Communication with CIC New Delhi and PMO to make applicable Section 7 (1) of RTI Act 2005 w.e.f 30.11.2016 to 04.01.2017

Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com>
Sub: Prayer for URGENT hearing against Second Appeal Diary No.
183722 dated 03.11.2016; which pertains to ‘Life or Personal liberty’ of a
Senior Citizen Women-reg.
1 message
Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:13
PM
To: rk.mathur53@gov.in
Date: 30.11.2016
To,
The Chief Information Commissioner,
Central Information Commission
Room No.339, II Floor
August Kranti Bhavan
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Sub: Prayer for URGENT hearing against Second Appeal
Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016; which pertains to
‘Life or Personal liberty’ of a Senior Citizen Women-
reg.

Hon’ble Sir,
1.The matter pertains to Life or Personal liberty of
a Senior Citizen Women Widow Asha Rani Devi, age
about 71 years against Diary No. 183722 dated
03.11.2016. Hence, Matter is URGENT. Patna High Court
(FAA) has not replied it back against First Appeal
till date.
2.That data is important to file Curative Petition
Criminal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
after the dismissal of Review Petition Criminal 825
of 2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016; which
will be heard on 01.12.2016 in the Chamber of Justice
Pinaki Chandra Ghose & U U Lalit at 1:30 PM.
3.N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 process u/s 83 Cr.Pc. has
been issued and kept it secret since then for the
same cause of action which has been settled by the
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi on 23.07.2013 in MAT.
APPL. 7 of 2012 after the appearance by the
respondent on 09.02.2011 before the Ld. Trial Court

at Dwarka at New Delhi.
4.Therefore praying for early hearing against the
diary no.183722 dated 03.11.2016 on the ground of
urgency; as it is still pending under scrutiny stage
with the Central Registry of CIC, New Delhi.
Second Appellant
Om Prakash
RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar Part-2
Palam Colony, New Delhi-110077
Mob: 9968337815
E-mail: om.poddar@gmail.com
Enclosure: As Above
CIC_early hearing against diary no 183722 dated 03.11.2016.pdf
98K

Om Prakash Poddar
<om.poddar@gmail.com>
Photographs of the victim in support of URGENT hearing against
Second Appeal Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 & RTI request dated
27.05.2016; which pertains to Life or Personal liberty of a Senior Citizen
Women-reg.
Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com> Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:32 PM
To: "rk.mathur53@gov.in" <rk.mathur53@gov.in>
Date: 30.11.2016
To,
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Sub: Photographs of the victim in support of URGENT
hearing against Second Appeal Diary No. 183722 dated
03.11.2016 & RTI request dated 27.05.2016; which
pertains to Life or Personal liberty of a Senior
Citizen Women-reg.

Sir,
03.11.2016. RTI request has been filed on 27.05.2016.
Hence, Matter is URGENT. Patna High Court (FAA) has
not replied it back against First Appeal till date.
4. Atrocities of Mafia & State Apparatus on OLD AGE
patients since 2004; he died while his wife is
surviving. Headmaster, Late Shri Deep Narayan

Poddar 1939-2007 & his wife Widow Asha Rani Devi
1946 to till date. Case link has all material
evidences against this
statement. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/state-apparatus-involved-
killing-conman-man-india-om-prakash-poddar?trk=prof-
post; http://seniorcitizenrights.blogspot.in/2016/11/dear-all-who-is-
responsible-for-brutal.html
diary no.183722 dated 03.11.2016 and
enclosing/supplying photographs of the victim as a
ground of urgency; as it is still pending under
scrutiny stage with the Central Registry of CIC, New
Delhi. Mr. U C Joshi does not pick up the landlines
number and does not like the mobile calls. He
categorically states that there is no time limit and
clear guidelines against the scrutiny business by the
CIC. Priority & urgency matters do not have clear
guidelines by CIC.
Second Appellant
Om Prakash
Raj Nagar Part-2

