• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
CASL vs CAN-SPAM - Canada’s Anti‐Spam Law
 

CASL vs CAN-SPAM - Canada’s Anti‐Spam Law

on

  • 19,114 views

Please visit the updated version of this presentation on our Dentons Global slideshare account:

Please visit the updated version of this presentation on our Dentons Global slideshare account:
http://www.slideshare.net/DentonsGlobal/comparing-casl-to-canspam-22498536

Statistics

Views

Total Views
19,114
Views on SlideShare
9,714
Embed Views
9,400

Actions

Likes
5
Downloads
247
Comments
0

36 Embeds 9,400

http://www.datagovernancelaw.com 6733
http://www.contactology.com 979
https://www.contactology.com 572
http://www.privacyanddatasecuritylaw.com 497
https://preview.hs-sites.com 141
http://www.fmc-law.com 136
http://www.dentonsblog4.com 95
http://blog.contactology.com 49
http://www.doingbusinessincanada.com 43
http://staging-en.fmc-law.com 37
http://www.staging.datagovernancelaw.com 31
https://twitter.com 25
http://abtasty.com 9
http://contactology-2.hs-sites.com 7
https://newsblur.com 6
http://www.datagovernancelaw.com. 5
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com 4
http://content.snrdenton.com 4
http://info.contactology.com 3
https://app.hubspot.com 3
http://api.contactology.com 3
http://springpad.com 2
https://hunter.testology.net 2
http://a0.twimg.com 2
http://feeds.feedburner.com 1
https://api.contactology.com 1
https://si0.twimg.com 1
http://twitter.com 1
https://my.contactology.com 1
https://translate.googleusercontent.com 1
http://digg.com 1
http://www.development.datagovernancelaw.com 1
http://feedly.com 1
http://www.linkedin.com 1
http://ranksit.com 1
http://preview.hs-sites.com 1
More...

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    CASL vs CAN-SPAM - Canada’s Anti‐Spam Law CASL vs CAN-SPAM - Canada’s Anti‐Spam Law Presentation Transcript

