SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 44
IMAGING IN HEPATIC INFECTIONS
AND INFLAMMATORY LESIONS
MODERATOR –Dr.BALASUBRAMABYAM S
PRESENTER – Dr.VISHWANATH PATIL
Introduction
• Infections of the liver include bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, and parasitic
involvement of the liver parenchyma.
• These infections may present with vague constitutional symptoms and pain
abdomen and are usually identified incidentally during an abdominal ultrasound.
• Radiological appearances of most hepatic infections are nonspecific, thereby often
requiring serological and histological confirmation. The most common differentials
are neoplasms and cysts.
• Common infections are
Liver Abscess
• This may be a consequence of bacterial, parasitic, fungal, or granulomatous
infection. There is a geographic and demographic divide in the etiological factors
responsible for liver abscesses.
• Abscesses involve the right lobe in about two-third of cases, probably in
accordance with the proportion of portal blood received by the right lobe.
• Amebic and pyogenic abscesses may be indistinguishable on clinical and imaging
features.
• However, they differ in terms of epidemiology as well as medical management.
• Amebic liver abscess is commonly seen in the 3rd and 4th decades, with a striking
male preponderance (M:F ratio 4–10:1).
• Most cases either reside in or have a history of recent travel to a tropical, endemic
region.
• Pyogenic abscesses, on the contrary, are usually seen in the 5th or 6th decade,
with no gender predilection.
• These are commonly polymicrobial, with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella being
the most common causes.
• Intra-abdominal infections like appendicitis and diverticulitis used to be the
most common etiological factors responsible for pyogenic liver abscesses in
the pre-antibiotic days.
• Right-sided abdominal pain, fever, and rigors.
• Persistence of elevated bilirubin should alert the radiologist to look for an
evidence of biliary obstruction.
Imaging
• Ultrasound:
• Abscesses are discrete
hypoechoic lesions with acoustic
through transmission.
• There may be presence of
internal echoes or air within the
cavity seen as echogenic foci with
reverberation.
Imaging
• Contrast-enhanced CT:
• Sensitivity of over 95%, a CECT is an
excellent investigation for liver abscess.
• Facilitates planning of percutaneous
interventions in complex cases.
• A microabscess on CECT scan is typically
a well-defined hypodense lesion with
faint rim enhancement and perilesional
edema.
• Multiple, small adjacent abscesses may
coalesce to aggregate into a single
larger cavity described as the cluster
sign .
• Transient segmental enhancement of
the hepatic parenchyma in arterial
phase scans may be seen in patients
with large vascular abscesses.
Pyogenic liver abscess—CT:
(A, arrows) Microabscess seen as a well-defined
hypodense lesion with perilesional edema;
(B, arrow) Cluster sign; (C, arrow) Larger abscess with
inner liquefied component and wall showing two rims
(double-target appearance);
(D, arrow) Air-foci in pyogenic liver abscess
Magnetic Resonance Imaging:
• Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not
routinely required for the diagnosis of liver
abscesses but may be invaluable in cases with
suspected biliary involvement.
• MRCP sequence can help define and
characterize any biliary obstruction because of
the liver abscess.
• Abscesses are usually T1 hypointense and T2
hyperintense lesions (Fig. 3A).
• However, their signal intensities are largely
dependent upon the protein content.
• Mild T2 hyperintensity may be seen surrounding
the abscess representing edema.
• The double target inflammatory rim showing
dynamic enhancement characteristics may be
seen with gadolinium enhanced MRI as seen on
CT (Fig. 3B).
• Marked central diffusion restriction on diffusion
weighted imaging (DWI) is a useful feature that
can sometimes help differentiate it from
neoplasms where marked restriction favors an
abscess over neoplasm.
• Pyogenic liver abscess—MRI: (A, arrow) T2W MR image
shows a large abscess showing heterogeneous
hyperintensity; (B, arrow) T1W post-contrast image
shows peripheral rim enhancement
• Key imaging features Although differentiating an
abscess from a neoplasm may be extremely
challenging at times, the key imaging features
include
• A.typical enhancement kinetics of an
inflammatory capsule with a layered
appearance,
• B.Transient segmental parenchymal
enhancement,
• C.Restriction of diffusion within the lesion on
DWI.
• Cysts: Lack of surrounding edema, diffusion
restriction, and rim enhancement differentiate
cysts from abscesses (Fig. 5).
• Biliary hamartomas: Although hepatic
hamartomas may show enhancing rims to mimic
abscesses, they do not show perilesional edema
or diffusion restriction.
• A phlegmonous abscess may
be difficult to differentiate
from a necrotic neoplasm.
Likewise, a necrotic mass may
mimic a liquefied abscess.
Unlike abscesses, neoplasms
seldom show the layered
appearance, segmental
enhancement, perifocal
edema, and central diffusion
restriction.
• Other ancillary findings
specific to tumor type can help
differentiate them from
abscesses
Tubercular Disease
• Hepatobiliary tuberculosis is uncommon, accounting for <1% of all
tubercular infections.
• Spleen is more commonly involved in patients with HIV infection.
• Hepatic tuberculosis may present in two forms.
• Hematogenous dissemination of tuberculosis to the liver presents
as its micronodular form with tiny (<2 mm) nodules that calcify on
healing.
• The macronodular hepatic tuberculosis presents as focal
granulomas (usually 1–3 cm in size) or frank abscesses.
• Tuberculomas often progress to abscesses resulting from
liquefaction of caseous necrosis.
• By virtue of their mass effect, they may cause focal biliary
dilatation.
Ultrasonography
• Miliary tuberculosis may present as
hepatomegaly with coarsening of
hepatic echotexture.
• Generally, a tuberculoma appears as
