Presentation explains briefly about the various practices which need to be employed in order to achieve good results

1. ©ZeusNumerix
Defense | Nuclear Power | Aerospace | Infrastructure | Industry
Practices to be followed to get
reasonable results
Abhishek Jain
abhishek@zeusnumerix.com
Best Practices

2. ©ZeusNumerix
2
Overview
 Zeus Numerix: Introduction
 Assumption
 What is a Best Practice
 Surface Grid
 Volume Grid
 Sample Problems
 Pressure Drop
 Skin Friction
 Heat driven flows
 Initial and Boundary Conditions
 General Gyan

3. ©ZeusNumerix
Assumption
 Participants know what CFD is about
 Know the basics of Compressible and Incompressible flow
 Know what are Initial Conditions and Boundary Conditions
 Know about Meshes
 Surface Mesh
 Volume Mesh
 Clustering
 Smoothening
 Have basic idea of Fluid Mechanics
3

4. ©ZeusNumerix
Best Practices
 Best Practice is a misnomer
 It should be good practices
 Before touching computer know
 Problem statement
 Aim of the problem
 Accuracy required
 Computing power available
 No blind trust on the software
 Validation
 http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/tutorial/glossar
y.html (a must read for all)
4

5. ©ZeusNumerix
GRID GENERATION
Rules to be followed in grid generation
5

6. ©ZeusNumerix
Grid Generation Essentials
 Knowledge of Physics is essential
 Grid for pressure drop estimation is very different from heat
flux estimation
 Accuracy required should be understood
 Preliminary design calculations or design improvement
 Very accurate may not be cost effective
 Will the grid be moving, if yes where
 Parameters that may be changed in design
 Good grid is half CFD done
 Bad grid is full CFD repeated
6

7. ©ZeusNumerix
Grid contd…
 What size of mesh is good mesh size
 For any new problem or new software grid convergence has
to be repeated
 Recipe for failing
 This software is well established, it will work
 Physics may be different but this software works
 Automatic mesh will be good
 Grid read by solver so it must be OK
 Make a large mesh and coarsen it, till you get 2 meshes
with reasonably identical results
7

8. ©ZeusNumerix
Grid contd…
 Always smoothen a grid before doing any other operation
 A grid parallel and perpendicular to the flow is the best grid
 Clustering must never precede smoothening
 More clustering makes convergence slower
 Less clustering does not resolve flow features
 5-10 grid points in boundary layer based on Reynolds
number
 Refinement of grid at sharp corners, bends and locations
where shocks are expected
 Check – Skewness, smoothness and aspect ratio
8

9. ©ZeusNumerix
Grid contd…
 Coordination with solver
 Velocity regime
 Euler, Laminar or Turbulent flow
 Which turbulent model
 Proper labeling and boundary conditions
 What BCs are required
 Proper labels to various components
 Units must be specified when grid is made
 If not made in SI units, COMMUNICATE
9

10. ©ZeusNumerix
SIMPLE PROBLEMS
Problems requiring less accuracy and attention
10

11. ©ZeusNumerix
Problem Types
 Problem desiring less accuracy
 Pressure drop across regions
 Supersonic flow – lift estimation
 Preliminary design calculations
 Design of low cost mechanical equipment
 High rise buildings
 Ventilation of huge spaces
 These problems require only estimation of gross number
 Spatial resolution of physical properties may not be
accurate, however gross properties are reasonably accurate
11

12. ©ZeusNumerix
Case Study: High Rise
 Aim 1: Estimation of wind loads on a high rise building
 Aim 2: Estimation of discomfort due to air flow on balconies
 Data required
 Building drawings – usually given in 2D format
 Wind data – Collection of data of metrology dept
 Data on nearby buildings
 Comfort data
 Step 1: Selection of number of simulation
 Select severest wind conditions for three seasons
 Also select any other worst case scenario as seen in the
metrology table
12

13. ©ZeusNumerix
CFD of Buildings
 Input is received in format as shown below
 Convert the format to 3D using Revit® or other tools
 Remove features that are small compared to the building
size like grill, ventilators, balcony designs and make them
flat
13
Buildingisusuallyrepresentedin
AutoCAD®format

14. ©ZeusNumerix
Meshes
 Shown are meshes and cleaned building model as seen by
CFD
 Mesh very coarse even near wall
 Good mesh = billions of cells 
14

15. ©ZeusNumerix
Simulation Table
 Following Simulations are selected from the Metrology data
 Data measured near Colaba by Metrology dept
 Site near the sea hence relative humidity is high
 Ground Boundary layer is approximated when performing
simulation
15
North-WestWestNorth-WestEastWind Direction
43.264.825.227Wind Speed (Kmph)
70877570Relative Humidity
37.434.842.236.2Temperature (C)
NovemberJulyAprilJanuary

16. ©ZeusNumerix
Results
 Load on the whole building is integrated by adding
individual forces on surface cells
 Major focus is given on the vortices formed in the buildings
16

17. ©ZeusNumerix
Results
 Vortices formed near NW apartments will be uncomfortable
 Construction of small structures suggested to suppress
them
17
Vortices

18. ©ZeusNumerix
ACCURACY MEDIUM
Problems requiring care in making mesh and simulation
18

