CO2 Emissions from Land Transport in India: Scenarios of the Uncertain - Presentation Transcript
CO2 Emissions from Land Transport in India Scenarios of the Uncertain Lee Schipper, Ph.D. Global Metro Studies, UC Berkeley Precourt Institute, Stanford University with Ipsita Banerjee Dept of Civil Engineering Wei-Shiuen Ng Consultant Sponsored by the Japan International Transport Institute
Motorization in India: How Fast or Slow?
Background
The Scenarios
Profound Data Problems
Results
Comparison of Input Assumptions
Comparison of Output Results
Discussion – What Scenarios Can Show Us
Lessons and Opportunities for Clean Transport in India
SCHIPPER ADB June 2008
Transport in India?
Asia: lumbering into modernity SCHIPPER ADB June 2008
Cheap Two Wheelers, but No Sidewalks The Peoples’ Car: Which People?
India Motorization Project
Background
EMBARQ , the World Resources Institute (WRI) Center for Sustainable Transport was approached by the Japan International Transport Institute (JITI) in early 2006 to review India’s motorization trends and challenges, and to suggest what policies and measures should be implemented to reduce transport CO 2 emissions.
This project is one of four other country studies, consisting of China, Japan and the United States (US), all supported by JITI.
A set of scenarios were developed, together with S. Menon, then of the World Bank, for future Indian urban road passenger transport in 2020 and 2030, where different assumptions are made for modal shares in each scenario.
Each scenario illustrates energy use and CO 2 emissions for 2010, 2020 and 2030.
India Motorization Project
Objective
This project aims to illustrate local criteria pollutant and CO 2 emissions from India’s growing transport sector using available reliable data, and to provide policies and measures that will prevent future undesirable consequences of motorization.
Focus on CO 2 at the national level
Goal is not to tell India what to do, rather to provide a tool to measure consequences of India’s choices
Scenarios for India
Illustrate and Quantify a World We Can’t See.. Yet
Reasonable estimates for “present values”
Growth in motorization on nearby example -- Korea
Convergence with many other studies in the base case
Quantitative Assumption-Driven Outputs
Vehicles, vehicle distances, fuel consumption
Impacts of alternative fuels
Total CO 2 emissions
Qualitative Results
Flesh and bones on the base case
Illustration of impact of “fuel efficiency” on total fuel use
Illustration of how a “livable cities” scenario might play out
BASIS OF APPROACH The ASIF Decomposition for Fuel and Emissions http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2000/flex2000.pdf Key Data Work by S. Menon, then World Bank
EMBARQ ’s Scenarios for India: Serious Data Problems Remain
Careful Literature Search
Assessment of meager data sources
Main published works on long-term trends in transport and energy use
Careful analysis of emission factor data
Discussions with Indian Experts
Approach authors of main studies (TERI, IIT Kanpur, etc)
Exchange of experience estimating emission factors
Pass-km “Data” from Central Govt. – very incomplete
Own Attempts – Consensus Picture
Manipulate vehicles, distances, fuel intensities
Find combinations that multiply up to give “actual” fuel use
Make plausible assumptions on emissions
Motorization Scenarios for India: S. Menon/ EMBARQ ’s Approach to Uncertainty
How Many Motor Vehicles in India?
Registration is one time; active stock uncertain
Among cars, share of household vs state/company cars and taxis unknown
Two wheeler stock even less well known
Human and Vehicle Activity and Travel
Vehicle usage and NMT data poor at national level
Many good city surveys, but none at national level
Pass-km “Data” from Central Govt. – very incomplete
Fuel Use
Until 1995/6, no official data on road diesel use
Use of diesel by cars, gasoline by both cars and two wheelers adds big layer of uncertainty
Fuel adulteration makes “official” data uncertain
Motorization Scenarios for India: S. Menon/ EMBARQ ’s Assumptions
Motor Vehicles and Activity
Active car, two-wheeler stock perhaps 2/3 of registrations
Yearly usage of private cars low -- 7500 km/year
Large vehicle usage from various data sources
Human and Vehicle Activity and Travel
Large share of urban bus, intercity bus/rail
Assume load factors to get car travel
Fuel Use and Fuel Intensity (fuel/km)
Car, two-wheeler fuel intensity from literature
Some information on heavy vehicles
Best estimates of possible improvements
EMBARQ ’s Scenarios for India: Why Do the Data Matter?
Future of Road Transport Depend on the Numbers
How much room is there on the roads?
How much could car/two wheeler use grow?
Is a transit plus 2/3-wheeler based system thinkable?
Fuel Use In India – Quantitative Issues
What is the quantitative scope for savings, substitution?
Local emissions -- where are emerging clean-fuels markets?
Transport as a constraint on fuel-use growth?
Restraining Growth in Fuel Demand
Impact of higher fuel prices important, but unknown
Will mini-cars save fuel and space or just explode demand?
Can advanced technology (hybrid cars, buses) matter?
The Five India Transport Scenarios
Business as usual (BAU)
Energy efficiency
Clean two and three wheelers
Sustainable cities/Urban Transport (SUT)
Extra Effort (#2 + #4)
Evaluation of scenario results,
particularly how overall mobility affects
fuel demand and CO 2 emissions.
Baseline Scenario
Using a consensus of forecasts for population and GDP development, with Korea as a marker to measure motorization (cars/capita) as a function of GDP/capita
Unconstrained development of road traffic and demand, driven by a booming economy and population growth, using extrapolation (and regardless of whether realistic)
Vehicle growth will be unconstrained and no new fuel taxes are assumed, including other fiscal constraints
The scenario will assume that energy, infrastructure and financial constraints do not hinder expansion of transport activities
Energy Efficiency
Reflects a policy focus aimed at oil saving and renewable fuels in all transport modes, in a world driven by energy security concerns
Higher fuel prices and taxes – Japanese level?
