More Related Content Similar to Chapter 21 (20) More from stanbridge (20) Chapter 212. Urgent Case for Quality
Improvement in the U.S. Health
Care System
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 2
3. Between 44,000 and 98,000 Americans die from
medical errors annually (IOM, 2000)
Medication-related errors for hospitalized
patients cost $2 billion annually (IOM, 2000)
49 million uninsured Americans exhibit
consistently worse clinical outcomes than the
insured and are at increased risk for dying
prematurely (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2011)
Selected Indicators from
Recent IOM Reports
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 3
4. Lag between discovery of more effective forms
of treatment and their incorporation into routine
patient care is 17 years (IOM, 2003)
25% of patients are not receiving care that is
recommended (AHRQ, 2010)
The 2008 National Healthcare Quality report
notes that U.S. health care quality is suboptimal
and continues to improve at a slow pace (AHRQ,
2010)
Selected Indicators from
Recent IOM Reports (cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 4
5. Safe: avoiding injuries to patients caused by the
care that is intended to help them
Timely: reducing waits and sometimes harmful
delays for those who receive and give care
Effective: providing services based on scientific
knowledge to all who could benefit, and
refraining from providing services to those not
likely to benefit
IOM’s Six Aims to Guide
Improvements
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 5
6. Efficient: avoiding waste of equipment, supplies,
ideas, and energy
Equitable: providing care that does not vary in
quality because of personal characteristics such
as gender, ethnicity, geographic location,
socioeconomic status
Patient-centered: providing care that is
respectful of and responsive to individual patient
preferences, needs, and values, and ensuring
that patient values guide all clinical decisions
IOM’s Six Aims to Guide
Improvements (cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 6
7. Care based on continuous healing relationships
Care customized to patient needs and values
The patient is the source of control
Knowledge is shared, and information flows freely
Decision making is evidence based
Safety is a system property
Transparency is necessary
Needs are anticipated
Waste is continually decreased
Cooperation among clinicians is a priority
Ten Simple Rules to Guide
Improvements
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 7
8. Total quality management (TQM)
Continuous quality improvement (CQI)
Continuous process improvement
Statistical process control
Performance improvement (PI)
Quality Buzzwords
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 8
9. Quality: customer defines quality
Scientific approach: organizational support for all
employees to develop knowledge and skills in
the science of QI
“All one team”: belief in the people who are
working to serve the customer
Cornerstones of Quality
Management
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 9
10. Customers pay attention to both personal
interactions and products or services
If the “bundle” of products or services provided
is seen as a good value, then customer loyalty is
enhanced
Quality
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 10
11. Improvement decisions based on sound, valid
data
Variation in processes must be understood
Common cause variation: stable, predictable, and in
statistical control
Special cause variation: unstable, unpredictable, and
not in statistical control
Scientific Approach
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 11
12. Believe in people and treat everyone in the
workplace with dignity, trust, and respect
Everyone in the organization works together to
continually enhance customer satisfaction
All One Team
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 12
14. W. Edwards Deming
American pioneer in quality management movement
Introduced U.S. to quality management principles
Worked with the Japanese in post–World War II
reconstruction efforts
Hospitals the first health-related organizations to
explore quality efforts beginning in the 1980s
History
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 14
15. Quality assurance
Inspection oriented
Reactive to problems
Corrected special problems and did not address
overall process improvement
Responsibility belonged to only a few people
Quality Assurance to Quality
Improvement
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 15
16. Quality improvement
Planning and prevention oriented
Problem solving by employees at all levels
Correction of common cause problems and
improvement in work processes
Quality Assurance to Quality
Improvement (cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 16
17. Drive quality improvement efforts in health care
facilities
Almost all regulatory and voluntary accrediting
agencies require quality management in some
form
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Regulatory and Accreditation
Agencies
17
18. Regulatory organizations
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
• Administers the Medicare program
• Requires quality management in “Conditions of Participation”
State licensing authorities require quality
management activities and set quality standards
Regulatory and Accreditation
Agencies (cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 18
19. 2002: TJC required accredited hospitals to collect data on
standardized “core” performance measures
2004: TJC and CMS aligned their current and future measures
