Sheets week 2 getting started vs 2


Published on

Published in: Technology, Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Sheets week 2 getting started vs 2

  1. 1. Getting started: definingpolicy research, first steps Definitions first steps
  2. 2. DefinitionsDefinitions of policy research Majchrzak, 1984, p. 12 - interpretation(a) Process of conducting primary research or analysing existing data on(b) Fundamental social problem(c) Purpose (client oriented objective): provide policy makers with pragmatic, action- oriented recommendations for alleviating the problem Check ‘policy analysis article’ in (2012) :>> prescriptive: Analysis for policy Policy research can also be conducted as analysis of policy by academic universities: fundamental science
  3. 3. Policy research process From first steps ( Bardach ) back to Exploring the issue
  4. 4. Getting started- Pierre’s note 1 cf Patton and SawickiWhat factor of the problem is most important to your client? >> Bardach step 1: define the problem Learn to focus quickly on central decision criterion (or criteria) on which the decision likely to be made? >> Bardach step 4 : select the criteriaExamples of criteria: Will it be minimizing the cost of some service? Or might it be able to spend more effectively the funds? >> survey major implementation risks related to poor or late communications or risks of the (possible) framing amongst an audience
  5. 5. Preceeding step 1: exploreSource 1- Bardach p 79- 94: how to proceed efficiently (incl. research interviews: )a) Write a memo about what you already knowb) Locate relevant sources – documents and persons;c) Gaining and maintaining access to sourcesd) Accumulate background info as leveragee) Protect political credibilityRemark: part of this takes place AFTER step 1
  6. 6. Adaptations for your project look for overviews on your topic and related issues. Look in various directions and cross borders. Include possible opponents and independent institutions; In communications policy advice: scan articles from various media on your topic and related issues. Identify what is presented as best and worst practices. Analyze who seem to be stakeholders and what might be a reputation risk and what aspect may help building a positive image.
  7. 7. Explore – 2: Majchrzak, chapter 2Four topics of issues to be clarified:A. Policy making context of problemB. Range of definitions and values heldC. Types of feasible recommendationsD. Resources needed and available
  8. 8. (A) First issue : policy making context identify policy issues, understand decision making processes (six types) e.g. consequences of US Dodd-Frank Act like EU- rules on the transparency in the upstream operations for biomass production; cf with
  9. 9. (B) Range of values and definitions Differences between kinds of biomass; eco- efficiency , various aspects of sustainability relating to use of renewable resources for gasMost of all consult authoritative newspapers and websites ran by independent or critical expertsTease out the interests, values and principles at stake
  10. 10. C. Types of feasible recommendations This looks like Bardach step 3 Important: feasible BUT- please consult main ideas from Majchrzak p 31. >> look also for options that imply fundamental change: Example 1- Banerjee & Duflo (2012) Poor Economics Do you know examples of ‘re-thinking the problem’ policy options? Is ethics important? Suggest some radical unethical policy options
  11. 11. D. Resources needed and availableConsult some independent authors to get acquainted with vocabulary and issues: Google Scholar article ‘Waste biomass-to-energy supply chain management: A critical synthesis’ Iakovou c.s. 2010. PRICE/ availability- If to expensive: ask in our library or ask client OR move to overviews in other sources Article ‘Smart Grid’ (2012) in – like many other sources of disputed neutralityIdentify relevant policy makers and commissions
  12. 12. Snowballing: accept other languages Quote about conference to be held in december WTC Rotterdam: “De lange termijn focus voor de BioBased Economy vanuit Den Haag en Brussel. D. Corbey, Voorzitter, Commissie Duurzaamheidsvraagstukken Biomassa “ .. SNOWBALLING brought me at ‘Dutch sustainability policy for biomass 2008- 2011’ After surfing with the name of Annelies Huygen, energy expert at TNO one may find: dr. Simone Pront-van Bommel (red.) (2010) De consument en de andere kant van de elektriciteitsmarkt These items relate also to step 3 from ‘steps to informationm inquiry’ in Majchrzak: Analyze legislative history and policy issues’
  13. 13. step 2 and 3 for information inquiry Source - Majchrzak (1984) p 34 – 35 Step 2: Identify key policy issues (Topic of assignment 1 ) Step 3: Analyze legislative history and policy issuesAdvice:Include the major issues resulting from step 3 either in your context statement (preferably) or refer to them by means of a research question in your research design
  14. 14. Next week First draft of your problem statement : Tuesday 25 September before 16.00 Criteria (in MOSCOW style: Must, Should, Could ..) MUST be affirmative and relate to a communications policy issue SHOULD apply step 1 from Bardach (2012) COULD contain the a and b element stated in Verschuren & Doorewaard (p 34)
  15. 15. Remember: your client wants to hear a unbiased line of thoughtConsult: Bardach (2012) step 8 ‘Tell your story’ from Pierre’s lecture- note 3: Give an analysis, not decisionsQuote“Policy analysts and planners usually give advice to their clients; they do not make decisions for them. This has important implications for the types of analyses that are done and even more importantly, for the methods of communicating the results of analysis. The client will make the final choice and should be able to reanalyze the policy data. This means that critical assumptions, values, and uncertainties must be reported.” A good policy analysis does not guarantee that the optimal solution will be selected or implemented. Why not?