s performance Internal dissensions Loss of key management leaders : Uncertain ability to between the members of accident / lack of interest for a more transfer or delegate key the top management mature company etc… responsibilities Probability Timing Impact Low Long term High ..……. 10 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  11. Strategic Strategic and operational threat difficulties acquiring companies Most of 54 Google’s acquisitions were successful In the future, Google could face some serious issues acquiring companies Strategic issues Operating difficulties Diversion of management time •  Forecasted revenues may not •  Integration of procedures and fully materialize: processes •  Rather than focusing on •  Technical integration of the operating business, top companies: management could focus on acquisition integration •  Google could miss investment challenges opportunities: Eg : It took 16 months to relaunch Jotspot after its acquisition by Google Probability Timing Impact Short term Mild Moderate ..……. 11 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  12. Strategic Competition with incumbents threat Until now, Google withstands competition on its core business: US search market (Hitwise 2009) Yahoo 18% Microsoft 5% Google 72% Other companies 5% But this situation might change Microsoft and Google distributors New entrants on Yahoo could could break their Google’s markets merge partnership Examples Apple search engine ? More efficient AdSense competitors? Probability Timing Potential impact Mild Middle term High ..……. 12 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  13. Strategic Development of a disruptive threat innovation on Google’s markets Some of the most successful IT companies have been victims of disruptive innovations: Historical leaders Broadband Google’s Disruptive innovations access PageRank Future disruptive innovations could seriously impact Google’s core business: Natural language search? Semantic Web? Other innovations? Probability Timing Impact Mild Long term High ..……. 13 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  14. Strategic Inability to control points of entry threat Google already had some difficulties controlling strategic points of entry: Example : Social networks Except in Brazil and India, Google’s Google and MySpace $900 Million social network never managed to deal on search and contextual ads compete with Facebook did not reach expected revenues Google may have difficulties in controlling future points of entry Mobile Video games Television set-top Internet of things consoles boxes Eg : Probability Timing Impact Mild Middle term Moderate ..……. 14 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  15. Interruption or failure of Google’s Other threat services Recently, several Google products experimented serious interruptions or failures: March 2009: some February 2009–March 2009: March 2009: some users' private users had difficulties Gmail crashed twice across documents were accidentally creating events the world shared with other users These problems may strongly affect Google: Brand damage Loss of business users A strong brand is all the more important Users can very easily move to since barriers to entry are relatively low competitor’s products, and need to fully in the Internet market trust the service Probability Timing Impact High Short term High ..……. 15 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  16. Other threat Privacy concerns Everyday, concerns are expressed about Google’s practices regarding the use of personal information A wide amount of information … …could be lost or used for unintended purposes Personal information Navigation tracking and logs Medical Data Location •  Governmental control •  Commercial uses Mails & Searches conversations •  Others. Eg. exploited by competitors WWW Personal Web documents behaviour As the amount of stored data is strongly increasing, privacy concerns will increase too, favoring: Claims Brand damage Loss of users Probability Timing Impact High Short term High ..……. 16 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  17. Other threat Opensource’s ecosystem threats Google is outsourcing its R&D to independent communities Google R&D is still important …but most of it is supported by Opensource actors : •  The Mozilla foundation •  2,12 billion $ in 2007 •  Most of Google products integrate •  12 % of Google turnover opensource code : from Android to •  vs. Microsoft’s R&D investments : 7,5 billion $ Google Chrome Google could be forced to internalize these efforts in the future Dissensions with the community Weaknesses of the community X / •  Opensource business models may evolve •  Google’s exploitation of Opensource efforts •  The long-term existence of these communities is not ensured •  Google’s proprietary strategy : keeping most parts of its developments secret Probability Timing Impact Mild Middle term Moderate ..……. 17 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  18. What do you think? Of what Which threat ? kind? ? Probability Forecast Impact Fill this slide and send it to contact@fabernovel.com to give your opinion! ..……. 18 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  19. Download this presentation at : http://www.fabernovel.com/en/analyze/ news/why-could-google-die ..……. 19 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •
  20. Stéphane Distinguin Founder and CEO stephane.distinguin@fabernovel.com Cyril Vart VP Strategy & Development cyril.vart@fabernovel.com Pierre Fremaux Project Analyst pierre.fremaux@fabernovel.com Matthieu Lecomte Junior Project Analyst matthieu.lecomte@fabernovel.com 42, bd de Sébastopol 75003 Paris Tél. : +33 1 42 72 20 04 Fax. : +33 1 42 72 20 03 www.fabernovel.com ..……. 20 March 2009 • Why could Google die ? •

+ Ouriel OhayonOuriel Ohayon, 10 months ago

custom

28713 views, 77 favs, 120 embeds more stats

Research of threats and weaknesses of Google

More info about this presentation

© All Rights Reserved

  • Total Views 28713
    • 16364 on SlideShare
    • 12349 from embeds
  • Comments 23
  • Favorites 77
  • Downloads 1315
Most viewed embeds
  • 6876 views on http://www.techcrunch.com
  • 1326 views on http://www.fabernovel.com
  • 951 views on http://seekingalpha.com
  • 802 views on http://jp.techcrunch.com
  • 445 views on http://eduardblacquiere.com

