Writing Assignment For this assignment, compare and contrast the

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•1 view

Writing Assignment For this assignment, compare and contrast the positions of paired theorists with respect to the associated topic. The completion of this analytical assignment will not require any additional or outside sources. Each topic can be addressed based on information derived from the assigned readings and lecture slides. Please select one of the following topics: (i) Marx and Nietzsche on ‘human nature,’ (ii) Marx and Weber on ‘ideas,’ or (iii) Marx and Durkheim on ‘social solidarity’. On the topic of ‘human nature,’ consider: How did Marx and Nietzsche’s conceptions of human nature influence their critiques of modern society? On the topic of ‘ideas,’ consider: What were Marx and Weber’s views on the historical significance of ideas as forces of social change? Or, on the topic of ‘social solidarity,’ consider: What were Marx and Durkheim’s thoughts on the sources of social solidarity in modern societies? Papers must conform to the following format specifications: ASA citation style (see ‘ASA Style Guide’ on SOC 101 CCLE Moodle website) Times 12-point font Double spaced Standard margins Numbered pages 5 pages in length (Title page not required) ...

Education

Conflict theory examines power struggles and inequalities that shape human interactions. Composing an essay on conflict theory is challenging, as it requires a thorough understanding of foundational theorists like Marx and Weber. It also demands engaging with different interpretations of conflict theory through analyzing real-world examples. Moreover, successfully conveying one's understanding of conflict theory in a coherent, logical, and persuasive written argument is difficult but important. For assistance with such intellectually demanding essays, professional writing services provide a convenient option.

Essays On Marxism.pdf

Amy Hart

essay on marxism | Marxism | Karl Marx. Marxism Analysis - Free Essay Example | PapersOwl.com. ≫ Marxism and Structuralism Free Essay Sample on Samploon.com. Marxist critique of capitalism essay - presentationbackgrounds.web.fc2.com. Analyzing Marxist Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays .... What is Marxism? - Free Essay Example | PapersOwl.com. marxist fmaily essay | Marxism | Bourgeoisie. Marxism and Class, Gender, and Race Essay Example | Topics and Well .... Example Of Marxism Essay. Marxian Theory of Power (Karl Marx) | TriumphIAS. Marxism Essay | LAWS4006 - Jurisprudence - Newcastle | Thinkswap. College Essay: Marxist criticism essay. Marxist Theory A very brief overview. Marxism: A* Essay Exemplar. Essay plan: Assess the contribution of Marxism to our understanding. Monthly Review | Three Essays on Marxism: Leading Principles of Marxism .... Marxism: A* Essay Exemplar 2. (PDF) Marx and the critique of capitalism. The marxist view on the role of the education system essay ....

Marxism Essay.pdf

Tamika Morris

Marxism is a complex topic that presents challenges for essay writing, as it requires a deep understanding of Marxist thought from its origins to various interpretations over time. Additionally, the essay must discuss Marxism's real-world implications and navigate criticisms from different perspectives. Researching Marxism involves sifting through many academic sources to gain thorough knowledge and support arguments. Overall, writing about Marxism demands strong analytical skills to synthesize information from diverse historical, theoretical, and critical concepts.

This is aTestand not a research paper. Only assigned written m.docx

kenth16

This is a Test and not a research paper. Only assigned written materials allowed. No downloads from Wikipedia, encyclopedias or any other internet or published source permitted. Select 2 out of the 3 questions below to answer. Then write Three pages for each of the two questions you’ve selected. Note the format should be in Times New Roman font, 12 inches, black ink. Pagination required. Start each question on a new page please 1. Compare and contrast the theories of modernization proposed by Durkheimn, Weber, and Marx. How do they pertain to the study of the relationship between the individual and society? 2. What are the material forces explained as part of the sociocultural system? How important are they and which do you consider more relevant if any? 3. Can postmodernist, social constructionist or social movement theories contribute to our understanding of a “social conflict for individual rights” in our society in this new 21stcentury? .

