Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of e-Tendering: A Business Case
1.
2. Kamel Badawy
Head of System Support – Procurement Directorate
Qatar Foundation
Email: kbadawy@qf.org.qa
Mobile: 0097433938123
Exploring e-tendering Challenges
& Benefits: a business case
3. Introduction
What is e-Procurement?
e-procurement evolution
e-procurement components
What is e-tendering?
Why e-tendering
e-tendering challenges
Business case
Recommendations
Surveys & Statistics
Questions
4. e-Procurement in a simple
term is used to describe the
automation of an
organization’s procurement
process using web-based
tools or applications
What is e-procurement? 2. Supplier
Assessment
3. Supplier
Identification
4. Sourcing (e-
Tendering/e-
Auctions)
5. Contract
Management
6.
Procurement
7. Order
Fulfillment
8. Invoicing &
Payment
1. Spend
Analysis
7. Why Procurement Automation is Important
Governance Focus
Sourcing
Electronic POs
Recurring Payments
Mitigate Risk
Dedicated Solution
Electronic POs
Direct Connect
E-tendering Tool
Invest in Systems
Provide Enablers
Catalogues
Electronic POs
P-Cards
Streamline
Rationalize &
Reduce
P-Cards
One Time Vendors
Minimize
Increased Benefits from Automation
Increasing
need for
Governance
& Control
Spend by
Category
High
Low
Low High
Frequency of Activity
-Sourcing/Contracts
-Transactions/Purchases
-Payments/Invoices
8. What is e-tendering?
e-tendering is an online version of the tendering process through a web-based
application from supplier registration, tender publication, receiving and submitting
tender documents, tender evaluation, awarding to post contract activities online.
In addition, e-tendering is offering additional features that protects the details of
the bidders and their bids and make it apparent if bids have been tampered with.
By doing so, the process becomes more accountable and it has been proven
that e-tendering systems are the most effective tools for addressing corruption
and process subversion.
It enables the buyer to operate a transparent process that can be audited and
evaluated. It also makes it easier and more cost-effective to operate the process.
11. Why e-Tendering?
Operational
BenefitsSimpler & fast
ordering
Reduce
paperwork
Easy online
comparison
Minimize
process errors
Better control &
compliance
Enhanced
inventory
management
Reduce cycle
time
Increase process
quality &
efficiency
Improved
communication
& collaboration
Streamlining
the process
Cost saving
12. Why e-Tendering? Cont.
Strategic
Benefits
Data for
strategic
sourcing
Business
intelligence
Real-time
reporting
Improved
transparency
Decrease
bureaucracy &
redundancy
Better decision
making
Green process
Corruption
free
Overhead
cost
reduction
Reduce
disputes
16. Training
• Provide training to End Users and buyers
• Provide training to suppliers
Support
• Onsite support to all stakeholders
• Online support
Involvement
• Involve all stakeholders from day one
• Motivate employees and stakeholders (Awards, promotion,
etc.)
Lack of knowledge
20. Oracle Sourcing:
Negotiation Styles (ex: Supplier Evaluation in RFI)
Team Scoring
Two Stage Evaluation of RFP
Enhanced Spreadsheet Support
Supplier response PDF
Notification Subscription
Earnest Money Deposit
Surrogate buyer
Descriptive Flex Field (DFF) in Oracle Sourcing Header
Oracle Procurement Contracts:
Establish contracts standards
Author contracts
Negotiate contracts
Approve and sign contracts
Execute and monitor contracts
Administer changes in the contracts
Renegotiate and close out contracts
Business Case
Why we choose Oracle e-Tendering?
21. Add-ons Features
• The Flexibility of Oracle Application has given the opportunity
to customize the solution based on requirement
Tender Fees Payment Confirmation
Limited Tender Committee
General Tender Committee
Committee Collaboration
Single Source Requests
Limited Tender Requests
Technical Evaluation Report
Commercial Evaluation Report
RFQ Approvals
Supplier Quote Withdrawal
Supplier Alternate Quote Submission
Generation/Submission of Letter(s)
of Intent, Award, Retraction, Regret…
27. Publication of
Notice
• 15 Days
Proposal
Submission
• 30 Days
Review
• At least 3 Days
Evaluation
• 21 Days
Planning and
Review
• 10 Days
Award
• 10 Days
Total= 88 Days
Online Notice
• 1 Day
Proposal
Submission
• 9 Days
Review
• 4 Days
maximum
Evaluation
• 21 Days
Planning and
Review
• 5 Days
Award
• 9 Days
Total= 49 Days
Tenderinge-Tendering
Tendering Vs. e-Tendering
Source: 2008, Deloitte "Impacts of the Introduction of the Public Contract Law"
28. Increase,
92%
Reduction
, 8%
Increase of Transparency
Increase,
77%
Reduction
, 23%
Increase of Value for Money
*Survey by the Portuguese Observatory of Technology and Engineering in 2010
Increase,
38%
Reduction
, 62%
Process Duration
Increase,
21%
Reduction
, 79%
Cost of Processes
29. E-procurement at Imperial College
In 2001, Imperial College in London had a fully implemented e-
procurement system and calculated that 50,000 hours of staff time
were released by automating the purchase order process.
Processing times have been reduced from 67 minutes using
manual systems to a few minutes using e-procurement. Imperial
College processed 50,000 transactions through its e-procurement
system in 2005-06.
Education Sector Cases
31. Benefits Statistics :
77 percent of organizations experience lower costs and achieve
better savings through e-sourcing
62 percent report that e-sourcing improves efficiency and
enables the internal team to focus on more strategic initiatives
58 percent find that e-sourcing opens the door to new supplier
relationships
Latest Survey by Intesource (29-04-2015)
*survey of procurement executives and practitioners, conducted by
Intesource 29-04-2015
32. Skill Gaps and Internal Resource Challenges:
31 percent identified uncertainty around the categories they
should take to auction
27 percent reported a lack of organization-wide support for e-
sourcing.
20 percent identified limited internal resources as the primary
roadblock
10 percent said the primary obstacle was a lack of qualified
suppliers.
Latest Survey by Intesource (29-04-2015)
Despite the financial and functional benefits of e-sourcing, some
organizations still aren't leveraging e-sourcing to its fullest capacity.
When asked for the top internal challenge preventing their departments
from running more events
33. Procurement Team Talent Gaps
Talent Skills Gap Percentage
Data Analytical 50 %
Expertise 35 %
Innovation & Collaboration 35 %
Negotiation 15 %
34. References
• Puschmann, T, & Alt, R (2005), 'Successful use of e-procurement in supply chains', Supply Chain
Management, 10, 2, p. 122-133
• Toktaş-Palut, P, Baylav, E, Teoman, S, & Altunbey, M 2014, 'The impact of barriers
and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis',
International Journal Of Production Economics, 158, p. 77-90,
• Neupane, A, Soar, J, Vaidya, K, & Yong, J 2014, 'Willingness to adopt e-procurement
to reduce corruption: Results of the PLS path modeling', Transforming Government:
People, Process And Policy, 8, 4, p. 500-520,
• The 2009 EU e-Government Procurement Benchmark report
• Source: 2008, Deloitte "Impacts of the Introduction of the Public Contract Law“
• CIPS white paper e-sourcing
• CIPS white paper “ selecting an e-procurement solution”
• Intersource.com
• National Audit Office “Improving Procurement in Further Education Colleges in
England”