This document is an email from Marlo Lewis to various recipients sharing a study by Robert Bradley rebutting John Holdren's critique of Bjorn Lomborg's book The Skeptical Environmentalist. The study argues that Holdren's critique of Lomborg fails. It provides a link to download Bradley's study examining Holdren's arguments against Lomborg's research.

1. 2ft~i1576.5 PagelIof I
RECORD TYPE: FEDERAL (NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR6Marlo Lewis <mlewisecei.org> (Mario Lewis <mlewis~cei.org> tUNKNOWN
CREATION DATE/TIME: 26-JUN-2003 14:50:16.00
SUBJECT:: The Heated Energy Debate: CEI study rebuts John Holdren's critique of Bj>r
TO:Marlo Lewis <mlewisgcei.org> ( Mario Lewis <mlewis~cei.org> (1UNKNOWNIA
READ:-UNKNOWN
BCC:Debb~ie S. Fiddelke( CN-Pebbie S. Fiddelke/OU=-CEQ/O=EOP[ CEQI
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
Dear all,
9,
When Bj>rn LomborgDj,s The Skeptical Environmentalist became an
international best seller, ideological environmentalists launched an
angry attack against9,the author. Among the key figures to9,impugnLomborgfl,
S scholarship is Harvard Professor John P. Holdren, a Clinton-era leader
of climate policy and energy technology task forces.9,Institute for
Energy Research President Robert L. Bradley, Jr. examines Holdren's
critique of Lomborg and demonstrates that it fails dismally.9,To read:V
Bradley's study, click here;'9,~-http: //www~cei.org/pdf/3539.pdf
file://D:search_7_1 05 ceql10765_ prh03ce t10/3/2005