More Related Content Similar to Community Health Needs Assessment Presentation.docx Similar to Community Health Needs Assessment Presentation.docx (20) More from studywriters (20) Community Health Needs Assessment Presentation.docx1. Discussion: Community Health Needs Assessment Presentation
Discussion: Community Health Needs Assessment PresentationORDER HERE FOR
ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS ON Discussion: Community Health Needs
Assessment PresentationAs a healthcare administrator in a hospital, you have been asked to
contribute to a community health needs assessment (CHNA) for your county. For your
contribution, create a slide presentation with a minimum of 10 slides including speaker’s
notes describing your analysis of a health need in a county you select and the data related to
disease distribution in the management of
disease.he007_rubric.pdfoverview.docxUnformatted Attachment PreviewHE007: Disease
Distribution and Management: Evaluate community health needs and data about disease
distribution to make decisions regarding disease management. Assessment Rubric Rubric
Criteria Needs Improvement Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Community Health
Needs Assessment Presentation Learning Objective 1.1: Response does not describe
sociodemographic characteristics, or the response is inaccurate or incomplete. Response
accurately and thoroughly describes the sociodemographic characteristics (i.e.,
demographic measures, social and economic factors, the physical environment, health
behaviors, clinical care, and health outcomes) in the community selected. Learning
Objective 1.2: Describe the prevalence of infectious and chronic diseases in a specific
community. Response does not describe the prevalence of diseases or the response is
inaccurate or describes fewer than two chronic and two infectious diseases. Discussion:
Community Health Needs Assessment PresentationResponse accurately describes the
prevalence of two chronic and two infectious diseases in the community selected. Learning
Objective 1.3: Analyze indicators to measure public health. Response does not analyze or
analyzes fewer than 10 indicators to measure public health. Response accurately and
thoroughly analyzes 10 indicators to measure public health and justifies its necessity for the
CHNA. Describe the sociodemographic characteristics of specific communities. © 2020
Walden University Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “Meets,” plus
the following: Response accurately describes additional data such as insurance status,
community safety, access to a healthy lifestyle, and access to healthcare services.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “Meets,” plus the following: Response
accurately compares and contrasts indicators based on the data provided. Demonstrates the
same level of achievement as “Meets,” plus the following: 1 Rubric Criteria Learning
Objective 1.4: Explain how stakeholders should be involved to ensure that community
needs are considered. Learning Objective 1.5: Explain the relationship between the social
2. determinants of health and the burden of disease. Learning Objective 1.6: Use data to make
comparisons about disease distribution. © 2020 Walden University Needs Improvement
Indicators are not appropriate to measure public health. Meets Expectations Response
represents a diverse mix of socio-economic, demographic, disease, and clinical indicators.
Exceeds Expectations Response includes a logical rationale on why each indicator was
chosen. Response does not explain or vaguely explains how stakeholders should be
involved to ensure that the entire spectrum of the community needs is considered or
includes fewer than three stakeholders. Explanation of the relationship between social
determinants of health and the burden of disease is missing, inaccurate, or incomplete.
Discussion: Community Health Needs Assessment PresentationResponse accurately and
thoroughly explains how at least three logical stakeholders that should be involved to
ensure that the entire spectrum of community needs is considered. Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “Meets,” plus the following: Response clearly explains the
relationships between the social determinants of health and the burden of disease.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “Meets,” plus the following: Description of
disease distribution is missing, inaccurate, or incomplete. Response appropriately uses data
to describe disease distribution, including information about highest and lowest rates.
Response explains how to engage the three stakeholders to get their input for the CHNA.
Response effectively correlates social determinants of health to health outcomes and health
equity. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “Meets,” plus the following:
Response uses data to compare chlamydia rates 2 Rubric Criteria Needs Improvement
Meets Expectations Learning Objective 1.7: Interpret data to make inferences about changes
in disease distribution. Response does not describe the data or describes data but makes
inaccurate or incomplete inferences about changes in disease distribution. Response
appropriately analyzes data to make accurate inferences about changes in disease
distribution. Learning Objective 1.8: Compare disease distribution at the local and state
level. Comparison of disease distribution at the local and state level is missing, inaccurate,
or incomplete. Response compares general disease distribution trends at the local and state
level.Learning Objective 1.9: Use data to make recommendations to improve health
outcomes. Recommendations regarding the deployment of mobile units for STI screenings
are missing, incomplete, or not supported by references to the data. Description of disease
distribution is missing, inaccurate, or incomplete. Response makes clear recommendations
regarding the deployment of mobile units for STI screenings. Learning Objective 1.10: Use
data to describe disease distribution. © 2020 Walden University Exceeds Expectations with
three additional counties. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “Meets,” plus the
following: Response accurately analyzes chlamydia risk factors and health behaviors.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “Meets,” plus the following: Response
includes an accurate analysis and comparison of the changes in STI rates over time utilizing
statistical data at the local, state, and national level. Demonstrates the same level of
achievement as “Meets,” plus the following: Response uses data to thoroughly and
accurately justify the recommendation. Response appropriately describes Demonstrates the
same level the geographic disease of achievement as “Meets,” distribution using visual and
plus the following: 3 Rubric Criteria Needs Improvement Meets Expectations directional
3. geographic references with no statistics present. Exceeds Expectations Response includes
specific statistics to support Descriptions provided. Response appropriately describes
Demonstrates the same level prevalence/incidence of diabetes of achievement as “Meets,”
over time.plus the following: Learning Objective 1.11: Analyze data to make inferences
about changes in disease distribution. Response does not analyze or makes inaccurate or
incomplete inferences about prevalence/incidence of diabetes over time. Learning
Objective 1.12: Usage of data to compare disease distribution at various levels is missing,
inaccurate, or incomplete. Response appropriately uses data to compare disease
distribution at the state and national level. Identification of top chronic diseases is missing,
inaccurate, or incomplete. Response accurately identifies the five most prevalent chronic
diseases among the population in the state selected for the most current year. Use data to
compare disease distribution at the local, state, and/or national level. Learning Objective
1.13: Identify top chronic diseases in specific populations. © 2020 Walden University
Response accurately identifies statistics for each year and any significant or unexpected
changes in the data. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “Meets,” plus the
following: Response uses data to compare disease distribution by sex. Demonstrates the
same level of achievement as “Meets,” plus the following: Response includes a description of
prevalence rates for the five most prevalent chronic conditions. 4 Rubric Criteria Learning
Objective 1.14: Compare leading chronic diseases between the states. Needs Improvement
Comparison of chronic diseases between the states is missing, incomplete, or inaccurate.
