Challenges for investment, growth, and job creation in the MENA region
1. Challenges for Investment, Growth and
Job Creation in the MENA Region:
Consequences for the MENA-OECD
Investment Programme
3 December 2013, Rabat
Steering Group
2. Agenda
1. Key message
2. The 3 Main Risks for Investment in the Region
3. Translate into Core Challenges
4. Which have Implications for the Activities of
the MENA-OECD Investment Programme
2
3. 1. MENA-OECD Investment Programme: Key message
1.1 Heightened risk perception in the MENA transition countries
Crisis in Syria, domestic political tensions, increasing fiscal deficits
1.2 Stress on socio-economic outlook
Economic growth in MENA transition countries is expected to remain too low (3-4% in 2013-14)
Persisting high (youth) unemployment rates
1.3 Implications
Risk of increased poverty, and refugee flows
Immediate government action is needed as well as long-term structural reforms
International community needs to scale up engagement: financially, but also structural reforms
2. In response to this pressing situation, the MENA-OECD Investment
Programme focusses on structural reforms for inclusive growth and job creation
through private sector development in four key areas:
I.
II.
III.
IV.
Investment policy and promotion
Policies for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
Women in the economy
Business integrity
3
4. Agenda
1. Key message
2. The 3 Main Risks for Investment in the Region
3. Translate into Core Challenges
4. Which have Implications for the Activities of
the MENA-OECD Investment Programme
4
5. 2. MENA transition countries face three main risks
1. Spill-over effects
from crisis in Syria and
heightened security concerns
2. Domestic uncertainty
and risks of political tensions
halt private sector activity.
November 2013: 5 million
internally displaced people.
Over 2.2 million Syrian
refugees in neighbouring
countries.
Turkey
600,000
Political risk rating
in MENA transition countries
Egypt
Jordan
Libya
Morocco
75
Tunisia
Yemen
Arab Spring begins
70
65
Lebanon
824,288
Egypt
127,876
60
Iraq
206,632
Jordan
553,311
3. Large fiscal deficits
55
50
45
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Energy subsidies 8.5 %
of GDP or 22 percent of
government revenues
in MENA region.
Social pressure impedes
the reduction of
subsidies.
Source: UNFPA November 2013
Source: The PRS Group, International.
Source: Masood, Ahmed: Arab Countries in Transition:
Update on Developments and Outlook.
5
6. 2. Political instability has become a major constraint to firms in MENA
Figure: Leading constraints to firms in MENA
Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys .
6
7. 2. Large fiscal deficits which constrain governments
Large fiscal deficits lead to increasing public debts and potentially crowd out private
sector investments.
After the 2011, MENA governments increased spending for wages, pensions and subsidies, partly
balancing the increases with lower capital investments.
Deficits are expected to decrease in 2013 and 2014 for Morocco, Jordan and Tunisia. In Egypt, deficits
are estimated to rise further, increasing the current debt level to 100% of the GDP.
Fiscal deficits result from
inefficient tax
systems, economic weakness
and energy subsidies which
account for 22% of
government revenues and
8.5% of GDP in MENA.
Several countries are
looking to reduce energy
subsidies or replace
them with targeted cash
transfers.
10
Fiscal deficits in transition countries (in % of GDP)
Egypt
Jordan
0
Libya
Morocco
-10
Tunisia
Yemen
-20
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook (October 2013). Own calculation. Note: Y scale
limited to improve overview. Libya had on average fiscal surplus of 17% in 2010 to 2010
7
8. 2. MENA transition countries need adequate support from external partners
Gross external financing needs1
(Billions of U.S. dollars, 2012-13)
18
2013
Official external disbursements
January 2011-August 2013
(Millions of U.S Dollars, estimates)
2014
16
ACT
Total
14
2013
$33.9
2014
Other, $6
,579
IMF, $863
G8, $2,82
6
$41.1
12
10
8
6
IFIs ex.
IMF, $6,7
62
4
2
0
Egypt
Tunisia
Morocco
Jordan
Yemen
Sources: National authorities; and IMF staff calculations
Calculated as the sum of current account balance (before grants) and external
Sources: National authorities; and IMF staff calculations
8
GCC, $21,
423
9. Agenda
1. Key message
2. The 3 Main Risks for Investment in the Region
3. Translate into Core Challenges
4. Which have Implications for the Activities of
the MENA-OECD Investment Programme
9
10. 3. The Growth Challenge: Economic growth is expected to remain too low…
GDP growth
constant prices, excluding Libya
6
4
4.45
3.84
3.45
2.74
2
Egypt
0
Jordan
2010
-2
2011
-1.06
2012
2013
2014
Morocco
Tunisia
Yemen
-4
Average
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook, October 2013
10
11. 3. …to reduce unemployment
Projected economic growth is too low
to reduce unemployment.