    • Comparing CASL to CAN-SPAMCanada’s Anti-Spam LawRaising the bar for online business communications in North AmericaMargot Patterson, Counselmargot.patterson@fmc-law.comhttp://ca.linkedin.com/in/margotpatterson Updated January 2013 1
    • Canada’s Anti-Spam Law (CASL)• CASL was enacted in December 2010 and is expected to enter into force in late 2013, or 2014• CASL is intended to promote e-commerce by deterring spam, identity theft, phishing, spyware, viruses, botnets, and misleading commercial representations online• CASL creates new offences, enforcement mechanisms and penalties to address these online threats 2
    • Canada’s Anti-Spam Law (CASL)• Canada is the last of the G-8 countries to introduce an over- arching law to combat spam, which continues to represent about 80% of all global e-mail traffic• Canada has distinguished itself in making its legislation tough: – Higher consent standards – Detailed content requirements – significant penalties: “Canada’s $10 million anti-spam law” 3
    • Comparing CASL to U.S. CAN-SPAM Act: A Snapshot 4
    • Comparing CASL to CAN-SPAMSome Similarities – both CASL and CAN-SPAM:• Are aimed at unsolicited online communications, and unfair/deceptive online practices• Require consent to send commercial electronic messages• Directly impact business communications with customers, prospective clients, and subscribers 5
    • Comparing CASL to CAN-SPAMKey Differences – CASL has:• Clear reach outside Canada – CASL expressly applies to messages “accessed from a computer system in Canada”: message can be sent from outside Canada• Higher standard for consent – Opt-in (CASL) versus Opt-out (CAN-SPAM)• Broader application – CASL also applies to installation of computer programs• Higher penalties – $10 million maximum penalty for CASL contravention 6
    • Comparing CASL to CAN-SPAM• The Implications:• More online activities will be caught by CASL• More activities affecting Canadians will be caught by CASL, even if initiated outside Canada• More steps will be needed under CASL to communicate online• Greater exposure to liability under CASL 7
    • Comparing CASL to CAN-SPAM Let’s Take a Closer Look at: • Objective of the legislation • Scope: Who, What, Where • Consent • Disclosure (Message Content) • Violations and Enforcement and… • Next Steps for Businesses 8
    • The Objective 9
    • The Objective: U.S. CAN-SPAM Act, 2003 U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), October 22, 2003: "Today, the Senate has sent the message that the government is going on the offensive against kingpin spammers. Americans are tired of just watching and fretting over in-boxes clogged with unwanted e-mail, and this legislation is an important step toward giving them more control." 10
    • The Objective: CASL, 2010 The Honourable Tony Clement, Minister of Industry, May 25, 2010: “The proposed (legislation) is intended to deter the most damaging and deceptive forms of spam, such as identity theft, phishing and spyware, from occurring in Canada and to help drive spammers out of Canada.” 11
    • Scope: Who, What and Where 12
    • Scope: Who (Reach)CASL CAN-SPAM• (For spam) senders of “commercial • (For spam) senders of “commercial electronic messages” electronic mail messages”• Potential vicarious liability: • Directors, officers, employers not – Expressly includes directors, referenced officers, agents or mandataries of a corporation – Expressly includes employers of employees acting within scope of employment 13
    • Scope: What (Activities)CASL CAN-SPAM• Spam • Spam• Malware, spyware, botnets • Purely malicious spam (i.e. not• Network re-routing “primarily commercial”) not• False or misleading covered representations online • False/misleading transmission• Installation of computer programs information (addresses aspects of network re-routing)• Address harvesting • Installation of computer programs not covered • Address harvesting 14
    • Scope: What (Messages)CASL CAN-SPAMA “commercial electronic message” A “commercial electronic mail message”is: is:• An electronic message • An electronic mail message – including text, sound, – email only voice, image• Sent to an electronic address – including e-mail, IM, phone or “any similar account” 15
    • Scope: What (Messages)CASL CAN-SPAMA “commercial electronic message”: A “commercial electronic mail message”:• Has as its purpose or one of its • The primary purpose of which is purposes… – commercial advertisement or – considering message content, promotion of a commercial hyperlinks, or contact info… product or service – to encourage participation in – Including content on a a commercial activity: website operated for a • transaction, act or conduct of commercial purpose a commercial character • whether or not in • Excludes “transactional or expectation of profit relationship” messages 16
    • Scope: Where (Jurisdiction)CASL CAN-SPAM• Activities outside Canada • Activities outside U.S. – Spam: computer system in – Not expressly addressed in CAN- Canada used to send or access SPAM Act message – Considered case-by-case – Software installation: computer pursuant to conflict of laws rules system receiving the program in Canada (or if installer is in • See: Facebook, Inc. v. Guerbuez, Canada, or operating under 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108921 (N.D. direction of person in Canada) Cal. 2008) [enforced by Quebec Superior Court in 2010] – Altering transmission data: computer system in Canada used to send/route or access message 17
    • Consent 18
    • ConsentCASL CAN-SPAM• CEMs can be sent if: • CEMs can be sent unless: – You have the express or – The recipient opts out of implied consent of the future commercial email recipient (“opt-in”), OR if – consent is not required under CASL 19
    • ConsentCASL CAN-SPAM• Exceptions to the consent requirement: • Exception to consent – “transactional or relationship messages” are not CEMs: – Message between individuals with personal or family relationship – Facilitating or confirming transaction that – An inquiry or application to a person the recipient already has agreed to; engaged in a commercial activity – Warranty, recall, safety, or security – Quote or estimate, requested by recipient information about a product or service; – Facilitating, completing or confirming a pre- – Information about a change in terms or existing transaction features or account balance information regarding a membership, subscription, – Warranty, product recall or safety/security account, loan or other ongoing commercial information relationship; – Factual information regarding subscription, – Information about an employment membership, account, loan relationship or employee benefits; or – Ongoing information about recipient’s – Delivering goods or services as part of a employment or benefit plan transaction the recipient already – Delivering a product, good or service, agreed to including updates/upgrades, as part of a transaction the recipient already agreed to 20
    • Consent• See also Draft Industry Canada regulations for further proposed exceptions to the consent requirement:1. Limited Exemptions for Certain Types of Message (within businesses, between organizations in a business relationship, legal notices)2. Third-Party Referrals3. Clarifying What is Required where Sender is an “Unknown Third Party”4. Clarifying Membership in a Club, Association or Voluntary Organization5. Limited Exemptions for Protecting, Upgrading and Updating Computer Networks• Comments on these Draft regulations due February 5, 2013 21
    • ConsentCASL CAN-SPAM• Implied consent: • Implied consent generally available for – Commercial transaction with the unsolicited messages, where the recipient recipient OR has not opted out of receiving them – Business, investment or gaming opportunity with recipient  within the previous two years – Inquiry from the recipient in the previous six months about the above – Written contract with the recipient, still in effect or expired within previous two years – Recipient has conspicuously published his or her electronic address, and message is relevant to his or her business role or function – Recipient has disclosed electronic address, and the message is relevant to his or her business role or function 22
    • ConsentCASL CAN-SPAM• Getting express consent: • No corresponding requirement – Purpose for the consent since consent is generally – Name “opt out” – Mailing address, and either phone number, e-mail or web address – Statement that the person can withdraw consent – See CRTC Guidelines 23
    • Disclosure (Message Content) 24
    • Disclosure (Message Content) CASL CAN-SPAM The message must: The message must: – In message itself or via clear and prominent website link: • Identify the sender (including • Identify the sender (CAN-SPAM defines “sent on behalf of”); who designated “sender” is) • Include mailing address, and • Include physical postal address either phone, email or web • Include email address or other form of address; and Internet-based communication to unsubscribe • Include an unsubscribe mechanism – See CRTC Guidelines 25
    • Violations and Enforcement 26
    • Violations and EnforcementCASL CAN-SPAM• CRTC: primary enforcement • FTC: primary enforcement agency, agency, including administrative including administrative penalties monetary penalties (AMPs) – Each individual email in violation – Maximum penalty is $10 million of CAN-SPAM is subject to for an organization, per violation penalties of up to $16,000 – Relevant factors include purpose of penalty, nature & scope of violation, history, financial benefit, ability to pay – May enter into compliance undertaking with CRTC 27
    • Violations and EnforcementCASL CAN-SPAM• Directors and officers’ liability / • D&O and employers’ liability not Employers’ liability expressly set out in legislation• Importance of “due diligence”: – No liability where due diligence taken to prevent the violation 28
    • Violations and EnforcementCASL CAN-SPAM• Private Right of Action • Private Right of Action – For individual or organization – No PRA for an individual affected by a contravention: can – PRA available to a “provider of obtain court order for compensation Internet access service”, “adversely – Acts or omissions (e.g. spam-related) affected by a violation” – Remedies include compensation for • Injunctive relief loss or damage suffered or expenses • Monetary damages for actual loss incurred, and a maximum penalty of: incurred • $200 per contravention of anti-spam; • Statutory damages based on number • max $1 million per day for spam, of unlawful messages transmitted malware, spyware, message routing, – PRA taken by ISPs, MySpace, PI harvesting, misrepresentation; and FaceBook • max $1 million per act of aiding, inducing, procuring breach of spam, malware, spyware, message routing.• Class Actions? 29
    • Next Steps: for CASL 30
    • Next Steps: for CASL• Regulations – CRTC regulations on CEM content & consent final March 2012 – Draft Industry Canada regulations issued for consultation• Entry into force – Expected 2013 or 2014 – Some steps should be taken now to be compliant in time – See “Next Steps for Doing Business in Canada”• Spam Reporting Centre – Once operational, will accept electronic messages, analyze trends in spam and other “threats to electronic commerce” 31
    • Next Steps: for CASLNew roles and responsibilities for three government agencies:• Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) – spam, malware, botnets, network re-routing• Competition Bureau – false/misleading representations online• Office of the Privacy Commissioner – address harvesting, dictionary attacks, spyware (personal information) 32
    • Next Steps: for CASL• International Cooperation – CASL mandates the three agencies to share information and consult with their international equivalents, including FTC• Bulletins / Interpretive Guidelines? – Many definitions and requirements remain broad and unclear in CASL and the regulations – CRTC has issued Information Bulletins on interpreting the Regulations, and on Opt-in Consent (“toggling”) 33
    • Next Steps: for Doing Business in Canada 34
    • Next Steps: for Businesses• Three-Year Transition Period – For three years after entry into force of anti-spam and computer program update/upgrade provisions: • Implied consent where existing business or non-business relationship – In all cases, recipient can still withdraw consent at any time – Businesses must obtain express consent during the three-year transition period, to continue afterwards. 35
    • Next Steps: for Businesses• CASL Audit – Conduct an audit of online communications with clients, prospects, and third parties, including: • bulk email, automated messages, periodic client newsletters and updates • processes for installation of software updates/upgrades• CASL Checklist – Review above communications (e-mail, computer program installation) against CASL requirements: • consent, unsubscribe, and disclosure • available exceptions 36
    • Next Steps: for Businesses• CASL Compliance Policy should: – Update your website and internal Privacy Policy – Update forms and procedures that document consent – Address unsubscribe requirements and timeframes – Update existing customer service processes – Include information/training for employees, management and Board of Directors – Address third-party contract requirements (limitation of liability, representations & warranties), including address rental• Consider insurance (traditional policies may not cover) 37
    • Next Steps: for Businesses• When operating in the North American market… meet both CASL and CAN-SPAM requirements 38
    • The preceding presentation contains examples of the kinds of issuescompanies dealing with anti-spam could face. If you are faced with one ofthese issues, please retain professional assistance as each situation isunique.
    • More Information on CASL: www.fmc-law.com/AreaOfExpertise/Anti_Spam.aspxhttp://www.datagovernancelaw.com/category/anti_spam Questions? Margot Patterson margot.patterson@fmc-law.com (613) 783-9693