Estimates of vehicle fuel economy, fuel use, and the impact of fuel prices on substitution between two wheelers and buses to show a range of fuel and CO 2 savings that this path could bring about. Includes significant “1 lakh cars”.
Clean Two and Three Wheelers Inspiration from Viet Nam
Reflects a mobility scenario based on small, clean vehicles and stronger mass transit
Recognizes the obvious difficulty India has building a car-friendly world, yet also recognizes that individual mobility cannot be contained, hence the push for clean, small vehicles
Accelerates trend towards cleaner fuels and motors in Indian two and three-wheelers
Four-wheeled cars fade as the promise for individual mobility in India, a situation aided by high taxes based on car power and size
Sustainable Cities and Sustainable Urban Transport (SUT)
Serious traffic congestion conditions in first three scenarios present a physical constraint that could decrease motor vehicle use and subsequently carbon emissions
This fourth scenario reflects “prescient” policies aimed at avoiding or lifting urban infrastructure constraints through strong demand management and modern mass transit as the backbone of clean mobility – JNURM
Urban bus and rail successfully rejuvenated to reduce two, three wheelers transport mode shares, but these modes (and NMT) feed mass transit
Strong land-use and transport policy initiatives required to contain sprawl and need to travel
Extra Effort: Efficiency + Sustainable Urban Transport (SUT)
Strong land-use and transport policy initiatives required to contain sprawl and need to travel – large, fast and powerful cars have little utility in such a setting
Large cars lose their share to mini cars like Nano because of high fuel taxes and congestion charges
Strong urban transport policies make driving and parking a normal car much more expensive than a mini car
Two, Three and Four-Mini vehicles useful for connecting to a strong transit grid.
Mini cars pass from being small to being efficient
Basic Driving Factors: GDP, Population
Vehicles Per Thousand People by Type
Per Capita Travel by Transport Mode Passenger-km per capita
Fuel Economy in BAU and EE Scenarios (1 mj/veh-km = 3.15 l/100 km = 80 gm/km)
Fuel Use By Mode and Fuel ( 1 EJ = 22.5 mtoe )
Total Fuel Use By Mode
Per Capita Fuel Use by Transport Mode (US 50 GJ; EU GJ/cap )
India: CO 2 Emissions by Transport Mode
Results: Some Comments
BAU -- Simple Extrapolation Realistic?
Huge energy use by 2030
Realistic? Compare China and Korea
Self-consistent? Oil demands in India, China push up oil price
Fuel Efficiency (Japanese fuel prices)
Modest improvements along slow energy growth
Much more possible – mini cars, hybrids
Bio-diesel, ethanol could restrain CO 2 further
Clean Two-three wheeler (policies)
Small vehicles as basis for low-energy transport?
Many infrastructure changes required now
Experience in Hanoi suggests 2-wheeler world possible
Sustainable Urban transport (strong policies)
Requires huge change in direction of urban transport
Requires huge change in treatment of NMT
Above all, requires move away from individual vehicle
Nano or Nono in Extra Effort? Opportunity or Threat
Mini Cars – Step up for 2 wheels?
Small and fuel economic, not necessarily fuel efficient
Have been around for a long time in Japan, even EU
Could be powered on any source (except hot air)
The Broader Context -
Urban streets clogged, urban air polluted
Urban transit systems (where they exist) under siege
Majority of travelers “outdoors” –at risk to accidents, bad air
Strong Urban Transport Policies
Charge for congestion and parking by vehicle size
Greater priority to non-motorized requires slower motorized
Good transit grid offers opportunities to mini cars
Is Nano a Step Back from Large Cars or Step up from TW? Are Urban Authorities and Policies Ready?
Opportunities for CO 2 reduction? India Can Avoid Problems – but almost too late
Vehicle Side
Technology- safe, small cars
Vehicle Choice- size matters
Vehicle usage –SUT assumes congestion charges
Fuel Side
Bio-diesel and alcohols have some promise, but ??
CNG lends savings, but India not a gas producer
Fuel cells or methanol from coal + sequestration???
Transport Policy Side: Best Bet
Long term look with options analyses, land use
Greatly improved urban bus systems/BRT
Metro only where income, pop. density justifies
Humble Policy Suggestions: Its Already Bad: Need it get Worse?
Urban Transport Policies First
Sidewalks and NMT lanes, access to transit
Exclusive lanes for 2Wheelers and Transit
Congestion and parking fees based on footprint?
Fuel Economy Standards in Context
Keep cars, small, efficient, and clean
Small may give more choices for non-oil
Must raise diesel to parity, raise all fuel prices
Don’t Forget Development Policies
Development must not ignore non-motorized
Improve in-town access before boosting out of town “campuses”
Create greater integration between three-wheelers and large transit
Conclusion Not Emitting in First Place Easier than Changing
If No Interventions
Urban transport itself headed for collapse
Little relief from flyover farms or metro mania
Once problems become recognized, its too late
Modest Interventions
Fuel efficiency has impact on CO 2 , but not transport
Air pollution can be reduce nevertheless
Aggressive Interventions Now!
Serious Urban Transport: Priority to buses, NMT
Taxes on car ownership and use, fuel consumptin
Strong fuel economy standards
National and Local Govt., Indian Supreme Court, NGOs, etc all b Could Bring Pressure to Bear to Force Strong Interventions
Thank You Lee Schipper [email_address] [email_address]
By Lee Schipper, Global Metro Studies, UC Berkeley more
By Lee Schipper, Global Metro Studies, UC Berkeley, Precourt Institute, Stanford University; and Ipsita Banerjee, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Wei-Shiuen Ng, Consultant. Sponsored by the Japan International Transport Institute less
0 comments
Post a comment