Hon’ble Prime Minister of India, CIC fails to give decision on the request to invoke section 7(1) of RTI Act made by the applicant on 30.11.2016, although the imminent danger has been demonstrably proven by the applicant. Section 7 in the Right to Information Act, 2005 says, (2) If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be fails to give decision on the request for information within the period specified under sub section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be shall be deemed to have refused the request. (8) Where a request has been rejected under sub section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be shall communicate to the person making the request,— (i) the reasons for such rejection; (ii) the period within which an appeal against such rejection may be preferred; and (iii) the particulars of the appellate authority. (9) An information shall ordinarily be provided in the form in which it is sought unless it would disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority or would be detrimental to the safety or preservation of the record in question. CIC has passed the following observation about section 7(1) in N.N. Kalia Vs University of Delhi on 3rd September 2009, "The life and liberty provision can be applied only in cases where there is an imminent danger to the life and liberty of a person and the non-supply of the information may either lead to death or grievous injury to the concerned person. Liberty of a person is threatened if she or he is going to be incarcerated or has already been incarcerated and the disclosure of the information may change that situation. If the disclosure of the information would obviate the danger then it may be considered under the proviso of Section 7(1). The imminent danger has to be demonstrably proven". Hence, this case is fit to invoke section 7(1) by CIC. However, CIC maintains silence on applicant’s application. NOW WHERE TO GO? WHAT TO DO? EXCEPT SURVIVE AT THE MERCY OF GOD OR ELSE FINISH LIFE SILENTLY. KINDLY INTERVENE INTO THE MATTER AND DO THE NEEDFUL. PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 7(1) OF RTI ACT MADE BY THE APPLICANT TO CIC

1. Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com>
Sub: Prayer for URGENT hearing against Second Appeal Diary No.
183722 dated 03.11.2016; which pertains to ‘Life or Personal liberty’ of a
Senior Citizen Women-reg.
1 message
Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com>
Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:13
PM
To: rk.mathur53@gov.in
Date: 30.11.2016
To,
The Chief Information Commissioner,
Central Information Commission
Room No.339, II Floor
August Kranti Bhavan
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Sub: Prayer for URGENT hearing against Second Appeal
Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016; which pertains to
‘Life or Personal liberty’ of a Senior Citizen Women-
reg.

2. Hon’ble Sir,
1.The matter pertains to Life or Personal liberty of
a Senior Citizen Women Widow Asha Rani Devi, age
about 71 years against Diary No. 183722 dated
03.11.2016. Hence, Matter is URGENT. Patna High Court
(FAA) has not replied it back against First Appeal
till date.
2.That data is important to file Curative Petition
Criminal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
after the dismissal of Review Petition Criminal 825
of 2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016; which
will be heard on 01.12.2016 in the Chamber of Justice
Pinaki Chandra Ghose & U U Lalit at 1:30 PM.
3.N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 process u/s 83 Cr.Pc. has
been issued and kept it secret since then for the
same cause of action which has been settled by the
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi on 23.07.2013 in MAT.
APPL. 7 of 2012 after the appearance by the
respondent on 09.02.2011 before the Ld. Trial Court

3. at Dwarka at New Delhi.
4.Therefore praying for early hearing against the
diary no.183722 dated 03.11.2016 on the ground of
urgency; as it is still pending under scrutiny stage
with the Central Registry of CIC, New Delhi.
Second Appellant
Om Prakash
RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar Part-2
Palam Colony, New Delhi-110077
Mob: 9968337815
E-mail: om.poddar@gmail.com
Enclosure: As Above

4. CIC_early hearing against diary no 183722 dated 03.11.2016.pdf
98K
Om Prakash Poddar
<om.poddar@gmail.com>
Photographs of the victim in support of URGENT hearing against
Second Appeal Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 & RTI request dated
27.05.2016; which pertains to Life or Personal liberty of a Senior Citizen
Women-reg.
Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com> Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:32 PM
To: "rk.mathur53@gov.in" <rk.mathur53@gov.in>
Date: 30.11.2016
To,
The Chief Information Commissioner,
Central Information Commission
Room No.339, II Floor
August Kranti Bhavan
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Sub: Photographs of the victim in support of URGENT
hearing against Second Appeal Diary No. 183722 dated
03.11.2016 & RTI request dated 27.05.2016; which
pertains to Life or Personal liberty of a Senior