Mob: 9968337815
Enclosure:As Above
7 attachments
Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar 1939-2007.jpg
489K
Oxygen dependent Widow Asha Rani Devi.jpg
33K
Oxygen dependent Widow Asha Rani Devi1.jpg
36K
AIIMS_5.jpg
38K
Widow Asha Rani Devi on Home Oxygen.jpg
261K
CIC_photographs of victim in support of early hearing against diary no 183722 dated
03.11.2016.pdf
104K
Second Appeal against Patna High Court_03_11_2016.pdf
340K

VICTIM NO.01 WHO WAS ENCIRCLED TO DEATH IN 2007

UNTIMELY BY THE NEXUS OF MAFIA & STATE APPARATUS

VICTIM NO.02 OXYGEN DEPENDENT SENIOR CITIZEN
WHO HAS BEEN ENCIRCLED IN THE SIMILAR FASHION BY
THE STATE APPARATUS LIKELY TO DEATH
Om Prakash Poddar
Sub: Prayer for URGENT registration of matter against Second Appeal
Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016; which pertains to ‘Life or Personal
liberty’ of a Senior Citizen Women-reg.
UmeshChandra Joshi <umesh.joshi@gov.in>
Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:36
AM
To: Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com>

Sir,
With reference to your above said mail, the Appeal diarised vide diary No.183722 dated 3.11.2016
was examined and it found that you have not claimed the ground of life and liberty at any stage i.e
RTI application, Ist appeal or even in IInd appeal. It is out of preview of Central Registry to acceede
to you request.
DS(CR)
On 11/30/16 02:42 PM, Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com> wrote:
Date: 30.11.2016
To,
Shri U.C.Joshi
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Sub: Prayer for URGENT registration of matter against
Second Appeal Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016;
which pertains to ‘Life or Personal liberty’ of a
Senior Citizen Women-reg.
Sir,
03.11.2016. Hence, Matter is URGENT. Patna High Court
(FAA) has not replied it back against First Appeal
till date.

diary no.183722 dated 03.11.2016 on the ground of
urgency; as it is still pending under scrutiny stage
with the Central Registry of CIC, New Delhi.
Second Appellant
Om Prakash
Raj Nagar Part-2
Mob: 9968337815

Om Prakash Poddar
CIC INVOKED SECTION 7(1) IN N.N. Kalia vs University of Delhi CASE
and should invoke the same against Second Appeal vide diary no.
183722 dated 03.11.2016
1 message
Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:58
PM
Cc: UmeshChandra Joshi <umesh.joshi@gov.in>, registrar-cic@nic.in, sharma.subhash@nic.in, DINESH
KUMAR <dineshupsc@gmail.com>, pushpaggn@yahoo.com
To,
The Chief Information Commissioner
Room No. 305, B-Wing,
August Kranti Bhawan
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Hon'ble Sir,
1. CIC has invoked section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 in
N.N. Kalia Vs University of Delhi earlier.
2. The CIC passed following observation about section

7(1), which might enable the Commission to take
decision against the Second Appeal vide diary
No.183722 dated 03.11.2016 which pertains to life or
personal liberty.
"The life and liberty provision can be applied only
in cases where there is an imminent danger to the
life and liberty of a person and the non-supply of
the information may either lead to death or grievous
injury to the concerned person. Liberty of a person
is threatened if she or he is going to be
incarcerated or has already been incarcerated and the
disclosure of the information may change that
situation. If the disclosure of the information would
obviate the danger then it may be considered under
the proviso of Section 7(1). The imminent danger has
to be demonstrably proven".
3. That there is imminent danger to the life of
applicant and his oxygen dependent mother in this
case because offrivolous N.B.W dated 08.09.2011
process u/s 83 Cr.Pc. has been issued and kept it
secret since then after the settlement of same matter
by High Court of Delhi in 2013
4. That above the amputee father of the applicant
(photo attached) has been encircled to death by the
nexus of State Apparatus and Mafia in 2007 untimely.
5. Hence, head of the family has been incarcerated
earlier and subjected to death.