common to both organizations
Standardized core measures are referred to as National Hospital
Quality Measures
2009 reporting requirements allow hospitals to collect and
submit data on a minimum of four core measure sets or a
combination
Core measures address acute myocardial infarction, heart
failure, pneumonia, pregnancy and related conditions, surgical
care improvement project (SCIP), children’s asthma care,
hospital outpatient department, and hospital-based inpatient
psychiatric services
The Joint Commission Core
Measures
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 19
20. 1. A patient understands that the hospital where he
is currently having a procedure done is “Joint
Commission” accredited. The patient asks the
nurse how accreditation ensures that patients
receive the best care possible. The nurse informs
the patient that there are several quality initiatives
required by The Joint Commission in order for the
hospital to be accredited. One of these quality
initiatives is known as:
A. Pareto charts
B. Never events
C. Core measures
D. PDSA cycle
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 20
22. Foundation for quality monitoring and evaluation
Measurable aspects of care that show the
degree to which clinical care is carried out (e.g.,
administer correct IV solution at prescribed rate)
Used as an assessment of clinical care to
identify areas in which quality improvement
issues may be present
Help to identify the goals of quality improvement
Clinical Indicators
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 22
23. Lean methodology
Six Sigma
Failure mode and effects analysis
All support the understanding of key work processes:
Analyzing and clearly understanding the work process
Selecting the key aspects of the process to improve
Establishing “trial” targets to guide improvement
Collecting and plotting data
Interpreting results
Implementing improvement actions and evaluating effectiveness
Process Improvement
Strategies/Models
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 23
24. Flowchart
Maps out what actually occurs in a work process
Includes steps and substeps, and who does the work
(see Figures 21-1 and 21-2 in the text)
Process Improvement Tools
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 24
25. Pareto chart
Bar chart
Reflects frequency at which events occur, or the effect
events have on a process
(see Figure 21-3 in the text)
Process Improvement Tools
(cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 25
26. Cause-and-effect diagram
Lists potential causes arranged by category to show
their effect on a problem
Helps determine potential causes of a problem
(see Figure 21-4 in the text)
Process Improvement Tools
(cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 26
27. Run chart
Graph of data points as they occur over time
Sometimes referred to as time plots
A control chart is a more sophisticated run chart that
helps to distinguish between “common” cause and
“special” cause
(see Figure 21-5 in the text)
Process Improvement Tools
(cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 27
28. 2. A quality improvement team was collecting data to
determine how nurses use their time and to identify areas
to improve nurses’ efficiency. The team found that 60% of
nurses’ time was spent charting, 30% was spent in direct
patient care activities, and 10% was spent on patient and
family teaching. Which type of chart would best support the
data collected by the quality improvement team?
A.Cause and effect
B.Flowchart
C.Pareto
D.Time plot
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 28
30. Referred to as best known methods or best
practices
Care carried out in uniform, systematic method
Employees trained to perform procedures
according to standards rather than learning by
watching others
Avoids haphazard changes to procedures
Standardized practices should be based on
scientific evidence and research
Definition and Purpose of
Standardization
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 30
31. Clinical guidelines or pathways
Outline the optimal sequencing and timing of clinical
interventions for a particular diagnosis or procedure
Benefits
Reduction in variation of care provided
Facilitation and achievement of expected outcomes
Reduction in care delays and lengths of stay
Improvements in cost-effectiveness
Increase in patient and family satisfaction with care
Methods of Standardization
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 31
32. Clinical algorithms or protocols: outline decision
paths that a practitioner might take during a
particular care episode or need (e.g., ACLS
algorithms)
(see Figure 21-6 in the text)
Methods of Standardization (cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 32
34. Knowledge about how to achieve better
performance in health care has been attained,
although it is not always used
Strong examples reveal organizations that have
applied the knowledge and “broken through” to
achieve substantial results
Premises of Breakthrough Thinking
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 34
35. Voluntary organization formed to assist health
care leaders to improve quality
Led development of change concepts for
specific areas
Reducing patient delays
Reducing cesarean deliveries
Reducing adverse drug events
Institute for Healthcare
Improvement (IHI)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 35
36. Three fundamental questions
What are we trying to accomplish?
How will we know that a change is an improvement?
What changes can we make that will result in
improvement?
