September 2008 Cleveland Plus Quarterly Economic Review

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    September 2008 Cleveland Plus Quarterly Economic Review - Presentation Transcript

    1. Our partners include: Greater Cleveland Partnership Greater Akron Chamber Stark Development Board Team Lorain County Youngstown-Warren Regional Chamber Medina County Economic Development Corporation Northeast Ohio Economic Review September 2008 Volume 2, Issue 3 The office space market in Cleveland Plus continues ™ to thrive.
    2. In our last report released in June 2008, Team Northeast Ohio showed that the industrial real estate market is strong, and demand is growing in the region. This edition looks at how the market for office space is faring in our 16-county Cleveland Plus™ region. The demand for space in the Northeast Ohio office market continues to grow. NEO Total Occupied Office Space: 2003–2008 The office space market in Northeast Ohio is strong, with occupied Class A, B and C space up nearly 5% since Q1 112 2004. There is more occupied space in Q2 2008 than 111 Square Feet (Millions) anytime in the past five years, as total occupied space has 110 increased to almost 112 million square feet. 109 108 Noting the solid demand for office space, the Real Estate 107 Research Corporation (RERC), lists Cleveland favorably as 106 one of the top 5 office markets to watch in 2008. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 377 33,859,369 377,157,582 376 34,589,053 376,484,148 Even in the face of a soft national economy, the demand for space in the Northeast Ohio office market continues to grow. Source: CoStar Office Data According to the Grubb and Ellis Q2 2008 office report, asking rents are rumored to be in the low- to mid-$30s for significant new developments, the highest rates ever quoted for commercial business district office space. U.S. Office Market Vacancy Rates New York City 5.6% 8.7% Los Angeles San Francisco 9.8% Boston 10.3% Minneapolis 10.4% Milwaukee 11.4% Columbus 11.7% Austin 11.7% Pittsburgh 11.8% Orlando 11.9% Northeast Ohio’s vacancy rate of 12.1% is Houston 12.0% nearly on par with the U.S. average of 11.5%, Baltimore 12.0% Market Northeast Ohio 12.1% and is notably lower than many major U.S. Kansas City 12.1% markets. As noted in the graph to the right, San Diego 12.6% Northeast Ohio’s vacancy rate is lower than the Indianapolis 12.7% San Diego, Chicago, Atlanta, Phoenix, Cincinnati 12.8% Denver 13.0% Las Vegas and Dallas markets. Chicago 13.2% 14.3% Atlanta Furthermore, when viewed by class type, Class Phoenix 15.7% A vacancy rates have drastically decreased by Las Vegas 16.2% nearly 6% in the past five years. Class B and C Dallas/ Ft. Worth 16.7% Detroit 17.5% vacancy rates have remained stable. 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% Vacancy Rate Source: CoStar Office Data
    3. The February 2008 Heartland Real Estate B office market can best be described curre Northeast Ohio Class A Occupied Space: 2003–2008 19,000,000 18,000,000 Square Feet 17,000,000 16,000,000 15,000,000 14,000,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Source: CoStar Office Data As depicted in the graph above, occupied Class A office space has increased nearly 17% since 2003 and should continue to grow. Class A occupied space represents nearly 17% of the total occupied space. Northeast Ohio Office Vacancy Rates: 2003–2008 20.0% 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% Vacancy Rate 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q4 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 2006 2003 2004 2005 2007 2008 Class A Vacancy Class B Vacancy Class C Vacancy Source: CoStar Office Data This graph displays the vacancy rates of Northeast Ohio office space broken down by property class. Class A, B and C office space is distinguished by many factors, including building age, infrastructure, location, amenities and architectural significance. Class A space is the most highly valued investment grade property, with Class B space representing a good value, and Class C space as generally utilitarian.
    4. siness Journal states the Cleveland ntly as one with steady, positive growth. NEO Office Vacancy Rates by MSA: 2003–2008 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% Vacancy Rate 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 NEO Canton-Massillon MSA Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor MSA Youngstown-Warren-Boardman MSA Akron MSA Source: CoStar Office Data “The office space activity The graph above depicts office vacancy rates by Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) within the 16-county region. The vacancy rate for all metro in the Akron area, now areas (where trend data is available) has shown decline in the last five quarters. and in the near future, is Due to data limitations, trend data for the Canton- Massillon MSA and the Youngstown-Warren- supported by the growth Boardman MSA are not available.* However, the snapshot of current conditions indicates low vacancy rates in both markets. and alliances being seen by our medical and educational institutions.” —Michael G. Wojno, founder and managing member for Wojno Development
