This document describes a peer review process established in Germany for community-based HIV/AIDS organizations. [1] It involved workshops to build skills in participatory methods, a methods handbook, and individual consulting. A key component was a Quality Colloquium where projects presented their work to a panel of peers for feedback. The goals were to promote quality development, fill a gap in quality assurance, and contribute to national structures. Guiding principles included action research, community-driven questions/methods, and developing practical and participatory quality assurance methods. The Colloquium provided a forum for new forms of evidence and diffusion of participatory norms. Issues discussed included balancing support vs judgment, incentives, and comparability across regions
Laura Eyre and Martin Marshall: Researchers in residence Nuffield Trust
Laura Eyre, Research Associate and Martin Marshall, Professor of Healthcare Improvement at UCL give an inside perspective on moving improvement research closer to practice.
Jim Warren
National Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland
(Friday, 3.00, General 3)
Provides background and overview of a Health IT Evaluation Framework that has been developed to support the National Health IT Plan and New Zealand health innovation generally. The framework recommends a pragmatic approach that includes use of both quantitative data (particularly data based on the transactional logs of operational IT systems), and qualitative data systematically gathered through stakeholder interviews. An Action Research orientation is recommended where the evaluators actively seek to understand barriers and find pointers to potential solutions. The investigation protocol is recommended to be iterative and flexible, and to involve dissemination of intermediate findings for feedback and broad dissemination of final results. Moreover, evaluation should be integrated with implementation, rather than a standalone post implementation activity. No single type of measurement should dominate the evaluation, which should employ a measurement framework including work and communication patterns, organisational culture, safety, effectiveness, system integrity and usability, as well as vendor factors, project management, participant experience and governance.
"Designing practitioner research for impact" Miggie Pickton, DARTS4ARLGSW
Miggie will highlight the growing importance of impact in research generally including impact case studies in the REF, funders’ demands for impact statements in research proposals, and employers requiring impact on service. This section will make a link between librarians supporting researchers and doing (and using) research themselves. This will lead on to looking at opportunities for making an impact in practitioner research.
Notes taken during breakout discussion on possible standards necessary to support the information ecosystem during the Pistoia Alliance Information Ecosystem Workshop in October 2011
Composing the perfect research symphony – What are the key elements to conduc...innogy Innovation GmbH
It was only a couple of years ago that online qualitative studies were still approached skeptically by researchers. Today many case studies and publications illustrate that online qualitative research has become a valid methodology amongst many practitioners.
• Do we actually use the full potential that online qualitative research offers?
• How can we actually determine the quality of online qualitative research?
• Does the quality just lie in the eye of the observer? What works, what does not?
In this webinar, research and innovation consultant Nicole Reinhold will take you a step further and share with you her strategies to achieve high quality results by doing ‘activity-based’ online research.
As a specialist in research for innovation projects, Nicole creates customized research designs that creatively combine different type of research methodologies into one online study. Feeling like a sort of ‘composer’ of research designs, she will share with us some of her international ‘compositions.’
ECEEE summer study 2011 presentation on using social media to promote energy efficiency research in New Zealand. Panel 8 - Dynamics of Consumption (which I co-led with Michael Ornetzeder)
The following resource was developed by RESYST for a research uptake workshop held in Kilifi, Kenya.
In this resource:
- Understand the importance of strategic planning for research uptake
- Familiarise key aspects of a research uptake strategy
- Develop research uptake objectives for your research group, project, hub or an event
- Identify key stakeholders using stakeholder analysis techniques
- Review communications channels, outputs and activities
- Explore indicators and tools for monitoring and evaluation
- Key questions to consider in a research uptake strategy
Find more: http://resyst.lshtm.ac.uk/resources/resource-bank-research-uptake
An analysis and key questions to consider for project sustainability and management. Some theoretical and practical aspects. The second part is using the YouthMetre Project to describe, explain and discuss sustainability issues
This ppt discusses about
What is Community based participatory research?
Principles of Community based participatory research
Advantages of Community based participatory research
What is Focus Group Discussion?
Why Focus Group Discussion?
Steps in Focus Group Discussion
Advantages and limitations of Focus Group Discussion
Conclusion
invoNET 2012 Presentation.
Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation.
Presenters: David Evans, Vito Laterza & Rosie Davies
Introductions: Simon Denegri, Chair of INVOLVE
Laura Eyre and Martin Marshall: Researchers in residence Nuffield Trust
Laura Eyre, Research Associate and Martin Marshall, Professor of Healthcare Improvement at UCL give an inside perspective on moving improvement research closer to practice.