a poorly defined hypoechoic mass.
• At times, it may be entirely
hyperechoic.
• A tubercular abscess is a complex
appearing lesion (Fig. 6D) that may
not have a distinct wall at all, may
have a circumferential hyperechoic
wall, or may appear as a solid lesion
• Hepatic tuberculosis—USG: (A) Coarsening of
liver echotexture; (B and C, arrows) Poorly
defined hypoechoic lesions; (D, arrow)
Tubercular abscess seen as a well-defined
hypoechoic lesion; (E, arrow) Solid-appearing
lesion.
CT
• Multiple hypodense nodules with
or without peripheral
enhancement (Figs 7A and B),
• A single hypodense mass with
central hypoattenuation, a
conglomerate mass with
honeycomb appearance, or a
fluid collection with enhancing
thick walls (Fig. 7C).
MRI
• The tuberculosis nodules are usually T1 hypointense. On T2WI, they are
commonly iso to hyperintense with a less hyperintense rim.
• Multifocal nodules may be seen on MRI having varying T2 signal intensity.
On DWI, tuberculomas exhibit restricted diffusion.
• On contrast administration, peripheral enhancement is seen.
• Abscesses are T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense.
Differential Diagnosis and Imaging
Pitfalls
• Miliary hepatic tuberculosis closely mimics lesions of fungal infection,
Pneumocystic jiroveci infection and sarcoidosis.
• The clinical profile of patients with the former two closely matches that of
those with tuberculosis making diagnosis challenging and histology
necessary.
• When differentiating tuberculosis from sarcoidosis, MRI plays an
important role.
• On T1WI, the caseating granulomas in tuberculosis have a varying signal
and show no enhancement, or sometimes peripheral enhancement in
comparison to noncaseating granulomas in sarcoidosis which have
intermediate signals on T1WI with enhancement that may persist on
delayed images.
• Pyogenic or amebic abscesses may not be differentiable from tubercular
abscesses on imaging. Lack of response to antibiotics and percutaneous
drainage should raise suspicion for tubercular etiology.
Viral Hepatitis
• The commonest viruses to infect the liver are hepatotropic viruses like
hepatitis A, B, C, and E, herpes simplex virus, HIV, and coxsackie virus.
• The imaging findings of acute viral hepatitis are essentially nonspecific.
• The role of radiology is to rule out other causes of similar biochemical and
clinical picture.
Ultrasonography
• Acute hepatitis appears as
hepatomegaly and decreased
parenchymal echogenicity with
prominent portal tracts described
classically as the starry sky
appearance.
• Gallbladder wall edema with
luminal collapse is noted.
• CT:
• Hepatomegaly, heterogeneous
hepatic contrast enhancement on
arterial phase images, well-defned
parenchymal zones with low
attenuation, periportal
hypoattenuation, or hepatic hilum
lymph node enlargement can be
observed.
• Gallbladder wall thickening.
• Magnetic resonance imaging:
• The findings on MRI are the same as
those on CT with a hyperintense
periportal halo on T2WI and a
hypointense T1WI image.
Parasitic Infestation
• Amebiasis:
• Liver amebic abscess is the most common site of extraintestinal involvement of
amebiasis, the infection of the large bowel by Entamoeba histolytica.
• Amebic abscess s usually a solitary unilocular cyst that is frequently located in the
right hepatic lobe, especially the posterior segment.
Five sonographic signs has
been described for amebic
abscesses:
(a) round or oval shape, (b)
absence of wall echoes,
(c) homogeneous low-level
internal echoes,
(d) acoustic through
transmission, and
(e) contiguity with hepatic
capsule.
Computed tomography
• On precontrast CT, an amebic abscess
is hypoattenuating but slightly more
attenuating than water, and varies in
density between 10 and 20
Hounsfeld units [HU] with a thick
peripheral capsule up to 1.5 mm in
diameter .
• The capsule is enhanced after
contrast administration and
surrounded by peripheral
hypoattenuation, known as the
“double target sign,” similar to that
observed with pyogenic abscesses.
• In addition, these abscesses have a
higher predisposition for extrahepatic
extension.
Hydatid Disease
• Echinococcus granulosus and Echinococcus multilocularis are
the causative organisms for hepatic echinococcosis with cystic
and alveolar echinococcosis being the commonest forms.
• Liver is the most commonly affected organ with a propensity
for right lobar involvement.
• The cysts grow up to approximately 1 cm in size in 6 months
and then progress at a rate of 2–3 cm per year.
Ultrasonography
CT
• The daughter cysts usually have a
lower attenuation than the main
cyst (Figs 11B and C).
• There may be air or fat within
indicating superadded infection
or communication (Fig. 11D).
• HAE presents as a heterogeneous
infiltrative mass that does not
enhance centrally.
• Clustered microcalcification or
dense focal calcifications may be
seen.
CT
MRI
• The pericyst is well delineated by MRI
as a T1 and T2 hypointense rim.
• The daughter cysts are more T2
hyperintense than the mother cyst.
• When collapsed, the membranes
appear hypointense on all sequences
(Figs 12A and B) and this is called
serpent sign.
• Irregularity of cyst wall is better
detected on MRI and represents loss
of viability of cyst.
• On administration of gadolinium, the
cyst fluid and the septae do not
enhance.
• The pericyst, being fibrous, may
enhance on delayed scans.
• Complications:
• A cyst may show communicating or contained
rupture or may directly rupture into the
surrounding anatomical structures including
viscera, thorax, pancreatobiliary ducts (Fig. 12C),
peritoneum, or skin.
• Key imaging features:
• The imaging features
correspond to the stage of cyst
transition.
• While a CL cyst may be
indistinguishable from a
simple cyst, demonstration of
daughter cysts on
ultrasonography or MRI is
diagnostic of hydatid disease.
• On contrast-enhanced
imaging, the pericyst enhances
avidly while the internal
sepatations do not.
Echinococcus multilocularis
• Small, multilocular confuent cysts associated with solid components that