6. That oxygen dependent 71 year old mother who is
dependent on unemployed applicant only (photo
attached) and residing on rented accommodation at New
Delhi is going to be incarcerated by the issuance of
frivolous N.B.W.
6. That the non-supply of the information may either
lead to death or grievous injury to my oxygen
dependent mother and me.
Hence this case is a fit case to invoke section 7(1)
of RTI Act 2005 by CIC in the furtherance of Justice.
With Best Regards
Om Prakash
Second Appellant vide diary no.183722 dated
03.11.2016
S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
RZF-893 Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar Part-2
Dwarka Sector-08
9968337815
9 attachments
Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar 1939-2007.jpg
489K
Oxygen dependent Widow Asha Rani Devi1.jpg
36K
AIIMS_5.jpg
38K
RTI online request.pdf
140K
CIC complaint_Patna High Court_2.pdf
5K
CIC COMPLAINT AGAINST CJM CUM PIO BEGUSARAI.pdf
5K

CIC Complaint_Department of Legal Affair_CIC Complaint.pdf
5K
CIC_Online appeal application submitted_30_10_16 Department of Legal Affairs.pdf
66K
CIC_Online appeal application submitted_01_11_16_Department of Justice.pdf
65K
Om Prakash Poddar
Application u/s 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 against Diary No. 183722 dated
03.11.2016-reg
1 message
Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 4:22
PM
To: jsadmin-cic@nic.in, sp.beck@nic.in
Date 15.12.2016
To,
Shri S.P. Beck
Joint Secretary (Admin)
Head of Registry CIC
New Delhi
Sub: Application u/s 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 against
Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016-reg
Sir,

1.The request u/s 7(1) of RTI Act has been made on
30.11.2016 through email by the applicant.
2.Reply from DS(CR) Shri U C Joshi has been received
on 02.12.2016.
3.Rejoinder has been filed before Registrar on
05.12.2016 physically by the applicant, demonstrably
proving the imminent danger to the life and liberty
of a Senior Citizen Oxygen dependent Woman.
4.Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 is still pending
at the scrutiny stage with DS(CR)even after marking
by the Chief of CIC and Registrar of CIC.
5.Hence, praying to convert the diary No. 183722
dated 03.11.2016 into CIC file so that Section 7(1)
of RTI Act 2005can be made applicable by the Chief
CIC.
Please find enclosed the previous communication
Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 made by the applicant,
wherein the imminent danger to life and liberty has
been demonstrably proven.

Submitted for your information and necessary action
please.
With Best Regards,
Second Appellant
Om Prakash
RZF-893
NETAJI SUBHASH MARG
RAJ NAGAR PART-2
PALAM COLONY NEW DELHI-110077
9968337815
E-mail:om.poddar@gmail.com
ENCLOSURE:
1. Om Prakash's Application under section 7(1) of RTI
Act 2005 to JS Admin of CIC
2.Communication under section 7 sub section 1 of RTI
Act with CIC
2 attachments

Communication under section 7 sub section 1 of RTI Act with CIC.pdf
604K
Om Prakash Application under section 7 of RTI Act to CIC_JS Admin.pdf
92K
Om Prakash Poddar
Reminder-1 "Application u/s 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 against Diary No.
183722 dated 03.11.2016-reg"
1 message
Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:59
PM
To,
Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi-110066
Sub: Application u/s 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 against
Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016-reg

Sir,
1.The request u/s 7(1) of RTI Act has been made on
30.11.2016 through email by the applicant.
2.Reply from DS(CR) Shri U C Joshi has been received
on 02.12.2016.
3.Rejoinder has been filed before Registrar on
05.12.2016 physically by the applicant, demonstrably
proving the imminent danger to the life and liberty
of a Senior Citizen Oxygen dependent Woman.
4.Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 is still pending
at the scrutiny stage with DS(CR)even after marking
by the Chief of CIC and Registrar of CIC.
5.Hence, praying to convert the diary No. 183722
dated 03.11.2016 into CIC file so that Section 7(1)
of RTI Act 2005can be made applicable by the Chief
CIC.
Please find enclosed the previous communication

Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 made by the applicant,
wherein the imminent danger to life and liberty has
been demonstrably proven.
Submitted for your information and necessary action
please.
With Best Regards,
Second Appellant
Om Prakash
RZF-893
NETAJI SUBHASH MARG
RAJ NAGAR PART-2
PALAM COLONY NEW DELHI-110077
9968337815
E-mail:om.poddar@gmail.com
ENCLOSURE:
1.Communication under section 7 sub section 1 of RTI

