3. What does Planning Aid England do?
• Provides free, independent, professional planning
advice - to people who can’t afford professional fees
• Provides support and training to local communities
so they can influence and contribute to planning
strategy, policy and decision making
• Neighbourhood Planning Support
3
4. Supporting Communities in
Neighbourhood Planning 2013-2015
4
• DCLG supported programme launched April 2013;
• Two key forms of support: grants and direct support;
• Also a shared learning element available to any NP group;
• Consortium including Locality, URS, PAE, NPIERS has
delivered the programme;
• The programme now winding down – new proposals
coming!
6. PAE Case Studies can be found at:-
http://www.ourneighbourhoodplanning.org.uk/case-studies
• Roseland: a case study on running your steering group;
• Higham Ferrers: a case study about local character and
design;
• Oxford Brookes: a case study about involving students in
neighbourhood planning;
• Friends of Fishwick and St Matthew’s (FOFS): a case study
about dealing with planning and non-planning issues;
• Leeds: a case study about a local authority’s role in
neighbourhood planning.
6
7. User Experience of Neighbourhood Planning
Research (June 2014)
Drivers and motivations for preparing plans:
•Reinvigorating the local area
•Protecting the desirable characteristics of the area
•Help shape a future vision for the neighbourhood
•Greater say in planning and development in their area
•Statutory weight a neighbourhood plan provides
•Control over the process
7
8. User Experience of Neighbourhood Planning
Research (June 2014)
Overall experience of neighbourhood planning:
•55% thought process was what they expected
•Over 90% felt it had gone well or okay
•Majority had overcome difficulties, often with consultant or
local authority support
•Overall it was regarded as initiative with merit and further
potential, although not without difficulties and opportunities
8
9. User Experience of Neighbourhood Planning
Research (June 2014)
What would make it more attractive to communities?
•Half wanted a better explanation of the process
•44% wanted more face to face advice
•39% felt faster process would make more attractive
•Evidence strongly suggests that neighbourhood planning can be
undertaken by most communities if effectively supported,
especially by local authority
9
12. Key Challenges Faced by Communities
• Setting up Forums
• Engaging hard to reach groups
• Understanding what land use planning policies are
• Project planning and Process
• Need for evidence
• Writing policy
• Resourcing
12
13. Even More Challenges!
• SEA
• Engaging constructively
• Separating fact from opinion
• Supporting statements
• Engaging Consultants
• Staying engaged
13
14. Understanding the need for Evidence
• “Decide where you want new homes and businesses to go” –
Groups have taken this to mean only evidence needed for site
selection is local opinion….
• Promoting and explaining the LPA evidence available is a key
support role for LPAs;
• SHLAA often misunderstood – seen as an LPA allocation exercise
• As ‘soundness’ of a neighbourhood plan (NP) not considered by
examiner; need for evidence base = need for robust policy;
• URS have done useful evidence reviews for groups.
14
15. Project Planning –
Process problems
• Groups have problems with
this because they don’t
understand the process;
• We recommend the PAS
spreadsheet;
• A simple key tasks list with
indicative dates should be
drawn up early in the plan
preparation process.
15
16. Understanding landuse planning policy – Quiz
• Provision of affordable homes?
• Retention of trees?
• Community litter patrols?
• Satellite dish restrictions?
• Expanded community bus services?
• Promotion of renewable energy in new homes?
• 20mph speed restrictions?
• Colour of bricks to use?
• Changing a house to a nursery?
16
17. Writing Policy – how to approach this
• Work up a vision and objectives if not already done;
• Issues and options can be teased out of existing
evidence – ie state of the parish and local surveys etc;
• Used “Policy Intent” as a bridge – ie what do you want
your policy to do?
• Introduce the need for technical evidence as well as
local preferences;
• Justification to include reference to evidence in
support and policy compliance.
