The document discusses methods for assessing fluid responsiveness in patients with acute circulatory failure. It finds that the end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) test can predict fluid responsiveness except in patients with strong spontaneous breathing. The passive leg raising (PLR) test is reliable when pulse pressure variation cannot be used, but requires starting from a semi-recumbent position and monitoring cardiac output. Non-invasive measures like changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide may also assess PLR effects. Both EEO and PLR have limitations and cannot be used in all cases.
Kukatpally Call Girls Services 9907093804 High Class Babes Here Call Now
Assessment of fluid responsiveness beyond PPV
1. Assessment of fluid responsiveness
Beyond PPV
French
Intensive
Care
Society
Prof. Xavier MONNET
Medical Intensive Care Unit
Paris-Sud University Hospitals
xavier.monnet@bct.aphp.fr
3. PPV cannot be used in patients with spontaneous breathing, cardiac
arrhythmias and ARDS with low Vt and/or low lung compliance
1
2
3
4
The 4key-messages
4. PPV, SVV EEO test
acute circulatory failure
when to administer fluid?
SB, arrhythmias, ARDS?
yesno
How to monitor fluid therapy
6. 34 patients with acute circulatory failure
monitored by PiCCO device
End-expiratory occlusion test
7. Easier with a continuous measurement of cardiac output
Prediction of fluid responsiveness end-expiratory occlusion test
8. -10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Effects of end-expiratory occlusion
on continuous cardiac index
increase 5%
Se = 91%
Sp = 100 %
34 patients with acute circulatory failure
monitored by PiCCO device
NR R
Prediction of fluid responsiveness end-expiratory occlusion test
10. 0 20 40 60 80 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
100-Specificity
Sensitivity
Sensitivity 90%
Specificity: 86%
>6%
PEEP = 14±4 cmH2O
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
100-Specificity
Sensitivity
Sensitivity: 80%
Specificity: 88%
>5%
PEEP = 5±0 cmH2O
End-expiratory occlusion test
The EEO test is reliable whatever the level of PEEP
34 ARDS patients
EEO test at PEEP=5 cmH2O and Pplat=30 cmH2O
11. EEO test
Cannot be used in non-intubated patients
but do we need to predict fluid responsiveness in such patients?
limitations
Cannot be used patients who cannot sustain an expiratory hold
Easier to perfom with a continuous measurement of cardiac output
PEEP level?
12. PPV cannot be used in patients with spontaneous breathing, cardiac
arrhythmias and ARDS with low Vt and/or low lung compliance
The EEO test is reliable to predict fluid responsiveness provided that
the patient does not exhibit a strong spontaneous breathing activity
1
2
3
4
The 4key-messages
13. PPV, SVV
EEO
acute circulatory failure
when to administer fluid?
SB, arrhythmias, ARDS?
yesno
EEO
PLR testPLR test
How to monitor fluid therapy
14. → PLR is like a " self preload challenge "
Prediction of fluid responsiveness passive leg raising
18. PPV cannot be used in patients with spontaneous breathing, cardiac
arrhythmias and ARDS with low Vt and/or low lung compliance
The EEO test is reliable to predict fluid responsiveness provided that
the patient does not exhibit a strong spontaneous breathing activity
The PLR test can be considered as reliable for predicting fluid
responsiveness when PPV cannot be used
1
2
3
4
The 4key-messages
19. Meta-analysis of 8 studies with PLR
and volume expansion
A large base of evidence→
Prediction of fluid responsiveness passive leg raising test
2important points→
20. semi-recumbent position PLR position
45° 45°
45°
PLR positionsupine position
Prediction of fluid responsiveness passive leg raising
21. 0
25
12.5
37.5
% change in cardiac
index from baseline
35 patients
All responders to PLR
Prediction of fluid responsiveness passive leg raising
22. Prediction of fluid responsiveness passive leg raising
Starting PLR from the semi-recumbent position
provides a more sensistive test
→
2nd important point→
27. 40CO2 (mmHg)
30 sec
0
Prediction of fluid responsiveness passive leg raising test
65 pts receiving volume expansion
Monitoring of end-expiratory CO2
passive leg raising volume expansion
28. Prediction of fluid responsiveness passive leg raising test
65 pts receiving volume expansion
Monitoring of end-expiratory CO2
PLR-induced changes in cardiac index
PLR-induced changes in EtCO2
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
100-Specificity
Sensitivity
*
PLR-induced changes in arterial pulse pressure
Non-invasive assessment of the effects of the PLR test→
29. Passive leg raising
Cannot be used in case of:
no real-time measurement of cardiac output
intracranial hypertension
operating room
limitations
30. PPV cannot be used in patients with spontaneous breathing, cardiac
arrhythmias and ARDS with low Vt and/or low lung compliance
The EEO test is reliable to predict fluid responsiveness provided that
the patient does not exhibit a strong spontaneous breathing activity
The PLR test can be considered as reliable for predicting fluid
responsiveness when PPV cannot be used
PLR must start from the semi-recumbent position and must be
monitored with a direct measurement of cardiac output
1
2
3
4
The 4key-messages
31. EEO EEO
Acute circulatory failure
When to administer fluid?
PPV, SVV
SB, arrhythmias, ARDS?
yesno
PLRPLR
Optimal management of fluid therapy?