5. In a patient with hemodynamic failure
Hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasodilation? ↘ cardiac output?
Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
diastolic AP
vasopressor
Do we need to measure cardiac output?→
7. -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Changes in CI induced by VE (%)
Changes in PP
induced by VE (%)
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Changes in CI induced by NE (%)
Changes in PP
induced by NE (%)
228 pts receiving volume expansion
145 patients with increase of NE
r = 0.56
n = 228
r = 0.21
n = 145
*
We need a direct measure of cardiac output in
patients receiving vasopressors
→
14. 20
40
60
80
100
120
0
= k . SV
The area under the systolic part of the arterial
curve is proportional to stroke volume
k is calibrated from transpulmonary
thermodilution
pulse contour analysisCardiac output monitoring
15. t
AP
Initial value provided by
transpulmonary dilution
Pulse contour analysis
pulse contour analysisCardiac output monitoring
20. In a patient with hemodynamic failure
hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasodilation ? ↘ cardiac output ?
Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
volume
responsiveness ?
↘ contractile
function ?
PPV, SVV…
21. 50
70
90
110
mmHg PPmax
PPmin
PPV = 32 %
PPV =
PPmax - PPmin
(PPmax + PPmin) / 2
spontaneous breathing activity
cardiac arrhythmias
ARDS with low Vt / lung compliance
Prediction of volume responsiveness
3 frequent situations
in the ICU
Cannot be used in case of :
22. Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasodilation ? volume expansion? ↘ contractile function?
When to administer fluid?
PPV, SVV
EEO test
arrhythmias, spontaneous breathing, ARDS ?
yesno
EEO test
23. systemic venous return
How to predict fluid responsiveness? end-expiratory occlusion test
24. Easier with a continuous measurement of cardiac output
How to predict fluid responsiveness? end-expiratory occlusion test
25. -10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Effects of end-expiratory pause
on continuous cardiac index
increase 5%
Se = 91%
Sp = 100 %
34 patients with acute circulatory failure
monitored by PiCCO device
NR R
Assessment of volume responsiveness end-expiratory occlusion test
26. Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasodilation? volume expansion ? ↘ contractile function ?
When to administer fluid?
PPV, SVV
EEO test
arrhythmias, spontaneous breathing, ARDS ?
yesno
EEO test
PLR test PLR test
27. → PLR is like a " self-volume challenge "
Assessment of volume responsiveness passive leg raising
28. Eso Doppler
echo
echo
echo and arterial flow
Flotrac/vigileo USCOM
PiCCO
Eso Doppler
PiCCO
echo
bioreactance
Assessment of volume responsiveness passive leg raising
29. -40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
PLR-induced changes in
arterial pulse pressure
*
RNR
False-negative cases
We need a real-time measurement of cardiac output for
assessing the effects of the PLR test
→
Assessment of volume responsiveness passive leg raising
30. Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasodilation? volume expansion ? ↘ contractile function ?
When to administer fluid?
PPV, SVV
EEO test
arrhythmias, spontaneous breathing, ARDS ?
yesno
EEO test
PLR test PLR test
when to stop fluid?
31. Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasopdilation? volume expansion ? ↘ contractile function ?
when to administer fluid?
Lung water ?
when to stop fluid?
