Constitutional Supremacy - For Academic Purposes Only
1. Constitutional Law
9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty1
Constitutional Supremacy vParliamentary SupremacyLAW 437 : CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I
By: azrin hafiz
1
What is a constitutional supremacy?
•Adoctrinewherebytheconstitutionissupremeandthegovernmentrulesinaccordancewiththeconstitutionandatthesametimethepowerofgovernmentislimitedbytheconstitution.
By: azrin hafiz
2
•TheConstitutionisthesupremelawofMalaysia
•Anylawpassedafter31Aug1957whichisinconsistentwiththeConstitutionshallbevoid,totheextentoftheinconsistency.
By: azrin hafiz
3
2. Constitutional Law9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty
2
What is a parliamentary supremacy?
•Aperemptoryruleofconstitutionallaw,thatlegislativeassembliescanmakeorrepeallawsastheyseefit,supremeoverthedictatesofthejudicialbranch,andsubjecttothestatedjurisdictionofthelegislativeassembly,ifany.
By: azrin hafiz
4
By: azrin hafiz
5
Theadoptionofawrittenandsupremeconstitution,asthechartandcompass,thesailandanchorofanation,hasanumberofdistinctimplications,whichareasfollows:
By: azrin hafiz
6
3. Constitutional Law9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty
3
i. A higher lawii. A limited parliamentiii. Federal setupiv. Fundamental rightsv. Judicial reviewvi. Special procedure for amendmentsvii. Subversion and emergency
By: azrin hafiz
7
1. A higher law
•Ithassuperiorityovertheinstitutionsitcreates,andtakesprecedenceoverallotherlaws.
Constitution
Ordinary Law
prevail
unconstitutional
X
By: azrin hafiz
8
TheruleofconstitutionalsupremacystatedinArticle4(1)oftheFederalConstitution:“thisConstitutionisthesupremelawoftheFederationandanylawpassedafterMerdekaDaywhichisinconsistentwiththisConstitutionshall,totheextentoftheinconsistency,bevoid”.
By: azrin hafiz
9
4. Constitutional Law
9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty
4
a. supreme law–higher legal validity than any other rule in society whether federal or state, enacted by Parliament or SLA. b. federation–refers to the State of Malaysia including federal government. c. any law–in lights of Art 160(2). Refers to written law, common law & recognisedcustom. d. after Merdeka Day–after 31 Aug 1957 e. to the extent of the inconsistency–an act may not be void as whole, only the inconsistent part may be void = doctrine of severability.
By: azrin hafiz
10
The consequences of Article 4(1) are far-reachingArt 4(1) Art 128 + Art 162(6)
strengthened by
By: azrin hafiz
11
Article128conferspoweronthesuperiorcourtstodeterminetheconstitutionalvalidityofFederalandstatelaws. Article162(6)laysdownthatanycourtortribunalapplyingtheprovisionsofanypre-MerdekalawmayapplyitwithsuchmodificationasmaybenecessarytobringitintoaccordwiththeConstitution.
By: azrin hafiz
12
5. Constitutional Law
9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty
5
Case: LohKooiChoonv Government of Malaysia [1977] 2 MLJ 187
•RajaAzlanShahFJ:
“theconstitutionisthesupremelawofthelandandembodying3bodyconcepts:
Fundamental rightsDistribution of sovereign power
Separation of power
By: azrin hafiz
13
Case: PhangChin Hock v Public Prosecutor [1980] 1 MLJ 70
•“Federallaw”includesalllawswhichParliamentiscompetenttopass,includingfederallawspassedtoamendtheconstitution,whichamendments,ifenactedaccordingtoprescribedprocedure,arevalidevenifinconsistentwithfundamentalliberties:anamendment,dulymade,„becomesanintegralpartoftheConstitution,itisthesupremelaw,andaccordinglyitcannotbesaidtobeatvariancewithitself‟.
By: azrin hafiz
14
2. A limited parliamentYang diPertuanAgong
Parliament
Court Attorney General
Auditor General
Senator
National Land CouncilConsolidated Funds
National Development Plan
By: azrin hafiz
15
6. Constitutional Law
9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty
6
Case: Ah Thianv Government of Malaysia [1976] 2 MLJ 112
•LordPresidentTunSuffianaffirmedthesupremacyoftheConstitution:
•„ThedoctrineofthesupremacyofParliamentdoesnotapplyinMalaysia.HerewehaveawrittenConstitution.ThepowerofParliamentandthestatelegislaturesinMalaysiaislimitedbytheConstitutionandtheycannotmakeanylawtheyplease’.