Jim Warren
National Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland
(Friday, 3.00, General 3)
Provides background and overview of a Health IT Evaluation Framework that has been developed to support the National Health IT Plan and New Zealand health innovation generally. The framework recommends a pragmatic approach that includes use of both quantitative data (particularly data based on the transactional logs of operational IT systems), and qualitative data systematically gathered through stakeholder interviews. An Action Research orientation is recommended where the evaluators actively seek to understand barriers and find pointers to potential solutions. The investigation protocol is recommended to be iterative and flexible, and to involve dissemination of intermediate findings for feedback and broad dissemination of final results. Moreover, evaluation should be integrated with implementation, rather than a standalone post implementation activity. No single type of measurement should dominate the evaluation, which should employ a measurement framework including work and communication patterns, organisational culture, safety, effectiveness, system integrity and usability, as well as vendor factors, project management, participant experience and governance.
"Designing practitioner research for impact" Miggie Pickton, DARTS4ARLGSW
Miggie will highlight the growing importance of impact in research generally including impact case studies in the REF, funders’ demands for impact statements in research proposals, and employers requiring impact on service. This section will make a link between librarians supporting researchers and doing (and using) research themselves. This will lead on to looking at opportunities for making an impact in practitioner research.
Notes taken during breakout discussion on possible standards necessary to support the information ecosystem during the Pistoia Alliance Information Ecosystem Workshop in October 2011
Composing the perfect research symphony – What are the key elements to conduc...innogy Innovation GmbH
It was only a couple of years ago that online qualitative studies were still approached skeptically by researchers. Today many case studies and publications illustrate that online qualitative research has become a valid methodology amongst many practitioners.
• Do we actually use the full potential that online qualitative research offers?
• How can we actually determine the quality of online qualitative research?
• Does the quality just lie in the eye of the observer? What works, what does not?
In this webinar, research and innovation consultant Nicole Reinhold will take you a step further and share with you her strategies to achieve high quality results by doing ‘activity-based’ online research.
As a specialist in research for innovation projects, Nicole creates customized research designs that creatively combine different type of research methodologies into one online study. Feeling like a sort of ‘composer’ of research designs, she will share with us some of her international ‘compositions.’
ECEEE summer study 2011 presentation on using social media to promote energy efficiency research in New Zealand. Panel 8 - Dynamics of Consumption (which I co-led with Michael Ornetzeder)
The following resource was developed by RESYST for a research uptake workshop held in Kilifi, Kenya.
In this resource:
- Understand the importance of strategic planning for research uptake
- Familiarise key aspects of a research uptake strategy
- Develop research uptake objectives for your research group, project, hub or an event
- Identify key stakeholders using stakeholder analysis techniques
- Review communications channels, outputs and activities
- Explore indicators and tools for monitoring and evaluation
- Key questions to consider in a research uptake strategy
Find more: http://resyst.lshtm.ac.uk/resources/resource-bank-research-uptake
An analysis and key questions to consider for project sustainability and management. Some theoretical and practical aspects. The second part is using the YouthMetre Project to describe, explain and discuss sustainability issues
This ppt discusses about
What is Community based participatory research?
Principles of Community based participatory research
Advantages of Community based participatory research
What is Focus Group Discussion?
Why Focus Group Discussion?
Steps in Focus Group Discussion
Advantages and limitations of Focus Group Discussion
Conclusion
invoNET 2012 Presentation.
Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation.
Presenters: David Evans, Vito Laterza & Rosie Davies
Introductions: Simon Denegri, Chair of INVOLVE
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/kqbnxVAZs-0
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/SINlygW1Mpc
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
NVBDCP.pptx Nation vector borne disease control programSapna Thakur
NVBDCP was launched in 2003-2004 . Vector-Borne Disease: Disease that results from an infection transmitted to humans and other animals by blood-feeding arthropods, such as mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas. Examples of vector-borne diseases include Dengue fever, West Nile Virus, Lyme disease, and malaria.
Knee anatomy and clinical tests 2024.pdfvimalpl1234
This includes all relevant anatomy and clinical tests compiled from standard textbooks, Campbell,netter etc..It is comprehensive and best suited for orthopaedicians and orthopaedic residents.
