Did angelina jolie have breast reduction brca gene breast cancer scheme billions

2,563 views
2,503 views

Published on

You may be wondering “Did Angelina Jolie Have Breast Reduction” ?
You can say thanks next to you see Angelina Jolie for keeping the wool pulled over the eyes of women everywhere while selling out to for-profit, monopolistic, corporate interests that incessantly seek to exploit women for profit.

There’s more to this story than just the patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Angelina Jolie is also using blatantly misleading statistics to terrify women into thinking their breasts might kill them.

Yet thanks to people like Jolie and the fear-mongering mainstream media, women all across the nation have been terrified into believing their breasts might kill them and the best way to handle the problem is to cut them off!

This, my friends, is the essence of doomsday fear mongering. This issue affects less than one-tenth of one percent of women but is being riled up into a nationwide fear campaign that just happens to feed profits into the for-profit cancer diagnosis and treatment industry, not to mention the monopolistic human gene patenting cartels.

That’s the real story of what’s happening here. Don’t expect to read this in the New York Times.

OK Back to the Story Did Angelina Jolie Have Breast Reduction ?
Angelina Jolie’s announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent, spontaneous, “heroic choice” that has been portrayed in the mainstream media.

I just learned it all coincides with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.

This is the investigation the mainstream media refuses to touch.

Here, I explain the corporate financial ties, investors, mergers, human gene patents, lawsuits, medical fear mongering and the trillions of dollars that are at stake here.

If you pull back the curtain on this one, you find far more than an innocent looking woman exercising a “choice.”

This is about protecting trillions in profits through the deployment of carefully-crafted public relations campaigns designed to manipulate the public opinion of women.

The signs were all there from the beginning of the scheme: Angelina Jolie’s highly polished and obviously corporate-written op-ed piece at the New York Times, the carefully-crafted talking points invoking “choice” as a politically-charged keyword, and the obvious coaching of even her husband Brad Pitt who carefully describes the entire experience using words like “stronger” and “pride” and “family.”

But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie’s seemingly spontaneous announcement magically appeared on the cover of People Magazine this week — a magazine that is usually finalized for publication three weeks before it appears on newsstands.

Tags: Angelina's Jolie's announcement, BRCA, brca ethnicity, b

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,563
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Did angelina jolie have breast reduction brca gene breast cancer scheme billions

