This document is a response from Phil Cooney to an Andy Revkin NYT article on climate change. [Cooney disputes some of the claims in the article]. Cooney argues the article presented an imbalanced view of the climate issue and ignored recent studies that question aspects of climate change predictions. He urges balancing coverage of the topic going forward. The response was sent to senior White House and EPA officials.

1. ~~~ ~Phil Cooney
06/3/2020:21:38 AM
Subjct- Response to Andy Revkn NYT atceon climtnat change today
OowreC*~OoeCEQIEOPon 061031200 09309 AM
y Phil
,,1Phil Cooney
060/000:19:41 AM
Aecor Type0: Record
To: Mc~el~riIHO/OP@
cot OPClfe E. ftOchan HOMEPMEOP
cc: See the dittibtn list at the botton of thismese
Subjct Repose to Andy ReAi NYTaricl clmtehaetdy

2. iviessce Co To: ,
med n~hoC5
Robert C. cNallyopDIEPEO
Karen Y. KnutOWOVPIeoQ~p@p
Kameran L. Bailey/CEOMEOPIEOP
Gary R.EdsonINsctrEop@op
4H**DtMpln/HO/EOP@EOP

3. -Ex~cTWE FFICE O iEPEIET
COUNCIL ONENV RNMETAli
*
~~ PLACE, NAY
722 .JlCkttON PHONE (202) 39555
WVASHING~TON D.C. 20503FX:(0)4656
FROM:
D A TE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ata cutplat infiirnmictIio whtA4di5 Ij
yt ii Ainci~i3it tr latte tvi. ' c1i 0i~r~i~ i
rlte I iunb mpii4*linvkht;j iX iisiui~i
46rw
~
*d~d hi .iit.ic ~Ji' 'ir eix~ixv n~d ~ i t~c~~~~~n.~if ir ori cenno~inrn ~ 'r.y i hri re~ virb
~iiat ~ h~' ~ 'py~i ol flisttr
~ A~
h itiotor n~~w ~ii~tift Ii u~It if~ti~~di4 m
So ,~rIC
is iti cti v
1
l'Uli Ie usN1uhi cl m d~ dhis i k ntic~¶Iv icu cit.i u uemci~m hi it, aitirm '
cd
Iiii~t.i iid hAi Aw 1i
o t er (~ to tii.
I I~I~C~IIIS IiiiIII.II4II ii
I 'li'II~Ii £hIt*v~c: n i;raig! ai~c(r tv'lirletto (h
n (fic Itic ci