1. THE ILC AFRICA
SCORECARD INITIATIVE
Presented by : Eng. Patrick NSABIMANA
ALPFG Technical consultant
2. Scorecard initiative
Responding to the commitments made by the
AU Head of States in the Declaration on Land
Policy Framework and Guidelines (LPFG), ILC
Scorecard is developed to support the
implementation of F&G, through monitoring the
set Indicators
3. Scorecard initiative
The F&G Scorecard is a tool initiated by the
International Land Coalition (ILC) in Africa
Region, and is led by Rwanda Initiative for
Sustainable Development (RISD).
4. Scorecard initiative
F&G Scorecard – which is in its piloting stage -
presents a good strategy for strengthening the
partnership between government and Civil
Society, which is critically important towards the
success of the F&G.
5. Scorecard initiative
The F&G Scorecard process seek to give voice to
different viewpoints leading to effective advocacy
through stimulating constructive dialogue and policy
debate
Scoring is based on a wide range of
evidence(Government & Research Institutions & CS)
including quantitative data if available, desk review and
analysis (e.g. of laws, policies, implementation
framework).
6. W the Scorecard!
hy
The F&G suggests that land policy
development should not be dissociated from
the implementation
F&G considers highly important progress
tracking in land policy development and
implementation as it gives African governments
the opportunity to learn from past successes
as well as failures, and to make timely re-
7. W the Scorecard! …..
hy
Consequently, the F&G calls for the
development of a set of benchmarks (Chap.6),
targets and indicators to assist African
countries assess over time, progress (or lack of
it) in the implementation of the F&G ie. national
land policy processes.
8. W the Scorecard!.....
hy
The F&G Scorecard specifically addresses the
need to a set of baseline indicators which are
adaptable to local context, with no comparison
between countries
The Scorecard puts emphasis on sharing lessons
learned from different countries on implementation
process with particular attention on: pro-poor;
centrality of land in economic development; and
protection of women land rights; legal framework
9. W the Scorecard!.....
hy
Information generated through the ILC Africa
Scorecard will be shared through a website,
which will be accessible to other stakeholders
in particular the LPI who will use the
information as a key source of the LPI
performance tracking reports as a contribution
to the lessons learnt.
10. W the Scorecard!.....
hy
The Scorecard system is using indicators
(country specific) to track the performance of
43 dimensions grouped in the 7 Thematic
areas.
11. 7 Thematic Area for the Scorecard
The land policy development process
The land policy implementation process
Appropriate institutional framework
Adequate resource allocation (financial, human,
technical)
Legal framework
Strengthening the tenure security of women
Centrality of land in the development process
12. Scoring design
Rating option
Dimension Indicator score#1 score#2 score#3 score#4
A Catego ries o f stakeho lders with defined ro les written in o fficial No ro les defined CSO ro les defined CSO & indigineo us CSO, indigeno us institutio ns
do cuments fo r the purpo se o f land po licy develo pment pro cess institutio ns ro les and land using public ro les
defined defined
B Representatio n o f indigeno us institutio ns at relevant admistrative levels No representatio n Lo cal level Regio nal level Natio nal level
during land po licy develo pment
C Catego ries o f stakeho lders sharing discussio n papers with Land P o licy Go vernment Go vernment & Do no rs Go vernment, Do no rs Go vernment, Do no rs, CSOs
drafting team & CSOs & Indigeno us Organizatio ns
D Number o f dialo gue fo rums between Go vernement and CSOs o n land 1meeting 2 meetings 3 meetings M o re than 3 meetings
issues during land po licy develo pment
13. SCORING CRITERIA
1. Score #1 : 0% to 25% progress towards target or output. Target/output is unlikely to be achieved. Target/output needs concerted effort to be
achieved within the stipulated timeframe.
2. Score #2: 25% to 50% progress towards achieving target or output. Some achievements have been registered and reinforcement of actions will
lead to achievement of the target/output
3. Score #3: 50% to 75% of progress towards achieving target. The target is very close to achievement and requires only minor efforts.