5. Citizen Women-reg.
Sir,
1.The matter pertains to Life or Personal liberty of
a Senior Citizen Women Widow Asha Rani Devi, age
about 71 years against Diary No. 183722 dated
03.11.2016. RTI request has been filed on 27.05.2016.
Hence, Matter is URGENT. Patna High Court (FAA) has
not replied it back against First Appeal till date.
2.That data is important to file Curative Petition
Criminal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
after the dismissal of Review Petition Criminal 825
of 2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016; which
will be heard on 01.12.2016 in the Chamber of Justice
Pinaki Chandra Ghose & U U Lalit at 1:30 PM.
3.N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 process u/s 83 Cr.Pc. has
been issued and kept it secret since then for the
same cause of action which has been settled by the
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi on 23.07.2013 in MAT.
APPL. 7 of 2012 after the appearance by the
respondent on 09.02.2011 before the Ld. Trial Court
at Dwarka at New Delhi.
4. Atrocities of Mafia & State Apparatus on OLD AGE

6. patients since 2004; he died while his wife is
surviving. Headmaster, Late Shri Deep Narayan
Poddar 1939-2007 & his wife Widow Asha Rani Devi
1946 to till date. Case link has all material
evidences against this
statement. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/state-apparatus-involved-
killing-conman-man-india-om-prakash-poddar?trk=prof-
post; http://seniorcitizenrights.blogspot.in/2016/11/dear-all-who-is-
responsible-for-brutal.html
5.Therefore praying for early hearing against the
diary no.183722 dated 03.11.2016 and
enclosing/supplying photographs of the victim as a
ground of urgency; as it is still pending under
scrutiny stage with the Central Registry of CIC, New
Delhi. Mr. U C Joshi does not pick up the landlines
number and does not like the mobile calls. He
categorically states that there is no time limit and
clear guidelines against the scrutiny business by the
CIC. Priority & urgency matters do not have clear
guidelines by CIC.
Second Appellant
Om Prakash
RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg

7. Raj Nagar Part-2
Palam Colony, New Delhi-110077
Mob: 9968337815
E-mail: om.poddar@gmail.com
Enclosure:As Above
7 attachments
Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar 1939-2007.jpg
489K
Oxygen dependent Widow Asha Rani Devi.jpg
33K
Oxygen dependent Widow Asha Rani Devi1.jpg
36K
AIIMS_5.jpg
38K
Widow Asha Rani Devi on Home Oxygen.jpg
261K
CIC_photographs of victim in support of early hearing against diary no 183722 dated
03.11.2016.pdf
104K
Second Appeal against Patna High Court_03_11_2016.pdf
340K

8. VICTIM NO.01 WHO WAS ENCIRCLED TO DEATH IN 2007 UNTIMELY BY THE NEXUS OF MAFIA &

9. STATE APPARATUS

11. VICTIM NO.02 OXYGEN DEPENDENT SENIOR CITIZEN WHO HAS BEEN ENCIRCLED IN THE SIMILAR
FASHION BY THE STATE APPARATUS
REPLY BY DS(CR) CIC
Om Prakash Poddar
<om.poddar@gmail.com>
Sub: Prayer for URGENT registration of matter against Second Appeal
Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016; which pertains to ‘Life or Personal
liberty’ of a Senior Citizen Women-reg.
UmeshChandra Joshi <umesh.joshi@gov.in>
Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:36
AM
To: Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com>
Sir,

12. With reference to your above said mail, the Appeal diarised vide diary No.183722 dated 3.11.2016
was examined and it found that you have not claimed the ground of life and liberty at any stage i.e
RTI application, Ist appeal or even in IInd appeal. It is out of preview of Central Registry to acceede
to you request.
DS(CR)
On 11/30/16 02:42 PM, Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com> wrote:
Date: 30.11.2016
To,
Shri U.C.Joshi
August Kranti Bhavan
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Sub: Prayer for URGENT registration of matter against
Second Appeal Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016;
which pertains to ‘Life or Personal liberty’ of a
Senior Citizen Women-reg.
Sir,
1.The matter pertains to Life or Personal liberty of
a Senior Citizen Women Widow Asha Rani Devi, age
about 71 years against Diary No. 183722 dated
03.11.2016. Hence, Matter is URGENT. Patna High Court
(FAA) has not replied it back against First Appeal
till date.
2.That data is important to file Curative Petition
Criminal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India