Basavarajeeyam is a Sreshta Sangraha grantha (Compiled book ), written by Neelkanta kotturu Basavaraja Virachita. It contains 25 Prakaranas, First 24 Chapters related to Rogas& 25th to Rasadravyas.
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
CDSCO and Phamacovigilance {Regulatory body in India}NEHA GUPTA
The Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) is India's national regulatory body for pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Operating under the Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, the CDSCO is responsible for approving new drugs, conducting clinical trials, setting standards for drugs, controlling the quality of imported drugs, and coordinating the activities of State Drug Control Organizations by providing expert advice.
Pharmacovigilance, on the other hand, is the science and activities related to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or any other drug-related problems. The primary aim of pharmacovigilance is to ensure the safety and efficacy of medicines, thereby protecting public health.
In India, pharmacovigilance activities are monitored by the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI), which works closely with CDSCO to collect, analyze, and act upon data regarding adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Together, they play a critical role in ensuring that the benefits of drugs outweigh their risks, maintaining high standards of patient safety, and promoting the rational use of medicines.
The Gram stain is a fundamental technique in microbiology used to classify bacteria based on their cell wall structure. It provides a quick and simple method to distinguish between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, which have different susceptibilities to antibiotics
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of the physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar lead (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
6. Describe the flow of current around the heart during the cardiac cycle
7. Discuss the placement and polarity of the leads of electrocardiograph
8. Describe the normal electrocardiograms recorded from the limb leads and explain the physiological basis of the different records that are obtained
9. Define mean electrical vector (axis) of the heart and give the normal range
10. Define the mean QRS vector
11. Describe the axes of leads (hexagonal reference system)
12. Comprehend the vectorial analysis of the normal ECG
13. Determine the mean electrical axis of the ventricular QRS and appreciate the mean axis deviation
14. Explain the concepts of current of injury, J point, and their significance
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. Chapter 3, Cardiology Explained, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/
7. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
These simplified slides by Dr. Sidra Arshad present an overview of the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract.
Learning objectives:
1. Enlist the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract
2. Briefly explain how these functions are carried out
3. Discuss the significance of dead space
4. Differentiate between minute ventilation and alveolar ventilation
5. Describe the cough and sneeze reflexes
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 39, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 34, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 17, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
4. Non-respiratory functions of the lungs https://academic.oup.com/bjaed/article/13/3/98/278874
New Drug Discovery and Development .....NEHA GUPTA
The "New Drug Discovery and Development" process involves the identification, design, testing, and manufacturing of novel pharmaceutical compounds with the aim of introducing new and improved treatments for various medical conditions. This comprehensive endeavor encompasses various stages, including target identification, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory approval, and post-market surveillance. It involves multidisciplinary collaboration among scientists, researchers, clinicians, regulatory experts, and pharmaceutical companies to bring innovative therapies to market and address unmet medical needs.
1. Setting Up a Peer Review Process for CBOs:
Conflicts and Challenges
Michael T. Wright, PhD, LICSW, MS Karl Lemmen, Dipl.-Psych.
Martina Block, Dipl.-Psych., MPH
Hella von Unger, PhD
Research Group Public Health Deutsche AIDS-Hilfe
Prof. Rolf Rosenbrock The National German AIDS
Social Science Research Center Organization
Berlin (WZB)
2. Project:
Establishing Structures for Quality
Assurance of HIV Prevention for ASOs in
Germany
– Partners: WZB and Deutsche AIDS-Hilfe (DAH)
– Funder: Federal Center for Health Education
(Ministry of Health)
– Timeline: 2006-2008
– Needs assessment: 2004-2005
3. The National German AIDS Service Organisation
– Founded in 1983 by the
Aids-Hilfe movement
– 116 Member ASOs
– 1 National Office
5. Theoretical Basis: Structural Prevention
– Focussing on behavior in
the social and political
context
– Enhancing self-esteem
and self-efficacy (e.g. for
gay men)
– Working towards legal
reforms (e.g. regarding
drug use)
– “Making the healthy
choice the easy choice!”