Marxist Criticism Essay.pdf

Jennifer Moore

This document discusses the challenges of writing a Marxist criticism essay. It notes that crafting such an essay requires a deep understanding of both Marxist theory and literary analysis. The essayist must apply Marxist concepts like class struggle, historical materialism, and ideology to specific literary works. They must analyze how societal forces shape elements like characters, plot, and themes. Constructing a coherent argument while avoiding oversimplification is also crucial. Overall, composing a Marxist criticism essay is a formidable task that demands a profound grasp of both Marxist theory and how to apply it judiciously in literary analysis.

PART II Comparisons Choose one of the three pairs of theorists.docx

mosyrettcc

PART II Comparisons Choose one of the three pairs of theorists below. Explain how their ideas compare with each other. What are the similarities or continuities? What are the differences? Are they compatible? You should demonstrate that you know what each concept is on its own and attempt to draw comparisons as best you can. Your answer should be about 500-600 words but it is most important than you take the time to formulate a thesis and back it up by making clear and concise comparisons in a well-organized manner. D. Marx and Weber Compare and contrast the way that Marx and Weber describe life under the division of labor and the capitalist mode of production. Compare how they both see it as a controlling power that subordinates people to its requirements. How similar are they? Are there any differences to how they see this issue? Look especially at how Marx discusses the “general formula for capital” in Capital and how Weber discusses rationalization and the iron cage at the end of The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism . E. Weber and Durkheim Compare the ways that Weber and Durkheim discuss social stratification. Towards the end of his discussion of “Classes, Status Groups and Parties,” Weber addresses the way the division, grouping and inequality of people on the basis of their economic position in the market affects the social position of status groups, especially when discussing castes and privileges of social ranks. How do markets and individual competition affect the social privileges of status groups? How does this compare with Durkheim’s discussion of caste in the section on the “Forced Division of Labor”? How does caste conflict with the spontaneous distribution of people into occupations? F. Durkheim and Marx Both Marx and Durkheim discuss the relation of individual development to the development of the species as a whole through the development of the division of labor. They both agree that the division of labor confers benefits on the species. They may differ on some of the details. Compare and contrast Marx’s and Durkheim’s discussion of the fate of individual and the species as it relates to the division of labor, specialization and the dangers of fragmentation. Look at Marx’s discussion of “Alienated Labor” (and perhaps some parts of the German Ideology ) and Durkheim’s discussion in the “Anomic Division of Labor” and his “Conclusion” in The Division of Labor in Society . How do their views on specialization and human development differ? .

Bureaucracy Essay.pdf

Damaris Tur

Bureaucracy In Public Service Essay Example - PHDessay.com. Bureaucracy Essay. Bureaucracy and self-government Free Essay Example. Street-Level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform - Michael .... Adm 636 topic 1 bureaucracy and health care reform essay by sajchfasd .... Presentation on bureaucracy. Bureaucracy Essay - SOC – 102 May 27, 2020 Bureaucracy Essay In our .... Bureaucracy Essay by Kim Lopez - Issuu. Bureaucracy Essay; Suitable For All Class | Ontaheen. (PDF) Understanding Bureaucracy. Bureaucracy as a Concept - 634 Words | Essay Example. How Bureaucracy stands in the way Essay Example | Topics and Well .... Key characteristics of bureaucracy Essay Example | Topics and Well .... The Concept of Bureaucracy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written .... (DOC) Essay: Bureaucracy in Southeast Asia - New Directions in ....

Essays On Sociology. Everett Community College

Amanda Rose

Crafting a sociology essay is a challenging task that requires a comprehensive understanding of sociological theories and concepts, and the ability to analyze how they apply to real-world issues. The essay must demonstrate knowledge of both classical and contemporary sociological perspectives, critically evaluate societal issues like inequality and crime using sociological methods of research, and present a well-structured argument supported by evidence. It is further made difficult by the dynamic nature of sociology as new theories and perspectives emerge regularly, demanding writers stay up-to-date with the evolving field. Composing a successful sociology essay is a rigorous intellectual endeavor.