4. Score #4 : More than 90% of progress towards achieving target. The target has either been met entirely or is very close to achievement and
requires only minor efforts
14. Thematic Area 1: The land policy development
process
Dimension 1: Clarification of the roles of different
stakeholders in the land policy development process,
such as indigenous institutions, civil society and the
land using public. (ALPFG 4.5.1)
Dimension 2: Recognition of the role of indigenous
institutions, whilst seeking to ensure equality of access
and representation (ALPFG 4.5.2)
15. Thematic Area 1….
Dimension 3: Stakeholder consultation and
identification of salient problems in the land sector
(ALPFG 4.5.3)
Dimension 4: Engagement with civil society
organizations during the process (ALPFG 4.5.4)
Dimension 5: Appraisal of institutional and
financial/budgetary options (ALPFG 4.5.7)
16. INDICATORS for Thematic Area 1
score#1 score#2 score#3 score#4
Indicator
Categories of stakeholders with defined roles written in official No roles defined CSO roles defined CSO & indigineo us CSO, indigenous institutions
do cuments for the purpose o f land policy develo pment process institutions ro les and land using public roles
defined defined
Representation of indigeno us institutions at relevant admistrative levels No representation Local level Regio nal level National level
during land policy development
Categories of stakeholders sharing discussion papers with Land Policy Government Government & Donors Government, Dono rs Government, Donors, CSOs
drafting team & CSOs & Indigenous Organizations
Number of dialogue forums between Go vernement and CSOs on land 1meeting 2 meetings 3 meetings M o re than 3 meetings
issues during land po licy development
17. Thematic Area 2: land policy
implementation process
Dimension 9: Existence of realistic and achievable
implementation strategies (ALPFG 5.3.2)
Dimension 10: Existence of an action plan (ALPFG
5.3.3)
Dimension 11: Rationalization of institutional
responsibilities for implementation ( APFG 5.3.3 para 2)
Dimension 12: Mobilization of political commitment
(ALPFG 5.3.4)
18. Thematic Area 2….
Dimension 13: Continuous engagement with the public through
decentralized structures (ALPFG 5.3.5)
Dimension 14: Existence of legislative land policy components
(ALPFG 5.3.6)
Dimension 15: Domestication of relevant regional and international
commitments through legislation (ALPFG 5.3.7)
Dimension 16: Response to new arising challenges (ALPFG 5.3.8)
Dimension 17: Monitoring and evaluation of the impacts of the
various components of land policy (ALPFG 5.4)
19. INDICATORS for Thematic Area 2
Indicator score#1 score#2 score#3 score#4
Co mprehensiveness o f the land po licy implementatio n plan Checklist o f activities Checklist o f activities Checklist o f activities Checklist o f activities
with co ncrete with co ncrete with co ncrete timeframe,
timeframe timeframe and financial and reso urce
financial planning planning (human and
technical)
Timeframe fo r planning o f financial and techno lo gical needs, capacity No timeframe Lo ng term planning Lo ng term and Lo ng term, medium term
building and mo bilizatio n o f reso urces medium term planning and sho rt term planning
P ercentage o f Land P o licy Implementatio n reso urces raised lo cally M o re than 1 o f to tal B etween 5% and 1
0% 0% B etween 1 and 4% o f
% Less than 1 o f to tal
%
implementatio n o f o f to tal to tal implementatio n implementatio n reso urces
reso urces implementatio n reso urces
reso urces
Co st o f land registratio n M o re than 1 o f
0% B etween 5% and 1 0% B etween 1 and 4% o f
% Less than 1 o f mean
%
mean mo nthly rural o f mean mo nthly rural mean mo nthly rural mo nthly rural inco me
inco me inco me inco me
Existance o f a specialized institutio n respo nsible fo r Land Po licy M inistry o f lo cal M inistry o f lands A uto no mo us Presidency
implementatio n go vernance institutio ns
Level at which decisio ns related to land refo rm implementatio n are Natio nal level Regio nal level Lo cal level Village level
