Using Purchasing Process
Constraints For Savings
Bill Kohnen
CPO Conference Q1 2015
HMB California Ritz Carlton
Overview
• An Efficient well understood “Req to Check” process
can increase efficiency and lower cost to process
orders. In extreme circumstances tactical purchasing
opex costs can be lowered 60% or more
• Companies with a reasonable process in place spend
15% to 30% less than peers with no process in place
• Another benefit of a well understood and transparent
process is that as needed temporary adjustment can be
made to
– Reduce Cost
– Improve Cash
– Focus on spend with higher ROI
Typical Core Process
Request Approve Negotiate
Purchase
Order
Receive Match Pay
Requestor
generates with
backup and
budgetary
price
Per Sig
Authority
Requestor
Responsible
Upon Approval
Final terms and
price
negotiated
PO issued by
person
delegated
Purchase
Authority
Connection to
Approved Req
Physical Items
on System
Services by
Requestor
PO, Receipt,
Invoice
Per PO Terms
Thoughtful Introduction of Bottlenecks
Request Approve Negotiate
Purchase
Order
Receive Match Pay
Require More
Documentation
Constrain
Request to
approved
supplier and or
agreements
Require ROI
hurdle or
Operational
Need Analysis
Increase
Signature
Levels
required
Reduce
Frequency of
Approvals
Require Site
Manager/GM
Review Prior
to next Level
Renegotiate all
orders
Attempt to
leverage and
combine all
spend
Increase
Signature Levels
required
Reduce
Frequency of
Approvals
Require Global
Review
Physical Items
on System
Services by
Requestor
PO, Receipt,
Invoice
Strict review of
PO and Invoice
Match with
return of
discrepancies
to suppliers
Strict
Adherence to
max allowable
terms (+)
DANGER
Without Visible Management OF Constraints and Understanding of Them It Can Be
difficult and Costly to Return to Normal State and Not Impact Supply Chain
Important Considerations
• Short term metering of the process will deliver short term benefit
• The actual amount of work required to manage this is only marginally less.
Do not resources cut resources if the workload and spend will be back in 2
quarters
• During the constrained process time have Purchasing team work to
identify categories and areas where spending constraints can be sustained
• Be sure to identify most Strategic requirements and DO Not constrain
spend without clear review. Look to opportunities for these items to
consume existing inventory. Communicate openly and directly with these
suppliers about situation.
• Supplier quality and reliability become more important with limits on
materials ordering.
• Total supply chain visibility is very important during this phase. If you are
not clear on this to begin with you are risking long term damage with a
cost higher than what you may save.

Using Purchasing Process Constraints for Short Term Savings

  • 1.
    Using Purchasing Process ConstraintsFor Savings Bill Kohnen CPO Conference Q1 2015 HMB California Ritz Carlton
  • 2.
    Overview • An Efficientwell understood “Req to Check” process can increase efficiency and lower cost to process orders. In extreme circumstances tactical purchasing opex costs can be lowered 60% or more • Companies with a reasonable process in place spend 15% to 30% less than peers with no process in place • Another benefit of a well understood and transparent process is that as needed temporary adjustment can be made to – Reduce Cost – Improve Cash – Focus on spend with higher ROI
  • 3.
    Typical Core Process RequestApprove Negotiate Purchase Order Receive Match Pay Requestor generates with backup and budgetary price Per Sig Authority Requestor Responsible Upon Approval Final terms and price negotiated PO issued by person delegated Purchase Authority Connection to Approved Req Physical Items on System Services by Requestor PO, Receipt, Invoice Per PO Terms
  • 4.
    Thoughtful Introduction ofBottlenecks Request Approve Negotiate Purchase Order Receive Match Pay Require More Documentation Constrain Request to approved supplier and or agreements Require ROI hurdle or Operational Need Analysis Increase Signature Levels required Reduce Frequency of Approvals Require Site Manager/GM Review Prior to next Level Renegotiate all orders Attempt to leverage and combine all spend Increase Signature Levels required Reduce Frequency of Approvals Require Global Review Physical Items on System Services by Requestor PO, Receipt, Invoice Strict review of PO and Invoice Match with return of discrepancies to suppliers Strict Adherence to max allowable terms (+) DANGER Without Visible Management OF Constraints and Understanding of Them It Can Be difficult and Costly to Return to Normal State and Not Impact Supply Chain
  • 5.
    Important Considerations • Shortterm metering of the process will deliver short term benefit • The actual amount of work required to manage this is only marginally less. Do not resources cut resources if the workload and spend will be back in 2 quarters • During the constrained process time have Purchasing team work to identify categories and areas where spending constraints can be sustained • Be sure to identify most Strategic requirements and DO Not constrain spend without clear review. Look to opportunities for these items to consume existing inventory. Communicate openly and directly with these suppliers about situation. • Supplier quality and reliability become more important with limits on materials ordering. • Total supply chain visibility is very important during this phase. If you are not clear on this to begin with you are risking long term damage with a cost higher than what you may save.