Essay #2 addresses some topic in the broad scope of Transcendentalism. Essay #2 has similar parameters -- length/outside source requirements, drafting process -- as Essay #1. You are always free to develop your own topic approach within the Transcendentalism topic. Some suggestive options: 1) Analyze Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience" in light of a contemporary example or figure or incident in the tradition of American civil disobedience. 2) Analyze the persuasive and rhetorical strategies of one of the transcendental pieces (or King's "Letter") that we have read. You might look at issues of audience, style, emotional vs./and rational appeal, appeals to history/tradition or rejection of history/tradtion, metaphoric style, tone and so forth. If you deem them successful, why/how do they succeed in arguing their points? What might be points of counterargument or criticism or weaknesses in their approach? Does it work as a piece of argument/writing? 3) Pick one (or several if you feel it's appropriate) key concepts or quotes from a work (or several works) and discuss the concept/quote in terms of how it has evolved or put it in larger context. How have these words taken form in our laws, practice, literature, or culture? Where are the gaps between the great ideals of these writers' words and the reality of their times and/or ours? e.g. How might MLK (in light of his "Letter") feel about the society and civil rights situation we see today? 4) You could pick one, two, or three key themes from any of the works and discuss how the text fleshes out these themes and why they are important to our understanding of the period, or the particular writer, or to transcendentalism as a movement, or to American tradition or literature and so forth. 5) You could pick a theme which runs through several of the texts (for example, something about the role or nature of the individual) and trace it through its different configuration and representations. Essay length: 4-5 pages -- again, I'm always more concerned with minimum than limiting any maximum length. Include outside critical sources. MLA documentation .

Cult of Domesticity.docx

write5

The document discusses the "cult of domesticity" in 19th century America, which regulated women's behavior to the home and family. It provides background on the cult and directs readers to analyze four primary source passages illustrating the cult's principles of piety, purity, submissiveness and domesticity. The passages both positively and negatively portray the principles, with some emphasizing the security and comfort women gained by accepting male authority, while others demonstrate how women used language to shift stances and speak out on moral issues.

Students are to write a four to five paper based on a current events.docx

orlandov3

Students are to write a four to five paper based on a current events article, applying theory to a specific subject/issue/event in today's society. Students will use this article as "data' on which they will seek to explain this current event through theory we have discussed this year in class (going from Tocqueville to Dubois). The article must be attached to the paper! The paper should include: 1) An intro, one or two paragraphs explaining the topic the student is writing on, the source of this information, and the theory they will be using 2) A summary and description of the article and the social issue it reports on (1-2 pages). 3) A discussion of how your theory explains this issue.(1-2 pages) 4) A conclusion, summing up your argument; why is the theory you chose important in dealing with this issue (1-2 paragraphs). 5) References. Must include at least a reference from the writings of the theorist (on Blackboard) and a secondary reference relating to this theorist and theory (for instance, a reference to an article by sociologist Robert Merton on Weber's Protestant Ethic thesis) Example's of Theorist: Marx, Max Weber, Du bois, Tocqueville. .