demonstrate exogenous growth invading the adjacent hepatic
parenchyma.
• A large cystic component is also frequently observed. Small cysts include
metacestodal vesicles, while large cysts are composed of liquefaction
necrosis. Moreover, solid components encompass calcifcation and
coagulation necrosis.
• Ultrasonography
• Heterogeneous lesion with
irregular borders and a large
hypoechoic lesion.
• Computed tomography:
• Usually presented as
heterogeneous lesion containing
hypoattenuating areas of necrosis
and active parasitic tissue with
scattered calcifcation with no
obvious enhancement after
contrast administration
Magnetic resonance imaging
• Typical findings include peripheral
arrangement of multilocular cysts
and slight or no contrast
enhancement of the solid component
(Fig. 15b).
• While cystic components are
markedlyhyperintense on T2WI, the
solid component can range from
hypo- to hyperintense on T2W
• The heterogeneous form of AE
can be misinterpreted as primary
and secondary hepatic
malignancies.
• Schistosomiasis: Hepatomegaly, periportal fibrosis, “turtle back” or “tortoise shell”
sign.
• Axial CT shows signs of portal hypertension, including large varices and
splenomegaly. Note the extraordinarily widened hepatic fissures deeply dividing
the segments of the liver along the portal vein branches. This is a characteristic
feature of hepatic schistosomiasis; the appearance of the liver has been described
as that of a tortoise shell.
• Fascioliasis Patchy and linear ill-defined subcapsular lesions converging
from the hepatic capsule toward the hepatic hilum, focal thickening and
enhancement of Glisson capsule, thickening and dilatation of biliary ducts
• Ascariasis : Tubular structures in the biliary tree corresponding to adult
worms, hepatic abscess as non-specific focal lesion.
• Ascariasis in a 36-year-old male patient.
• Axial and coronal reformatted contrast-enhanced CT
• (a, b) show intrahepatic and
extrahepatic bile duct dilatation (black arrows).
Note intrahepatic bile ducts filled with structures more attenuating than bile (black arrowhead),
indicating adult worms.
Oblique coronal single-shot fast spinecho MR cholangiogram
(c) shows adult worms as serpiginous and nodular filling defects in the left intrahepatic and
extrahepatic bile ducts (white arrows).
• Clonorchiasis Mild diffuse peripheral intrahepatic bile duct dilatation
reaching the subcapsular area with relative sparing of extrahepatic bile
duct, thickening of bile duct wall with increased periductal
enhancement,stenosis of intrahepatic
Inflammatory lesions of liver
• Pseudotumor of the Liver
• Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) is a benign and rare process composed
of polymorphous inflammatory cell infiltrates and variable amounts of fibrosis.
• These are tumor-like lesion consisting of an inflammatory infiltrate that often can
mimic a malignant liver neoplasm. The cause of an inflammatory pseudotumor of
the liver is unknown.
• The tumor displaced the adjacent hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava (IVC) without any signs of vessel
invasion. There were no signs of liver cirrhosis and no dilated bile ducts or capsular retraction were noted.
There was no associated lymphadenopathy. At this point, imaging characteristics were controversial
regarding diagnosis. The differential diagnosis tilted in favor of ICC, mainly due to the enhancement
characteristics and the absence of liver cirrhosis.
• Absence of the typical features of malignancy on imaging in a liver mass
should prompt the consideration of an alternative diagnosis of rare liver
lesions, such as an inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver.
• Differentiating this pseudotumor from hepatic space-occupying lesions is
crucial since an inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver may regress
spontaneously with conservative management.
• However, the treatment of choice is still surgical resection for patients
with severe symptoms or an indeterminate diagnosis.
Sarcoidosis
• Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown pathogenesis,
characterized by noncaseating granulomas.
• Although it may involve almost any organ in the body,
pulmonary sarcoidosis is most common.
• Sarcoidosis of the liver is also relatively frequently seen, but the
granulomas are usually not macroscopically detectable and
thus may not produce focal abnormalities on imaging studies.
• Classically, the granulomas develop in a periportal location resulting in
periportal fibrosis, cirrhosis, and eventually portal hypertension.
• ultrasound:
– pattern of either diffuse
increased homogeneous or
heterogeneous echogenicity
– Nodules are usually hypoechoic
relative to the background liver 1
• Hepatic contrast-enhanced CT may
typically reveal multiple, diffuse small
low-density areas in both the liver
and spleen (Fig. 22.6).
Conclusion
• Hepatic infections are common.
• Imaging findings are mostly nonspecific.
• However, if correctly interpreted, any peripheral solid component and irregular
peripheral or central enhancement as well as septal calcification should favor a
diagnosis of neoplasm rather than infection.
• Ultrasonography allows accurate characterization of cystic lesions in general and
for hydatid cysts allow accurate detection of daughter cysts and membranes.
• The presence of fever, jaundice and immunosuppression favour the clinical
diagnosis.
• Laboratory investigations favoring infective etiology include elevated total
leukocyte count, absolute eosinophil count, hydatid serology, and other parasite
serology in selected cases.
• Needle aspiration may sometimes be used, when despite all measures diagnosis
remains unclear.
• MRI features of hepatic sarcoidosis nare also nonspecific and include
organomegaly, multiple low-signal-Intensity lesions relative to background
parenchyma with all sequences, increased periportal signal, irregularity of
the portal and hepatic vein branches, and patchy areas of heterogeneous
signal.
Thank you.