Act with CIC
Communication under section 7 sub section 1 of RTI Act with CIC.pdf
604K
Om Prakash Poddar
Sub: Prayer for URGENT registration of matter against Second Appeal
Diary No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016; which pertains to ‘Life or Personal
liberty’ of a Senior Citizen Women-reg.
UmeshChandra
Joshi <umesh.joshi@gov.in>
Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:50 PM
To: Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com>
With reference to your query the Hon'ble CIC has held that " There is no statutory provision under
the RTI Act,2005 to prioritize the hearing of second appeal and decide the same within 48
hours as matter concerning life and Liberty".
For information please.
DS(CR)
[Quoted text hidden]
Centralized Public Grievance Redress and
Monitoring System (CPGRAMS)
Registration Number : PMOPG/E/2016/0577788
Name Of Complainant : OM PRAKASH
Date of Receipt : 13 Dec 2016
Received by : Prime Ministers Office
Forwarded to : DSIR-Information Rights
Contact Address : Room No. 279-A, North Block
New Delhi
110001
Contact Number : 23092755
Grievance Description : Hon’ble Prime Minister of India, CIC fails to give decision on the request to invoke
section 7(1) of RTI Act made by the applicant on 30.11.2016, although the imminent
danger has been demonstrably proven by the applicant. Section 7 in the Right to
Information Act, 2005 says, (2) If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public
Information Officer, as the case may be fails to give decision on the request for
information within the period specified under sub section (1), the Central Public
Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be shall be

deemed to have refused the request. (8) Where a request has been rejected under sub
section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as
the case may be shall communicate to the person making the request,— (i) the reasons for
such rejection; (ii) the period within which an appeal against such rejection may be
preferred; and (iii) the particulars of the appellate authority. (9) An information shall
ordinarily be provided in the form in which it is sought unless it would disproportionately
divert the resources of the public authority or would be detrimental to the safety or
preservation of the record in question. CIC has passed the following observation about
section 7(1) in N.N. Kalia Vs University of Delhi on 3rd September 2009, "The life and
liberty provision can be applied only in cases where there is an imminent danger to the
life and liberty of a person and the non-supply of the information may either lead to death
or grievous injury to the concerned person. Liberty of a person is threatened if she or he is
going to be incarcerated or has already been incarcerated and the disclosure of the
information may change that situation. If the disclosure of the information would obviate
the danger then it may be considered under the proviso of Section 7(1). The imminent
danger has to be demonstrably proven". Hence, this case is fit to invoke section 7(1) by
CIC. However, CIC maintains silence on applicant’s application. NOW WHERE TO
GO? WHAT TO DO? EXCEPT SURVIVE AT THE MERCY OF GOD OR ELSE
FINISH LIFE SILENTLY. KINDLY INTERVENE INTO THE MATTER AND DO
THE NEEDFUL. PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED THE APPLICATION UNDER
SECTION 7(1) OF RTI ACT MADE BY THE APPLICANT TO CIC
Current Status : CASE CLOSED
Date of Action : 04 Jan 2017
Details : Non-implementation of provisions of RTI Act may be taken up with the concerned
Information Commissions as conmplaints under section 18 of the RTI Act.

Communication with CIC New Delhi and PMO to make applicable Section 7 (1) of RTI Act 2005 w.e.f 30.11.2016 to 04.01.2017

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Communication with CIC New Delhi and PMO to make applicable Section 7 (1) of RTI Act 2005 w.e.f 30.11.2016 to 04.01.2017

Similar to Communication with CIC New Delhi and PMO to make applicable Section 7 (1) of RTI Act 2005 w.e.f 30.11.2016 to 04.01.2017 (10)

More from Om Prakash Poddar

More from Om Prakash Poddar (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Communication with CIC New Delhi and PMO to make applicable Section 7 (1) of RTI Act 2005 w.e.f 30.11.2016 to 04.01.2017