Economic growth rates in selected MENA countries
(per cent of GDP)
8
2001-08
6
2009
Economic growth rates in the MENA region
decreased from close to 6% per year on
average from 2001 to 2008 to an estimated
2.2% in 2013.
4
Estimates for 2014 predict growth rates of
3.8% for MENA - too low to substantially
reduce unemployment in the long-term.
-2
2010
2011
2
2012
0
2013
2014-18
100
Country disparities: Growth rates are
improving in Jordan and are reaching
pre- financial crisis level in Morocco.
80
60
2009
40
2010
20
2011
0
A growth rate of 6.5% in the MENA
region is needed to create enough
jobs, according to estimates of the
World Bank
2001-08
2012
-20
-40
Libya
Yemen
2013
2014-18
-60
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Database, 2013
11
12. 3. The FDI Challenge: FDI inflows decreased significantly…
Inward FDI flows to MENA between 2003 and 2012 (US$ Billion)
100
Beginning of global
financial crisis
90
Deauville
Partnership
countries
89.9
2011 events
80
70
61.7
60
Rebound
50
43.8
40
30
Golf
Cooperation
Council
total
26.4
20
16.3
10
7.9
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Source: UNCTAD data
• FDI inflows predominate in sectors with low job creation (oil, non-tradables)
• Political instability even further discouraged the FDI in labor-intensive manufacturing
and services sectors
12
13. 3. ….re-enforce the Unemployment Challenge
Unemployment rates for different regions
35
(percent, latest available data)
Tunisia
30
Recent trends
Youth unemployment rate
MENA transition Jordan
countries
25
MENA
EU
Europe and Central
Euro area
Asia
Egypt
Unemployment
in the MENA
region rose by
3.3 million
between 2007
and 2013 and is
expected to
reach 16.8
million in 2015.
20
OECD members
Lower middle
income
15
Morocco
Latin America &
Caribbean
South Asia
10
5
Source: ILO 2013.
0
0
2
4
6
8
Total unemployment rate
Source: World Bank Development Indicators and national authorities.
13
10
12
14
14. Agenda
1. Key message
2. The 3 Main Risks for Investment in the Region
3. Translate into Core Challenges
4. Which have Implications for the Activities of
the MENA-OECD Investment Programme
14
15. 4. Implications for the MENA-OECD Investment Programme
Focusing on structural reforms to improve the business environment with the aim to
foster inclusive growth.
Areas of governmental
actions:
Reallocate public spending to
infrastructure and basic services along
with reducing unsustainable fiscal
deficits
Address inequalities by increasing the
inclusion of the youth and women
into the economy, fighting corruption
and improving business integrity:
MENA-OECD Investment Programme
The international community needs
to scale up its engagement!
Foster private sector-led growth
through investment climate
improvement and support to SME
development: MENA-OECD
Investment Programme
Deepen regional integration in in
particular in trade and investment:
MENA-OECD Investment Programme
15
16. The focus areas of the Programme were adapted to support structural reforms
A. Investment Policy
•
Risk mitigation and investor
protection:
• Working Group on
Investment Policies
and Promotion
• ISMED Support
Programme
• DP related activities
C. Business Integrity
•
•
•
B. SME Policies
•
Inclusive
Growth &
Job Creation
in turbulent
times
Strengthening Integrity in
Business
Corporate Governance
Networks
Responsible Business
Conduct
•
•
D. Women in the Economy
•
•
•
16
Working Group on SME to
focus on business operations
in transition
DP related activities
SME policy index
Supporting Women as
Economic Actors during
Periods of Transition
OECD-MENA Women’s
Business Forum
DP related activities
17. Programme is supporting the G8 Deauville Partnership process under the UK
Chairmanship
Investment
Policy
SME Policy
Women as
Economic Actors
• Identification of the Investment Climate Reform
Priorities in the six Arab Countries in Transition
(ACTs)
• Assistance on the improvement of the investment legal
and institutional frameworks
• Near-term plans for SME development in the
transition countries
• IFI Coordination Plateform: Workshop on
implementation of SME reform priorities in Morocco
with IDB
• Assess the legal and institutional framework to
support women in the economic sphere in the
TCs
17
18. MENA Transition Fund projects: implemented with the support of the OECD
Project
Implementation Support
Agencies
Project Objective
Operationalising PublicPrivate Partnerships (PPPs)
in Tunisia
OECD and AfDB
Assist Tunisia in establishing a
new law on PPPs
Establishment of Tunisia
Investment Authority
OECD and IFC
Assist Tunisia in implementing
a new investment code
Invest in Youth in Tunisia
OECD and IDB
Assist Tunisia in strengthening
employability of Youth during
Tunisia’s transition to a green
economy
SME Development Strategy in
Libya
OECD / IDB
Strengthening the legal and
institutional framework for
SMEs in Libya
18
20. Governance structure of the MENA-OECD Investment Programme
MENA Co-chair (Morocco)
H.E. Mr. Mohamed EL OUAFA
Minister delegate to the Head
of Government in charge of
General Affairs and Governance
OECD Co-chair (Sweden)
H.E. Mr. Anders AHNLID
Ambassador, Delegation of
Sweden to the OECD
Steering Group
Regional partners
A. Investment Theme
D. Business Integrity
Theme
Strengthening Integrity in
Business Network
Corporate Governance
Networks
Responsible Business
Conduct Network
Regional
Representations
• Islamic Development
Bank
• League of Arab States
• Gulf Co-operation Council
• Arab Monetary Fund
WG on Investment Policies &
Promotion (Chairs:
Jordan, Japan)
DP Investment Policies Action
Plans
ISMED project
International partners
B. SME Policy Theme
Regional Networks
WG on SME
Policy, Entrepreneurship
& Human Capital
Development (Chairs:
Tunisia, Italy)
DP SME Action Plans
C. Women in the Economy
Theme
Women Business Forum (Chairs:
Jordan, Sweden)
Supporting Women as Economic
Actors Network
20
Task Forces and
Networks
• UNDP, UNIDO &
UNIFEM
• European Commission
• World Bank Group
(MIGA & IFC)
• Centre for International
Private Enterprise (CIPE)
• International Labour
Organization
• International
Development Research
Centre (IDRC)
20
21. Financials: MENA-OECD Investment Programme
2012
General Programme Fund
Czech Republic
Japan
Sweden
Spain
Turkey
TOTAL General Programme Fund
Project related contributions
United States - Iraq Project
Sweden Iraq
EC Egypt BCDR
Siemens
UK - FCO - Business Integrity
Sweden - Women
EC ISMED
France - ISMED
EC SME project
Sweden - WOMEN
IMF/CEF - Kuwait
Transition Fund - SME Libya
TOTAL Project related contributions
Expected contributions
Japan
USAID - Competitiveness Working Group
TOTAL Expected Contributions
TOTAL Voluntary Contributions
10,000
100,000
1,967,080
225,000
70,000
2,372,080
1,000,000
72,750
210,000
86,930
59,816
249,930
80,000
1,759,426
0
4,131,506
21
2013
2014
2015
85,000
983,540
983,541
983,541
35,000
1,103,540
35,000
1,018,541
35,000
1,018,541
2,075,764
1,122,384
372,000
1,009,336
24,250
170,000
999,705
50,000
330,000
333,333
21,000
314,779
3,624,403
249,925
190,000
333,333
333,333
629,557
3,478,579
629,557
2,085,274
80,000
334,000
334,000
5,061,943
80,000
334,000
414,000
4,911,120
80,000
3,183,815
Editor's Notes
Lebanon’s economy has been hit hard, and sectarian tensions have increased The number of Syrian refugees in Lebanon has exceeded [723] thousand or [18] percent of Lebanon’s population; The cost of refugees is straining Lebanon’s public finances due to rising healthcare, education, and security costs; Real GDP growth is estimated to have declined from 8 percent on average during 2009-10 to 1.5 percent in 2012, partly due to a sharp decline in tourism and related industries.Although bilateral trade accounted for only 6‒9 percent of Lebanon’s exports of goods and services prior to the conflict, transit trade and tourism from and to Lebanon through Syria were reportedly substantial and have been seriously impacted by the conflict. The number of tourists to Lebanon declined by 32 percent in 2012 compared to its 2009-10 average. Furthermore, deposit growth has moderated to about 8 percent annually in 2013 from 18 percent on average during 2009-10, while FDI inflows are estimated at about 7 percent of GDP in 2012, down from 12.7 percent on average during 2009-10.Lebanese banks have contained their direct exposure to Syria, halving these exposures and increasing provisions. The Syrian conflict has increased the sectarian divide in Lebanon and is contributing to difficulties in forming a new government.The crisis is straining Jordan’s social, economic, and fiscal conditions Jordan is hosting [520] thousand refugees, equivalent to 8 percent of Jordan’s population. The refugees have presented Jordan with additional fiscal pressure of 0.7 percent of GDP in 2012, mostly in education, health, and security outlays; Due to increased demand by refugees, rents and housing prices rose and the labor market is strained, exacerbating the already-high unemployment rate; The crisis disrupted transit trade through Syria—although Jordan’s diversified trade channels have mitigated the impact; FDI inflows declined from an average of 8 percent of GDP in 2009-10 to an estimated 4.5 percent in 2012; Tourism income recovered partially in 2012 to 11 percent of GDP, but it was still below the pre-crisis average level of 13 percent during 2009-10.Iraq’s security conditions and trade with Syria have been severely affected: With the escalation of violence in Syria, the security situation deteriorated dramatically in Iraq, leading to a steep increase in casualties; Syrian imports to Iraq fell to less than 1 percent of total imports, down from 15-20 percent pre-war; The influx of Syrian refugees to Iraq, constituting less than 1 percent of Iraq’s population at end-August 2013, is accelerating, particularly from the Kurdistan region of Syria, posing challenges to the already strained public services.
The possibilities of many governments to increase public services with the objective to improve living standards are restrained by large fiscal deficits (see Figure 6). Deficits have been increasing to unsustainable levels due to rising public expenditures for wages, pensions and the costs of imported and heavily subsidized fuel commodities and - in a few countries - increased interest expenditures. Along with increasing public expenditures, decreasing public revenues added to the fiscal deficit. Lower revenues are related to the economic weakness and an unfavourable tax system . The rising fiscal deficits and overall debt ratio raised concerns about fiscal sustainability in many transition countries. The following lower sovereign credit ratings further reduced the access to the international capital market and much required external exchanges. As a result of the inability to access external funds, governments rely more on the domestic capital market, with negative impacts on the private sector. The additional sovereign bonds increases banks’ sovereign risks and in face of low saving rates might crowd in several countries might crowd out private sector borrowings. World Bank (2013) Middle East and North Africa - Investing in Turbulent Times
Inclusive growth is an multi-dimensional approach that seeks to ensure that the benefits of economic growth is shared more evenly across the society - among different income groups, regions and economic sectors - ultimately improving living standards and outcomes that matter for people’s quality of life. Growth rates in the MENA region were and are too low to reduce unemployment and further decreased from close to 6 per cent in 2010 to 2.2 per cent in 2013 (see Figure 3). Growth has been adversely affected by the political and social instability, a lack of institutional capacities and a challenging global environment, especially the economic crisis in Europe, the main export market for many North African countries. Growth in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries is expected to slow to 4.2 per cent but remain the strongest in the region, whereas economic growth in oil importing countries will slightly increase to 2.9 per cent. Growth rates in Egypt decreased from 2.2 per cent in 2012 to 1.8 per cent in 2013 owing largely to an increasing political instability. Libya is the only transition country, experiencing a negative growth of -2.0 per cent in 2013. Whereas, Morocco achieved with 5.1 per cent a growth rate similar to the average level of the decade preceding 2010. The main driver of growth has been an increase in agricultural production, a strong performing tourism sector and relatively stable economic and political conditions.World Bank (2013) Middle East and North Africa - Investing in Turbulent TimesOil-importing countries: Egypt, Tunisia, Djibouti, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, West Bank & GazaTransition countries under the Deauville Partnership are: Egypt, Libya, Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia and Yemen. Growth vs. job strategy
Unemployment remains high in many MENA countries, with the exception of the GCC countries. In Egypt and Tunisia, unemployment increased in 2011 by 2.7 and 5.3 percentage points respectively.MENA has a 27.9% youth unemployment rate, which is the highest in the world; in 2012the global average was 12.6%. 2The female labour force participation rate is the lowest in the world at 25%, compared to 60% for OECD countries. Outlook: Expansion of the labour force will add to the pressure to create jobs. According to World Bank estimates, the MENA region needs to create at least 50 – 75 million jobs over the next decade, which would require economic growth of 6.5% in resource-poor countries.1