More Related Content

Similar to hepatic infections and inflammatory lesions VP (1).pptx

Focal vs diffuse gall bladder wall thickening
Focal vs diffuse gall bladder wall thickeningFocal vs diffuse gall bladder wall thickening
Focal vs diffuse gall bladder wall thickening
airwave12
 

Similar to hepatic infections and inflammatory lesions VP (1).pptx (20)

FNH.ppt
FNH.pptFNH.ppt
FNH.ppt
 
23205039
2320503923205039
23205039
 
Role of imaging in renal tuberculosis
Role of imaging in renal tuberculosisRole of imaging in renal tuberculosis
Role of imaging in renal tuberculosis
 
Urinary tract infections
Urinary tract infectionsUrinary tract infections
Urinary tract infections
 
Non Tubercular Infections of Genitourinary tract
Non Tubercular Infections of Genitourinary tractNon Tubercular Infections of Genitourinary tract
Non Tubercular Infections of Genitourinary tract
 
Oxford Abdomen Cases.pptx
Oxford Abdomen Cases.pptxOxford Abdomen Cases.pptx
Oxford Abdomen Cases.pptx
 
2 abdomen pathology ct
2 abdomen pathology ct2 abdomen pathology ct
2 abdomen pathology ct
 
Imaging of spleen ct and mri
Imaging of spleen ct and mriImaging of spleen ct and mri
Imaging of spleen ct and mri
 
Abdominal tb
Abdominal tbAbdominal tb
Abdominal tb
 
Sahad gb
Sahad gbSahad gb
Sahad gb
 
Imaging in Benign hepatic lesions
Imaging in Benign hepatic lesionsImaging in Benign hepatic lesions
Imaging in Benign hepatic lesions
 
Diagnostic Imaging of Cholangiocarcinoma
Diagnostic Imaging of CholangiocarcinomaDiagnostic Imaging of Cholangiocarcinoma
Diagnostic Imaging of Cholangiocarcinoma
 
Usg evolution of biliary tree and gallbladder.pptx
Usg evolution of biliary tree and gallbladder.pptxUsg evolution of biliary tree and gallbladder.pptx
Usg evolution of biliary tree and gallbladder.pptx
 
Presentation1, radiological imaging of colitis.
Presentation1, radiological imaging of colitis.Presentation1, radiological imaging of colitis.
Presentation1, radiological imaging of colitis.
 
Pancreatitis F.pptx
Pancreatitis F.pptxPancreatitis F.pptx
Pancreatitis F.pptx
 
Focal vs diffuse gall bladder wall thickening
Focal vs diffuse gall bladder wall thickeningFocal vs diffuse gall bladder wall thickening
Focal vs diffuse gall bladder wall thickening
 
sandra liver.pptx
sandra liver.pptxsandra liver.pptx
sandra liver.pptx
 
genitourinary infection radiology.pptx
genitourinary infection radiology.pptxgenitourinary infection radiology.pptx
genitourinary infection radiology.pptx
 
Biliary pathologies
Biliary pathologiesBiliary pathologies
Biliary pathologies
 
Utrasound Gall-bladder & biliary tract
Utrasound Gall-bladder & biliary tractUtrasound Gall-bladder & biliary tract
Utrasound Gall-bladder & biliary tract
 

More from vishwanath0908 (13)

MRI KNEE.pptx
MRI KNEE.pptxMRI KNEE.pptx
MRI KNEE.pptx
 
VP pulmonary thmboembolism.pptx
VP pulmonary thmboembolism.pptxVP pulmonary thmboembolism.pptx
VP pulmonary thmboembolism.pptx
 
Solitary pulmonary nodule vp.pptx
Solitary pulmonary nodule vp.pptxSolitary pulmonary nodule vp.pptx
Solitary pulmonary nodule vp.pptx
 
Pancreatic Endocrine Tumor imaging2.pptx
Pancreatic Endocrine Tumor imaging2.pptxPancreatic Endocrine Tumor imaging2.pptx
Pancreatic Endocrine Tumor imaging2.pptx
 
