Running Head: DEATH PENALTY 1 DEATH PENALTY 8 DEATH PENALTY Jimetria Grice Colorado Technical University Rhonda Ntepp Death penalty is commonly referred to as the capital punishment which refers to the action taken by the government as sanction to discipline and punish law offenders who have been found guilty of committing crime equitable to death. The government conducts the act in line with the provision of the court of law and order. The execution of the death penalty is termed as death penalty or death punishment. The penalties are normally conducted as punishment. The criminals mostly posted on perpetrators of international and country wars and conflicts and treason activities, regional wars and crimes leading to massive deaths and killings, genocide activities and all sort of crimes against the will and desires of the humanity. In most cases the government executes the death punishment through beheading of the criminals. However, most countries have gone against the death penalty terming it unconstitutional and against the will of the human rights. The European Union has gone further to describe the fundamental rights and termed use and implication of death penalties as violation of human rights. Some countries however still apply the death penalties such as Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan countries to punish the law offenders and criminals. The U.S judicial system has also manipulated the death penalty to safeguard the human rights. I personally oppose corporal death punishment and I support the abolishment of the inhuman act since it ruins and interferes with the human rights. The death penalty is an infringement of human rights and ought to in this way be annulled. Different types of disciplines ought to be applied as opposed to death retribution. Most nations practice capital punishment on murder, war, fear monger acts or injustice cases (Acker, 2017). A few nations then again do the death penalty on inappropriate behavior and wrongdoings, for example, assault cases, homosexuality activities, incest and detailed infidelity hand with strict violations. Some likewise lead the punishment on tranquilize dealers and traffickers. China executes capital punishment on genuine defilement cases just as human dealers and traffickers. In any case, casualties of weakness and disobedience offenses in military missions face capital punishment. The death penalty is probably the best infringement of Human Rights. This torment of life is against the Human Rights Charter. Nobody has the privilege to end a real existence, in any event, as indicated by the scriptural implication of life. The brutal and savage act is against God's instructions and it ought to be exceptionally censured. Human activists consistently restrict the death penalty. It ought to be canceled as it denies the Human Rights under the International Human reprieve (Garrett, B. L. (2019). An equal move ought to be made however not just passing. Detainm.

1. Running Head: DEATH PENALTY
1
DEATH PENALTY 8
DEATH PENALTY
Jimetria Grice
Colorado Technical University
Rhonda Ntepp
Death penalty is commonly referred to as the capital punishment
which refers to the action taken by the government as sanction
to discipline and punish law offenders who have been found
guilty of committing crime equitable to death. The government
conducts the act in line with the provision of the court of law
and order. The execution of the death penalty is termed as death
penalty or death punishment. The penalties are normally
conducted as punishment. The criminals mostly posted on
perpetrators of international and country wars and conflicts and
treason activities, regional wars and crimes leading to massive
deaths and killings, genocide activities and all sort of crimes
against the will and desires of the humanity. In most cases the
government executes the death punishment through beheading
of the criminals. However, most countries have gone against the

2. death penalty terming it unconstitutional and against the will of
the human rights. The European Union has gone further to
describe the fundamental rights and termed use and implication
of death penalties as violation of human rights. Some countries
however still apply the death penalties such as Russia, Armenia
and Azerbaijan countries to punish the law offenders and
criminals. The U.S judicial system has also manipulated the
death penalty to safeguard the human rights. I personally
oppose corporal death punishment and I support the abolishment
of the inhuman act since it ruins and interferes with the human
rights.
The death penalty is an infringement of human rights and ought
to in this way be annulled. Different types of disciplines ought
to be applied as opposed to death retribution. Most nations
practice capital punishment on murder, war, fear monger acts or
injustice cases (Acker, 2017). A few nations then again do the
death penalty on inappropriate behavior and wrongdoings, for
example, assault cases, homosexuality activities, incest and
detailed infidelity hand with strict violations. Some likewise
lead the punishment on tranquilize dealers and traffickers.
China executes capital punishment on genuine defilement cases
just as human dealers and traffickers. In any case, casualties of
weakness and disobedience offenses in military missions face
capital punishment.
The death penalty is probably the best infringement of Human
Rights. This torment of life is against the Human Rights
Charter. Nobody has the privilege to end a real existence, in any
event, as indicated by the scriptural implication of life. The
brutal and savage act is against God's instructions and it ought
to be exceptionally censured. Human activists consistently
restrict the death penalty. It ought to be canceled as it denies
the Human Rights under the International Human reprieve
(Garrett, B. L. (2019). An equal move ought to be made
however not just passing. Detainment of the influenced
unfortunate casualties ought to be directed with an end goal to
rebuff the lawbreakers. We can generally show suspects and

3. unfortunate casualties without delivering enduring in them all in
all. Regard individual flexibility and ownership of life.
The death penalty results into responsibility of treachery by
executing honest people wrongly. Not all cases have the vital
and enough proof in this way cases have been accounted for on
improper execution of guiltless individuals to confront capital
punishment. Imagine a scenario where executions are begun
against the initiators and propellers of capital punishment by
human activists. In the United States for example, somewhere in
the range of 1992 and 2004, thirty nine demise executions were
led without full proof (Ulmer.et.al, 2019). The unfortunate
casualties were not especially seen as liable rather advantage of
uncertainty was utilized to give the decision. Nonetheless, the
recently designed DNA tests issue some proof before the last
execution has reinstalled trust in the lives of unfortunate
casualties. The confirmations from DNA tests have forestalled
untimely execution of around fifteen demise cases promptly it
was created and demonstrated. As of now, more than one –
hundred and fifty nine detainees have gotten away 'passing
barely' because of no proof by DNA (Stinneford, 2018).
Numerous obscure cases are additionally accepted to exist since
not generally the exploited people can pay for the DNA or even
the obstruction of the outcomes along these lines coming about
into an inappropriate execution. Safeguard faculty consistently
focus their endeavors on the customers who have their lives
spared instead of focusing on expanding odds of endurance of
the 'demise' respondents. Unseemly executions can be because
of inappropriate court methods. For example, the contention
about the abuse of the Drugs Act in Singapore by the Amnesty
universal expresses that; suppositions were utilized for
indictment. There was no reasonable confirmation. There is a
widespread assurance of guiltlessness until an injured individual
is seen as blameworthy (Franklin , 2016).
According to the case for Rodney Reed regardless of the
evidence provided on innocence, it was evident that no matter
what criminal action had been undertaken, the judicial systems

