2. Correlative clinical neurology, imaging findings and surgical results run hand in glove.
There are, however, at times we do face discordance/unexplainable clinical
parameters or radiological features.
OCCAM'S RAZOR
Suppose there exist two explanations for an occurrence. In this case, the simpler
one is usually better. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you
have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is. Occam's razor applies
especially in the philosophy of science, but also more generally.
HICKAM’S DICTUM
HICKAM'S DICTUM IS a counterargument to the use of Occam's razor in the medical
profession. The principle is commonly stated: "Patients can have as many
diseases as they damn well please". The principle is attributed to John Hickam,
MD.
CLINICAL RATIONALISM-WISDOM
Clinical medicine sometimes is not like mathematics
3.
4.
5. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2018;21:9-18.
Arch Med Health Sci 2017;5:1-8.
Dr. Ralph Jozefowicz
6. PRINCIPLES OF NEUROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
• Symptom profile and symptom analysis - HISTORY
• Grouping of signs ( by EXAMINATION) and symptoms –
SYNDROMIC FORMULATION & PATTERN RECOGNITION
• Mode of ONSET and COURSE
• Anatomic Localization – WHERE IS THE LESION?
• Pathology – WHAT IS THE LESION?
• Aetiology – WHY IS THE LESION?
• Investigations
• Final Diagnosis
7. GENERAL PRINCIPLES: NEUROLOGICAL
LOCALISATION
Observe each symptom carefully, and consider its significance.
Then put the several symptoms together and consider the
meaning of their combination especially whether there is any
one part of the nervous system at which disease might cause
them all
Lastly, consider the way they came on as indicating the nature
of the lesion, comparing this with the evidence of their seat and
remembering also that their character may in itself tell you
something of their probable nature. When described in the
abstract, this may seem a lengthy process. It may even seem a
formidable process . As a rule it is neither”
Sir William Gowers
8. PROBLEM SOLVING IN NEUROLOGY
Symptom recognition, symptom cluster & symptom analysis
Pattern Recognition
Logical Analysis-Inductive reasoning; based on neuroanatomy,
neurological disorders knowledge database (clinical pattern, temporal
profile, etiology, and neuropathology
Longitudinal (vertical extent) vs. Transverse localization (horizontal
extent)
Unilateral; Bilateral; Symmetrical; Asymmetrical; Multifocal; Diffuse
To define the level of the lesion: CNS vs. PNS
– Supratentorial : cerebral hemispheres
– Infratentorial : brainstem, cerebellum
– Spinal : spinal cord, nerve roots
– Multiple levels (multifocal)
9. PROBLEM SOLVING-PATHOLOGY
WHAT IS THE LESION?
• Define the most likely pathology:
– Infective
– Vascular : Acute
– Inflammatory : Subacute
– Neoplastic : Focal and chronic
– Heredofamial Degenerative : Diffuse and chronic
– Traumatic
– Toxic-metabolic-Physical agents (radiation etc)
– Demyelinating
– Dysmyelinating
– Post infective/Para-infective
– Endocrine
14. Supratentorial Level
Motor deficits with neighborhood lobology signs
– Weakness and/ or loss of sensation on the same side of
the face and body (Uncrossed weakness & COPS)
– Contralateral to lesion
– Seizures, MMSE abnormal; Behavioural alterations,
Psychiatric disturbances; Lobe functions-abnormal;
Altered level/content of consciousness
15. Supratentorial Level
Lobology Signs
– Visual field defect
– Olfactory symptoms
– Language disturbance (aphasia)
– Memory deficit
– Attention deficit ( amnesia)
– Affect and emotional disturbance
– Impaired performance of learned motor skills
– Seizures
16. Infratentorial Level
– Weakness and /or cranial nerve deficits on the side of
lesion (ipsilateral to lesion)
– Long tracts signs on the opposite side of the body
(contralateral to lesion)
– Crossed hemiplegia (at brainstem-pons-ipsilateral LMN
VII and contralateral hemiplegia & COPS)
– Above pons- Uncrossed hemiplegia (UMN VII and
hemiplegia on the same side, contralateral to lesion)
17. Infratentorial Level
• Segmental: Ipsilateral to lesion
– Weakness of upper and lower face muscles
– Double vision (Diplopia)
– Difficulty with articulation (Dysarthria)
– Difficulty swallowing (Dysphagia)
– Incoordination (Ataxia)
18. Spinal level
– Weakness or sensory loss in both sides of the body but
not the face (cranial nerves spared-below FM)
– Upper motor neuron weakness in:
• Quadriparesis or paraparesis
• Monoparesis(leg) or hemiparesis
– Sensory loss with sensory level (myelopathic level)
– Sphincteric involvement
– Brown Sequard, Transverse myelopathy
– Red Flag: Cortical paraplegia; Pseudospinal stroke
19. PATTERN RECOGNITION
• Mode of presentation: acute, subacute, chronic
• Temporal profile: intermittent, paroxysmal, partially/completely
reversible, residual neurological disability, remitting-relapsing,
recurrent, progressive, progressive with intermittent relapses
• UMN vs. LMN
• Aetiology
• Upper motor neuron weakness
– In the upper limbs-Extensors weaker than flexors
– In the lower limbs-Flexors weaker than extensors
– Muscle stretch reflexes are brisk- Hyperreflexia
22. PATTERN RECONITION-PERIPHERAL
NEUROPATHY
• Motor Weakness predominantly distal
– Hypotonia
• Glove and stocking sensory loss
• Diminished reflexes-Hyporeflexia
• Pan-sensory modalities affected (large vs. small fiber
neuropathy)
• Exceptions: Proximal neuropathies: Guillain- Barre syndrome,
CIDP, Porphyric neuropathy, GB mimics, Diabetic proximal
neuropathy (PDN)
23. PATTERN RECONITION-MYOPATHY
• Proximal greater than distal muscle weakness
• Neck muscles often affected
• Sensations are intact; Pure motor presentation
• Muscle stretch reflexes are normal (Ankle DTRs last to be lost)
• Presence of pseudohypertrophy
• Duchenne muscular dystrophy, polymyositis
• HIMET acronym
• Exceptions: Distal myopathies: Welander; Miyoshi, Nonaka,
Udd, Markesberg-Griggs, Laing distal myopathy
24. PATTERN RECONITION-RADICULOPATHY
• Proximal (upper lumbar roots) as well as distal weakness (lower
lumbo-sacral roots) innervated by a common nerve root
• Vertebral pain (extradural compression)
• Radicular pain (sensory root)
• Dermatomal sensory loss
• Segmental reflex alteration:
– C5,6: Biceps and brachioradialis
– C7: Triceps jerk
– L3,4: Knee jerk
– S1: Ankle jerk
25. PATTERN RECONITION-PARTIAL MYELOPATHY
(Brown Sequard syndrome)
• At the level of the lesion: Segmental Lower motor neuron
weakness
• Upper motor neuron weakness, hyperreflexia and Babinski sign
ipsilateral to the lesion
• Dissociated sensory loss:
– Vibration and proprioception- ipsilateral
– Pain and temperature-Contralateral
– Sensory level
33. FRONTAL LOBOLOGY – PHINEAS GAGE
1868
Phineas Gage, the science of brain localization; phrenology-functional
specialization-anatomical correlation-’modularity of the mind’
34. Neurological stamp
Phineas Gage and the science of brain localization
Commemorating the 150th anniversary of the event; the first
day cover shows Dr John Martin Harlow
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:761
59. CEREBRAL LOCALIZATION
Site How to localise
Cerebral cortex [Cortical] [Grey
matter]
Lobe functions / Lobe function tests
[Aphasia,apraxia,agnosia,behavioural
& personality changes,h/o
seizures,MMSE alterations]
Motor weakness - monoparesis
Subcortical [White matter] Hemiplegia,Hemianesthesia,Hemiano
piaDenser weakness
pattern,movement disorders [Basal
ganglia],No seizures,No cognitive
deficits usually
Diencephalon Thalamic syndrome,Asc RAS –
altered level of consciousness
Brain stem The company of cranial nerve deficits
Ipsilateral cranial nerve +
contralateral long tract signs
[Crossed signs]
60. MOTOR WEAKNESS LOCALIZATION
Monoparesis + Cortical signs