SPINAL dysraphism VP,,.pptx
SPINAL dysraphism VP,,.pptxSPINAL dysraphism VP,,.pptx
SPINAL dysraphism VP,,.pptx
 
Ovarian cancer ppt VP.pptx
Ovarian cancer ppt VP.pptxOvarian cancer ppt VP.pptx
Ovarian cancer ppt VP.pptx
 
Liver Doppler made simple JC
Liver Doppler made simple JCLiver Doppler made simple JC
Liver Doppler made simple JC
 
Hysterosalphyngography
HysterosalphyngographyHysterosalphyngography
Hysterosalphyngography
 
Filters and beam restrictors
Filters  and beam restrictorsFilters  and beam restrictors
Filters and beam restrictors
 
Mammography technique
Mammography techniqueMammography technique
Mammography technique
 
Grids
GridsGrids
Grids
 
SONOELASTOGRAPHY
SONOELASTOGRAPHYSONOELASTOGRAPHY
SONOELASTOGRAPHY
 
Hip ultrasonography in infants and children
Hip ultrasonography in infants  and  childrenHip ultrasonography in infants  and  children
Hip ultrasonography in infants and children
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Dipal Arora
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 9332606886 𖠋 Will You Mis...
The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 9332606886 𖠋 Will You Mis...The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 9332606886 𖠋 Will You Mis...
The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 9332606886 𖠋 Will You Mis...
 
Call Girls Guntur Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Guntur  Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Guntur  Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Guntur Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls Bahadurpally 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls Bahadurpally 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋VIP Hyderabad Call Girls Bahadurpally 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls Bahadurpally 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
 
Best Rate (Patna ) Call Girls Patna ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl In 5 ...
Best Rate (Patna ) Call Girls Patna ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl In 5 ...Best Rate (Patna ) Call Girls Patna ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl In 5 ...
Best Rate (Patna ) Call Girls Patna ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl In 5 ...
 
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Dehradun Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Dehradun Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Dehradun Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Dehradun Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Ooty Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ooty Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Ooty Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ooty Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Russian Call Girls Service Jaipur {8445551418} ❤️PALLAVI VIP Jaipur Call Gir...
Russian Call Girls Service  Jaipur {8445551418} ❤️PALLAVI VIP Jaipur Call Gir...Russian Call Girls Service  Jaipur {8445551418} ❤️PALLAVI VIP Jaipur Call Gir...
Russian Call Girls Service Jaipur {8445551418} ❤️PALLAVI VIP Jaipur Call Gir...
 
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Varanasi Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Varanasi Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Varanasi Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Varanasi Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Top Quality Call Girl Service Kalyanpur 6378878445 Available Call Girls Any Time
Top Quality Call Girl Service Kalyanpur 6378878445 Available Call Girls Any TimeTop Quality Call Girl Service Kalyanpur 6378878445 Available Call Girls Any Time
Top Quality Call Girl Service Kalyanpur 6378878445 Available Call Girls Any Time
 
All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...
All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...
All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...
 
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
 
Mumbai ] (Call Girls) in Mumbai 10k @ I'm VIP Independent Escorts Girls 98333...
Mumbai ] (Call Girls) in Mumbai 10k @ I'm VIP Independent Escorts Girls 98333...Mumbai ] (Call Girls) in Mumbai 10k @ I'm VIP Independent Escorts Girls 98333...
Mumbai ] (Call Girls) in Mumbai 10k @ I'm VIP Independent Escorts Girls 98333...
 
Night 7k to 12k Navi Mumbai Call Girl Photo 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️ night ...
Night 7k to 12k Navi Mumbai Call Girl Photo 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️ night ...Night 7k to 12k Navi Mumbai Call Girl Photo 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️ night ...
Night 7k to 12k Navi Mumbai Call Girl Photo 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️ night ...
 
Call Girls Jabalpur Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jabalpur Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Jabalpur Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jabalpur Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Visakhapatnam Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Ava...
Call Girls Visakhapatnam Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Ava...Call Girls Visakhapatnam Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Ava...
Call Girls Visakhapatnam Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Ava...
 
Premium Bangalore Call Girls Jigani Dail 6378878445 Escort Service For Hot Ma...
Premium Bangalore Call Girls Jigani Dail 6378878445 Escort Service For Hot Ma...Premium Bangalore Call Girls Jigani Dail 6378878445 Escort Service For Hot Ma...
Premium Bangalore Call Girls Jigani Dail 6378878445 Escort Service For Hot Ma...
 
O898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24×7 In Ahmedabad
O898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24×7 In AhmedabadO898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24×7 In Ahmedabad
O898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24×7 In Ahmedabad
 