more

All embeds
  • 6876 views on http://www.techcrunch.com
  • 1326 views on http://www.fabernovel.com
  • 951 views on http://seekingalpha.com
  • 802 views on http://jp.techcrunch.com
  • 445 views on http://eduardblacquiere.com
  • 149 views on http://www.onedaywithoutgoogle.org
  • 144 views on http://tinycomb.com
  • 140 views on http://lucadebiase.nova100.ilsole24ore.com
  • 138 views on http://www.isriya.com
  • 118 views on http://createordie.de
  • 115 views on http://www.selbstaendig-im-netz.de
  • 94 views on http://blog.jamestetler.com
  • 93 views on http://www.olivierdedoncker.com
  • 67 views on http://www.ethority.de
  • 48 views on http://colunas.epocanegocios.globo.com
  • 47 views on http://wiktorcegla.wordpress.com
  • 39 views on http://tecneira.com.br
  • 36 views on http://www.vannessauhlein.net
  • 31 views on http://primerocomunico.blogspot.com
  • 29 views on http://www.eriknude.com
  • 28 views on http://merrione.tistory.com
  • 27 views on http://www.riply.co.za
  • 25 views on http://sourcode.net
  • 25 views on http://www.kylecai.com
  • 24 views on http://www.fabianpimminger.com
  • 22 views on http://www.gregorysmart.com
  • 21 views on http://amitklein.com
  • 20 views on http://blog.renwei.org
  • 18 views on http://jamestetler.com
  • 18 views on http://webolution30.blogspot.com
  • 17 views on http://enlacesdeldia.hagoclic.com
  • 16 views on http://blog.davidreche.com
  • 16 views on http://entwickler.com
  • 15 views on http://www.christcoolen.nl
  • 15 views on http://feeds.feedburner.com
  • 14 views on http://www.congruous.org
  • 14 views on http://www.thinkervine.com
  • 13 views on http://www.mediathink.com
  • 13 views on http://www.fewmorethings.com
  • 12 views on http://springboardmedia.blogspot.com
  • 12 views on http://www.portal-gestao.com
  • 12 views on http://okyuu.com
  • 11 views on http://isriya.com
  • 11 views on http://www.idea-lounge.net
  • 11 views on http://www.pateandopiedras.com
  • 11 views on http://24per7.blogspot.com
  • 10 views on http://www.estetica-design-forum.com
  • 9 views on http://www.buaconsulting.com
  • 9 views on http://safe.tumblr.com
  • 9 views on http://portal-gestao.com
  • 9 views on http://www.o2be.net
  • 8 views on http://www.hanrss.com
  • 8 views on http://www.paperblog.fr
  • 7 views on http://dpm.posterous.com
  • 7 views on http://www.yann-madeleine.com
  • 7 views on http://enamu.tumblr.com
  • 7 views on http://ymjkim.tumblr.com
  • 7 views on http://www.webolution30.blogspot.com
  • 6 views on http://pateandopiedras.com
  • 6 views on http://money.blogdig.net
  • 5 views on http://feedproxy.google.com
  • 5 views on http://movii.fh-trier.de:8080
  • 5 views on http://www.idg.co.kr
  • 5 views on http://itsthesoftware.wordpress.com
  • 5 views on http://ultragenius.blogspot.com
  • 5 views on http://zerocold.net
  • 5 views on http://www.primerocomunico.com
  • 5 views on http://www.ilovegoogle.it
  • 4 views on http://entwickler-magazin.de
  • 4 views on http://xss.yandex.net
  • 3 views on http://omg-otis
  • 3 views on http://www.spochat.com
  • 3 views on http://philsci.posterous.com
  • 3 views on http://theperipheries.blogspot.com
  • 2 views on http://techcrunch.com
  • 2 views on http://espanolparaturismofebrero2009.wordpress.com
  • 2 views on http://www.agglom.com
  • 2 views on resource://brief-content
  • 2 views on http://static.slidesharecdn.com
  • 1 views on http://74.125.77.132
  • 1 views on http://presentations.tumblr.com
  • 1 views on http://www.jackthorogood.com
  • 1 views on applewebdata://3E5D0533-F330-48D9-9484-E372DE79D147
  • 1 views on http://pagedeck.com
  • 1 views on http://www.pageflakes.com
  • 1 views on http://heyjk.tumblr.com
  • 1 views on http://127.0.0.1:8795
  • 1 views on http://www.buildagadget.com
  • 1 views on http://www.webwag.com
  • 1 views on http://gregb.me
  • 1 views on http://74.125.95.132
  • 1 views on http://www.protopage.com
  • 1 views on http://www.nofoon.com
  • 1 views on file://
  • 1 views on http://209.85.227.132
  • 1 views on applewebdata://72331EA2-8D4A-421E-B23C-D0C8C1AF8816
  • 1 views on http://66.249.89.132
  • 1 views on http://spochat.com
  • 1 views on http://22by7-eureka.blogspot.com
  • 1 views on http://www.cheetah-news.com
  • 1 views on http://gregb.tumblr.com
  • 1 views on http://tumblr.jeffhui.net
  • 1 views on http://bostjankaluza.wordpress.com
  • 1 views on http://idg.co.kr
  • 1 views on http://rdbcci:8100
  • 1 views on http://lab.mydns.jp
  • 1 views on http://www.clqlog.cn
  • 1 views on http://mysyndicaat.com
  • 1 views on http://feeds2.feedburner.com
  • 1 views on http://www.netvibes.com
  • 1 views on http://www.lavanguardia.es
  • 1 views on http://www.cyosn.com
  • 1 views on http://blogr.yonego.nl
  • 1 views on http://media2.gr
  • 1 views on http://www.zhuaxia.com
  • 1 views on http://www.icibingo.com
  • 1 views on http://www.foldier.com
  • 1 views on http://ohpan.com
  • 1 views on http://rss.wagenhoefer.com
  • 1 views on http://15.12.125.105

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories