0
Statutory Interpretation:Purposive Approach           NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
Definition:The approach that requires judges to   seek, and promote, the purpose      underlying the legislation.         ...
Background:• Too general or too complex• Indeterminate wordings• Imprecision wordings                   NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
Authority:Section 17A of Interpretation Act 1948 & 1967:  In the interpretation of a provision of an Act, a  construction ...
Case 1:United Hokkien Cemetries, Penang               v Majlis Perbandaran, P Pinang       [1979] 2 MLJ 121          NMA/L...
Issue:Whether a columbarium, a placewhere urns of cremated ashes of thedeceased is kept, could be suchbuilding?           ...
Held:Per Chang Min Tat FJ:  I see no reason therefore why the same  interpretation should not be extended to a  columbariu...
Case 2:DYTM Tengku Idris Shah ibni Sultan Salahuddin               Abdul Aziz Shah                     v      Dikim Holdin...
Fact:Writ of summons        &statement of claim     Defence        &   counterclaim     NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
Issue:Whether the plaintiff was Ruler forpurpose of Article 181, 182 and 183of Federal Constitution?             NMA/LWB01...
Held:Per Haidar FCJ:  it is clear that only the Rulers and not the  persons exercising the functions of the Rulers  have t...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

purposive approach

2,054

Published on

DISCLAIMER:
this note is merely for revision purposes.
any defects of facts will be not amount to any liabilities

one of the statutory provision
based on Malaysian Legal System

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,054
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
21
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "purposive approach"

  1. 1. Statutory Interpretation:Purposive Approach NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  2. 2. Definition:The approach that requires judges to seek, and promote, the purpose underlying the legislation. NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  3. 3. Background:• Too general or too complex• Indeterminate wordings• Imprecision wordings NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  4. 4. Authority:Section 17A of Interpretation Act 1948 & 1967: In the interpretation of a provision of an Act, a construction that would promote the purpose or object underlying the Act (whether that purpose or object is expressly stated in the Act or not) shall be preferred to a construction that would not promote that purpose or object. NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  5. 5. Case 1:United Hokkien Cemetries, Penang v Majlis Perbandaran, P Pinang [1979] 2 MLJ 121 NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  6. 6. Issue:Whether a columbarium, a placewhere urns of cremated ashes of thedeceased is kept, could be suchbuilding? NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  7. 7. Held:Per Chang Min Tat FJ: I see no reason therefore why the same interpretation should not be extended to a columbarium and the repose of the ashes of the departed kept in their honour and in memory of them should not be regarded as a religious worship. NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  8. 8. Case 2:DYTM Tengku Idris Shah ibni Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah v Dikim Holdings Sdn Bhd & Anor [2002] 2 MLJ 11 NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  9. 9. Fact:Writ of summons &statement of claim Defence & counterclaim NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  10. 10. Issue:Whether the plaintiff was Ruler forpurpose of Article 181, 182 and 183of Federal Constitution? NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  11. 11. Held:Per Haidar FCJ: it is clear that only the Rulers and not the persons exercising the functions of the Rulers have the exclusive recourse to the special court. NMA/LWB01B/2010-1011
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×