  1. 1. http://www.empowernetwork.com/awesomeleads/blog/did-angelina-jolie-have-breast-reduction-brca-gene-breast-cancer-scheme-billions/May 17, 2013Did Angelina Jolie Have Breast Reduction ? | BRCA GeneBreast Cancer Scheme BillionsYou may be wondering “Did Angelina Jolie Have Breast Reduction” ?You can say thanks next to you see Angelina Jolie for keeping the wool pulled over the eyes ofwomen everywhere while selling out to for-profit, monopolistic, corporate interests thatincessantly seek to exploit women for profit.There’s more to this story than just the patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Angelina Jolie isalso usingblatantly misleading statistics to terrify women into thinking their breasts might kill them.Yet thanks to people like Jolie and thefear-mongering mainstream media,women all across the nation have beenterrified into believing their breasts mightkill them and the best way to handle theproblem is to cut them off!This, my friends, is the essence ofdoomsday fear mongering. This issueaffects less than one-tenth of onepercent of women but is being riled upinto a nationwide fear campaign thatjust happens to feed profits into the for-profit cancer diagnosis and treatmentindustry, not to mention themonopolistic human gene patentingcartels.That’s the real story of what’shappening here. Don’t expect to readthis in the New York Times.OK Back to the Story DidAngelina Jolie Have BreastReduction ?Angelina Jolie’s announcement ofundergoing a double mastectomy(surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent,spontaneous, “heroic choice” that has been portrayed in the mainstream media.I just learned it all coincides with a well-timedfor-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide
  2. 2. with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.This is the investigation the mainstream media refuses to touch.Here, I explain the corporate financial ties, investors, mergers, human gene patents, lawsuits,medical fear mongering and the trillions of dollars that are at stake here.If you pull back the curtain on this one, you find far more than an innocent looking womanexercising a “choice.”This is about protecting trillions in profits through the deployment of carefully-crafted publicrelations campaigns designed to manipulate the public opinion of women.The signs were all there from the beginning of the scheme: Angelina Jolie’s highly polished andobviously corporate-written op-ed piece at the New York Times, the carefully-crafted talkingpoints invoking “choice” as a politically-charged keyword, and the obvious coaching of even herhusband Brad Pitt who carefully describes the entire experience using words like “stronger” and“pride” and “family.”But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie’s seemingly spontaneous announcementmagically appeared on the cover of People Magazine this week — a magazine that is usuallyfinalized for publication three weeks before it appears on newsstands.That cover, not surprisingly, uses the same language found in the NYT op-ed piece: “HER BRAVECHOICE” and “This was the right thing to do.” The flowery, pro-choice language is not acoincidence.Are you starting to see Why This was a False Flag yet again…Angelina Jolie did not Have Breast Reduction! Why did we get Schemedinto this ?What this proves is that Angelina’s Jolie’s announcement wasa well-planned corporate P.R. campaign with carefully-crafted messages designed to influencepublic opinion. But what could Jolie be seeking to influence?…how about trillions of dollars in corporate profits?Upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision to rule on patent viability forBRCA1 gene in Favor of BRCA Gene Breast Cancer Scheme BillionsAngelina Jolie’s announcement and all its carefully-crafted language had four notable immediateimpacts:1) It caused women everywhere to be terrified of breast cancer through the publishing of falsestatistics that drove fear into the hearts of anyone with breasts. (See below for explanation.)2) It caused women to rush out and seek BRCA1 gene testing procedures. These tests justhappen to bepatented by a for-profit corporation called “Myriad Genetics.” Because of this patent, BRCA1 testscan cost $3,000 – $4,000 each. The testing alone is a multi-billion-dollar market, but only if the
  3. 3. patent is upheld in an upcoming Supreme Court decision (see below).3) It caused the stock price of MyriadGenetics (MYGN) to skyrocket to a 52-week high. “Myriad’s stock closed up 3%Tuesday, following the publication ofthe New York Times op-ed,”wrote Marketwatch.com.4) It drove public opinion to influence theupcoming U.S. Supreme Court decisionto rule in favor of corporate ownershipof human genes (see more below).Women all over the world are beingduped into supporting Angeline Joliewhen she never really had a BreastReduction, having no idea that whatshe’s really doing is selling out womento the for-profit cancer industry. But tofully understand what’s happening, you have to dig deeper…Myriad Genetics sees stock price skyrocket thanks to Jolie, andObamacare will funnel billions their way“Salt Lake City-based Myriad Genetics (MYGN) holds the patent on the test that determined theactress had an 87% chance of developing breast cancer, as well as the genes themselves,” wroteMarketWatch.com.And that’s only the beginning. If the U.S. Supreme Court can be influenced to uphold Myriad’spatent, it could mean a trillion-dollar industry over just the next few years. Even more, MyriadGenetics is reportedly “ripe for mergers” according to the financial press, because it’s part of thesuper-hot human genome industry.“The world’s largest maker of DNA testing and analysis tools, Life Technologies Corp. said that it isset to be acquired by Thermo Fisher Scientific for a record $13.6 billion,” writes MarketWatch.com.“A race that kicked into high gear more than 26 years ago is heating up, with foreign governmentsand corporations joining the U.S. in funding the quest to map all the human genomes. And even asthe recent flurry of mergers and acquisitions in the genomics space has spurred returns, investorsstill have opportunities to profit from this multibillion-dollar industry.”The higher Myriad’s stock price goes, the more profitable a merger becomes for its current owners.So Jolie’s P.R. stunt just happened to generate unknown millions of dollars in value for the verypeople who claim a patent monopoly over the breast cancer genes residing in the bodies ofwomen. Coincidence? Hardly.Obamacare mandates taxpayers pay for BRCA gene testing: yetanother government handout to wealthy corporationsBut here’s what’s even more crooked about all this: You know how Obama likes to talk “freemarket” but actually engages in so-called “crony capitalism” by handing out money to all hiscorporate buddies, Wall Street insiders and deep-pocketed campaign donors? Part of Obamacare
  4. 4. — the “Affordable Care Act” — mandates thattaxpayers pay for BRCA1 genetic testing!Myriad Genetics, in other words, stands to receive a full-scale windfall of profits mandated bygovernment and pushed into mainstream consciousness through a campaign of “medical terror”fronted by Angelina Jolie and the New York Times. Are you starting to see how this all fitstogether yet?This is all one bigcoordinated corporate sellout of women, and it’s all being hidden by playing the “women’s power”card and using “choice” language to more easily manipulate women. Angelina Jolie, remember, is akey spokesperson for the United Nations, an organization already caught engaged in child sexslavery and drug running. Although Jolie obviously isn’t engage in that sort of behavior, her job isto covertly influence American women into supporting a carefully-planned, plotted and executedcorporate profit campaign that turns women’s bodies into profits.Here’s why the Supreme Court decision puts trillions of dollars at stake…Details on the upcoming Supreme Court decision to Scheme BillionsThe ACLU and the Public Patent Foundation filed a lawsuit in 2009, challenging the corporateownership of human genes. Anyone who believes in women’s rights, human rights, civil rights oreven the right to eat non-GMO foods should immediately agree thatcorporations should NOT be able to patent human genes and then use those patents to rake inbillions of dollars in profits while stifling scientific research into those genes.A question to all women reading this: Do you believe a corporation in Utah owns your body? If not,you should be opposed to corporate ownership of human genes. It also means you should opposeAngelina Jolie’s P.R. campaign because although she’s running a brilliant public relations campaign,behind the scenes her actions are feeding potentially trillions of dollars of profits directly into thefor-profit human gene patenting industry that denies human beings ownership over their owngenetic code.The ACLU explains the basics of its lawsuit against Myriad Genetics as follows:On May 12, 2009, the ACLU and the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) filed a lawsuit chargingthat patents on two human genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer, BRCA1 and BRCA2,are unconstitutional and invalid. On November 30, 2012, the Supreme Court agreed to hearargument on the patentability of human genes. The ACLU argued the case before the U.S. SupremeCourt on April 15, 2013.We expect a decision this summer.On behalf of researchers, genetic counselors, women patients, cancer survivors, breast cancerand women’s health groups, and scientific associations representing 150,000 geneticists,pathologists, and laboratory professionals, we have argued that human genes cannot bepatented because they are classic products of nature. The suit charges that thegene patents violate the First Amendment and stifle diagnostic testing and research that couldlead to cures and that they limit women’s options regarding their medical care.
  5. 5. Got that? If the Supreme Court rules against Myriad Genetics, it will cause a multi-billion-dollarbreast cancer genetic testing industry to collapse virtually overnight. This means a huge loss fornot just Myriad, but also many other human gene corporations that wish to exploit the humanbody — including the bodies of women — for monopolistic profits. (All patents are government-granted monopolies.) Ultimately,trillions of dollars in corporate gene patents are at stake here.Patenting human genes is huge businessToday, about20 percent of your genes are already patented by corporations and universities. As the ACLUexplains, “A gene patent holder has the right to prevent anyone from studying, testing or evenlooking at a gene. As a result, scientific research and genetic testing has been delayed, limited oreven shut down due to concerns about gene patents.”This means that when corporations own patents on human genes, it stifles scientificresearch while granting that corporation a monopoly over the “intellectual property” encoded inyour own DNA! (How criminal is that? You decide…)What this means is that if the Supreme Court rules against Myriad, it would set a precedent thatwoulddismantle the entire human gene patenting industry, affecting trillions of dollars in future profits.This, I believe, is the real reason behind Angelina Jolie’s announcement. It seems designed toinvoke women’s emotional reactions and create a groundswell of support for corporate-ownedgenes, thereby handing these corporations a Supreme Court precedent that will ensure trillions infuture profits. It’s a for-profit PR stunt that tries to trick women into supporting a