The Access Point bridge needs its own DHCP server since it is on a different subnet. *True *False Solution It is true. The uncertainty arises due to the way that we\'re regularly looking at re-configuring routers as repeaters, and not utilising standalone, dedicated devices. Routers don\'t allow the task of their own local IP address utilising DHCP. To have the router reference itself doesn\'t make much point as the fact it\'s deciding the IP network, gateway IP, DNS server(s), and providing the DHCP server. In other words, the switch isn\'t typically a client to anything on the local system or network. Rather, it takes care of business for others by building up its own local IP address (e.g., 192.168.1.1), and by extension, the system or network that suggests (e.g., 192.168.1.x). So now you choose to transform that router into a repeater. In any case, again, it was never intended to allocate itself a local IP address through DHCP (as I portrayed previously). Furthermore, in the event that you can\'t utilise DHCP to appoint the local IP address, then you absolutely don\'t need the static IP you do you do assign to conflict with any IP address that may be given out by the primary router\'s DHCP server to some other device. .

1. The Access Point bridge needs its own DHCP server since it is on a different subnet. *True
*False
Solution
It is true. The uncertainty arises due to the way that we're regularly looking at re-configuring
routers as repeaters, and not utilising standalone, dedicated devices.
Routers don't allow the task of their own local IP address utilising DHCP. To have the router
reference itself doesn't make much point as the fact it's deciding the IP network, gateway IP,
DNS server(s), and providing the DHCP server. In other words, the switch isn't typically a client
to anything on the local system or network. Rather, it takes care of business for others by
building up its own local IP address (e.g., 192.168.1.1), and by extension, the system or network
that suggests (e.g., 192.168.1.x).
So now you choose to transform that router into a repeater. In any case, again, it was never
intended to allocate itself a local IP address through DHCP (as I portrayed previously).
Furthermore, in the event that you can't utilise DHCP to appoint the local IP address, then you
absolutely don't need the static IP you do you do assign to conflict with any IP address that may
be given out by the primary router's DHCP server to some other device.