17
19. What can local authorities do for local NP groups?
19
• Explain the policy context and its implications;
• Explaining the process, assisting with project planning;
• Provide information and evidence that the NP may (hopefully)
want to respond to – ie extent and pattern of growth proposed;
• Providing comments on early ideas for policy/issues etc;
• Enable DM to give comments on emerging policy and assist with
policy writing;
• Committing to attend number of forum meetings;
• Providing access to materials from PAE, Locality, PAS etc;
• Providing consistency and clarity throughout the process;
• Keep group in the loop in later stages of the process.
20. Examples of good LPA engagement - Bristol
• Strategic Planning team supports forums – dedicated link officers;
• 2 levels of support – higher in areas of deprivation & regeneration
opportunity;
• Memorandum of understanding with level 2 groups;
• Links to other council departments’ resources and technical
support (transport, housing);
• Regular attendance at meetings;
• Advice on content and policy wording of plan;
• Links to existing Neighbourhood Partnerships;
• Bristol currently has 5 NP groups.
20
22. Examples of good LPA engagement - Camden
• Supporting highest number of
Forums in London (10) – eg Kentish
Town, Highgate, West Hampstead
• Dedicated officers
• Cross-boundary plans & complex
issues (e.g. HS2)
• Regular attendance at forum
meetings; comments on policies by
email; evidence advice.
22
Uses Volunteers – often chartered members RTPI – can count towards CPD
Core support staff at RTPI. NP has involved obtaining
This is a two year programme. End date is 31 March 2015. Supports development of NP’s and NDO’s.
Shared learning – case studies etc
One of the old regional offices…
Case Studies on our website - this is just a selection – shows the lessons learnt via information from interviews with the groups.
User Experience of
Neighbourhood Planning in England Research
Prof Gavin Parker with Tessa Lynn, Matthew Wargent and Locality
Need for forum in un-parished area key reason for less NP activity in urban areas.
Consultation generally good – but reaching less obvious suspects can be avoided. Best yoof work – rave where Qaire had to be filled in first – generally going to existing groups (particularly in urban areas) ie mosques, sports clubs,
Understanding what land use planning policies are, and what they can and can’t do – I have realised how opaque planning policy is.
Being able to write effective policy – have come to accept this is not something most groups can do, need professional help.
Underestimating time - Trying to cover every eventuality – Financial – often a surprising lack of project planning skills, sometimes too many!
Site allocation and evidence - later
Understanding the planning context (uptodate LP)
SEA – successful legal challenge when Stat bodies not consulted – recent guidance screening opinion or the Env. Report needed at submission.
Need for evidence – next slide
Supporting statements – Consultation and Basic Conditions – latter difficult for groups
Staying Engaged – Groups get tired and there is a tendency to rush the last part and then regret it.
Engaging Consultants – often had to assist with drawing up a brief, dissuading group from paying hourly rate etc
Original CLG promotion for Nping has been misunderstood; pins in a map exercise
Initial project plan in 2013 – pretty good, but process imperfectly understood – ie LPA role
READ STAGES 6-8, Groups often don’t understand that submission = end of their control of the process
Quiz used to aid understanding of what is a landuse issue!
Transport is the hardest issue for groups to understand – 20mph limits = No, Traffic calming = yes
Non-landuse issues can go in separate annexe to the NP – projects section ie Exeter.
Groups have really struggled with this – and it is a specialized skill – learnt perhaps without realising it.
Starting with Vision and Objectives,
Simple spreadsheet to assist groups work out what policies they need
Suggest final wording and framing is something 99% groups will need assistance with.
DM = Development Management
Some LPAs have produced guides etc, PAE developing tools as I speak!
Key thing: It is a support role not a directing role.
Once NP submitted LPA role becomes more central and QB less in control.
Groups all have level 2 support
Memorandum of understanding sets out roles and responsibilities of group and council
Bristol had pre-existing neighbourhood consultation and governance structure – useful framework
Camden
Dealing with NF’s in areas of London with some of highest land values in country – intense development pressures
Neighbourhood Forums in areas of affluence alongside areas of high deprivation
Highgate
Kentish Town
Fortune Green and West Hampstead
Somers Town
Dartmouth Park
Camley Street
Fitzrovia East
Church Row and Perrins Walk
Redington and Frognal
Hampstead
Plug for volunteering with PAE
Any questions? (or separate session?