corporatesystem of patents and monopolies that claims, right now, to own portions of the bodies of everywoman living today.While most media outlets have no clue about the patent issues at stake here, the Detroit FreePress took notice, saying:“The Hollywood star’s decision to get tested for a breast cancer gene mutation, undergo a doublemastectomy and then write about it calls attention to a case now pending before the court. Thejustices have just weeks to decide if Myriad Genetics’ patent on the two genes that can identify anincreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer is legal. Critics complain that the company’s monopolyleaves them as the sole source of the $4,000 tests needed to determine each woman’s risk.”Lying with statistics: Jolie’s 87% risk exaggerationIn the NYT op-ed piece, Jolie claims her doctor told her she has an “87% risk” of developing breastcancer. But what she didn’t tell you is that this number doesn’t apply to the entire population: it’sactually old data derived almost exclusively from families that were previously documented tohave very high risks of breast cancer to begin with.A study published on the National Human Genome Research Institute website and conducted byscientists from the National Institutes of Health reveals that breast cancer risks associated withBRCA1 genes are significantly lower than what’s being hyped up by Jolie and the mainstreammedia.
  6. 6. In fact, in a large room of 600 women,only ONE will likely have a BRCA mutation in her genetic code. The actual incidence is 0.125 to 0.25out of 100 women, or 1 in 400 to 1 in 800. I used 600 as the average of 400 and 800.And out of that 1 in 600 women who has the mutation, her risk of breast cancer is only 56percent, not 78 percent as claimed by Jolie. But 13 percent of women without the BRCA mutationget breast cancer anyway, according to this scientific research, so the increased risk is just 43 outof 100 women.So what we’re really talking about here is 1 in 600 women having a BRCA gene mutation, then lessthan half of those getting cancer because of it. In other words,only about 1 in 1200 women will be affected by this.Corporate media refuses to mention real prevention and treatmentoptionsAs part of the breast cancer fearmongering and treatment scam nowbeing run across the mainstream media,nearly all media sources are prohibitingany mention of holistic or naturaloptions for treatment or prevention.Sure, the media talks about “options,”but all those options just happen to leadback to the for-profit cancer industry. Asan example, read this story by ABCNews, part of the lying mainstreammedia that misinforms women andpushes a corporate agenda:If you do test positive for BRCA, youhave options, and you don’t necessarilyhave to go the Jolie route. Some womenchoose not to have surgery. Instead, theyincrease cancer surveillance withimaging tests. These include regularmammograms to test for breast cancer,and regular pelvic sonograms and blood-tests to watch for ovarian cancer.Nowhere in this article does ABC Newsmention ways to suppress the BRCA1gene by, for example, eating rawcruciferous vegetables containing Indole-3-Carbinol (I3C), a potent anti-cancer nutrient that haltsbreast cancer in its tracks. Nowhere does ABC News mention vitamin D which prevents nearly 4out of 5 cancers of all types, including breast cancer.Nope, the “options” being pushed by mainstream media are nothing more than mammograms,surgery, radiation and chemotherapy — all owned and run by the for-profit cancer industry that
  7. 7. feeds on women and exploits their bodies for profit.Nor is their any discussion of the total scam of the “pink ribbons” cancer cure industry which isprimarily focused on giving women cancer through “free mammograms.” As any scientist orphysicist already knows, mammograms cause cancer because they emit ionizing radiation directlyinto the breast and heart tissues. Get enough mammograms done and sooner or later they willdetect breast cancer because they caused it! To date, 1.3 million women have been harmed bymammography.About The Author: Scott RaleyLike so many people, I grew tired of worrying how the bills would get paid every month.I grew tired of working a job I didnt really enjoy, and that I knew would never createthe life I wanted and deserved. But there was nothing worse than going to bed everynight with the feeling that what I was reaching for, felt so far away. So I decided to do somethingabout it. Believe it or not, the decision alone did wonders for me. It gave me a feeling of controland hope that I never felt working for somebody else! And now I know why. Working from homehas been an absolute blessing. Its taught me how to work smarter, rather than work harder. Itshelping me make more money, and at the same time create more time to enjoy it. It provides mewith an opportunity to meet people just like me, and help them create the life and lifestyle theydream about. If youre friendly and have a goal in mind, Id love to work with you. In fact, theres ateam of people behind me that devote every day of their lives to helping good people succeedwith this incredible opportunity. Whether you have a lot of experience or none at all… a lot of timeto invest or just a little… its all good! Our company, our team, and our proven system work withwhat youve got - and help you bring about the results youre looking for. If you have anyquestions, contact me! If you have any concerns, let me know! If youre ready to go, Im right therewith you! Im also living proof that this business really can change your life! ***Exclusive BONUSCoaching session with myself & David Wood aka the "The Guru Slayer" Reveals How To Make$1,500 a day by Blogging. Email me at RetireWithScott@aweber.com for a free insider access tothis exclusive interview.***

×