The document is a forwarded email that contains comments criticizing claims made by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) regarding the health impacts of power plant emissions. It summarizes NRDC testimony arguing that the Bush administration's Clear Skies initiative does not go far enough in reducing emissions. The comments then examine NRDC's claims about the impacts of particulate matter and mercury emissions, finding little evidence that current levels cause harm to public health.
Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...
NRDC Claims on Power Plant Emissions Plausibility
1. ~~J15 750 PagelIof 90
RECORD TYPE: FEDERAL (NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR-Dana M. Perino ( CN=Dana M. Perino/OU=CEQ/O=EOP( CEQI
CREATION DATE/TME: 4-JUN--2003 11:22:38.00
SUBJECT:: Conmments on NRDC's testimony on Power Plant Regulation
To:michael_catanzaro~epw.sen~ate.gov @ inet Cmichael_catanzarogepw.senate~gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
this is outrageous
-- --------- Forwarded by Dana M. Perino/CEQ/EOP on 06/04/2003
11:21 AM -- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Debbie S. Fiddelke 06/03/2003 06:54:49 PM
Record Type: Record
To: Phil Cooney/CEQ/EOP61EOP, Elizabeth A. Stolpe/CEQ/EOPOEOP, Dana
M. Perino/CEQ/EOPOEOP
cc:
Subject: Comments on NRDC's Testimony on Power Plant Regulation
note Clear Skies comments ... .didn't realize we were apologists for
Jef fords and the NRDC. ...
------------ Forwarded by Debbie S. Fiddelke/CEQ/EOP on
06/03/2003 06:53 PM…---- ---------
Marlo Lewis <mlewis~cei~org>
06/03/2003 03:51:21 PM
Record Type: Record
To: Mar10 Lewis <m1ewis~lcei.1org>
cc:
Subject: Comments on NRDC's Testimony on Power Plant Regulation
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is the leading force behind
Sen. James Jef fords's (I-Vt.) Clean Power Act (S. 366), a bill that wouldY~
impose costly new controlsion power plant emissions of sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, mercury, and carbon dioxide.9The Bush Administrationfl,s
Clear Skies initiative, which would establish new controls on sulfur
dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury, but not carbon dioxide, is, in no
small measure,' a UJ&me-tooO8 response to:VSenatory)JeffordsO,s bill.:VIt is thus
fair to say that NRDC is driving much of the debateSgin Washingtonover
Clean Air Act O&reform.fl8
NRDC ClimateSyCenter Director David Hawkins has testified twice on the
Clean Power Act, and once on the Clear Skies Act (S. 485) .yMr.Y~HawkinsYi
has argued that the Bush plan will57kill thousands of Americans every year
becaxise9'it does not go far enough to reduce power plant emissions.
file://D:search_7_11_'05_ceq1O730 fz4dxgOO3..ceq.txt 10/3/2005
2. Page 2 of 90
This paper examines9'NRDCO, syclaimsS-regarding the health and mortality
effects of~fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) and mercury emissions.V'It
finds thatVPM2.5 at current levels is unlikely to be increasing
mortality, and that sulfatefl~the form of PM caused byi~power plant
emissionsO*is a particularly~implausible cause of deaths; becauseksulfate
is not toxic.91
Current power plant mercury emissions are also an implausible cause of
harm. Power-plant mercury isjja concern because high levels are found in
some non-commercial freshwater fish consumed by sport-fishers and their
friends and families. But less than one in 1,000 women have blood mercury
levels as high as those associated with even subtle reductions in
childrenfl s neurological health. Furthermore, as EPA concluded, no one
knows where the mercury in fish is coming from. Most of it may come from
past emissions that remain in the environment and are continually
deposited and reemitted, and/or from areas outside the U.S.where mercury
emissions are 'much higher. Thus, there is a significant risk that
mandatory reductions in power plant mercury emissions will not
significantly reduce mercury ilevels in freshwater fish.
Because higher incomes alloW~peovle to enhance their overall!:'health and
safety, the economic burdens iof the Clean Power Act and the Clear Skies
Act are likely to doymore harm than goodf~for public health.
-NRDC.pdf
- ~~~~~ATTACHMENTf 1 -
ATT CREATION TIME/DATE: 0 00:00:00.00
TEXT:
Unable to convert NSREOP0102;(,IATTACH.D12]SREOP01300GXD4Z.001 to ASCII,
The following is a HEX DUMP,
255044462D3l12E33 0D25E2E3CFD30D0A3535203 02 6F62 6A0D3C3C200D2F4C696E656172697A65
642031200D2F4F203537200D2F48205B2037383020343439205D200D2F4C20323034383533200D
2F45203835373830200D2F4E203l32200D2F5420323033363335200D3E3E200OD656E646F626A0D
2020202020202020202020202020202020202 02020202020202020202020202020202020202020
202020202020202020202026262020202:0787265660D3535203 137200D30303030303030303 136
203030303030206E0D0A30303030i3036303 6383720303~030303 0206EQD0A303030303030313232
392035030303030206E0D0A30303030303031333,3 3203~03030,3030206E0D0A3030303030303135
3636203030303030206E0D0A30303030303032313437203030303030206E0D0A30303030303032
373430203030303 030206E0OD0A303030303 03 032393638203 030303030206E0D0OA3~03030303030
3332303220303~0303030206E0D0Ai303030303Q333323431203030303030206E0D0A3030303030
303430393.5203030303030266E0D0A30303030303433393837203030303030206E0D0A30303030
3034343 0363520303030303 0206E0D0A30303030303735323 03020a3030303030206E0D0A303030
30303737383737203030303030206OEOD0A30303030303030373830203030303030206E0D0A3030
3030303 0313230382030303 03030206E0D0A74726169;6C65720D3C3C0D2F53697A652037320D2F
496E666F20353320302052200D2F526F6F7420353620302052200D2F5072657620323033363235
200D2F49445B3C393831323139633537313961343038383435613536316331613232616~4623236
3E3C64613235386635656530356659346534663064323 864356265363039663430633E5D0D3E3E
0D7374617274787265660D300Di255454F460D202 020200D35362030206F626A0D3C3C200D2F54
797065202F436174616C6F67200D2F506167657320353120302052200D2F4D6574616461746120
353420302052200D2F506167654C6162656C7320343920302052200D3E3E200)6:56E646F626AOD
file:-//D:search_7_ 1 1_05__peq_10730_f z4dxzo03_ceq.txt 10/3/2005