19. ©ZeusNumerix
Problem Types
 Problem desiring higher accuracy
 Flow around automobiles
 Flow around aircraft and missiles
 Flow in process industry – cyclone separator, piping, ducts
 These problems require only estimation of properties at
specific locations with reasonable accuracy
 Grid generation requires attention
19

20. ©ZeusNumerix
Case Study: Flow Past Automobile
 Aim 1: Estimation of aerodynamic forces on an automobile
 Aim 2: Estimation of discomfort due to dust ingress
 Data required
 IGES file of the automobile
 Wind Conditions for the problem
 Step 1: Cleaning of CAD data
 Remove the components that are small in size
 Close the gaps of handle, doors
 Assumptions
 Tyre rotation effect is not modeled
 Dust as particles is not modeled
20

21. ©ZeusNumerix
CFD of Automobile
 Input is received in format as shown below
 Remove features that are small compared to the vehicle
size like grill, door handle , headlight protrusions etc
21
CADDrawingofanSUV
Withallfeatures
15000components

22. ©ZeusNumerix
Grid Generation
 CAD is cleaned to remove surfaces not exposed to
aerodynamics or insignificant surfaces
 Surface is divided into patches for generation of hex grid
 Clustering done to fraction of mm to capture boundary layer
22
Domain of Analysis for MUV
MUV Surface
MUV Block Surface

23. ©ZeusNumerix
Grid
 View showing clustered grid at the surface
23
Grid density is
high near vehicle
surface

24. ©ZeusNumerix
Results
 Streamlines are important; seeds are correct locations
 Dust ingress will be known by streamlines curving inside
24
Path lines seen to
point inward

25. ©ZeusNumerix
Iso-surfaces
 Zero axial velocity on green surfaces
25
Iso-surfaces shown
by Green

26. ©ZeusNumerix
ACCURACY HIGH
Problems to be attempted by experienced personnel
26

27. ©ZeusNumerix
Problem Types
 Problem desiring highest accuracy
 Aerothermal considerations in high speed flow
 Heat driven flows
 Reactive flows
 Turbomachinery (rotating flows)
 These problems require estimation of properties accurately
to serve the aim of simulation
 Grid generation requires high degree of care as the
simulations are very sensitive
27

28. ©ZeusNumerix
Heat Flux
 Aim 1: Estimation of heat flux of a missile
 Aim 2: Estimation of aerodynamic coefficients
 Data required
 IGES file of the missile
 Atmospheric Conditions for the problem
 Isothermal temperature of the wall
 Step 1: Cleaning of CAD data
 Remove the components that are small in size
 Close the gaps of missile and fins etc
 Assumptions
 Air remains calorifically perfect
28

29. ©ZeusNumerix
Grid Generation
 Surface grid chosen after extensive analysis
 Requirement of y+ is within bounds of 1-5 at all places
 Since the flow is very high speed, first cell distance has to
be 1 micron from the surface for the given mach number
 VALIDATION is a must before attempting these problems
29
Comparisonofresultsfor
variousmeshes.151and201
havesameresults

30. ©ZeusNumerix
Results
 Variation of y+ on the surface
 Variation of heat flux on the surface
 * Heating more in wing than nose
30
Mach Number
variation
High
Low
High heat flux regions
Heat Flux
Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence
Model, HLLC Scheme
y+ range 1-5 at all places

31. ©ZeusNumerix
INITIAL & BOUNDARY
CONDITION
Importance of putting conditions for correct results
31

32. ©ZeusNumerix
Initial Conditions
 It is a wrong assumption that whatever conditions you give
flow will finally converge to a correct solution
 Sometimes wrong initial condition may have a physical
meaning
 Constant Initial Conditions throughout the domain may not
work always
 Most obvious initial conditions may not be the fit for certain
solvers
32

33. ©ZeusNumerix
Example
 Consider a case of supersonic CD nozzle with the three ICs
 Flow at zero velocity inside domain
 Flow supersonic everywhere
 Flow supersonic in converging section and gradually decreased
to subsonic till the exit
 The representation physically
 Flow shock will enter inside and form a normal shock and
subsequent flow will be subsonic throughout
 Flow has been made supersonic everywhere by use for
external machines
 Flow has been made supersonic and now exiting in
atmosphere
33

34. ©ZeusNumerix
Boundary Conditions
 A pressure and velocity boundary is not the same as mass
flow boundary for incompressible flow
 Signal traveling backward may change mass flow rate
 Farfield and outlet are not the same for compressible flow
 Farfield means waves are not affected by flow
 Isothermal wall is significantly different than adiabatic,
default expression is adiabatic wall
34

35. ©ZeusNumerix
General
 Better to use standard format like CGNS for interoperability
 Research says lot of time wasted in converting file formats
 Aim not written at the beginning is a sure recipe for
disaster
 Solution should be doable in reasonable cost
 Try to arrange a computer that can handle the problem
instead of taking shortcuts and solving on existing resource
 CDAC gives good access to computing power for academics
 Make a checklist of activities if same type of problem may
come all the time
 Usually engineers make a mistake in routine simulations due
to over confidence
 More engineers doesn’t mean faster results; reverse
possible
35

36. ©ZeusNumerix
Thank You!
3 November 2014 36

37. ©ZeusNumerix
Questions?