HUM111326GA057-1162-001 (World Cultures I)Course HomeStudent.docx

maple8qvlisbey

HUM111326GA057-1162-001 (World Cultures I) Course Home Student Center Mobile Learn Announcements Email Gradebook Class Introductions Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Supplemental Lectures Assignment 2: Project Paper – Comparative Essay (200 pts) Week 8 Assignment 2 - Submit Here Students , please view the "Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment" in the Student Center. Instructors , training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 2: Project Paper – Comparative Essay Due Week 8 and worth 200 points This “Assignment 2” writing assignment is a comparative essay focused on topics encountered in our HUM 111 class. The project will be based on research but will reflect your views and interpretation of the topic. This project is designed to help you stretch your mind and your abilities as an organized, innovative, and critical thinker. If approached properly, it should also be fun! Choose one (1) of the topics from the list of topic choices below. Read the topic carefully. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper (750-1,000 words) that follows instructions and covers each part of the topic. (The title page and References list do not get included in this word count). Note: Your instructor may require you to submit your topic choice for approval before the end of Week 5. For the topic you choose: Establish a clear thesis about your topic as part of the introductory paragraph (often the thesis is the last thing one determines after doing the basic research and outline; however it will be placed in the first paragraph of your paper). This is a comparative essay. Comparison approached properly will require some critical thinking on your part. Use a point-by-point approach for the essay. That means, if comparing subject A with subject B, don't do the first half of the essay on subject A and then the second half on subject B--that will seem like two (2) separate essays and comparisons will tend to get lost. Instead, you should be mentioning both subjects in most of your paragraphs as you compare them throughout the essay. Comparisons will identify similarities as well as contrasts. Do not try to do everything on your two (2) subjects. You should end up narrowing your focus to a few insights and issues about the subjects being compared. And, from those fairly specific points of comparison, you will develop a thesis and glean some lessons. Follow closely the instructions below for your specific topic. Include a concluding paragraph at the end. This paragraph will, in some way, refer back to the thesis established in your first paragraph, since now you have demonstrated and supported it. It may be here that you also include your observations relating your study to the modern workplace or society (see your topic). Try to finish with flair! Use at least three (3) good quality academic sources, with one (1) source being the class text. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic res.

Social Stratification Essay. Springfield College

Melissa Ford

Writing an essay on social stratification requires navigating theories of societal hierarchies and examining how unequal distributions of resources arise from economic and cultural factors. Crafting a compelling analysis involves presenting empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks to show how stratification structures impact individuals and society. Addressing this complex topic demands extensive research, acknowledging changing contemporary issues, and proposing insightful perspectives on the dynamic nature of social stratification.

Writing A Sociology Essay. Antioch College

Tiny Keenan

Writing a sociology essay is a challenging endeavor that requires comprehending complex sociological concepts and theories, and presenting these ideas coherently through critical thinking, analysis, and real-world examples. It demands an awareness of societal issues and the ability to analyze them from multiple perspectives, supported by empirical evidence from academic research. Beyond content, a sociology essay must have a clear structure with an introduction setting up the argument, a well-organized body logically unfolding the thesis, and a conclusion tying everything together, using precise yet accessible language and an academic tone.

A Sociological Reading Of Classical Sociological Theory

Sandra Long

This document discusses the need to re-examine classical sociological theory from Marx, Weber, and Durkheim from a more critical perspective. It argues that traditionally these theorists have been viewed as the authoritative foundation of sociology, but they were products of their time and place and reflected Eurocentric perspectives. The document proposes contextualizing the classics by considering the social and political factors that elevated their status, decentralizing the European experience as the sole focus of analysis, and diversifying entry points beyond just the canonical theorists. This would allow for a more inclusive and dynamic interpretation of classical theory.

