2. Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the electrode placement during
experimentation. A TCRE and CDE were attached to the O2’ and O2
regions (where the signals were collected from), the reference to the
mastoid process, and the ground to the forehead. After preampfification,
the TCRE is amplified and transmitted to the computer via Grass Aura
LTM64. Signals are displayed and recorded with Grass Technologies TWin
software.
C. Experimental Procedure
Impedances, between the TCRE elements, and to the
reference, were measured using an impedance meter.
Subjects were seated in a comfortable chair and were then
asked to open and close their eyes alternately every 15
seconds to determine if alpha waves appeared.
D. Signal Acquisition and Processing
The TCRE was connected to the custom built
preamplifier (gain = 48, high-pass = 0.5 Hz) and the outputs
connected to the Aura LTM64 amplifier (Grass
Technologies) for further amplification and digitization. The
rest of the electrodes were also connected to the Aura
LTM64. The signals were acquired and displayed with
TWin (Grass Technologies) running on a laptop computer at
1600 samples per second and 1 to 100 Hz bandwidth with
the 60 Hz notch filter active. The custom TCRE interface
combines two differential signal pairs from the TCRE as
described previously by Besio [6]:
16*(M-D) – (O-D), where M, D, and O are the potentials on
the middle, central disc, and outer TCRE elements,
respectively. To summarize, the algorithm is two-
dimensional and weights the middle ring and central disc
difference 16 times greater than the otuer ring and central
disc difference.
III. RESULTS
The average impedances of the 10 mm TCRE were lower
than the average impedances of the 6.0 mm and the 4.0 mm
(Table 1.). Alpha waves are neural oscillations in the
frequency range of 7.5-12.5 Hz arising from synchronous
and coherent (in phase) electrical activity of the human
thalamus.
Table 1. Impedence Recordings
Avr
1cm
Sd
1cm
Avr
6mm
Sd
6mm
Avr
4mm
Sd
4mm
Reference-outer 6.22 1.66 17.84 4.47 18.11 3.19
Reference-middle 6.42 1.54 19.84 4.15 8.83 2.42
Reference-disc 6.69 1.96 7.74 1.78 11.52 3.38
Outer-disc 1.51 .327 14.91 8.34 19.41 8.59
Outer-middle 1.12 .51 12.17 5.42 14.36 6.06
Disc-middle 1.46 .496 14.08 8.84 12.74 2.91
* Units in kilo-ohms. Average impedances and standard deviation.
IV. DISCUSSION
Alpha waves from the TCREs were detected when the 10
0m electrode was used and coincided with the CDE EEG
alpha waves. This demonstrates that the Signa gel is not
overly conductive and that the custom TCRE interface is
sensitive enough to see the brain signals. Alpha waves
detected from the 6.0 and 4.0 mm TCREs were not as
consistent with the CRE EEG. This may be due to
connecting the 6.0 and 4.0 mm TCREs to the TCRE interface
with alligator clips which are very noisy.
V. CONCLUSION
We found that the 10 mm TCRE worked very well with
Signa gel recording alpha waves. Further work must be
performed to determine why the 6 mm and the 4mm were
inconsistent.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank all of our volunteers for helping us
acquire the data.
REFERENCES
[1] F. Babiloni, C. Babiloni, L. Fattorini, F. Carducci, P. Onorati, and A.
Urbano, “Performances of surface Laplacian estimators: a study of
simulated and real scalp potential distributions,” Brain Topogr., vol.
8, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 1995.
[2] T. Gasser, L. Sroka, and J. Möcks, “The transfer of EOG activity into
the EEG for eyes open and closed,” Electroencephalogr. Clin.
Neurophysiol., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 181–193, 1985.
[3] T. Gasser, L. Sroka, and J. Möcks, “The correction of EOG artifacts
by frequency dependent and frequency independent methods,”
Psychophysiology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 704–712, 1986.
[4] S. K. Law, P. L. Nunez, and R. S. Wijesinghe, “High-resolution EEG
using spline generated surface Laplacians on spherical and ellipsoidal
surfaces,” Biomed. Eng. Ieee Trans., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 145–153,
1993.
[5] P. L. Nunez, R. B. Silberstein, P. J. Cadusch, R. S. Wijesinghe, A. F.
Westdorp, and R. Srinivasan, “A theoretical and experimental study
of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacians and cortical
imaging,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 90, no. 1, pp.
40–57, 1994.
[6] W. Besio, K. Koka, R. Aakula, and W. Dai, “Tri-polar concentric
electrode development for high resolution EEG Laplacian electroen-
cephalography using tri-polar concentric ring electrodes,” IEEE
Trans.Biomed. Eng., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 926–933, May 2006.
[7] W. Besio, R. Aakula, K. Koka, and W. W. Dai, “Development of
tripolar concentric ring electrode for acquiring accurate Laplacian
bodysurface potentials,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 426–
435, Mar. 2006.
[8] K. Koka and W. Besio, “Improvement of spatial selectivity and
decrease of mutual information of tri-polar concentric ring
electrodes,”J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 165, pp. 216–222, Sep. 2007.