6. Goals of WZB/DAH Project
– National demonstration project to promote quality
development through participatory research
– Filling the structural gap for quality assurance in
community work in HIV prevention
– Contributing to the establishment of national
structures for institutionalizing prevention services
for socially disadvantaged groups
7. Guiding Principles
– Action research
– Community-driven questions and explanations
(local theory)
– Community-driven methods
(local quality assurance)
– Developing methods which are:
– Tailor-made
– Practical
– Useful
– Participatory
– Sound
– Focus on quality assurance
8. Project Components
1. Skill-Building Workshops
– participatory curriculum, participatory methods
2. Methods Handbook
– internet based, interactive
3. Individualized Consulting
– project-driven focus
4. Quality Colloquium (formerly: Peer Review Process)
– focus on prevention for MSM
5. Network of Researchers
– promoting a new discussion in German on participatory
research
9. Quality Colloquium – Pragmatic Basis
– Workers’ need for input from outside their projects
– Results of needs assessment
– More than an idea exchange or problem solving between projects
– Critical appraisal with no effect on funding
10. Quality Colloquium – Theoretical Basis
– Quality is not an objective category
– Defined in the context of a discussion (discourse)
– Various stakeholders play an important role in the
discussion
– Community members, project workers, funders, researchers
– Involving key stakeholders in a formal review process
makes implicit processes explicit
– Greater transparency
– Setting of norms which extend beyond the review process
11. Quality Colloquium – Theoretical Basis
– Provides a forum for producing new forms of
evidence for public health
– Judicial Principle (Keith Tones)
– Decision of a jury (of one’s peers)
– Plausibility (“beyond a reasonable doubt”)
– Validity of evidence is not restricted to scientific categories
– Social consensus plays a central role
– Diffusion of participatory norms
– Through experience of participants
– Through changing membership among the reviewers
12. Quality Colloquium: Structure and Goals
– Voluntary
– Question defined by the presenting project
– Formal feedback on community-based work
– “diagnostic” function (strengths and weaknesses)
– not a certification
– Panel consisting of community member,
service provider, funder, researcher
– from a different region than the presenting project
14. Quality Colloquium: Process
1. Information from Projects
– annual report, completed questionnaire (including a description of their question)
2. Invitation to Reviewers
– Based on needed expertise
3. Colloquium
– 4 hours per project
– Dialogue between project and reviewers until project’s question is answered
– Feedback from the project to the reviewers and the moderator
– Meeting of the reviewers to reflect on their work
4. Documentation/ Reflection
– Project worker summarizes what s/he learned
– Reviewers summarize as a group what they have learned (with particular attention
to the review process itself)
5. Diffusion of Results
– Basic information presented (description of project, question, names of all
participants, date of the colloquium)
– Lessons learned by the participants
6. Follow-up with the project
– What effect has the input had on the work of the project?
15. Issues for Discussion
– Fear of being “judged” vs.
Creating a supportive atmosphere of critical
appraisal
– Building a pool of reviewers (particularly funders)
– Nationally or regionally based?
– Incentives for projects to present their work
– Incentives for reviewers
16. Advice/ Feedback 1
– Interesting model – extension of community advisory board model
(“board swapping”) overcoming conflicts of interest
– Comparability of regions?
– Would probably be adapted over time to the culture and
context of each region
– Legitimizing the boards over time important, incorporation/
recognition from other review processes
– Follow-up with the board: Effects on the board members in their
own work as a result of serving on the board
– Discussion period between the review board and the project is
important – very different than other review processes –
opportunity to clarify the points – crucial to the success
17. Advice/ Feedback 2
– Bias and accountability
– Importance of work ahead of time on the part of the reviewers, reflecting on
their own bias in the rule (managing their ego in the context of the role) –
not the typical role in everyday work
– Change process at individual level over the course of the discussion – your
mind might change during the discussion – Need for reflection as a group
in between?
– Importance of a common language among all reviewers and respect for
difference/ homogeneity of perspectives – a key task of the moderator
– Practicality/ Representation
– Might need more community representation to assure balance of view/
opinion
– Diversity of reviewers, or always the same people
– Administration of the process
– Accountability
– What happens if the project of low quality?
18. Advice/ Feedback 3
– How do you assure a commonness in the view of quality among the reviewers?
– Discussion among the reviewers as a way to achieve that
– Conflict between the project and the review panel – how to resolve
– Setting up a culture of discourse is central element
– How best to do that?
– How much structure (training) or developed as one goes
– How are peers chosen? (Bias)
– Boundaries, type of feedback
– Role of the facilitator in driving the process – does that distract from participatory
intent
– How does the group come to concensus?
– Open-ended or consensus driven?
– How does it relate to other models?
– Continuous Quality Improvement
– Other practice models around quality