Pick one of these questions and write 5-6 pages on the topic.1.docx

saundersabelard

Pick one of these questions and write 5-6 pages on the topic. 1) The methods of surplus appropriation can have important influences on the historical development of social formations (societies). Compare and contrast control over immoveable property in land and the accumulation of material wealth with control over persons and redistribution as two forms of surplus appropriation, and indicate what may be the developmental constraints and implications for each of these two forms of surplus appropriation. 2) Compare and contrast bigmanship and chiefship in terms of their role in economic exchanges, flexibility of political organization, and effectiveness of social integration and control resulting from their respective economic and political positions. Use specific ethnographic examples from the assigned readings (you may use Mauss as well as Sahlins and Goody on this question). 3) Describe and discuss the jajmani system in relation to any two of the following: (1) the domestic mode of production, (2) the slave mode of production, (3) the Asiatic mode of production, and (4) the capitalist mode of production. 4) Critically assess how Marx views the role of such entities as capital, rent, interest, profit, wages, in the operation of the capitalist mode of production, and discuss the applicability of these categories to the lineage/domestic mode of production, especialy as discussed by Sahlins and Meillassoux, (albeit in different way),. and the Asiatic mode of production (as in the jajmani system). 5) Terry Eagleton suggests that while there is a relationship between ideology and hegemony, this is not an isomorphic one. How does Eagleton’s analysis of ideology fit with Raymond Williams’ discussion of hegemony? (If you are familiar with Bourdieu’s analysis of doxa, orthodoxy and heterodoxy in “Outline of a Theory of Practice” you may bring this into your discussion.) 6) David Harvey talks about “modern” and “postmodern” and the transition between these as a process. How does the postmodern differ from the modern in his analysis? (There are a number of ways to think about this) Give specific examples. 7) Harvey suggests that “the postmodern condition” is deeply apolitical. Why does he say this–what is his argument and what is his evidence? Be specific. 8) Both David Harvey and Raymond Williams suggest that the production of culture and the aesthetic are central to social reproduction and especially so in the postmodern world. Discuss their ideas about this in relation to other readings you have done for this topic in this course. (Escobar, Ahmed among others) 9) Drawing on Harvey’s discussion of the postmodern condition, do a close reading/analysis of the film “Bladerunner”. Be specific, and be sure you do an analysis and not only a description of the film. 10) Drawing on Gewertz and Errington and/or the readings in “Localizing Global Knowledge,” discuss how best to approach the analysis of power and surplus extraction or .

The course project requires you to research and write an analytical .docx

ssuser454af01

The course project requires you to research and write an analytical paper comparing and contrasting the political views of two philosophers on one of the following areas: Human Conflict - the nature and causes thereof. The best or best possible cooperative social arrangements, capable of resolving or diminishing society's common problems. The moral foundations of political legitimacy (what is the good state). Who should govern - one, few, or many? Within your paper discuss how the views of your two chosen philosophers on the one chosen political issue relate to that same political issue today. Share your own well-supported views on the matter in a conclusion. Finalize your search for the two and write a paragraph in which you announce their names and the one area of political thought for comparison. In a sentence or two, explain what draws you to this focus. .

In the Kivisto and Faist text, Citizenship Discourse, Theory, and.docx

mecklenburgstrelitzh

In the Kivisto and Faist text, Citizenship: Discourse, Theory, and Transnational Prospects , read Chapter 2, "Inclusion," pages 15–48. Research Complete the following research in preparation for this unit's discussions: Locate at least three peer-reviewed articles that discuss examples—either contemporary or historical—of protectionism and isolationism. Please include the articles with this discussion as separate attachments. Of these three, only one example can be about the United States. You will be using these articles in the Inclusionism in Modern Society discussion later in this unit, so you will want to find examples that provide interesting elements for you and your peers' analyses. Discussion Assignment: Inclusionism offers opportunities to collaborate on public issues and to find solutions that address some of the most troubling problems of modern times. Incorporate the articles you located in the first study into your discussion post. What situations have you personally encountered that are analogous to isolationism? To inclusionism? Contrast the results of these experiences. If such experiences are outside of your personal experience, use examples from literature you have encountered in this course. What decision-making and communications strategies are appropriate for inclusionist approaches? What will this mean in your work as a public administrator? How do these concepts intersect with the global issues that the public administration field faces today? .