effected
M echanisms to implement land po licy strategic plans No existing Enactment o f new laws Enactment o f new laws Enactment o f new laws,
mechanisms and revisio n/amendment o f
revisio n/amendment existing laws and re-/design
o f existing laws o f institutio ns
Level o f do mesticatio n o f regio nal and internatio nal co mmitments Co nstitutio n Organic law Natio nal P o licy Natio nal regulatio ns
Number o f meetings per year between stakeho lders reviewing po licies 0 meeting 1meeting 2 meetings 3 meetings
impementatio n pro cess
Number o f land po licy develo pment and implementatio n co mpo nents 1to 2 co mpo nents 3 to 4 co mpo nents 5 to 6 co mpo nents 7 co mpo nents
tracked (please see the co mment)
21. INDICATORS for Thematic Area 3
Indicator score#1 score#2 score#3 score#4
Presence of institutions in charge of land related issues at National level Regional level Local level Village level
adiminstrative levels
Ratio of land corruptio n cases reported compared to o verall corruption M ore than 50% Between 31% and 50% Between 10% and 30% Less than 10%
cases
Percentage of land disputes resolved in a timely manner by community Less than 10% Between 10% and 30% Between 31% and 50% M ore than 50%
institutions
22. Thematic Area 4: Adequate resource
allocation
Dimension 21: % GDP devoted to land policy
development/implementation.
Dimension 22: Adequacy of budget to particular
national needs. (ALPFG 4.4.4)
23. Thematic Area 4….
Dimension 23: Origin of funds (donor-driven, or
backed by domestic funds implying commitment
and sustainability). (ALPFG 4.4.4 para 2)
Dimension 24: Existence of actions to ensure that human
resources are adequate to the reform process (capacity
building). (ALPFG 4.4.5)
24. INDICATORS for Thematic Area 4
Indicator score#1 score#2 score#3 score#4
Percentage of National budget allocated to land sector Less than 1% Between 1% and 3% Between 4% and 6% M ore than 6%
Percentage of land policy needs covered by the National budget Less than 5% Between 5% and 10% Between 11% and 16% M ore than 16%
Percentage composition of donor funds in national lands budget M ore than 6% Between 4% and 6% Between 3% and 1% Less than 1%
Percentage of land budget allocated to capacity building of staff dealing Less than 1% Between 2% and 5% Between 6% and 9% M ore than 9%
with land
25. Thematic Area 5: Legal framework
Dimension 25: Equal distribution and effective
management of land. (ALPFG 3.2.1)
Dimension 26: Redistribution of land to those in need.
(ALPFG 3.2.2)
Dimension 27: Improved access to land resources
(ALPFG 3.2.3)
Dimension 28: Existence of land related services
(ALPFG 3.3.3)
26. INDICATORS for Thematic Area 5
Indicator score#1 score#2 score#3 score#4
Percentage of persons owning land that is bigger than the average land size. 30% between 29% and 20% Between 19% and 10% Below 10%
Percentage of land redistributed to vulnerable groups. Less than 1% Between 1% and 10% Between 11% and 20% M ore than 20%
Percentage of landless/homeless/squatting households M ore than 20% Between 11% and 20% Between 10% and 1% Less than 1%
Existance of formal mechanisms land management and land administration Nonexistence of Formal mechanisms Formal mechanisms Laws on formal mechanisms
formal mechanisms are mentioned in policy are mentioned in laws are applied in reality
papers
27. Thematic Area 6: Strengthening the tenure
security of women
Dimension 29: Documented claims to land within and
outside marriage
Dimension 30: Equal rights for women to inherit land
Dimension 31: Co-ownership of registered land by
spouses
Dimension 32: Promotion of women’s participation in
land administration structures
Dimension 33: Shift from seeing the land rights of women
as a private, family issue, to seeing them as a public,
28. Thematic Area 6…..
Dimension 34: Land registration data disaggregated on a gender
basis.
Dimension 35: Existence of legal provisions to allow land ownership
by women in the law of marriage, inheritance.