4. needed to obey the human rights. The background of the case
was where Mr. Reed was punished following the flow of the
new evidences provided in the court of law. His execution was
expected to be steady and not cruel not to undermine and limit
the provisions of the rule of law. Following Reed’s and other
prisoners appeal letter through what is commonly referred to as
the friend of the court, they appeared before the jurisdiction.
Rodney Reed had been the main suspect for the killing of
Stacey Stites who was aged 19 years by the year 1996. She had
been raped and dumped across the road at Bastrop. After years
of investigations and DNA tests, it was evident that the sperms
collected inside the body were linked to Mr. Reed.
Capital punishment is a for the most part a discipline directed
principally to exploited people from racial and ethnic minorities
and other poor monetary foundations than just to all
lawbreakers. The blade cuts just the less favored, for instance,
passing cases rotating about African Americans are increasingly
inclined to confront capital punishments and the dark litigants
are bound to confront capital punishment in cases including
white exploited people.
Areas have made feelings intended to forbid capital
punishments. For example, the sixth Protocol and the thirteenth
Protocol intended to abrogate harmony and different conditions
individually were laid out under the European Convention on
Human rights were intended to forestall capital punishments.
Then again the second Protocol offered agree to America and
Canada to annul capital punishment (Garrett, B. L., &
Kovarsky, L. B. (2018). Different associations in the universal
organization have improved the nullification of capital
punishment. The EU censures the capital punishments in
European nations with the exception of in Russia however
capital punishment cases are uncommon since 1996. The
convention nullifies any type of capital punishment which has
been marked by practically all nations in Europe. As of late,
Poland has acknowledged to sign the bargain to abrogate the
death penalty.

5. Some African nations inside the Sub-Saharan district have
additionally clung to nullification of capital punishment. In
2009, Burundi canceled all capital punishments regardless of
what wrongdoing, Gabon likewise abrogated capital punishment
in 2010 and on 2012, and Benin watched the International
Covenant on Civil and Political rights by sanctioning the
Protocol on capital punishment (Ulmer, J. T., & Hanrath, L.
(2019). Practically all nations have expressed a cancelation of
this punishment, even the most up to date nation the South
Sudan is among the one hundred and eleven individuals from
the United Nations association who completely confirm and
bolster the expulsion of capital punishment as concurred by the
organs General Assembly. The individuals marked duplicates of
the adherence bargain to end and forestall any capital
punishment regardless of what wrongdoing and offers a counter
strategy for managing violations of death.
In conclusion, the death penalty is against humankind and
instead some other lighter punishments should be adopted. The
enforcements should include imprisonment, forgiving them and
issuing them with new advisory roles in the community to act as
ambassadors and guidance and counselling personnel to warn
and educate others against crime in the society. I would like to
propose immediate implementations of the alternatives in the
constitutions and rule of laws for various countries especially
the ones who still retain capital punishments. All in all, it is
against the Human Rights, Amnesty International, and other
universal associations to execute capital punishment to any
injured individual rather different disciplines ought to be
authorized like detainment. It is in this manner pivotal to look
out for such allegations consequently non-legislative
associations and human activists ought to be on bleeding edge
to forestall any infringement. A few nations anyway still apply
the capital punishments, for example, Russia, Armenia and
Azerbaijan nations to rebuff the law wrongdoers and criminals
which is against the United States of America Judicial Systems
and the rule of law. I for one contradict corporal demise

6. discipline and I bolster the abolishment of the brutal capital
punishment (death penalty) since it ruins and meddles with the
human rights.
References
Acker, J. R. (2017). Scrutinizing the death penalty: State death
penalty study commissions and their recommendations. In The
death penalty today (pp. 45-76). CRC Press.
Garrett, B. L. (2019). Innocence and the global death penalty.
In Comparative Capital Punishment. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00020
Garrett, B. L., & Kovarsky, L. B. (2018). The death penalty.
Foundation Press.
https://theintercept.com/2019/11/08/rodney-reed-death-row-
texas/
Schabas, W. A. (2019). International law and the abolition of
the death penalty. In Comparative Capital Punishment. Edward
Elgar Publishing. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429027765-1
Stinneford, J. (2018). Original Meaning and the Death
Penalty. University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public
Policy, 13(1), 44.
Ulmer, J. T., & Hanrath, L. (2019). Disparities in Death Penalty
Prosecution and Punishment: A Review of Recent Research and
an Expanded Agenda. In Handbook on Sentencing Policies and
Practices in the 21st Century (pp. 254-280). Routledge.
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429027765-13
Ulmer, J. T., Kramer, J. H., & Zajac, G. (2019). The Race of
Defendants and Victims in Pennsylvania Death Penalty
Decisions: 2000–2010. Justice Quarterly, 1-29. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1679865