Essay On Sociology.pdf

Jamie Belknap

Assignment 2 Project Paper – Comparative EssayDue Week 4 and .docx

huttenangela

Assignment 2: Project Paper – Comparative Essay Due Week 4 and worth 200 points This “Assignment 2” writing assignment is a comparative essay focused on topics encountered in our HUM 111 class. The project will be based on research but will reflect your views and interpretation of the topic. This project is designed to help you stretch your mind and your abilities as an organized, innovative, and critical thinker. If approached properly, it should also be fun! Choose one (1) of the topics from the list of topic choices below. Read the topic carefully. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper (750-1,000 words) that follows instructions and covers each part of the topic. (The title page and References list do not get included in this word count). Note: Your instructor may require you to submit your topic choice for approval before the end of Week 5. For the topic you choose: Establish a clear thesis about your topic as part of the introductory paragraph (often the thesis is the last thing one determines after doing the basic research and outline; however it will be placed in the first paragraph of your paper). This is a comparative essay. Comparison approached properly will require some critical thinking on your part. Use a point-by-point approach for the essay. That means, if comparing subject A with subject B, don't do the first half of the essay on subject A and then the second half on subject B--that will seem like two (2) separate essays and comparisons will tend to get lost. Instead, you should be mentioning both subjects in most of your paragraphs as you compare them throughout the essay. Comparisons will identify similarities as well as contrasts. Do not try to do everything on your two (2) subjects. You should end up narrowing your focus to a few insights and issues about the subjects being compared. And, from those fairly specific points of comparison, you will develop a thesis and glean some lessons. Follow closely the instructions below for your specific topic. Include a concluding paragraph at the end. This paragraph will, in some way, refer back to the thesis established in your first paragraph, since now you have demonstrated and supported it. It may be here that you also include your observations relating your study to the modern workplace or society (see your topic). Try to finish with flair! Use at least three (3) good quality academic sources, with one (1) source being the class text. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources. You are highly encouraged to use the Resource Center tab at the top of your Blackboard page. Topic Choices – Choose just one (1) of the topics below: Qualities of the Hero: Comparing Gilgamesh and Odysseus . Write an essay comparing these two (2) heroic figures from ancient epics of different cultures, especially focusing your analysis on the sources about their encounters with monsters: Gilgamesh encounters the monster guarding the forest, Humbaba, in Table.

Organizing a critical communicology ofgender and workKAR.docx

alfred4lewis58146

Organizing a critical communicology of gender and work KAREN LEE ASHCRAFT AND DENNIS K. MUMBY Abstract This article engages in two broad tasks. First, it articulates the basic prem- ises of a ‘‘critical communicology of gender and work,’’ suggesting a com- munication-oriented model for examining the relationships among gender, discourse, organizing, and power. The four basic elements of this model are (1) a postmodern feminist conception of subjectivity, (2) a dialectical conception of the relationship between power and resistance, (3) a dia- chronic perspective on gender and work, emphasizing the importance of historical context for gender analyses of organizing, and (4) a dialectical view of the relationship between discursive and material worlds. Second, the article demonstrates the heuristic value of this model through an empirical analysis of professional airline pilot identities. Drawing on both archival and interview data, the analysis shows how these identities are far from fixed and unitary, but are actually complex discursive constructions pro- duced by myriad historical, cultural, political, and economic forces. The analysis positions gender, not as a marginal feature of organizational life, but as a constitutive feature of the relations among power, discourse, identity, and organizing. 1. Introduction Although scholars have studied gender in organizations for over three decades, comparatively little research has examined the ways in which organizations are fundamentally gendered. In recent years, however, critical and feminist scholars have begun to theorize gender as a fundamental organizing principle. For example, Acker (1990) proposed a sociology of gendered organization, arguing that ‘‘advantage and disadvantage, exploitation and control, action and emotion, meaning and identity, are 0165–2516/04/0166–0019 6 Walter de Gruyter Int’l. J. Soc. Lang. 166 (2004), pp. 19–43 patterned through and in terms of a distinction between male and female, masculine and feminine’’ (Acker 1990: 146). A number of scholars have extended Acker’s framework, exploring the complex relations among gender, power, discourse and organizing (e.g., Alvesson 1998; Britton 1997; Ehlers 1998; Gregg 1993; Martin 1990). Indeed, much of the research conducted in the last ten years or so has married theoretical so- phistication with ‘‘thick description’’ to provide insight into the gendered character of everyday organizational life (e.g., Holmer Nadesan 1996; Martin et al. 1998; Scheibel 1996; Trethewey 1997). While we position our e¤orts firmly within this body of literature, the present study stems from two observations about the growing research on gendered organization. First, we see much of it as reflecting a general proclivity toward the physical site of work. This focus downplays par- allel (and intersecting) formations that organize work, such as labor per- formed beyond traditional work sites ( Rollins 1.