By: azrin hafiz
16
Types of Limits on Parliament‟s power
Substantive Limits
•Limitsrelatingtosubjectmatterincluding:
-jurisdictionalerror
-restrictfundamentalrights
-violatingthefederal- statedivisionofcompetence.
Procedural Limits
•Abouthowpowermustbeexercised.
•Inperforminglegislativefunction,parliamentisobligedtocomplywiththeproceduralrequirementofArt2(b),38(4),66,68,159&161E
By: azrin hafiz
17
3. Federal set up
•Malaysiaisafederationofstates.
•Thereisadivisionoflegislativeexecutive, judicialandfinancialpowersbetweenthefederalandstateassemblies.
•ThisdivisionisentrenchedintheschemeoftheConstitution.
By: azrin hafiz
18
7. Constitutional Law
9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty
7
3. Federal-State Division of Power
Legislative
Executive
Judicial
Financial PowersFederal
State
By: azrin hafiz
19
Art 74 + Art 77 + 9thScheduleFederal List
State ListConcurrent List
Supplementary State List for Sabah & SarawakSupplementary Concurrent List for Sabah & Sarawak
28
13
14
6
9
By: azrin hafiz
20
4. Fundamental rights
•TheFederalConstitution(inArticles5to13) containsachapteronfundamentalliberties.
•ThoughParliamentisgivenextensivepowerstoregulatetheselibertiesonawiderangeofgrounds,itcannotbedeniedthattheconstitutionalprovisionsdocreate„obstacles…inthepathofthosewhowouldlayrashhandsuponthearkoftheConstitution‟(asperLordBirkenheadinMcCawleyvTheKing)
By: azrin hafiz
21
8. Constitutional Law
9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty
8
•Superiorcourtjudgeshaveshowngreatunwillingnesstoenforcehumanrights.
•Areluctancetosetasidefederalorstatelegislativeenactmentsonthegroundofviolationofhumanrightssafeguards.
•Example:MenonvGovernmentofMalaysia[1987]–sectionofthePensions(Amendment) Actwhichdiscriminatedagainstnon-residentpensionswasheldbytheHighCourtviolateArticle8.Thedecisionwasreversedonappeal[1990]
By: azrin hafiz
22
5. Judicial review
•Constitutionalsupremacyismaintainedbygivingtothecourtsthepowertoreviewexecutiveandlegislativeactsonconstitutionalgrounds.
•HundredsofexecutiveactionshavebeeninvalidatedbythecourtsforviolationoftherequirementsoftheConstitution.
By: azrin hafiz
23
Constitutional Challenges: a. 4against pre-Merdekalawsb.14against post Merdeka laws c. of these 18decisionsi.6reversed on appeal ii. 2rendered ineffective
By: azrin hafiz
24
9. Constitutional Law
9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty
9
Case: Mamatbin Daud& Ors v Government of Malaysia [1988] 1 MLJ 119
•The issue was as to who should have enacted section 298A of the Penal Code (doing acts which were likely to cause disunity among persons professing the religion of Islam) –the Federal Parliament or the State Assembly concerned?
•Application of the doctrine of pith & substance
By: azrin hafiz
25
Jurisdiction & locus standi
•InAhThianvGovernmentofMalaysia[1976]2MLJ112at113,SuffianLPsummeduptheprinciplesoflegislativereview.
•Thecourtshavepowertodeclareawrittenlawinvalidononeofthethreegrounds: If it violates the federal-state division of powers
If either Federal or State written law is inconsistent with the Constitution
If a State written law is inconsistent with a Federal law
By: azrin hafiz
26
•Thepowertodeclareanylawinvalidonthegroundofviolationoffederal-statedivisionofpowers–issubjecttoseveralrestrictions:
a)Thechallengemustliebywayofaproceedingforadeclarationthatthelawisinvalidontheground:
Art4(3)
b)Theproceedingmaybebroughtby:
-anindividualvanotherindividual,
-anindividualvaGovernment,
-aGovernmentvanotherGovernment;or
-aGovernmentvanindividual:Art4(4)
By: azrin hafiz
27
10. Constitutional Law
9/27/2014
azrin.hafiz / BLS (Hons)/ UiTM Law Faculty
10
•c.TheFederationandtheStateareentitledtobeapartytosuchproceedingstoensurethatnoadverserulingismadewithoutgivingtherelevantgovernmentanopportunitytoarguetothecontrary.
•d.OnlytheFederalCourthasjurisdictiontodeterminewhetheralawmadebyParliamentorbyaStatelegislatureisinvalid:Art128(1).
By: azrin hafiz
28
Reference
•Shad SaleemFaruqi(2008), Document of Destiny: The Constitution of the Federation of Malaysia, Star Publication
By: azrin hafiz
29
Thank you!
By: azrin hafiz
30