Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Chanimal Naming Logo Guidelines


Published on

Rule for company, product naming and top 4 criteria for an effective logo

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Chanimal Naming Logo Guidelines

  1. 1. Company, Division & Product Naming Plus… Logo (Identity) Guidelines
  2. 2. Process <ul><li>Review Naming Guidelines - options </li></ul><ul><li>Concur on our approach </li></ul><ul><li>Product positioning – brand promise </li></ul><ul><li>Compare current product name to guidelines </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Existing equity, brand transition strategy, constraints (code name change, collateral) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Review competition </li></ul><ul><li>Create or brainstorm for candidates – no critique </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluate candidates against guidelines, brand promise, marketability </li></ul><ul><li>Create short list </li></ul><ul><li>Positioning statements (positions, clarifies) </li></ul><ul><li>Research US & Foreign trademark, product, business, URL, user group (consumer) </li></ul><ul><li>Finalize name based on availability or recycle through approach </li></ul><ul><li>Register name, URL </li></ul><ul><li>Logo & Identity (Review Logo Guidelines) </li></ul>
  3. 3. Naming Guidelines <ul><li>Review guidelines first </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Level sets the entire team </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Creates baseline rules that we agree on </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Reduces personal opinion and setting up camps--unless based on accepted rules </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Opinions are good, but if they don’t follow agreed upon rules, then they are subjective, not empirical and may not represent what market prefers. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Likewise, my opinion, outside of the rules, counts for “1” (although interesting, not statistically significant) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Should not discredit examples since they are not always market relevant, since they are concept relevant </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Group Concurrence <ul><li>We should agree to go through process – before solidifying opinions </li></ul><ul><li>Examples: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>HRW </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>100 years of tradition </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Strong camps </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Empirical evidence - 3% recognition in their logo </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Result – 100% concurrence we needed to change it </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Everything not finalized – discussion PowerPoint </li></ul>
  5. 5. Branding Considerations <ul><li>Institutional brand identity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Acid test – Microsoft “Where do you want to go today?” Actual: “A Safe Bet” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Positive and negative experience/baggage </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Metrowerks – Codewarrior </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Motorola – kept company name, transition </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Now Freescale – across the board (building new) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Product brand identity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>P&G approach – product branding </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Attachmate / DCA – institutional branding vs product </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Microsoft approach - combined </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Recommendations – depends on association </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Don’t eat our own dog food. External perceptions critical. </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Company/Division Naming <ul><li>Two conventions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Call after primary product </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Goldmine, WordPerfect, Coca-Cola </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Metrowerks discussion </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Standalone </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Founder. Dell, Ford, Mercedes (after person), Covey </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Suggestive. Firestone, Thrifty, Dollar </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Combination. Micro/Soft </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Acronyms. IBM. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Initials – engineering loves them, hard (expensive) to brand </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Tangible objects. Apple, Red Hat (easier to remember) </li></ul></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Corporate Tag Lines <ul><li>Identity (what they make) known </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Microsoft – tag line </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Sun – tag line </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Descriptive (answers, “who are you”) </li></ul><ul><li>Positioning (#1, most, leader) </li></ul><ul><li>Rules of thumb – 7-9 words (billboard) </li></ul><ul><li>Association </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Tied to corporation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Tivoli – An IBM Company </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Metrowerks – A Motorola Company </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Acid test… worth more with, or without associate w/holding co. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Acquisition – watch out, don’t loose existing brand equity in the transition </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. Product Positioning <ul><li>The apex of all strategy </li></ul><ul><li>How it is positioned within the field of competitors? </li></ul><ul><li>What is the unique differentor? </li></ul><ul><li>Examples: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Crossfax – a hook was built in </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Codewarrior for Windows – no hook, made one </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Name reflects positioning – if possible. If not, tagline reflects it. </li></ul>
  9. 9. Branding <ul><li>Purpose: Prevent price erosion (better brands can demand higher prices, more credibility) </li></ul><ul><li>What do prospects expect from a company like yours? </li></ul><ul><li>What promises can you deliver? Brand promise (implied, expressed). Examples? </li></ul><ul><li>Forget about what you are known for, capture and become what the market wants (not a person, a company/product) </li></ul><ul><li>Overarching positioning </li></ul><ul><li>3-4 positioning statements that validate the positioning </li></ul>
  10. 10. Product Naming <ul><li>#1 preference: Call it what it is or what it does. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Microsoft Mouse, Microsoft Project, Microsoft Word, WinFax, PhotoShop, Corel Draw </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Not sexy, but immediate, inexpensive to brand, owns category </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Acid test </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Call prospect (or buyer if a reseller). Give name of the product. Ask, “What is it?” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>If they can’t identify the product, or at least the category – start over (too hard to brand) </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. Tag Lines <ul><li>If your name needs “clarification” then describe it with a tag line </li></ul><ul><ul><li>3D Website Builder (category) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Everything you need to create 3D VRML Worlds On The Internet </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Describes, positions, (11 words) beyond 7-9 word rule </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Difficult names </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Ascend, HP Newwave, Eudora </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ami Pro </li></ul></ul><ul><li>7-9 word rule </li></ul>
  12. 12. Bad Examples <ul><li>Nike (fine, if you have millions to create equity) </li></ul><ul><li>IBM (initial – fine, after billions in equity) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>International Business Machines </li></ul></ul><ul><li>You can brand anything… with enough money . </li></ul><ul><li>Unless you have hundreds of millions to spend, then choose a “cheaper” brand name </li></ul><ul><li>No subliminal – initials, codes (AmiPro) </li></ul>
  13. 13. Approaches (good or bad) <ul><li>Suggestive - Klenex </li></ul><ul><li>Acronym - IBM </li></ul><ul><li>Obvious – Microsoft Mouse </li></ul><ul><li>Clipping – FedEx </li></ul><ul><li>Product – Coca Cola </li></ul><ul><li>Resource – Toys R Us </li></ul><ul><li>Abstract – Samna </li></ul><ul><li>Benefit – Trusted Data </li></ul>
  14. 14. Compare Current Name <ul><li>Name: </li></ul><ul><li>Positioning: </li></ul><ul><li>Tag Line: </li></ul><ul><li>Classification </li></ul><ul><li>Existing equity </li></ul><ul><li>Brand transition strategy </li></ul><ul><li>Constraints (cost (code name, collateral)) </li></ul>
  15. 15. Example <ul><li>Product Name </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Positioning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>#1 best-selling </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Highest ranked </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Description (what does it do) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Benefit (How does it help) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>#1 Best-selling Software To Do What? </li></ul></ul>
  16. 16. Competition <ul><li>Competitors </li></ul><ul><ul><li>May want to consider their naming conventions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>May or may not be critical </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Home spun alternatives </li></ul></ul>
  17. 17. Brainstorming <ul><li>All is fair – no critique </li></ul><ul><li>Software to help ($110 </li></ul><ul><li> (free engine to come up with a site name, but works for all names) </li></ul>
  18. 18. Evaluate Candidates <ul><li>Cross off obvious </li></ul><ul><li>Review remaining against guidelines, promise, marketability </li></ul><ul><li>Consider </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Easy to remember </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3 syllables </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Balanced </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Power Consonants </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Marketability (CodeWarrior, Facility Commander) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Determine short list </li></ul>
  19. 19. Research <ul><li>US Trademark </li></ul><ul><li>Foreign Trademark </li></ul><ul><li>Products and Business Names </li></ul><ul><li>Field of use – watch out </li></ul><ul><li>URL availability </li></ul>
  20. 20. Finalize <ul><li>Finalize or re-cycle through process </li></ul><ul><li>Register name, URL </li></ul><ul><li>Logo Creation </li></ul>
  21. 21. Logo Guidelines <ul><li>Priority for effective, less expensive, quick recognition </li></ul><ul><li>You can brand anything with enough money – key is immediate recognition , minimal cost </li></ul><ul><li>How will it look in black and white? </li></ul><ul><li>Vertical or horizontal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Horizontal is easier to work with for most treatments </li></ul></ul>
  22. 22. Logo Guidelines <ul><li>Priority for best logos </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Make the company logo the name </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Name integrated with unique graphic </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A “mark” that can stand on its own </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A mark that cannot stand on its own </li></ul></ul>
  23. 23. Logo Guidelines <ul><li>Make the company logo the name </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Coca Cola, CNN, Yahoo, Citrix, Intuit, Intel, IBM, Goldmine, Microsoft </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Should not be able to duplicate it with a word processor (must be a graphic , not just a font) </li></ul></ul></ul>
  24. 24. Logo Guidelines <ul><li>2. Name integrated with unique graphic </li></ul><ul><ul><li>K-mart (mart inside the K) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>GoodYear (winged foot between Good and Year) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>McDonalds (text intersecting arches) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>AOL </li></ul></ul>
  25. 25. Logo Guidelines <ul><li>3. A “mark” that can stand on its own </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Tangible object you can visualize </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Unique </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Large enough to differentiate at distance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Fewest impressions to make connection </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Apple (bite out of apple) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Red Hat (physical felt red hat) </li></ul></ul></ul>
  26. 26. Logo Guidelines <ul><ul><li>4. Worst: A mark that cannot stand on its own </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Must have a text name next to it to equate it to anything </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Nike swoosh (swoosh did not mean anything. Fine if you have hundreds of millions (brand anything)) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Goldmine newer logo (means absolutely nothing on its own) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>HRW (Owl hidden in bushes, same size line points, invisible at a distance of 2 feet) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Also, the text next to it was not unique, it was inconsistent (sometimes sans, or serif, initials or spelled out) </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Only 3% of respondents could identify the standalone logo as ours (after 100 years of use (or misuse)). A travesty. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Acid test. Take away the name and ask, “Who is this?” </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>You’ll recognize those that have spent a fortune branding, but not those that have not. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>
  27. 27. Logo Selection <ul><li>Select from the first option whenever possible </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Use the name as the logo </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Easier to establish equity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cheaper </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Not the same rules for a mass consumer product (but doesn’t apply to us) </li></ul></ul>