Assignment 1Assignment 2 Project Paper – Comparative Essay.docx

maribethy2y

This document outlines the instructions for Assignment 2, a comparative essay for a HUM 111 class. Students must choose one topic comparing two subjects or figures from different cultures or time periods. They must analyze similarities and differences, consider what this reveals about the cultures, and suggest modern lessons. The essay should be 3-4 pages following APA style. Topics include comparing heroes Gilgamesh and Odysseus, philosophers Confucius and Aristotle, sculptures from India and Greece, or skeptical thinkers from Rome and China. The assignment will be graded on various elements including following instructions, quality of research, and writing mechanics.

Sociological Theory doc3.docx

intel-writers.com

A sociological theory A sociological theory seeks to explain social phenomena. Theories can be used to create a testable proposition, called a hypothesis, about society (Allan 2006). Theories vary in scope depending on the scale of the issues that they are meant to explain. Macro-level theories relate to large-scale issues and large groups of people, while micro-level theories look at very specific relationships between individuals or small groups. Grand theories attempt to explain large-scale relationships and answer fundamental questions such as why societies form and why they change. Sociological theory is constantly evolving and should never be considered complete. Classic sociological theories are still considered important and current, but new sociological theories build upon the work of their predecessors and add to them (Calhoun 2002).

Assignment 2 Project Paper – Comparative EssayDue Week 8 an.docx

karenahmanny4c

Assignment 2: Project Paper – Comparative Essay Due Week 8 and worth 200 points This “Assignment 2” writing assignment is a comparative essay focused on topics encountered in our HUM 111 class. The project will be based on research but will reflect your views and interpretation of the topic. This project is designed to help you stretch your mind and your abilities as an organized, innovative, and critical thinker. If approached properly, it should also be fun! Choose one (1) of the topics from the list of topic choices below. Read the topic carefully. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper (750-1,000 words) that follows instructions and covers each part of the topic. (The title page and References list do not get included in this word count). Note: Your instructor may require you to submit your topic choice for approval before the end of Week 5. For the topic you choose: Establish a clear thesis about your topic as part of the introductory paragraph (often the thesis is the last thing one determines after doing the basic research and outline; however it will be placed in the first paragraph of your paper). This is a comparative essay. Comparison approached properly will require some critical thinking on your part. Use a point-by-point approach for the essay. That means, if comparing subject A with subject B, don't do the first half of the essay on subject A and then the second half on subject B--that will seem like two (2) separate essays and comparisons will tend to get lost. Instead, you should be mentioning both subjects in most of your paragraphs as you compare them throughout the essay. Comparisons will identify similarities as well as contrasts. Do not try to do everything on your two (2) subjects. You should end up narrowing your focus to a few insights and issues about the subjects being compared. And, from those fairly specific points of comparison, you will develop a thesis and glean some lessons. Follow closely the instructions below for your specific topic. Include a concluding paragraph at the end. This paragraph will, in some way, refer back to the thesis established in your first paragraph, since now you have demonstrated and supported it. It may be here that you also include your observations relating your study to the modern workplace or society (see your topic). Try to finish with flair! Use at least three (3) good quality academic sources, with one (1) source being the class text. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources. You are highly encouraged to use the Resource Center tab at the top of your Blackboard page. Topic Choices – Choose just one (1) of the topics below: Qualities of the Hero: Comparing Gilgamesh and Odysseus . Write an essay comparing these two (2) heroic figures from ancient epics of different cultures, especially focusing your analysis on the sources about their encounters with monsters: Gilgamesh encounters the monster guarding the forest, Humbaba,.

Primary Source AnalysisFor this assignment, you will find and anal.docx

Writing Assignment For this assignment, compare and contrast the

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Writing Assignment For this assignment, compare and contrast the

Similar to Writing Assignment For this assignment, compare and contrast the (16)

More from sarantatersall

More from sarantatersall (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Writing Assignment For this assignment, compare and contrast the