Critical Thinking 63In general, it is fairly rare that som.docx
Issue template
1. Framework Key:
Opinion:
Support 2:
Stance:
Support 1: Nuance/Counterexample:
Intro
Introduce Topic. Discuss the two competing sides of the topic.
In the preceding statement, the author states that (paraphrase of the author's statement).
Though the author’s opinion may have merit, the following examples will illustrate why (reiterate topic
sentence) is/is not the case.
Para 2
One reason why (reiterate topic sentence) is
The author's premises, the basis for his argument, lack any legitimate evidentiary support and render his
conclusion unacceptable.
Para 3
In addition, the author makes several assumptions that remain unproven.
The author weakens his argument by making assumptions and failing to provide explication of the links
between X and Y he assumes exists.
2. Para 4
While the author does have several key issues in his argument's premises and assumptions, that is not to say that
the entire argument is without base.
Though there are several issues with the author's reasoning at present, with research and clarification, he could
improve his argument significantly.
Conclusion
In sum, the author's illogical argument is based on unsupported premises and unsubstantiated assumptions that
render his conclusion invalid.
If the author truly hopes to change his readers' minds on the issue, he would have to largely restructure his
argument, fix the flaws in his logic, clearly explicate his assumptions, and provide evidentiary support. Without
these things, his poorly reasoned argument will likely convince few people.