Negative indices of tests
of fluid responsiveness
33. 30 pts
EVLW measured by TPTD and by postmortem gravimetry
First validation of EVLW-TPTD evaluation in
humans
Validated in humans→
How to avoid excessive fluid loading? lung water
34. Extra-vascular lung water and pulmonary vascular permeability index are independent
prognostic factors in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute lung injury
Crit Care Med in pressJozwiak M, Silva S, Persichini R, Anguel N, Osman D, Richard C, Teboul JL, Monnet X
0
20
40
60
80
100
EVLWImax > 21 mL/kg EVLWImax ≤ 21 mL/kg
70%
42%
p = 0.0001
Day-28 mortality (%)
200 pts with ARDS
EVLW measured by PiCCO device
Lung water measured by transpulmonary thermodilution
has a real physiological significance
→
How to avoid excessive fluid loading? lung water
p value
EVLWImax (1 unit = 1 mL/kg) 1.07 (1.02 - 1.12) 0.007
Maximum blood lactate (1 unit = 1 mmol/L) 1.29 (1.14 - 1.46) 0.0001
Minimum PaO2/FiO2 (1 unit = 1 mmHg) 0.98 (0.97 - 0.99) 0.006
Mean PEEP (1 unit = 1 cmH2O) 0.78 (0.67 - 0.91) 0.002
SAPS II (1 unit = 1 point) 1.03 (1.01 - 1.05) 0.02
Mean cumulative fluid balance (1 unit = 1 mL) 1.0004 ( 1.0001 - 1.0008) 0.02
Odds Ratio ( CI 95%)
35. Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasodilation ? volume expansion ? ↘ contractile function ?
When to administer fluid?
PAOP ?
when to stop fluid?
↗ lung water
Negative indices of tests
of fluid responsiveness
36. PAOP group
Time (hours)
Cumulative fluid balance (L)
7
3
1
5
-1
-3
-5
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
* *
*
*
* p < 0.0001 vs time 0
EVLW group
lung water
101 ARDS patients
randomized to EVLW-guided management vs.
PAOP-guided management
How to estimate the risk of fluid administration ?
37. 0
5
10
15
20
25
Ventilation days ICU days
PAOP Group
EVLW Group
*
*
Management of
fluid therapy with :
Lung water may guide fluid therapy during ARDS→
101 ARDS patients
randomized to EVLW-guided management vs.
PAOP-guided management
lung waterHow to estimate the risk of fluid administration ?
38. Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasodilation? volume expansion ? ↘ contractile function ?
when to administer fluid? when to stop fluid?
↗ lung water
Negative indices of tests
of fluid responsiveness
↗ lung permeability
39. lung water
Cold bolus pulmonary blood volume
Pulmonary vascular
permeability index =PVPI
PiCCO
How to avoid excessive fluid loading?
41. Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasodilation? volume expansion ? ↘ contractile function ?
when to administer fluid? when to stop fluid?
↗ lung water
↗ lung permeability
negative tests of fluid
responsiveness
43. How to assess the contractile function?
Echocardiography is the gold standard
but requires a skilled operator
does not allow continuous monitoring
cardiogenic shock
at 1st day
How many echos?
LVEF
We need a more continuous estimation of the LV systolic function
44. How to assess the contractile function?
cardiac index
cold bolus global end-diastolic volume
cardiac function index =CFI
stroke volume
LV end-diastolic volume
LVEF
45. 0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
100 - specificity
Sensitivity
3.2 min-1
CFI for detecting LVEF
35%
60 pts
Monitoring with PiCCO and TTE
CFI allows detecting a low LVEF→
How to assess the contractile function?
46. Hemodynamic monitoring to guide treatment
PLR test PLR test
hemodynamic monitoring
?
vasodilation? volume expansion? ↘ contractile function?
fluid administration?
PPV, SVV…
arrhythmias, sp. breath., ARDS?
yesno
EEO testEEO test
when to stop fluid?
↗ lung water
↘ CFI
↗ PAOP
DAP
49. 1,000 pts with ALI/ARDS
Comparison of conservative vs. liberal fluid strategies
When to stop volume expansion?
50. Cohort study
3,147 pts with sepsis
When to stop volume expansion?
How to avoid fluid overload ?→
51. Fluid overload is clearly deleterious in septic and ARDS patients and must be
avoided
Volume expansion does not always result in the expected increase in cardiac
output
Several tests are now available for predicting fluid responsiveness
For a precise assessment of the response to fluid administration, we need a
direct measurement of cardiac output
1
2
3
4
The 6key-messages
Fluid administration does not always result in an improvement of tissue
oxygenation
5
Markers of tissue hypoxia detect patients in whom fluid will improve tissue
oxygenation
6