Call Girls Gwalior Just Call 8617370543 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Gwalior Just Call 8617370543 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Gwalior Just Call 8617370543 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Gwalior Just Call 8617370543 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 

hepatic infections and inflammatory lesions VP (1).pptx

  • 1. IMAGING IN HEPATIC INFECTIONS AND INFLAMMATORY LESIONS MODERATOR –Dr.BALASUBRAMABYAM S PRESENTER – Dr.VISHWANATH PATIL
  • 2. Introduction • Infections of the liver include bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, and parasitic involvement of the liver parenchyma. • These infections may present with vague constitutional symptoms and pain abdomen and are usually identified incidentally during an abdominal ultrasound. • Radiological appearances of most hepatic infections are nonspecific, thereby often requiring serological and histological confirmation. The most common differentials are neoplasms and cysts.
  • 4. Liver Abscess • This may be a consequence of bacterial, parasitic, fungal, or granulomatous infection. There is a geographic and demographic divide in the etiological factors responsible for liver abscesses. • Abscesses involve the right lobe in about two-third of cases, probably in accordance with the proportion of portal blood received by the right lobe. • Amebic and pyogenic abscesses may be indistinguishable on clinical and imaging features. • However, they differ in terms of epidemiology as well as medical management. • Amebic liver abscess is commonly seen in the 3rd and 4th decades, with a striking male preponderance (M:F ratio 4–10:1). • Most cases either reside in or have a history of recent travel to a tropical, endemic region.
  • 5. • Pyogenic abscesses, on the contrary, are usually seen in the 5th or 6th decade, with no gender predilection. • These are commonly polymicrobial, with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella being the most common causes. • Intra-abdominal infections like appendicitis and diverticulitis used to be the most common etiological factors responsible for pyogenic liver abscesses in the pre-antibiotic days. • Right-sided abdominal pain, fever, and rigors. • Persistence of elevated bilirubin should alert the radiologist to look for an evidence of biliary obstruction.
  • 6. Imaging • Ultrasound: • Abscesses are discrete hypoechoic lesions with acoustic through transmission. • There may be presence of internal echoes or air within the cavity seen as echogenic foci with reverberation.
  • 7. Imaging • Contrast-enhanced CT: • Sensitivity of over 95%, a CECT is an excellent investigation for liver abscess. • Facilitates planning of percutaneous interventions in complex cases. • A microabscess on CECT scan is typically a well-defined hypodense lesion with faint rim enhancement and perilesional edema. • Multiple, small adjacent abscesses may coalesce to aggregate into a single larger cavity described as the cluster sign . • Transient segmental enhancement of the hepatic parenchyma in arterial phase scans may be seen in patients with large vascular abscesses. Pyogenic liver abscess—CT: (A, arrows) Microabscess seen as a well-defined hypodense lesion with perilesional edema; (B, arrow) Cluster sign; (C, arrow) Larger abscess with inner liquefied component and wall showing two rims (double-target appearance); (D, arrow) Air-foci in pyogenic liver abscess
  • 8. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely required for the diagnosis of liver abscesses but may be invaluable in cases with suspected biliary involvement. • MRCP sequence can help define and characterize any biliary obstruction because of the liver abscess. • Abscesses are usually T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense lesions (Fig. 3A). • However, their signal intensities are largely dependent upon the protein content. • Mild T2 hyperintensity may be seen surrounding the abscess representing edema. • The double target inflammatory rim showing dynamic enhancement characteristics may be seen with gadolinium enhanced MRI as seen on CT (Fig. 3B). • Marked central diffusion restriction on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is a useful feature that can sometimes help differentiate it from neoplasms where marked restriction favors an abscess over neoplasm. • Pyogenic liver abscess—MRI: (A, arrow) T2W MR image shows a large abscess showing heterogeneous hyperintensity; (B, arrow) T1W post-contrast image shows peripheral rim enhancement
  • 9. • Key imaging features Although differentiating an abscess from a neoplasm may be extremely challenging at times, the key imaging features include • A.typical enhancement kinetics of an inflammatory capsule with a layered appearance, • B.Transient segmental parenchymal enhancement, • C.Restriction of diffusion within the lesion on DWI. • Cysts: Lack of surrounding edema, diffusion restriction, and rim enhancement differentiate cysts from abscesses (Fig. 5). • Biliary hamartomas: Although hepatic hamartomas may show enhancing rims to mimic abscesses, they do not show perilesional edema or diffusion restriction.
  • 10. • A phlegmonous abscess may be difficult to differentiate from a necrotic neoplasm. Likewise, a necrotic mass may mimic a liquefied abscess. Unlike abscesses, neoplasms seldom show the layered appearance, segmental enhancement, perifocal edema, and central diffusion restriction. • Other ancillary findings specific to tumor type can help differentiate them from abscesses
  • 11. Tubercular Disease • Hepatobiliary tuberculosis is uncommon, accounting for <1% of all tubercular infections. • Spleen is more commonly involved in patients with HIV infection. • Hepatic tuberculosis may present in two forms. • Hematogenous dissemination of tuberculosis to the liver presents as its micronodular form with tiny (<2 mm) nodules that calcify on healing. • The macronodular hepatic tuberculosis presents as focal granulomas (usually 1–3 cm in size) or frank abscesses. • Tuberculomas often progress to abscesses resulting from liquefaction of caseous necrosis. • By virtue of their mass effect, they may cause focal biliary dilatation.
