Relex Smile Laser surgery : is this the end of lasik ?
Presentation at the Annual Meeting in Clinical Ophthalmology (AMICO) in Brussels, March 14 2015.
7. SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
8. SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
9.
10.
11.
12. SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
13.
14. WWW.GOES.BE
Figure 2. (Walter) Monthly comparison between outdoor humidity, procedure room
humidity, and outdoor temperature with the percentage of enhancement rates. J
Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:798–803 2004 ASCRS and ESCRS
RELEX SMILE CLINICAL RESULTS
16. SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
17.
18.
19. SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
27. SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
30. SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
31.
32.
33.
34. WWW.GOES.BE
PRK
STABILITY
NO FLAP
+/- NO ECTASIA
PAIN
HAZE
LASIK
FAST RECOVERY
NO PAIN
NO HAZE
ECTASIA
FLAP
RELEX SMILE
FAST RECOVERY
NO FLAP
+/- NO ECTASIA
NO PAIN
NO HAZE
35.
36. REFRACTIVE OUTCOME AT 1 M
WWW.GOES.BE
1%
4%
17%
26%
40%
9%
2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
GoesEyeCentre
<
-2,00
-2,00
to
-1,51
-1,50
to
-1,01
-1,00
to
-0,51
-0,50
to
-0,126
+-0,125
+0,126
to
+
0,5
+0,51
to
+1,00
+1,01
to
+1,50
+1,51
to
+2,00
>
+2,00
± 0.50 D: 84%
± 1.00 D: 97%
D: Refractive outcome - Percentage within Attempted
1 m (228)
month
(eyes)