Dimension 36: Existence of national advocacy programmes to
discourage the discrimination of women ownership on land.
Dimension 37: Proportion of land disputes involved women recorded
Dimension 38: Existence of Affirmative action to encourage women
land ownership including allocation, purchase and professionalism
29. Thematic area 6….
Dimension 39: Legal provisions for spouse consent
during the alienation of land
Dimension 40: Protection of women land rights in
situations where there is a presumed marriage or no
legal marriage
30. INDICATORS for Thematic Area 6
Indicator score#1 score#2 score#3 score#4
P ercentage o f land disputes invo lving wo men M o re than 50% B etween 31 and 50%
% B etween 1 and 30%
0% Less than 10%
P ro po rtio n o f wo men with do cumented land rights Less than 1% B etween 1 and 1
% 0% B etween 1 % and 20%
1 M o re than 20%
P ercentage o f parcels legally co -o wned by spo uses Less than 1% B etween 1 and 1
% 0% B etween 1 % and 20%
1 M o re than 20%
P ercentage o f female staff in land administratio n institutio ns Less than 10% B etween 1 and 20%
0% B etween 21 and 30%
% M o re than 30%
Number o f awareness public campaigns o n wo men's land rights Less than 2 B etween 2 and 4 B etween 5 and 7 M o re than 7
per year
Co nsideratio n o f gender within o fficial data No - - Yes
A ckno wledgment o f wo men's individual land rights in the laws No ackno wledgment Wo men's land rights Wo men's land rights A ckno wledgment o f
ackno wledged in land ackno wledged wo men's land rights due to a
po licy witho ut legal seco ndary in o ther specific law
implicatio ns laws
31. Thematic Area 7: Centrality of land in the
development process
ALPFG 3.1
Dimension 41: the importance given to land in the
national constitution;
Dimension 42: The importance given to land in the
national vision documents;
Dimension 43: The importance given to land in the
PRSPs
32. INDICATORS for Thematic Area 7
Indicator score#1 score#2 score#3 score#4
Number of articles related to land in the national constitution 1article 2 articles 3 articles M ore than 3 articles
Degree of reflection of land in the national vision documents Not mentioned M entioned secondary M entioned as a M entioned as a specific
specific chapter national land vision
Degree of reflection of land in the PRSPs Not mentioned M entioned secondary M entioned as a sub- M entioned as a specific
chapter chapter
33. Pilot Countries for Scorecard
The Scorecard has 6 pilot countries to be
implemented in two phases
Phase 1: Rwanda, Kenya, Benin
Phase 2: Malawi, Madagascar, South Africa
35. BENIN…..
ASPECTS SCORE NOTES
The land Policy development Representation of indigenous institutions at relevant administrative levels during land policy development need to be at all level
process now they are represented at local level
81.3 % The country need to increase the number of forums between Government and CSOs on land issues during land policy development
The Land Policy implementation The country need to increase locally the Percentage of Land Policy Implementation resources from the current percentage (4%)
Process to more than 10%
Decrease considerably the cost of land registration which is currently at 140% of the monthly GDP
77.8 %
Decisions related to land reform implementation are currently effected at local level, the country need to decentralize it at
village level
Appropriate institutional Institutions in charge of land related issues must be decentralized at village level
50%
framework The country need to reduce land corruption cases and resolve all reported cases in a timely manner.
Adequate resource allocation Percentage of National budget allocated to land sector must be more than 6% , the current figure is about 3%
(financial, human, technical) Percentage of land policy needs covered by the National budget is still very low and need to be increased
25 % For the sustainability purpose the percentage composition of donor funds in national lands budget need to decrease from 60%
to less than 10%.
land budget allocated to capacity building of staff dealing with land need to be increased up to 15%
Legal framework To reach the land access to all, the country must increase the Percentage of land redistributed to vulnerable groups. And reduce
56.3 % the percentage of landless/homeless/squatting households
The country need also design formal mechanisms of land management and administration
Strengthening the tenure security There is a need to increase the Proportion of women with documented land rights and the percentage of land registration co
of women owned by the two spouses
60.7 %
The country need also to increase the number of female personnel in land management institutions .