  • 12. Ultrasonography • Miliary tuberculosis may present as hepatomegaly with coarsening of hepatic echotexture. • Generally, a tuberculoma appears as a poorly defined hypoechoic mass. • At times, it may be entirely hyperechoic. • A tubercular abscess is a complex appearing lesion (Fig. 6D) that may not have a distinct wall at all, may have a circumferential hyperechoic wall, or may appear as a solid lesion • Hepatic tuberculosis—USG: (A) Coarsening of liver echotexture; (B and C, arrows) Poorly defined hypoechoic lesions; (D, arrow) Tubercular abscess seen as a well-defined hypoechoic lesion; (E, arrow) Solid-appearing lesion.
  • 13. CT • Multiple hypodense nodules with or without peripheral enhancement (Figs 7A and B), • A single hypodense mass with central hypoattenuation, a conglomerate mass with honeycomb appearance, or a fluid collection with enhancing thick walls (Fig. 7C).
  • 14. MRI • The tuberculosis nodules are usually T1 hypointense. On T2WI, they are commonly iso to hyperintense with a less hyperintense rim. • Multifocal nodules may be seen on MRI having varying T2 signal intensity. On DWI, tuberculomas exhibit restricted diffusion. • On contrast administration, peripheral enhancement is seen. • Abscesses are T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense.
  • 15. Differential Diagnosis and Imaging Pitfalls • Miliary hepatic tuberculosis closely mimics lesions of fungal infection, Pneumocystic jiroveci infection and sarcoidosis. • The clinical profile of patients with the former two closely matches that of those with tuberculosis making diagnosis challenging and histology necessary. • When differentiating tuberculosis from sarcoidosis, MRI plays an important role. • On T1WI, the caseating granulomas in tuberculosis have a varying signal and show no enhancement, or sometimes peripheral enhancement in comparison to noncaseating granulomas in sarcoidosis which have intermediate signals on T1WI with enhancement that may persist on delayed images.
  • 16. • Pyogenic or amebic abscesses may not be differentiable from tubercular abscesses on imaging. Lack of response to antibiotics and percutaneous drainage should raise suspicion for tubercular etiology.
  • 17. Viral Hepatitis • The commonest viruses to infect the liver are hepatotropic viruses like hepatitis A, B, C, and E, herpes simplex virus, HIV, and coxsackie virus. • The imaging findings of acute viral hepatitis are essentially nonspecific. • The role of radiology is to rule out other causes of similar biochemical and clinical picture.
  • 18. Ultrasonography • Acute hepatitis appears as hepatomegaly and decreased parenchymal echogenicity with prominent portal tracts described classically as the starry sky appearance. • Gallbladder wall edema with luminal collapse is noted.
  • 19. • CT: • Hepatomegaly, heterogeneous hepatic contrast enhancement on arterial phase images, well-defned parenchymal zones with low attenuation, periportal hypoattenuation, or hepatic hilum lymph node enlargement can be observed. • Gallbladder wall thickening. • Magnetic resonance imaging: • The findings on MRI are the same as those on CT with a hyperintense periportal halo on T2WI and a hypointense T1WI image.
  • 20. Parasitic Infestation • Amebiasis: • Liver amebic abscess is the most common site of extraintestinal involvement of amebiasis, the infection of the large bowel by Entamoeba histolytica. • Amebic abscess s usually a solitary unilocular cyst that is frequently located in the right hepatic lobe, especially the posterior segment.
  • 21. Five sonographic signs has been described for amebic abscesses: (a) round or oval shape, (b) absence of wall echoes, (c) homogeneous low-level internal echoes, (d) acoustic through transmission, and (e) contiguity with hepatic capsule.
  • 22. Computed tomography • On precontrast CT, an amebic abscess is hypoattenuating but slightly more attenuating than water, and varies in density between 10 and 20 Hounsfeld units [HU] with a thick peripheral capsule up to 1.5 mm in diameter . • The capsule is enhanced after contrast administration and surrounded by peripheral hypoattenuation, known as the “double target sign,” similar to that observed with pyogenic abscesses. • In addition, these abscesses have a higher predisposition for extrahepatic extension.
  • 23. Hydatid Disease • Echinococcus granulosus and Echinococcus multilocularis are the causative organisms for hepatic echinococcosis with cystic and alveolar echinococcosis being the commonest forms. • Liver is the most commonly affected organ with a propensity for right lobar involvement. • The cysts grow up to approximately 1 cm in size in 6 months and then progress at a rate of 2–3 cm per year.
  • 25. CT • The daughter cysts usually have a lower attenuation than the main cyst (Figs 11B and C). • There may be air or fat within indicating superadded infection or communication (Fig. 11D). • HAE presents as a heterogeneous infiltrative mass that does not enhance centrally. • Clustered microcalcification or dense focal calcifications may be seen.
  • 26. CT
  • 27. MRI • The pericyst is well delineated by MRI as a T1 and T2 hypointense rim. • The daughter cysts are more T2 hyperintense than the mother cyst. • When collapsed, the membranes appear hypointense on all sequences (Figs 12A and B) and this is called serpent sign. • Irregularity of cyst wall is better detected on MRI and represents loss of viability of cyst. • On administration of gadolinium, the cyst fluid and the septae do not enhance. • The pericyst, being fibrous, may enhance on delayed scans.
  • 28. • Complications: • A cyst may show communicating or contained rupture or may directly rupture into the surrounding anatomical structures including viscera, thorax, pancreatobiliary ducts (Fig. 12C), peritoneum, or skin. • Key imaging features: • The imaging features correspond to the stage of cyst transition. • While a CL cyst may be indistinguishable from a simple cyst, demonstration of daughter cysts on ultrasonography or MRI is diagnostic of hydatid disease. • On contrast-enhanced imaging, the pericyst enhances avidly while the internal sepatations do not.