Two-Part Model for Improving
Health Care (IHI)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 36
37. Plan–do–check–act (PDCA) cycle
Plan: develop action plan based on the three
questions
Do: take action to test the action plan
Check: make refinements as needed
Act: implement resultant changes in real work settings
(see Figure 21-7 in the text)
Two-Part Model for Improving
Health Care (IHI) (cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 37
39. Identifies five practices that improve nurses’ work
environments and are linked to quality and safety
Balance the tension between efficiency (productivity) and
reliability (safety)
Support the development and maintenance of trusting
relationships throughout work areas
Actively manage the process of change
Involve workers in decision making pertaining to work design
and workflow
Use knowledge management practices to establish a “learning
organization”
Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming
the Work Environment of Nurses (IOM,
2004)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 39
40. Nonprofit organization known as an education resource
for the prevention of medication errors
Provides independent, multidisciplinary, expert review of
reported errors
Health care professionals across the nation voluntarily
and confidentially report medication errors and
hazardous conditions that could lead to errors
Offer Medication Safety Self Assessments to allow
nurses and other health care professionals to assess the
medication safety practices in their work setting
www.ismp.org
Institute for Safe Medication
Practices
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 40
41. TJC sentinel event standard
Requires organizations to carry out designated steps
to fully understand the factors and systems
associated with adverse patient events
Root cause analysis: conducted to understand the
systems at fault within the organization so that
improvements can be determined and implemented to
prevent future occurrences
Programs Initiated in Response to
Imperative to Improve Patient
Safety
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 41
42. TJC National Patient Safety Goals
Purpose: promote specific improvements in patient
safety with the goals highlighting problematic areas
and evidence-based solutions to the problems with
system-wide solutions wherever possible
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Programs Initiated in Response to
Imperative to Improve Patient Safety
(cont'd)
42
43. TJC 2010 National Patient Safety Goals
Improve the accuracy of patient identification
Improve the effectiveness of communication among caregivers
Improve the safety of using medications
Reduce the risk of health care–associated infection
Reduce the risk of patient harm resulting from falls
Prevent health care–associated pressure ulcers
The organization identifies safety risks inherent in its patient
population
Universal Protocol—the organization fulfills the expectations set
forth for eliminating wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong person
surgery
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Programs Initiated in Response to
Imperative to Improve Patient Safety
(cont'd)
43
44. CMS “never events”
Serious, costly errors that should never happen
Examples: wrong site surgery, mismatched blood
transfusions, patient falls, hospital-acquired infections
CMS will no longer pay the additional cost of
hospitalization of such conditions as an incentive to
hospitals to prevent the events
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 44
Programs Initiated in Response to
Imperative to Improve Patient Safety
(cont'd)
45. Answers for improved patient safety require all
care providers to pull together to review critical
circumstances and learn from key events
Nurses’ challenge is to make patient safety a
personal priority
The Professional Nurse and
Patient Safety
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 45
46. Two significant nursing functions closely
influence patient safety and quality
Monitoring for early recognition of adverse events,
complications, and errors
Initiating deployment of appropriate care providers for
timely intervention and response/rescue of patients in
these situations
The Professional Nurse and
Patient Safety (cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 46
47. National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators
(NDNQI)
Indicators that strongly affect clinical outcomes
Two major purposes
• Provide comparative data to health care organizations to
support quality improvement activities
• Acquire national data for better understanding of link
between nurse staffing and patient outcomes
The Professional Nurse and
Patient Safety (cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 47
48. Quality indicators
Nursing hours per patient day
Staff mix (RNs, LPNs/LVNs, UAP)
Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers
Falls/injury resulting from falls
Nurse staff satisfaction/RN survey
Pediatric/neonatal only: pain assessment and peripheral IV
infiltration
Psychiatric only: physical/sexual assault
RN education and certification
Nurse turnover
Nosocomial infections
The Professional Nurse and
Patient Safety (cont'd)
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 48
49. Work environment that supports effective
communication of nurses with other health care
professionals is critical to patient safety
Patient care dependent on effective
communication to support coordination of
activities to promote efficiency and safety
Interprofessional Teamwork
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 49
50. Enter practice with the knowledge and skills to
make quality improvement part of their regular
work
Quality improvement should not be considered a
separate function within the nursing role but
rather an ongoing part of the professional role
Nurses’ Role in Quality
Improvement
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 50
Editor's Notes ANS: C
Rationale: C is correct because The Joint Commission initiated the performance measurement and improvement initiative known as “Core Measures” intended to support organizations in their quality improvement efforts as well as supplement their accreditation process. A is incorrect because Pareto charts are bar graphs, with the height of bars reflecting the frequency with which events occur or the effect events have on a process problem, and are used in analyzing quality improvements initiatives but not required as part of The Joint Commission Accreditation process. B is incorrect because Never Events were initiated by The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and are serious adverse events during an inpatient stay that should never occur or are reasonably preventable through adherence to evidence-based guidelines. D is incorrect because the PDSA cycle is one type of quality improvement model and not specified as required by The Joint Commission.
Level of Difficulty: Comprehension
ANS: C
Rationale: C is correct because the Pareto chart is a graphic tool that helps break a big problem down into its parts and then identifies which parts are the most important or common. A is incorrect because a cause-and-effect diagram lists all potential causes of a problem, arranged by categories. B is incorrect because a flowchart provides pictures of the sequence of steps in a process and does not identify the causes of the problem. D is incorrect because a time plot graphs data points as they occur over time but does not identify the major causes of variation.
Level of Difficulty: Application