Each discussion answer must be a minimum of 400 words. Also no
headlines please.
Will be checked using turnitin for plagiarism.
Discussions:
#1
Explain the controversy of establishing a court system at the creation of the U.S. Constitution. Your responses must include the major elements of the controversy, the varying viewpoints for the needs for U.S. courts, and the ultimate outcome. Finally, postulate how our criminal justice system would be different today had the Founding Fathers not established the current system in use.
#2
Carefully examine “How to Read a Research Article” (
See attached
Spohn & Hemmens, 2012
pp. 42-45). Using the 10 criteria for review found in the text, prepare a critical analysis of
one
of the four
articles which immediately follow the analyses techniques:
“The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court” (Feeley, 1971, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 46-55); 46-53
“The Honest Politician’s Guide to Juvenile Justice in the Twenty-First Century” (Feld, 1994, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 55-67);
“The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Justice: An Empirical Assessment” (Smith, 2003, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 67-83); or
Your analysis should focus on whether or not you believe that the author provided a persuasive analysis and your reasoning for your conclusion.
.
Each discussion answer must be a minimum of 400 words. Also nohe.docx
1. Each discussion answer must be a minimum of 400 words. Also
no
headlines please.
Will be checked using turnitin for plagiarism.
Discussions:
#1
Explain the controversy of establishing a court system at the
creation of the U.S. Constitution. Your responses must include
the major elements of the controversy, the varying viewpoints
for the needs for U.S. courts, and the ultimate outcome. Finally,
postulate how our criminal justice system would be different
today had the Founding Fathers not established the current
system in use.
#2
Carefully examine “How to Read a Research Article” (
See attached
Spohn & Hemmens, 2012
pp. 42-45). Using the 10 criteria for review found in the text,
prepare a critical analysis of
one
of the four
articles which immediately follow the analyses techniques:
“The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower
Criminal Court” (Feeley, 1971, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens,
2012, pp. 46-55); 46-53
“The Honest Politician’s Guide to Juvenile Justice in the
Twenty-First Century” (Feld, 1994, as cited in Spohn &
Hemmens, 2012, pp. 55-67);
“The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Justice: An Empirical
Assessment” (Smith, 2003, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012,
pp. 67-83); or
Your analysis should focus on whether or not you believe that
2. the author provided a persuasive analysis and your reasoning for
your conclusion.