  • 29. Echinococcus multilocularis • Small, multilocular confuent cysts associated with solid components that demonstrate exogenous growth invading the adjacent hepatic parenchyma. • A large cystic component is also frequently observed. Small cysts include metacestodal vesicles, while large cysts are composed of liquefaction necrosis. Moreover, solid components encompass calcifcation and coagulation necrosis.
  • 30. • Ultrasonography • Heterogeneous lesion with irregular borders and a large hypoechoic lesion. • Computed tomography: • Usually presented as heterogeneous lesion containing hypoattenuating areas of necrosis and active parasitic tissue with scattered calcifcation with no obvious enhancement after contrast administration
  • 31. Magnetic resonance imaging • Typical findings include peripheral arrangement of multilocular cysts and slight or no contrast enhancement of the solid component (Fig. 15b). • While cystic components are markedlyhyperintense on T2WI, the solid component can range from hypo- to hyperintense on T2W • The heterogeneous form of AE can be misinterpreted as primary and secondary hepatic malignancies.
  • 32. • Schistosomiasis: Hepatomegaly, periportal fibrosis, “turtle back” or “tortoise shell” sign. • Axial CT shows signs of portal hypertension, including large varices and splenomegaly. Note the extraordinarily widened hepatic fissures deeply dividing the segments of the liver along the portal vein branches. This is a characteristic feature of hepatic schistosomiasis; the appearance of the liver has been described as that of a tortoise shell.
  • 33. • Fascioliasis Patchy and linear ill-defined subcapsular lesions converging from the hepatic capsule toward the hepatic hilum, focal thickening and enhancement of Glisson capsule, thickening and dilatation of biliary ducts
  • 34. • Ascariasis : Tubular structures in the biliary tree corresponding to adult worms, hepatic abscess as non-specific focal lesion. • Ascariasis in a 36-year-old male patient. • Axial and coronal reformatted contrast-enhanced CT • (a, b) show intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct dilatation (black arrows). Note intrahepatic bile ducts filled with structures more attenuating than bile (black arrowhead), indicating adult worms. Oblique coronal single-shot fast spinecho MR cholangiogram (c) shows adult worms as serpiginous and nodular filling defects in the left intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts (white arrows).
  • 35. • Clonorchiasis Mild diffuse peripheral intrahepatic bile duct dilatation reaching the subcapsular area with relative sparing of extrahepatic bile duct, thickening of bile duct wall with increased periductal enhancement,stenosis of intrahepatic
  • 36. Inflammatory lesions of liver • Pseudotumor of the Liver • Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) is a benign and rare process composed of polymorphous inflammatory cell infiltrates and variable amounts of fibrosis. • These are tumor-like lesion consisting of an inflammatory infiltrate that often can mimic a malignant liver neoplasm. The cause of an inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver is unknown.
  • 37. • The tumor displaced the adjacent hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava (IVC) without any signs of vessel invasion. There were no signs of liver cirrhosis and no dilated bile ducts or capsular retraction were noted. There was no associated lymphadenopathy. At this point, imaging characteristics were controversial regarding diagnosis. The differential diagnosis tilted in favor of ICC, mainly due to the enhancement characteristics and the absence of liver cirrhosis.
  • 38. • Absence of the typical features of malignancy on imaging in a liver mass should prompt the consideration of an alternative diagnosis of rare liver lesions, such as an inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver. • Differentiating this pseudotumor from hepatic space-occupying lesions is crucial since an inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver may regress spontaneously with conservative management. • However, the treatment of choice is still surgical resection for patients with severe symptoms or an indeterminate diagnosis.
  • 39. Sarcoidosis • Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown pathogenesis, characterized by noncaseating granulomas. • Although it may involve almost any organ in the body, pulmonary sarcoidosis is most common. • Sarcoidosis of the liver is also relatively frequently seen, but the granulomas are usually not macroscopically detectable and thus may not produce focal abnormalities on imaging studies. • Classically, the granulomas develop in a periportal location resulting in periportal fibrosis, cirrhosis, and eventually portal hypertension.
  • 40. • ultrasound: – pattern of either diffuse increased homogeneous or heterogeneous echogenicity – Nodules are usually hypoechoic relative to the background liver 1 • Hepatic contrast-enhanced CT may typically reveal multiple, diffuse small low-density areas in both the liver and spleen (Fig. 22.6).
  • 41. Conclusion • Hepatic infections are common. • Imaging findings are mostly nonspecific. • However, if correctly interpreted, any peripheral solid component and irregular peripheral or central enhancement as well as septal calcification should favor a diagnosis of neoplasm rather than infection. • Ultrasonography allows accurate characterization of cystic lesions in general and for hydatid cysts allow accurate detection of daughter cysts and membranes. • The presence of fever, jaundice and immunosuppression favour the clinical diagnosis. • Laboratory investigations favoring infective etiology include elevated total leukocyte count, absolute eosinophil count, hydatid serology, and other parasite serology in selected cases. • Needle aspiration may sometimes be used, when despite all measures diagnosis remains unclear.
  • 42. • MRI features of hepatic sarcoidosis nare also nonspecific and include organomegaly, multiple low-signal-Intensity lesions relative to background parenchyma with all sequences, increased periportal signal, irregularity of the portal and hepatic vein branches, and patchy areas of heterogeneous signal.
  • 43.