Monoparesis;No cortical signs
3 H’s
Ipsilat III + Contralateral H
Ipsilat VI/VII + Contralateral H
Ipsilat V,IX,X,XII + Contra
Long tract signs
Only weakness, No Cr N signs
62. CLUES FOR LMN LOCALIZATION
Type/Site of Lesion Diagnostic Features
Anterior Horn Cell Focal/Segmental LMN type of
weakness; Pure Motor signs;
Fasciculations
Roots Root pains; Localization according to
root affected [Motor & Sensory signs]
Plexus No root pains; Plexus anatomy &
localization [Mainly motor signs]
Peripheral Nerves Motor + Sensory signs
Neuromuscular Junction Pure motor signs; Fatigability; Diurnal
variation
Muscle Pure motor signs
65. SENSORY LOCALIZATION
CN V Face T4: Nipple
C2-3: Neck T10: Umbilicus
C4: Shoulder L1: Inguinal
C6: Thumb L3: Knee
C7: M. finger L5: Ant. Leg and foot
C8: L. finger S1: Heel
66. NEUROPATHY MYOPATHY
Distal Symmetrical Motor; Glove &
Stocking sensory signs
Pure Motor; No Sensory
Symmetrical Proximal weakness;
Selective muscle involved with
hypertrophy/pseudohypertrophy
DTRs – Hyporeflexic; Distal Ankle
jerks – lost first/early
DTRs – Normal; Proportional to
muscle bulk/weakness;Ankle jerks –
preserved till late/last to be lost
Proximal Neuropathy
AIDP/GB Syndrome
Diabetic Amotrophy
Porphyric Neuropathy
Distal Myopathy - Genetic
Extensor Digitorum Brevis (EDB) -
wasted
EDB - preserved
JPS/Vibration Sense - affected JPS/Vibration Sense – Normal
83. EMOTIONAL FACIAL PARESIS
• Emotional facial paresis (EFP) is characterized by impaired activation
of face muscles with emotion [smiling; mimetic smile)] but normal
voluntary activation.
• Volitional facial paresis affects facial movements with voluntary effort,
sparing activation on emotion.
• Volitional facial paresis (VFP) refers to weakness of facial muscles on
voluntary effort while emotional movements are preserved.
• Separate pathways for volitional and emotional facial muscle control
• Sites EFP: frontal lobe white matter, SMA, striatocapsular territory,
anterolateral thalamus, insula, posterior thalamus, subthalamus,
hypothalamus, operculum, mesial temporal lobe and insula, dorsal
midbrain
• Sites for VFP: involvement of motor cortex/descending pyramidal
tract/corticobulbar pathways; sparing BG, frontal & temporal
• Aetiology: stroke, lacunar infarcts, tumours, demyelinating lesions,
hematoma, ICA dissection
84. Emotional Facial Palsy
(EFP)
(A) Symmetric voluntary
activation (showing the teeth)
(B) right EFP while smiling
(C) MRI showing left
striatocapsular infarction
A B
C
86. (A) “Showing the teeth” demonstrates symmetric innervation on volition. (B) Smiling discloses left
emotional facial paresis. Right Horner’s syndrome is demonstrated by the small palpebral fissure.
(C) Contrastenhanced T1-weighted MRI. Section at the upper pontine level documenting
involvement of the cerebellum and the right dorsal pontine tegmentum. For C and D, right is on the
right-hand side. (D) Drawing of the upper pontine level. The hatched area corresponds to the area
involved as shown in C. This area is quite distinct from the corticobulbar tract mediating voluntary
facial innervation
EFP OF PONTINE
ORIGIN
87. VOLUNTARY FACIAL PARESIS
(A) VFP (showing the teeth), (B) symmetric activation with emotion
(laughing). (C) MRI after intravenous gadolinium (0.1 mmol lkg body
weight) showing enhancement of the right cortex.
A B C
90. Conus Medullaris Cauda Equina
Spontaneous pain Bilateral;Symmetric
S234 (Perineum/Thighs)
Radicular
pain;Unilateral;Asymme
tric at S234
Sensory deficit Saddle
area,Bilateral,Symmetrical,
Dissociative
Saddle,Unilateral,Asym
metric,No
dissociation,All
sensations affected
Motor loss Symmetric,Less marked Asymmetric,Marked
Reflex loss Ankle lost Knee/Ankle lost
Sphincters Early and marked Late and less marked
Trophic changes Common Less marked
Sexual functions Erection impaired Less impaired
Onset Sudden and Bilateral Gradual and Unilateral