13. after the dismissal of Review Petition Criminal 825
of 2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016; which
will be heard on 01.12.2016 in the Chamber of Justice
Pinaki Chandra Ghose & U U Lalit at 1:30 PM.
3.N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 process u/s 83 Cr.Pc. has
been issued and kept it secret since then for the
same cause of action which has been settled by the
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi on 23.07.2013 in MAT.
APPL. 7 of 2012 after the appearance by the
respondent on 09.02.2011 before the Ld. Trial Court
at Dwarka at New Delhi.
4.Therefore praying for early hearing against the
diary no.183722 dated 03.11.2016 on the ground of
urgency; as it is still pending under scrutiny stage
with the Central Registry of CIC, New Delhi.
Second Appellant
Om Prakash
RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar Part-2
Palam Colony, New Delhi-110077
Mob: 9968337815
E-mail: om.poddar@gmail.com
Om Prakash Poddar
<om.poddar@gmail.com>
CIC INVOKED SECTION 7(1) IN N.N. Kalia vs University of Delhi CASE

14. and should invoke the same against Second Appeal vide diary no.
183722 dated 03.11.2016
1 message
Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com> Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:58 PM
To: "rk.mathur53@gov.in" <rk.mathur53@gov.in>
Cc: UmeshChandra Joshi <umesh.joshi@gov.in>, registrar-cic@nic.in, sharma.subhash@nic.in, DINESH
KUMAR <dineshupsc@gmail.com>, pushpaggn@yahoo.com
To,
The Chief Information Commissioner
Central Information Commission
Room No. 305, B-Wing,
August Kranti Bhawan
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Hon'ble Sir,
1. CIC has invoked section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 in
N.N. Kalia Vs University of Delhi earlier.
2. The CIC passed following observation about section
7(1), which might enable the Commission to take
decision against the Second Appeal vide diary
No.183722 dated 03.11.2016 which pertains to life or
personal liberty.
"The life and liberty provision can be applied only
in cases where there is an imminent danger to the

15. life and liberty of a person and the non-supply of
the information may either lead to death or grievous
injury to the concerned person. Liberty of a person
is threatened if she or he is going to be
incarcerated or has already been incarcerated and the
disclosure of the information may change that
situation. If the disclosure of the information would
obviate the danger then it may be considered under
the proviso of Section 7(1). The imminent danger has
to be demonstrably proven".
3. That there is imminent danger to the life of
applicant and his oxygen dependent mother in this
case because offrivolous N.B.W dated 08.09.2011
process u/s 83 Cr.Pc. has been issued and kept it
secret since then after the settlement of same matter
by High Court of Delhi in 2013
4. That above the amputee father of the applicant
(photo attached) has been encircled to death by the
nexus of State Apparatus and Mafia in 2007 untimely.
5. Hence, head of the family has been incarcerated
earlier and subjected to death.
6. That oxygen dependent 71 year old mother who is
dependent on unemployed applicant only (photo
attached) and residing on rented accommodation at New
Delhi is going to be incarcerated by the issuance of
frivolous N.B.W.

16. 6. That the non-supply of the information may either
lead to death or grievous injury to my oxygen
dependent mother and me.
Hence this case is a fit case to invoke section 7(1)
of RTI Act 2005 by CIC in the furtherance of Justice.
With Best Regards
Om Prakash
Second Appellant vide diary no.183722 dated
03.11.2016
S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
RZF-893 Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar Part-2
Palam Colony, New Delhi-77
Dwarka Sector-08
9968337815
9 attachments
Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar 1939-2007.jpg
489K
Oxygen dependent Widow Asha Rani Devi1.jpg
36K
AIIMS_5.jpg
38K
RTI online request.pdf
140K
CIC complaint_Patna High Court_2.pdf
5K
CIC COMPLAINT AGAINST CJM CUM PIO BEGUSARAI.pdf
5K
CIC Complaint_Department of Legal Affair_CIC Complaint.pdf
5K
CIC_Online appeal application submitted_30_10_16 Department of Legal Affairs.pdf
66K
CIC_Online appeal application submitted_01_11_16_Department of Justice.pdf
65K