course material

1. Discussion: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART)
Discussion: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART)Discussion: Adherence to
antiretroviral therapy (ART)Rouleau et al. (2019) conducted a qualitative study on the
nursing practice in support of people living with HIV (PLWH) and their adherence to
antiretroviral therapy (ART). A total of sixteen nurses participated in the study, where nine
nurses were part of a focus group and the remaining seven were interviewed individually.
The nurses who participated in the focus group were excluded from participating in the
individual interviews. The focus group nurses were part of a convenience sampling strategy,
that was broad in nature, with no specific parameters as to who could participate. The focus
group was planned as an activity that was part of a 1-day meeting held by an HIV mentoring
program. Whereas the sampling for nurses that were selected for the interviews was more
focused and certain parameters needed to be met according to the needs of the study. These
nurses were selected using a combination of maximum variation strategy and purposive
sampling. The purposive parameters included French-speaking nurses who worked with
PLWH and wished to reflect on their practice whereas the maximum variation strategy
warranted a heterogeneous sample that was extensive in choosing nurses from various
nursing practice settings as well as various nurse profiles (Rouleau et al., 2019).I think the
combination of the sampling with having a randomized focus group as well as having a
more focused purposive selection of nurses who were interviewed individually gives the
study a unique edge and broad scope of the population sample. Thus, the quality of the
sampling pool in terms of the deviation of the focus group from those who were
interviewed individually is a definite strength. There was also variation amongst the nurse
practice setting from nurses in clinical practice to those in clinical research, academia,
public health, and management. However, while there was variation amongst the practice
setting and role of the nurses, eleven out of the sixteen nurses were clinicians practicing in a
clinical setting – most working in outpatient HIV clinics. While the focus of the study is
nursing practice in the adherence of ART amongst HIV patients, I think having more nurses
who were practicing in the public health setting could’ve also played a role in strengthening
the sampling and study overall. Another strength of the sampling pool was the wide
variation of years of experience as an HIV nurse ranging from 0.7 years to 25 years with the
average nurse having 12 years of experience. Thus, giving a perspective from both nurses
who have just begun working with HIV patients to those who are well seasoned and
experienced HIV nurses. Age and education were also parameters the sample showed
strengths in. However, another area where the study could’ve shown improvement in the

2. quality of the sampling is the ratio of female to male nurses. The sample of the study was
predominantly female, with only a total of three males out of sixteen participating in the
study. While this could be due to the lack of male nurses in the field overall, having more
female participants than male participants could lead to gender bias in the data
collectionORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERSYou must proofread
your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker;
failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to
suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will
be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and
make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your
paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected
mistakes.Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or
compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is
better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress
it into fewer pages.Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing,
increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any
other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable,
wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.The paper must be neatly formatted,
double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When
submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to
read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.