Meets Expectations Response describes chronicdisease prevalence for the leading five
diseases in the state selected and Illinois. Learning Objective 1.15: Organize data using a
table to compare leading chronic diseases between states. Table is missing, incomplete, or
inaccurate. Discussion: Community Health Needs Assessment PresentationTable accurately
displays data comparing five chronic-disease indicators for the most current year available
in the state selected, as well as Illinois, California, Florida, and Hawaii. © 2020 Walden
University Exceeds Expectations Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following: Response uses statistics to accurately analyze chronic disease
prevalence in Alabama compared to Illinois. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as
“Meets,” plus the following: Table includes a brief narrative that draws relevant conclusions
regarding the disease burden as a whole among the five states. 5 As a healthcare
administrator in a hospital, you have been asked to contribute to a community health needs
assessment (CHNA) for your county. For your contribution, you will create a slide
presentation with a minimum of 10 slides including speaker’s notes describing your
analysis of a health need in a county you select and the data related to disease distribution
in the management of disease. Your slide presentation should be organized as follows: 1.
Cover slide: Introduction 2. Visit the “CHNA Map Gallery (https://sparkmap.org/maproom)
to: i. demographic measures, ii. social and economic factors, iii. the physical environment, iv.
health behaviors, and v. clinical care. vi. Describe the county you selected based on three
indicators within each of the following five gallery categories: vii. Describe two prevalent
preventable diseases and two chronic diseases using the health outcomes category. 3. Visit
the Explore BRFSS Data by Location section of the website,
http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/brfssprevalence/, then based on your research: i. Then describe
4. what each indicator measures and justify its necessity for the CHNA. You should use a mix of
socio-economic, disease, and clinical indicators. Your speaker’s notes should include 2-3
sentences for each indicator. ii. Describe 10 indicators to measure public health that you
would use to develop a holistic picture of the health community you selected. iii. Explain
how three stakeholders should be involved to ensure the entire spectrum of community
needs is considered. Note: Detailed instructions for the use of this web tool, titled
“Instructions for BRFSS Prevalence and Trends Data by State” are available in the
Assessment Materials, if needed. 4. Explain the relationship between the social
determinants of health and the burden of disease. 5. Discussion: Community Health Needs
Assessment PresentationUse the most recent data presented in The Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation’s interactive tool for sexually transmitted infections (STIs)
(https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/) and select the state in which the county you
original selected is located. a. Based on your review of this information, describe the
geographic distribution of chlamydia in the state you selected. Then describe which county
in that state has the highest rates and which has the lowest? Examine the trend data for the
county you initially selected and explain what the data tells you about changes over time in
the county’s chlamydia rates. Finally, describe how chlamydia rates have changed over time
in the state as a whole. b. Based on the morbidity rates and associated coloring on the map
of the state you selected, explain where you would deploy a mobile unit for STI screenings
and why the color gradient is significant. 6. Visit the CDC map of “Diagnosed Diabetes
Percentage(https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/diabetes/DiabetesAtla s.html) and address the
following: a. Describe the geographic distribution of diabetes in the United States for the
latest year published. Then, select the state you selected for the latest year published and
describe the distribution of diabetes in that state. b. Examine the national maps of diabetes
from the past five years. Describe the changes in diabetes prevalence/incidence over time in
the United States. c. Discussion: Community Health Needs Assessment PresentationExplain
how the rates of diabetes in the state you selected compare to the nation as a whole. 7. Use
the “BRFSS Prevalence and Trends Data by State”
(http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/brfssprevalence/) tool to address the following: a. Describe the
five most prevalent chronic diseases among the population of the state you selected for the
most current year available based on the chronic health indicators listed. b. Explain how the
rates for the five most prevalent chronic diseases among the population of the state you
selected for the most current year available compare to the five most prevalent chronic
diseases in Illinois in the same time period. c. Create a table comparing five chronic-disease
indicators of your choice for the most current year available in the state you selected,
Illinois, California, Florida, and Hawaii. Note: Detailed instructions for the use of this web
tool, titled “Instructions for BRFSS Prevalence and Trends Data by State” are available in the
Assessment Materials, if needed. 8. Summary 9. Resources (i.e. bibliography) …