Centrality of land in the This has been emphasized in all development process but there is a need to emphasize it more in the national constitution
75 %
development process
37. KENYA ……
ASPECTS SCORE NOTES
The land Policy development The land development process has took into consideration all ALPFG recommendations on land policy development
100.0
process
The Land Policy implementation The country need to increase locally the Percentage of Land Policy Implementation resources from the current percentage (4%)
Process to more than 10%
75.0 Decisions related to land reform implementation are currently effected at local level, the country need to decentralize it at
village level
Appropriate institutional The country must put in place Institutions in charge of land related issues at all administrative levels
25.0
framework The country need to reduce land corruption cases
Adequate resource allocation Percentage of National budget allocated to land sector must be more than 6% , the current figure is about 3%
(financial, human, technical) Percentage of land policy needs covered by the National budget is still very low and need to be increased
31.3 For the sustainability purpose the percentage composition of donor funds in national lands budget need to decrease from 60%
to less than 10%.
land budget allocated to capacity building of staff dealing with land need to be increased up to 15%
Legal framework To reach the land access to all, the country must increase the Percentage of land redistributed to vulnerable groups. And reduce
56.3 the percentage of landless/homeless/squatting households
The country need also design formal mechanisms of land management and administration
Strengthening the tenure security There is a need to increase the Proportion of women with documented land rights and the percentage of land registration co
of women 89.3 owned by the two spouses
Centrality of land in the This has been emphasized in all development process but there is a need to emphasize it more in the national constitution
75.0
development process
39. RWANDA …….
ASPECTS SCORE NOTES
The land Policy development Representation of indigenous institutions at relevant administrative levels during land policy development need to be at all level
process now they are represented at local level
Indigenous institutions must be represented under Categories of stakeholders sharing discussion papers with Land Policy
68.8 % drafting team
The country need to increase the number of forums between Government and CSOs on land issues during land policy development
The Land Policy implementation The country need to increase locally the Percentage of Land Policy Implementation resources from the current percentage (4%)
Process to more than 10%
80.6% Decisions related to land reform implementation are currently effected at local level, the country need to decentralize it at
village level
Appropriate institutional Institutions in charge of land related issues must be decentralized at village level
75%
framework The country need to reduce land corruption cases
Adequate resource allocation Percentage of National budget allocated to land sector must be more than 6% , the current figure is about 3%
(financial, human, technical) Percentage of land policy needs covered by the National budget is still very low and need to be increased
43.8 % For the sustainability purpose the percentage composition of donor funds in national lands budget need to decrease from 60%
to less than 10%.
land budget allocated to capacity building of staff dealing with land need to be increased up to 15%
Legal framework To reach the land access to all, the country must increase the Percentage of land redistributed to vulnerable groups. And reduce
87.5 %
the percentage of landless/homeless/squatting households
Strengthening the tenure security Public awareness campaigns targeting women's land rights need to increase and the country must set up new strategies to
85.7 %
of women reduce land disputes involving women
Centrality of land in the This has been emphasized in all development process but there is a need to emphasize it more in the national constitution
83.3 %
development process
40. What has been done
Identification of Technical Staff
Development of the User Guide
Development of the System (Indicators, linking Dimensions,
Website)
Identification of the national team and focal persons in pilot
countries
Adaptation of indicators country specific
Training of the Country Team
Data Gathering
41. What to be done till December 15 2012
Continue data gathering
Launch of the Scorecard Website
Hosting options of the hosting the Scorecard
Website (Independent, RISD)
Final reports for 2012 to be published on the
web and shared with LPI and other
stakeholders
42. Scorecard in 2013 - 2015
National workshops to launch Scorecard in 3 PC
(Rwanda, Benin, Kenya)
Training and adaptation of indicators in the 3
other pilot countries ( Madagascar, Malawi and
SA)
Produce reports two times in a year
Add three more countries each year
Increase interactive tools on the scorecard