    5. Northeast Ohio employment picture mirrors challenging economic times. Quarterly Unemployment Rate 7.5% 7.0% The regional unemployment rate has 6.5% been following the pattern of both the U.S. and Ohio. The trends for all three 6.0% have been similar up until this past 5.5% quarter when the unemployment rate for Northeast Ohio increased while the rate 5.0% for Ohio and the U.S. saw a moderate 4.5% decrease. Of note is an increase in 4.0% Northeast Ohio’s labor pool, reaching the Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q3 highest point in the last five years. Q1 Q4 Q1 Q4 Q1 Q4 Q1 Q4 Q1 Q4 Q1 Q4 Q1 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 NEO 16 Ohio U.S. Source: Ohio Labor Market Information (LAUS Data) Northeast Ohio Total Employment This chart shows the total jobs in (Not Seasonally Adjusted) Northeast Ohio without seasonal adjustment. Looking at the history for 2.08 each quarter makes it easier to see 2.06 year-to-year comparisons. The overall 2.04 trend also illustrates the seasonal pattern 2.02 in employment. Total jobs usually are (Millions) highest in Q3 and lowest in Q1. 2.00 1.98 Total employment in Northeast Ohio 1.96 declined to just under 2 million workers 1.94 in Q1 of 2008. Total employment 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 increased to 2.03 million workers in Q2. While total employment was lagging a Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 year ago, typical seasonal improvement was realized. Source: Ohio Labor Market Information (LAUS Data)
    6. Northeast Ohio: Real GRP Modest growth Billions (2007 Dollars) expected to $190 0.9% 0.7% 0.2% continue through $180 1.1% 12.6% 1.8% $170 0.3% (-1.9)% 1.2% 2.6% 1.2% 4.8% 2008. $160 3.0% 3.8% $150 5.1% 0.3% 3.6% $140 As reported in the June 2008 issue, Northeast Ohio is seeing its seventh $130 consecutive year of growth which will mean $120 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 we have grown in 14 of the last 15 years. Real GRP Average Annual Growth = 1.9% Moody’s Economy.com expects modest growth to continue through 2008.The 2008 Source: Moody’s Economy.com number was adjusted down as was 2007. Note: At the time of printing, the latest GRP statistics were not available. This data comes from Moody’s Economy.com, which continues to revise its estimates. Even now, 2007 remains an estimated number. It comes as no surprise that these numbers were adjusted down, as we know the economy weakened at the end of 2007 and the beginning of 2008. The gap between the Average Annual Growth trend line and the 2007 and 2008 bars is representative of softness in both the national and local economies. About Team NEO Team NEO markets Northeast Ohio to attract business investment in targeted industry clusters. The organization is a joint venture of the largest metro chambers, representing 16 counties and their 4 million people. Team NEO serves as a central resource, informing and serving those considering investment in Northeast Ohio and is a co-founder of the Cleveland Plus™ Marketing Alliance, a coalition to drive strategic, long-term marketing for Northeast Ohio. For more information, visit www.teamneo.org. Data Sources: Team Northeast Ohio uses a number of data sources for the Regional Economic Review. One of the primary sources is the Moody’s Economy.com (www.economy.com) Northeast Ohio modeling system. This firm is the leading independent provider of economic, financial and industry research and data that specializes in national and metropolitan economic growth forecasts. Moody’s Economy.com county level output, employment and payroll historical data are estimated from several publicly available sources and are summarized into the Team NEO regional footprint. It is important to understand data provided by Economy.com are estimates of economic activity. Ashtabula Lake Team NEO also uses data from federal and state sources as part of the report. As with Economy.com, the information for the Team NEO footprint is derived from data reported at either the county or metropolitan level. We rely heavily on data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.bls.gov) and Ohio’s Labor Market Information (www.lmi.state.oh.us) for information on wages, Cleveland Geauga unemployment and both general and industry-specific employment. In addition, Team NEO uses data from the Census (www. Cuyahoga census.gov) to track housing-related activity including the number of single and multifamily permits, as well as their values. Trumbull Lorain Office data for this edition was derived from the CoStar Group. The CoStar Group is a leading provider of commercial Summit Portage real estate data throughout the United States, covering more than 58 billion square feet of property throughout the Youngstown Medina Akron country. Mahoning Due to market limits within the CoStar database, historic trend data for the Team NEO region is defined as 10 of Ashland the 16 counties forming the regional footprint. These counties include Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Wayne Columbiana Canton Medina, Portage, Richland, Stark and Summit. Richland Stark *Furthermore, CoStar does not offer data for the Mansfield MSA, so it is excluded from the NEO Office Vacancy Rates Carroll by MSA: 2003–2008 chart. Cleveland Plus 16-County Region 737 Bolivar Road, Suite 2000, Cleveland, Ohio 44115 888.NEO.1411 • www.teamneo.org • www.clevelandplusbusiness.com
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Team NEOTeam NEO Nominate

    custom

    404 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    This edition of the Northeast Ohio Economic Review more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 404
      • 403 on SlideShare
      • 1 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds
    • 1 views on http://www.teamneo.org

    more

    All embeds
    • 1 views on http://www.teamneo.org

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories