2. Introduction
β’ Academic achievement of student is important in achieving economic growth and
development.
β’ With higher learning, an individual well equipped with great and noble
information, skills and better interpretation of information or something they get
to economic for their country.
β’ However these variables may change overtime in accordance with the current
situation.
β’ Theoretical studies suggest that the co-relation between education and economic
growth is not clear enough.
3. β’ The term of economic growth has been conceptualized to two part of
individual :
a) highly skilled individuals and professional in academic
b) professional degree beyond high schools or university
β’ In the Tenth Malaysian Plan (2011-2015), has stated their high
focused into putting in efforts on non-physical infrastructure that
includes human capital development such as
a) skills development
b) strong innovation capabilities.
4. β’ Therefore, government is implementing a holistic approach to
strengthen education and training system, from early childhood to
tertiary level.
For Example :
Technical and vocational training is being provided as an alternative for
individuals in strengthening full potential.
β’ Academic achievement is essential key that has relation in
contributing towards the economic growth.
β’ The requirements of high skill development and knowledge are
needed by firms to fulfil national economic growth.
5. Objective of study
β’ To obtain something information from citizen like their perception
about Academic Achievement Malaysian students and the effect to
economicsβ growth in Malaysia.
β’ This research is done to see the relationship between educations on
the economic growth of Malaysia.
6. Previous Study
β’ The economic growth school of thoughts begins with classical
economist. In the era of classical economics, which are, Adam Smith,
David Ricardo and Karl Marx.
β’ The main question concerned that the growth theory introduced by
these economist is differ from one another.
7. Adam
Smith
β’ states that the efficiency of labor is important to economic
growth.
David
Ricardo
β’ states the theory of distribution and capital accumulation.
Karl
Marx
β’ states that a capitalist profit attained from the utilization of
labor, a profit oriented organization.
8. Adam Smith
β’ Adam Smith viewed that growth process as strictly endogenous and
there are two factors contribute to economic growth, which is,
β’ a) Division of labor
β’ b) Capital accumulation on labor productivity
β’ These two factors have a positive relationship that could lead to a
higher labor productivity.
9. David Ricardo
β’ David Ricardo states that economic growth depends on supply of
land, capital stock, labor and agricultural technology.
β’ The motive of profit influenced the outcome of the market and
allocation of resources.
β’ The assumption of this model is that agricultural sector contributes
most consumption from land (variable).
10. Karl Marx
β’ Marx believes that growth does not move on continuously
β’ Marx view economic development in a view of social and history.
β’ Labors productivity, labors skill, knowledge in science and
technology and environment are the factors contributes towards
economic development
11. John Stuart Mill
β’ John Stuart Mill was heavily influenced by David Ricardo.
β’ Concentrates on the variables such as,
β’ 1. capital accumulation
β’ 2. population growth and technology.
β’ He agrees on the existences of diminishing return, division of labor
and governmentβs role in contributing towards economic growth.
12. Method Used (Methodology)
β’ The research instrument used in this research is a quantitative method through the
Questionnaire Forms which are distributed to the 100 selected respondents online. This
questionnaire form have three general form, six questions under Economic Growth, five
questions in academic achievements and three general knowledge.
β’ This research used linear models.
Ex: Dependent Variable, Economic Growth (y)
Independent Variable, Academic Achievement (x)
β’ There are two types of test that will be carry out :
i. Pearson Correlation Test
ii. Regression Test
15. Data Analysis/Finding
β’ 100 randomly online respondentβ
β’ 53%, female
β’ 47%, male
Male Female
Primary and
Secondary School
5 7
Diploma / Matric /
STPM
10 11
Degree 21 21
Others 11 14
16. Economy Growth & Academic Achievement
Economy Growth
β’ Malaysian people still confuse with
economic in Malaysia stable or not.
Average
Agree Disagree TOTAL
Question 2 0.098 0.102 0.2
Question 3 0.116 0.084 0.2
Question 4 0.106 0.094 0.2
Question 5 0.126 0.074 0.2
Question 6 0.1 0.1 0.2
TOTAL 0.546 0.454 1
55%
45%
Percentage
Agree Disagree
17. Economy Growth & Academic Achievement
Academic Achievement
β’ More people say that the government still
not provide enough financial aid and
assistance for your education
development from time to time
Average
Agree Disagree TOTAL
Question 1 0.106 0.094 0.2
Question 2 0.114 0.086 0.2
Question 3 0.102 0.098 0.2
Question 4 0.11 0.09 0.2
Question 5 0.096 0.104 0.2
TOTAL 0.528 0.472 1
53%
47%
Percentage
Agree Disagree
19. Empirical Data Analysis and Findings
Regression and Pearson Correlation
β’ In this case, we will use regression and correlation method to measures the
degree/strength of relationship between one dependent variable and
independent variable.
β’ Linear models Correlation test
π¦ = π + ππ₯ π =
π π₯π¦
π π₯π₯ π π¦π¦
Where,
π¦ = πΈπππππππ ππππ€π‘β
π₯ = ππππππππ ππβπππ£πππππ‘
π = ππππππ π πππ ππππ /πππππππππππ‘
π = ππππππ π πππ ππππ π‘πππ‘
20. Regression and Pearson Correlation Test
Regression line
π¦ = 27.41 + 0.726π₯
Correlation test
π = 0.8332
π2 = 0.6941
β΄ We can say that, 0.8332 is close to +1 imply strong positive linear association between x and y
(There is a positive relationship between academic achievements in Malaysian economy growth).
Calculation above shows the value of π 2, 0.6941 where 69.41% changes in the dependent variable
y, economic growth, can be explained together with the independent variables x, academic
achievement
21. Regression and Pearson Correlation Test
Analysis of Test Model Linearity and Pearson correlation
According to the hypothesis that was developed in this research study,
π»0: There is a positive relationship between academic achievements in Malaysian economy growth.
π»1: There is a negative relationship between academic achievements in Malaysian economy growth.
S1: Setting up hypothesis
π»0: π½ = 0
π»1: π½ β 0
S2: Stating the test statistic
π‘ πππ π‘ =
π½βπ½0
πππ π½
; π€βπππ πππ π½ =
π π¦π¦β π½π π₯π¦
(πβ2)π π₯π₯
22. Regression and Pearson Correlation Test
S3: Using πΌ = 0.01 to find the critical region
π‘ πΌ
2,πβ2
= π‘0.005,3 = 5.841
S4: Computing
πππ π½ =
π π¦π¦β π½π π₯π¦
(πβ2)π π₯π₯
π‘ πππ π‘ =
π½βπ½0
πππ π½
πππ π½ =
8266β(0.726β7866)
3 β10836
π‘ πππ π‘ =
0.726β0
0.0774
πππ π½ =0.0774 π‘ πππ π‘ =2.6106
S5: Decision and Conclusion
Since 2.6106 < 5.841, we accept π»0, with significant level is 0.01 where there is a positive
relationship between academic achievements in Malaysian economy growth.
25. Conclusion
β’ hypothesis is accepted; there is a positive relationship between
academic achievement and economy growth in Malaysian.
β’ Academic achievement shows a significance positive outcome into
economic growth.
β’ There is a strong relation between academic achievement and that
involves a better knowledge, highly skilled for supporting economic
growth.
β’ In terms of research methodology, this research explained the
findings based on the questionnaire survey approach.